• No se han encontrado resultados

EL IMPACTO DEL ACUERDO EN LA REGULARIZACIÓN

4.5 OTRAS CARACTERÍSTICAS RELEVADAS

On December 2, 1823, President James Monroe issued what has been called The Monroe Doctrine. His statement was blunt and to the point, declaring "that the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers."1

President Monroe added an explanation, declaring that the political systems in European countries were different from those in the Americas:

"We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and those powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety."2

Monroe's action came as the result of a treaty, called the Treaty of Verona, signed by the government leaders of Austria, France, Prussia, and Russia who, according to a then current observer, American Senator Robert Owen, had:

well-laid plans also to destroy popular government in the American colonies which had revolted from Spain and Portugal in Central and South America under the influence of the successful example of the United States.

142

It was because of this conspiracy against the American repub- lics by the European monarchies that the great English statesman, Canning, called the attention of our government to it, and our statesmen then, including Thomas Jefferson, took an active part to bring about the declaration by President Monroe in his next annual message to the Congress of the United States that the United States would regard it as an act of hostility to the Government of the United States and an unfriendly act if this coalition or if any power of Europe ever undertook to establish upon the American Conti- nent any control of any American republic or to acquire any territorial rights.3

Senator Owen entered the Treaty in the Congressional Record in 1916.

It reads, in part:

The undersigned... have agreed as follows:

Article 1: The high contracting powers being convinced that the system of representative government is equally as incompatible with the monarchial principles as the maxim of the sovereignty of the people with the divine right, engage mutually... to sue all their efforts to put an end to the system of representative govern- ments, in whatever country it may exist in Europe, and to prevent its being introduced in those countries where it is not yet known.

Article 2: As it can not be doubted that the liberty of the press is the most powerful means used by the pretended supporters of the rights of nations to the detriment of those of the princes, the high contracting parties promise reciprocally to adopt all proper measures to suppress it, not only in their own states but also in the rest of Europe.

Article 3: Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states those measures which the clergy may adopt... so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes....4

Monroe's bold declaration struck the European governments a rather severe blow. Many European diplomats spoke out against it, but it was popular with the citizens of the South American nations it protected.

Monroe's Secretary of State was John Quincy Adams, and he was largely reponsible for writing the Doctrine. The American people, pleased with what he had written, responded by electing him President of the United States in 1824.

But more importandy, another move by the European powers into the affairs of the American people had been repulsed.

wrote "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

Lyndon Johnson (below), not a Communist, wrote "We (in government) are going to try to take all of the money that we (in government) think is unnecessarily being spent and take it from the 'haves' and give it to the 'have nots' that need it so much."

Oswald Spengler, right, (1880-1936), a German historian and author, came to the realization that "Communist" movements were controlled by wealthy interests, supposedly the "enemy" of the Communists. He wrote "There is no proletarian, not even Communist, movement that has not operated in the interests of money . . .and without the idealists among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact."

Adam Weishaupt, left, a former Jesuit priest, founded the Illuminati on May 1, 1776. His organization was dedicated to the destruction of Christianity and all religion. There is evidence that the Iluminati is still in existence, but under other names.

that "the Communist Conspiracy (was) merely a branch of a much bigger conspiracy." She discovered that any one of three wealthy American "capitalists" could make decisions for the Party. These decisions were always ratified later by the Communist Party in Russia.

This cartoon by Robert Minor in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch appeared in 1911. It depicted the acceptance of Marxist Communism by the "wealthy capitalists," supposedly the enemies of Marx and his followers. The financiers depicted are:

John D. Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan, John D. Ryan of National City Bank, and Morgan partner George W. Perkins. Immediately

Alexis, the son of Nicholas II, Czar of Russia, in 1914, and Colonel Michal Goloniewski, who claims to be the adult Alexis, in 1964. The Communist government sup- posedly murdered the entire family of the Czar in 1918, but the Colonel charges that they were spirited out of Russia to safety in Europe. The colonel's claim to be the son of the Czar was confirmed by the Ameri- can government, yet few outside of those who investigated this claim will agree that the family survived the alleged massacre. Perhaps the reason this is so is that any legally certified heir to the Romanov for- tune would inherit several billions of dollars deposited in American and European banks by the Czar prior to the revolution.

Thomas Jefferson, left, warned the American people about creating a national debt. He wrote: "To preserve our independence, we must not let our leaders load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes—-a principle which, if acted on, would save one half of the wars of the world." In 1984, America's national debt was approximately $1,600,000,000,000 ($1.6 trillion).

Andrew Jackson, right, as President of the United States, fought a battle with the federally chartered Second Bank of the United States. He later claimed that it was responsible for the assassination attempt made against him in 1835.

seh Sherman wrote in his book Memoirs I: "The truth is not always palatable, and should not always be told." Historians are still uncovering evidences of the Euro- pean and American conspiracy that split the United States into a North and a South so that they could finance both sides in the ensuing conflict.

President Abraham Lincoln wrote that a "money power" was at work in the Civil War and that it assisted in the passage of the National Banking Act of 1863. This bill created a national bank with the ability to create money and loan it, at interest, to the United States government. It was this same

"power" that was involved in his assassination in 1865.