GREGORIO SABATER NAVARRO Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
2. La influencia del contexto portugués en el movimiento obrero español
2.1 Comisiones Obreras, ¿una Intersindical española?
“And my mom says, ‘Don’t be arrogant.’ And I’m, like, ‘I’m not being arrogant.’ Or you know what? Let me be arrogant, because that is what everybody else is doing.”
Nita, an Indian-‐American college student in her early 20s, started off our interview with a bold statement about her current feelings toward college: “I’m at a point in my education where I’m kind of done with it and dissatisfied…which is sad, because the whole point of being in college is exploring things and learning new things.” A human services major, Nita turned to open learning to fill two holes unmet by her coursework. The first, was that as a woman of color, she felt like her professors were only allowing surface level conversations in the classroom around race and gender issues, citing one instance in particular where a faculty member stated that she did not want to offend the freshmen. Online and with other students of color, Nita found the content that she thought was missing from her classroom:
And I feel like Tumblr has taught me a lot more…A lot of the social issues – well, more of that whole analysis aspect and really critical deep thinking, is Tumblr. It’s things like Feministing, it’s things like ColorLines…It’s the people I follow. Like my friends are also, you know, we think the same way, we have the same issues. A lot of us are minorities and we, like this was our reality
you know? Going through what we went, like racial politics, like, identity issues, the whole cultural issues of being, maybe coming from an immigrant family. And we constantly discuss these things, so when we’re on these online platforms, particularly Tumblr, and we’re all on Tumblr – we follow people that align with our interests who can provide it.
When it came to politics and identity issues, Nita felt like her online community and circle of like-‐minded friends helped her learn far more than her professors
provided.
The other hole Nita used open learning to fill was on content that would help her run her startup, a subscription service for children’s STEM education toys. She had joined the university’s entrepreneurship club with a friend, they co-‐founded a company, and soon after won a startup challenge at the school. The win afforded them initial funding for their idea and support from mentors in the local
entrepreneurship community. Still, there was much to learn and so Nita was
utilizing classes and content she found online and offline to fill in the gaps. One site in particular, an offline open learning site called Wintrepreneur, helped her to make local connections with peers and instructors in the startup community. Unlike her online learning about politics and identity, this new community was primarily composed of white men and Nita’s social justice consciousness was initially
challenged during her first class. After taking in the demographics of the room, Nita separated judgment from observation, and settled in:
But hey, you’ve got to learn. Yes, the space was great, everyone was really attentive, the speaker – I don’t remember his name – but he was great, he was making me think things about legal stuff I’ve never even thought about or even learned. But I really like how approachable, like, the instructors are.
Because we just go up and you ask them questions, and that was cool. And then being able to just engage with other people in the class, as well, at the end. We ended up going to dinner with one of the dudes there and we were
just, like, “Oh,” like, “why did you come to this even?” Like, “What did you need to learn?”
Nita was pleasantly surprised with how open the space felt and was inspired by how engaged other participants were in the class.
When I asked her if Wintrepreneur felt different than her university
experience, she responded, highlighting the differences in students’ interest and curiosity:
Yes, in the sense that what I saw from everyone is that everyone was actually interested in the topic. Because when you’re just going to class at a university you’re always going to have those kids who are on their laptops doing
something completely unrelated, not being engaged. And again, it’s like one of those situations like, you’re there because you want to be there. But other than that, it was interactive, especially the last few I’ve been going to,
because if you don’t get something and you want them to clarify you’re going to raise your hand. And then they give you problems to do, so it’s kind of collaborative. So you have to, like, kind of talk to the people around you. And it’s kind of, like, you’re-‐all-‐in-‐this-‐together kind of feel. And that’s kind of similar to school I guess.
Nita enjoyed the kind of learning and collaboration that she experienced at Wintrepreneur and in entrepreneurial learning spaces in general.
While the lack of diversity was initially a deterrent for Nita, it became a way for her to get out of her comfort zone and encourage others like her to do the same:
I think as a woman, and then being, like, a minority, as being an Indian woman and doing the whole startup thing, there’s not many of us…And then this whole startup experience is very white-‐male dominated, and then you try to seek out people who can help you out. And so, yes, it’s just, like, not many women, and not that many minorities. And I do feel tokenized at times, so I don’t want other to feel [bad], like, we’re here, we’re visible, we want to make sure that you have the right support as well.
Nita had to tightrope walk the line between openness and exclusion, but in doing so she reported becoming more confident because “yes, there are a lot of men right?”
She told a story about presenting her startup with other students to a team of older,
white male advisors who were walking around asking questions and giving advice.
Nita observed how differently the advisors talked to her and the “white dudes”
around her.
Nita despised older men who thought they understood her better than she did.
In a conversation with one advisor, she told him that she was a “hands-‐on kind of learner” and the man responded, “You should’ve been an engineer. I bet you regret being a human services major.” Nita’s response held no punches:
And I’m like, “You would not tell a fat dude next door to me saying that kind of stuff. So who are you to say that to me?” And I was very, very angry. It was like, Just because I’m a woman doesn’t mean you can just treat me that way.
Her anger evolved into confidence, but Nita’s mother was concerned:
And I think that has definitely made me feel a lot more confident. And my mom says, “Don’t be arrogant.” And I’m like, “I’m not being arrogant. Or you know what? Let me be arrogant, because that is what everybody else is doing.”
Despite her vow to be arrogant, Nita was well aware of what was at stake. As a daughter of immigrants, she felt pressured to succeed and told me that she grew up hearing that her parents came to America so she could succeed. In order to do so, Nita knew she was going to have to make some big decisions soon about her future and the future of her startup. Entrepreneurship was enticing but risky, and she was savvy enough to look around and ask, “well, who’s not here?” despite all of the
“empowering stories about learning entrepreneurship from people.” Her current mood was like many I talked to: “I’m finally in that position where I’m, like, ‘If I fail, I fail. At least I did it.’…it’s just part of it and you have to accept that, you have to accept that as part of life.”
Nita was ready to fail as an entrepreneur, but was reluctant to fail as a student, even if she did express a desire to drop out. Given her family’s immigrant
background, it would not have been acceptable for her to graduate from college and not have a job immediately. It would not have been ok to blame unemployment on the economy or her university. She expressed how irrelevant some of her
coursework felt and how removed her peers and faculty were from communities of practice. This was not just an issue about how to talk about race or gender; it bled into other aspects of her education. The entrepreneurship club and the classes at Wintrepreneur exposed her to a different way of learning and a different way of being, where she might have been underrepresented but with the right amount of confidence or even arrogance she could be equal if not better than others. Nita felt like her role in college was to let others learn from her, as a woman of color, with very little reciprocated from peers with dominant identities. In open learning spaces, she was learning from others as much as they were learning from her, and race and gender were not always front and center as part of the learning. Nita’s experiences exemplified a tension between hypervisibility in formal education and invisibility in open education. During our interview, she contemplated the tradeoffs between hypervisibility and invisibility, reasoning that at places like Wintrepreneur she could be recognized for the work she does, even if it meant navigating peoples’
ignorance. Her curious, perseverant, and confident attitude oriented her towards others who had similar dispositions towards their learning, even if the majority of them were white men. Still, there was a question for Nita if the risk of
entrepreneurship was worth it for her as a woman of color. The absence of others
like her made her question what hidden costs might be haunting the belongingness she experienced while learning entrepreneurialism.