• No se han encontrado resultados

Various microbiological, chemical and physical analyses are conducted on fermented milks in accordance with the standard offi cial procedures of countries, to ensure quality and safety of fi nal products. In addition, sensory evaluations allow guaranteeing that the product meets the required standards defi ned by the dairy company.

For microbiological analyses of fermented milks, counts of specifi c microfl ora are realized at the end of production. Target values of counts depend on countries regulations, health claims and specifi cation given by the producer. As an example, for yogurt, total counts of Lb. delbrueckii subsp.

bulgaricus and S. thermophilus must be higher than 107 CFU/g at shelf life.

The presence of spoilage microfl ora such as coliforms, yeasts or molds, and pathogenic bacteria including Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella subsp. has to be checked. Yeast and molds have to be detected in yogurts samples, especially in fruits yogurts that have been incubated at 30°C or 25°C during 3 or 10 days. As an example, the target values that are used in France correspond to the absence of L. monocytogenes and Salmonella subsp. in 25 g of product, less than 10 CFU/g of Enterobacteriaceae and total coliforms and less than 100 CFU/g of yeasts and molds. The frequency of sampling is defi ned by each dairy plant, according to its own good hygiene practices.

By considering chemical analyses, the fat and total solid content are controlled in the fermented milks. Acidity of the products is measured, either from pH and/or titratable acidity.

Physical characteristics of yogurt such as the lack of visual whey separation and the viscosity are important parameters of the quality and of consumers’ acceptance. They are generally determined one day after packaging. Set yogurts, stirred yogurts and drinking yogurts have different physical properties that must be checked. As yogurt can be either a viscoelastic fl uid (stirred or drinking yogurt) or a viscoelastic solid (set

yogurt), different texture parameters such as fi rmness, consistency and viscosity are estimated, by using specifi c instruments such as penetrometer, viscometer or rheometer (Chammas et al. 2006).

Sensory evaluations are performed with panelists experienced in the evaluation of fermented milks in order to describe the sensory characteristics of the products. Appearance (color, syneresis, smooth), fl avor (odor, aroma), taste and aftertaste (acid, fresh, persistency) and texture (palatability, fi rmness, consistency, fl uidifying) of yogurt samples are evaluated in order to verify the consumer acceptability (Martin et al. 1999, Soukoulis et al. 2007). An example of sensory attributes used to describe the sensory characteristics of yogurts is showed in Table 3.

Table 3. Defi nitions of the descriptors (sensory attributes) used for the evaluation of the yogurts. Adapted from Soukoulis et al. (2007).

Attribute Description

Color Color of the product (white, whitish, yellowish)

Syneresis Visual observation of the yogurt surface; Level of whey drainage after inserting the spoon into the curd

Odor Intensity of acetaldehyde immediately after removing the lid Aroma Flavor defect (e.g., unclean, masked, unnatural, cooked, lacks

freshness) by smelling and oral perception of samples

Palatability Taste of samples considering several attributes associated with taste (e.g., unclean, unnatural, whey, refreshing perception) and aftertaste (e.g., sourness, astringency, sweetness, bitterness, saltiness) Firmness Hardness, brittleness, gumminess, gelatin-like texture of the

coagulum

Consistency Viscosity when stirring the samples with the spoon; rheological behavior of yogurt in the mouth

Overall acceptance Overall score of samples considering the appearance, taste, texture and fl avor profi les

6 Conclusion

Whatever the considered fermented milk, consumers are looking for products with elevated shelf life and stability, good consistency or viscosity, pleasant taste and mouth feel, together with high and reliable quality. In addition, other factors such as usefulness (drinkable or spoonable, on the go, different sizes), nutritional and functional benefits (probiotic microorganisms, bioactive peptides, low-fat products), ethnical constraints (Halal, Kosher), variety of the products (traditional, regional, fun) are often considered. More recently, investigations look for its availability to everybody (in the context of food security) and the consideration of environmental factors (energy and water sobriety, sustainable development).

These requirements, together with an increasing demand, allow developing and modifying the yogurt industry to reach high quality standards, by considering different criteria:

• Food quality: Consistency of product, sensory properties, critical quality assurance in production;

• Food safety: Microbiological safety, chemical contamination, traceability;

• Environment: GHG emissions, carbon footprint, packages waste, energy and water saving, life-cycle assessments;

• Supply capability: supply fl exibility, delivery without defects and with high accuracy;

• Operational effi ciency and costs: Overall equipment effectiveness and time utilization, total effective equipment performance, product losses and yields, media consumption, staff time utilization, operating and investment costs.

Even if these developments principally concern the yogurt industry, the industrial manufacture of other fermented milks in the world is also concerned with the aim to increase their level of quality.

Finally, some changes regularly occur concerning the market of the fermented milks. The most recent one concerns the very quick development of the Greek type yogurt chain, as a result of consumer’s demand, that raises the global demand for fermented milks in the USA. In addition, yogurt consumption has strongly expanded in Asia, due to increasing purchasing power and spending patterns.

Keywords: Fermented milk, Industrial process, Lactic acid bacteria,

Organoleptic quality, Probiotic bacteria, Yogurt References

Abbasi, H., M.E. Mousavi, M.R. Ehsani, Z. Emamdjomea, M. Vaziri, J. Rahimi and S. Aziznia. 2009. Infl uence of starter culture type and incubation temperatures on rheology and microstructure of low fat set yoghurt. International Journal of Dairy Technology 62: 549–555.

Altermann, E., W.M. Russell, M.A. Azcarate-Peril, R. Barrangou, B.L. Buck, O. McAuliffe, N. Souther, A. Dobson, T. Duong, M. Callanan and others. 2005. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102(11): 3906–3912.

Aureli, P., L. Capurso, A.M. Castellazzi, M. Clerici, M. Giovannini, L. Morelli, A. Poli, F. Pregliasco, F. Salvini and G.V. Zuccotti. 2011. Probiotics and health: An evidence-based review. Pharmacological Research 63(5): 366–376.

Badel, S., T. Bernardi and P. Michaud. 2011. New perspectives for Lactobacilli exopolysaccharides. Biotechnology Advances 29: 54–66.

Baroudi, A.A.G. and E.B. Collins. 1976. Microorganisms and characteristics of Laban. Journal of Dairy Science 59(2): 200–202.

Béal, C. and G. Corrieu. 1994. Viability and acidifi cation activity of pure and mixed starters of

Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus 404 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus 398 at the different steps of their production. LWT-Food Science and Technology 27: 86–92. Béal, C., J. Skokanova, E. Latrille, N. Martin and G. Corrieu. 1999. Combined effects of culture

conditions and storage time on acidifi cation and viscosity of stirred yoghurt. Journal of Dairy Science 82(4): 673–681.

Béal, C. and I. Sodini. 2003. Fabrication des yaourts et des laits fermentés. Techniques de l’Ingénieur. Paris, pp. 1–16.

Bernardeau, M., J.-P. Vernoux, S. Henri-Dubernet and M. Guéguen. 2008. Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: the Lactobacillus genus. International Journal of Food Microbiology 126: 278–285.

Beshkova, D.M., E.D. Simova, G.I. Frengova, Z.I. Simov and Z.P. Dimitrov. 2003. Production of volatile aroma compounds by kefi r starter cultures. International Dairy Journal 13: 529–535.

Bolotin, A., B. Quinquis, P. Renault, A. Sorokin, S.D. Ehrlich, S. Kulakauskas, A. Lapidus, E. Goltsman, M. Mazur, G.D. Pusch and others. 2004. Complete sequence and comparative genome analysis of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Nature Biotechnology 22: 1554–1558.

Caroli, A., A. Poli, D. Ricotta, G. Banfi and D. Cocchi. 2011. Dairy intake and bone health: a viewpoint from the state of the art. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 5249–5262.

Chammas, G.I., R. Saliba, G. Corrieu and C. Béal. 2006. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented milk “laban”. International Journal of Food Microbiology 110(1): 52–61.

Chaves, A.C.S.D., M. Fernandez, A.L.S. Lerayer, I. Mierau, M. Kleerebezem and J. Hugenholtz. 2002. Metabolic engineering of acetaldehyde production by Streptococcus thermophilus. Applied Environmental Microbiology 68(11): 5656–5662.

Cheirsilp, B., H. Shoji, H. Shimizu and S. Shioya. 2003. Interactions between Lactobacillus

kefi ranofaciens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in mixed culture for kefi ran production. Journal of Biotechnology 96: 279–284.

Cheng, H. 2010. Volatile fl avor compounds in yogurt: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 50(10): 938–950.

Chervaux, C., C. Grimaldi, A. Bolotin, B. Quinquis, S. Legrain-Raspaud, J.E.T. van Hylckama Vlieg, G. Denariaz and T. Smokvina. 2011. Genome sequence of the probiotic strain

Bifi dobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CNCM I-2494. Journal of Bacteriology 193(19): 5560–5561.

Choi, J., L. Sabikhi, A. Hassan and S. Anand. 2012. Bioactive peptides in dairy products. International Journal of Dairy Technology 65: 1–12.

Corrieu, G., C. Monnet, F. Fonseca and C. Béal. New trends in lactic acid fermentation; 2006 25–29 March; Hammamet, Tunisie.

Corrieu, G., H.E. Spinnler, Y. Jomier and D. Picque. 1988. Automated system to follow up and control the acidifi cation activity of lactic acid starters. French patent FR 2 629 612. Courtin, P., V. Monnet and F. Rul. 2002. Cell-wall proteinases PrtS and PrtB have a different role

in Streptococcus thermophilus / Lactobacillus bulgaricus mixed cultures in milk. Microbiology 148: 3413–3421.

Courtin, P. and F. Rul. 2004. Interactions between microorganisms in a simple ecosystem: yogurt bacteria as a study model. Lait 84: 125–134.

Crittenden, R.G., N.R. Martinez and M.J. Playne. 2003. Synthesis and utilisation of folate by yoghurt starter cultures and probiotic bacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology 80: 217–222.

Danova, S., K. Petrov, P. Pavlov and P. Petrova. 2005. Isolation and characterization of

Lactobacillus strains involved in koumiss fermentation. International Journal of Dairy Technology 58: 100–105.

De Vuyst, L., F. De Vin, F. Vaningelgem and B. Degeest. 2001. Recent developments in the biosynthesis and applications of heteropolysaccharides from by lactic acid bacteria. International Dairy Journal 11: 687–707.

De Vuyst, L., S. Weckx, F. Ravyts, L. Herman and F. Leroy. 2011. New insights into the exopolysaccharide production of Streptococcus thermophilus. International Dairy Journal 21: 586–591.

Delorme, C. 2008. Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: Streptococcus thermophilus. International Journal of Food Microbiology 126: 274–277.

Do Espirito Santo, A.P., R. Perego, A. Converti and M.N. Oliveira. 2012. Infl uence of milk type and addition of passion fruit peel powder on fermentation kinetics, texture profi le and bacterial viability in probiotic yoghurts. LWT-Food Science and Technology 47: 393–399. Ebrecht, A.C., D.M. Guglielmotti, G. Tremmel, J.A. Reinheimer and V.B. Suárez. 2010. Temperate

and virulent Lactobacillus delbrueckii bacteriophages: Comparison of their thermal and chemical resistance. Food Microbiology 27: 515–520.

FAO/WHO. 2001. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria: report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Cordoba, Argentina.

FAO/WHO. 2011. Codex Alimentarius: Codex standards for fermented milks 243-2003. pp. 6–16. In: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization for the United Nations, editors. Milk and milk products. 2nd Edition ed. Rome.

Fernandez-Espla, M.D., P. Garault, V. Monnet and F. Rul. 2000. Streptococcus thermophilus cell wall-anchored proteinase: Release, purification, and biochemical and genetic characterization. Applied Environmental Microbiology 66(11): 4772–4778.

Fitzgerald, R.J. and B.A. Murray. 2006. Bioactive peptides and lactic fermentations. International Journal of Dairy Technology 59: 118–125.

Florence, A.C.R., C. Béal, R.C. Silva, C.S.B. Bogsan, A.L.O.S. Pilleggia, L.A. Gioiellia and M.N. Oliveira. 2012. Fatty acid profi le, trans-octadecenoic, -linolenic and conjugated linoleic acid contents differing in certifi ed organic and conventional probiotic fermented milks. Food Chemistry 135(4): 2207–2214.

Florence, A.C.R., R.C. da Silva, A.P.D.E. Santo, L.A. Gioielli, A.Y. Tamime and M.N. Oliveira. 2009. Increased CLA content in organic milk fermented by bifi dobacteria or yogurt cultures. Dairy Science and Technology 89(6): 541–553.

Folkenberg, D.M., P. Dejmek, A. Skriver, H.S. Guldager and R. Ipsen. 2006. Sensory and rheological screening of exopolysaccharide producing strains of bacterial yoghurt cultures. International Dairy Journal 16: 111–118.

Galia, W., C. Perrin, M. Genay and A. Dary. 2009. Variability and molecular typing of

Streptococcus thermophilus strains displaying different proteolytic and acidifying properties. International Dairy Journal 19: 89–95.

Garneau, J.E. and S. Moineau. 2011. Bacteriophages of lactic acid bacteria and their impact on milk fermentations. Microbial Cell Factories 10(Suppl 1): S20.

Garrigues, C., E. Johansen and M.B. Pedersen. 2010. Complete genome sequence of

Bifi dobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, a widely consumed probiotic strain. Journal of Bacteriology 192(9): 2467–2468.

Gilbert, C., B. Blanc, J. Frot-Coutaz, R. Portalier and D. Atlan. 1997. Comparison of cell surface proteinase activities within the Lactobacillus genus. Journal of Dairy Research 64: 561–571. Golowczyc, M.A., P. Mobili, G.L. Garrote, M. De Los Angeles Serradel, A.G. Abraham and

G.L. De Antoni. 2009. Interaction between Lactobacillus kefi r and Saccharomyces lipolytica isolated from kefi r grains: evidence for lectin-like activity of bacterial surface proteins. Journal of Dairy Research 76: 111–116.

Gomes, A.M.P. and F.X. Malcata. 1999. Bifi dobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus acidophilus: biological, biochemical, technological and therapeutical properties relevant for use as probiotics. Food Science and Technology 10: 139–157.

Gonzalez-Gonzalez, C.R., K.M. Tuohy and P. Jauregi. 2011. Production of angiotensin-I- converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity in milk fermented with probiotic strains: effects of calcium, pH and peptides on the ACE-inhibitory activity. International Dairy Journal 21: 615–622.

Guizani, N., S. Kasapis and M. Al-Ruzeiki. 2001. Microbial, chemical and rheological properties of laban (cultured milk). International Journal of Food Science and Technology 36(2): 199–205.

Guldas, M. and M. Atamer. 1995. Effect of pasteurization norm and storage temperature on the quality of long-life yogurt. GIDA 20: 313–319.

Horiuchi, H., N. Inoue, E. Liu, M. Fukui, V. Sasaki and T. Sasaki. 2009. A method for manufacturing superior set yogurt under reduced oxygen conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 4112–4121.

Hugenholtz, J., W. Sybesma, M. Nierop Groot, W. Wisselink, V. Ladero, K. Burgess, D. van Sinderen, J.-C. Piard, G. Eggink, E.J. Smid and others. 2002. Metabolic engineering of lactic acid bacteria for the production of nutraceuticals. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 82: 217–235. Iyer, R., S.K. Tomar, T.U. Maheswari and R. Singh. 2010. Streptococcus thermophilus strains:

multifunctional lactic acid bacteria. International Dairy Journal 20: 133–141.

Janhøj, T., M. Bom Frøst and R. Ipsen. 2008. Sensory and rheological characterization of acidifi ed milk drinks. Food Hydrocolloids 22: 798–806.

Kahala, M., M. Mäki, A. Lehtovaara, J.-M. Tapanainen, R. Katiska, M. Juuruskorpi, J. Juhola and V. Joutsjoki. 2008. Characterization of starter lactic acid bacteria from the Finnish fermented milk product viili. Journal of Applied Microbiology 105: 1929–1938. Kulozik, U., A. Tolkach, S. Bulca and J. Hinrichs. 2003. The role of processing and matrix design

in development and control of microstructures in dairy food production—a survey. International Dairy Journal 13: 621–630.

Le Bars, D. and M. Yvon. 2008. Formation of diacetyl and acetoin by Lactococcus lactis via aspartate catabolism. Journal of Applied Microbiology 104: 171–177.

Lee, W.J. and J.A. Lucey. 2004. Structure and physical properties of yogurt gels: effect of inoculation rate and incubation temperature. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 3153–3164. Lee, W.J. and J.A. Lucey. 2010. Formation and physical properties of yogurt. Asian-Australasian

Journal of Animal Sciences 23(9): 1127–1136.

Leroy, F. and L. De Vuyst. 2004. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Food Science and Technology 15: 67–78.

Liu, C.F., K.C. Tseng, S.S. Chiang, B.H. Lee, W.H. Hsua and T.M. Pan. 2011. Immunomodulatory and antioxidant potential of Lactobacillus exopolysaccharides. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91: 2284–2291.

Mahony, J., S. Ainsworth, S. Stockdale and D. Van Sinderen. 2012. Phages of lactic acid bacteria: the role of genetics in understanding phage-host interactions and their co-evolutionary processes. Virology 434: 143–150.

Marteau, P., B. Flourie, P. Pochart, C. Chastang, J.F. Desjeux and J.C. Rambaud. 1990. Effect of the microbial lactase activity in yoghurt on the intestinal absorption of lactose: an in vivo study in lactase-defi cient humans. British Journal of Nutrition 64: 71–79.

Martin, F., R. Cachon, K. Pernin, J. De Coninck, P. Gervais, E. Guichard and C.N. 2011. Effect of oxidoreduction potential on aroma biosynthesis by lactic acid bacteria in nonfat yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 614–622.

Martin, F., N. Cayot, C. Vergoignan, L. Journaux, P. Gervais and R. Cachon. 2010. Impact of oxidoreduction potential and of gas bubbling on rheological properties of non-fat yoghurt. Food Research International 43: 218–223.

Martin, N., J. Skokanova, E. Latrille, C. Béal and G. Corrieu. 1999. Infl uence of fermentation and storage conditions on the organoleptic properties of plain low fat stirred yoghurts. Journal of Sensory Studies 14(2): 139–160.

Mehmood, T., T. Masud, S. Ali Abbass and S. Maqsud. 2009. Isolation and identifi cation of wild strains of lactic acid bacteria for yoghurt preparation from indigenous Dahi. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 8(6): 866–871.

Michaylova, M., S. Minkova, K. Kimura, T. Sasaki and K. Isawa. 2007. Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus from plants in Bulgaria. FEMS Microbiology Letters 269: 160–169.

Monnet, C., M. Nardi, P. Hols, M. Gulea, G. Corrieu and V. Monnet. 2003. Regulation of branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis by alpha-acetolactate decarboxylase in

Streptococcus thermophilus. Letters in Applied Microbiology 36: 399–405.

Monnet, V., D. Atlan, C. Béal, M.C. Champomier-Vergès, M.P. Chapot-Chartier, H. Chouayekh, M. Cogcaign-Bousquet, M. Deghorain, P. Gaudu, C. Gilbert and others. 2008. Métabolisme et ingénierie métabolique. pp. 271–509. In: G. Corrieu and F.M. Luquet (eds.). Bactéries lactiques: De la génétique aux ferments. Paris: Tec&Doc Lavoisier.

Mu, Z., X.J. Yang and H. Yuan. 2012. Detection and identifi cation of wild yeast in Koumiss. Food Microbiology 31: 301–308.

Mutz-Darwell, S., M. Yurgec and K. Fox. 2012. Alternative production approach for Greek yogurt. Bridgewater, NJ: Ingredion Incorporared. 7 pp.

Nsabimana, C., B. Jiang and R. Kossah. 2005. Manufacturing, properties and shelf life of labneh: a review. International Journal of Dairy Technology 58(3): 129–137.

Offi cial Journal of the European Union. 2006. Regulation (EC) n° 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Brussels, Belgium.

Ostlie, H.M., M.H. Helland and J.A. Narvhus. 2003. Growth and metabolism of selected strains of probiotic bacteria in milk. International Journal of Food Microbiology 87(1-2): 17–27. Ostlie, H.M., J. Treimo and J.A. Narvhus. 2005. Effect of temperature on growth and metabolism

of probiotic bacteria in milk. International Dairy Journal 15: 989–997.

Papademas, P. and T. Bintsis. 2010. Food safety management systems (FSMS) in the dairy industry: a review. International Journal of Dairy Technology 63: 489–503.

Prasanna, P.H.P., A.S. Grandison and D. Charalampopoulos. 2012. Screening human intestinal

Bifi dobacterium strains for growth, acidifi cation, EPS production and viscosity potential in low-fat milk. International Dairy Journal 23: 36–44.

Quigley, E.M.M. 2011. Gut microbiota and the role of probiotics in therapy. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 11(6): 593–603.

Routray, W. and H.N. Mishra. 2011. Scientifi c and technical aspects of yogurt aroma and taste: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 10(4): 195–247. Samet-Bali, O., A. Bellila, M.A. Ayadi, B. Marzouk and H. Attia. 2010. A comparison of the

physicochemical, microbiological and aromatic composition of traditional and industrial Leben in Tunisia. International Journal of Dairy Technology 63(1): 98–104.

Shiby, V.K. and H.N. Mishra. 2013. Fermented milks and milk products as functional foods—a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 53(5): 482–496.

Sieuwerts, S., F.A.M. De Bok, J. Hugenholtz and J.E.T. Van Hylckama Vlieg. 2008. Unraveling microbial interactions in food fermentations: from classical to genomics approaches. Applied Environmental Microbiology 74: 4997–5007.

Sieuwerts, S., D. Molenaar, S.A. van Hijum, M. Beerthuyzen, M.J. Stevens, P.W. Janssen, C.J. Ingham, F.A. de Bok, W.M. de Vos and J.E. van Hylckama Vlieg. 2010. Mixed- culture transcriptome analysis reveals the molecular basis of mixed-culture growth in Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Applied Environmental Microbiology 76(23): 7775–7784.

Siezen, R.J. 1999. Multi-domain, cell-envelope proteinases of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76: 139–155.

Simova, E., D. Beshkova, A. Angelov, T. Hristova, G. Frengova and Z. Spasov. 2002. Lactic acid bacteria and yeast in kefi r grains and kefi r made from them. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 28: 1–6.

Sodini, I., E. Latrille and G. Corrieu. 2000. Identifi cation of interacting mixed cultures of lactic acid bacteria by their exclusion from a model predicting the acidifying activity of non-interacting mixed cultures. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 54: 715–718.

Soukoulis, C., P. Panagiotidis, R. Koureli and C. Tzia. 2007. Industrial yogurt manufacture: Monitoring of fermentation process and improvement of fi nal product quality. Journal of Dairy Science 90(6): 2641–2654.

Stadie, J., A. Gulitz, M.A. Ehrmann and R.F. Vogel. 2013. Metabolic activity and symbiotic interactions of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts isolated from water kefi r. Food Microbiology 35: 92–98.

Stiles, M.E. and W.H. Holzapfel. 1997. Lactic acid bacteria of foods and their current taxonomy. International Journal of Food Microbiology 36: 1–29.

Sun-Waterhouse, D., J. Zhou and S.S. Wadhwa. 2013. Drinking yoghurts with berry polyphenols added before and after fermentation. Food Control 32: 450–460.

Ur-Rehman, S., J.M. Dunker and M.J. McCloskey. 2010. Yogurt compositions and methods of making. USA patent US 2010/0297294 A1.

Van de Guchte, M., S. Penaud, C. Grimaldi, V. Barbe, K. Bryson, P. Nicolas, C. Robert, S. Oztas, S. Mangenot, A. Couloux and others. 2006. The complete genome sequence of

Lactobacillus bulgaricus reveals extensive and ongoing reductive evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103: 9274–9279.

Van Hylckama Vlieg, J.E.T. and J. Hugenholtz. 2007. Mining natural diversity of lactic acid bacteria for fl avour and health benefi ts. International Dairy Journal 17: 1290–1297. Vardjan, T., P. Mohar Lorbeg, I. Rogelj and A. Canzek Majhenic. 2013. Characterization and

stability of lactobacilli and yeast microbiota in kefi r grains. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 2729–2736.

Vasiljevic, T. and N.P. Shah. 2008. Probiotics—From Metchnikoff to bioactives. International Dairy Journal 18(7): 714–728.

Vinderola, C.G., G.A. Costa, S. Regenhardt and J.A. Reinheimer. 2002a. Infl uence of compounds associated with fermented dairy products on the growth of lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria. International Dairy Journal 12: 579–589.

Vinderola, C.G., P. Mocchiutti and J.A. Reinheimer. 2002b. Interactions among lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria used for fermented milk products. Journal of Dairy Science 85(4): 721–729.

Zotta, T., A. Ricciardi, R. Rossano and E. Parente. 2008. Urease production by Streptococcus

6

6

Fermented Fish and Fish

Documento similar