• No se han encontrado resultados

C. Obligaciones en materia de acceso a información

V. CONCLUSIONES

“The persistence of royal absolutism or more generally of a preindustrial bureaucratic rule into modern times has created conditions unfavorable to democracy of the Western variety.”

Moore, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, 1966 The Kremlin, from its external projections of imperial force in Georgia and Ukraine to its decentralization into regional absolutists loyal to Putin, is a reflection of its institutional past. While inferior to the efficient, profit-seeking open-access societies of the West, the Muscovite model has proved to be significantly more durable and sophisticated than expected. From 1440 to the present, regimes that may appear to be different on the surface are in fact strikingly similar to the original model.

Centuries ago, Muscovy emerged as an unlikely winner between principalities in the wake of Mongol control thanks to the political shrewdness of its rulers. The fledgling state thrived under institutions created in the dualism of Orthodoxy and its relationship to the Tartars. This paper identified several key aspects of the institutional system and the forces behind its emergence. One is Russia’s unique geographical setting in terms of both weather and security, which led to early adoption of communal social organization. As is consistent with Haber (2012), such social organization is not easily amenable to open and inclusive society. Rather, it is

susceptible to a centralized formation of extractive institutions. This deep historical legacy was reinforced and adapted at several key moments in history, such as during the rise of the

Bolsheviks, and continues to play a major role today in rejecting the Western conception of liberalism.

Additionally, the unifying influence and powerful secular institutional system the Mongol brought by force set Russia down a much different path from fragmented Europe. Rent

81

the powerful Russian Empire long after the Golden Horde had vanished from the steppe. At the turn of the industrial age, however, this system struggled to adapt and eventually collapsed. The Soviet Elite that arose in its place took hold of similar extractive and authoritarian institutions. Their slight modifications to economic institutions allowed for adoption of some capitalist

efficiency, but did not result in real transition because they were offset by an even more intensely personal state in political life. Finally, conflict, divergence of Orthodoxy from the rest of

Christendom, and concentrated propaganda evolved over a significant amount of time into a powerful concept of Russian nationalism and rejection of influences deemed foreign rather than Russian.

This paper hopes to serve in the first place as a model for similar analysis of countries that often confound Western academics. In the second place, it raises broader policy

implications. Policymakers ought to be wary of failing to comprehend the institutional legacies of a country they might seek to influence because the everyday social dynamics of that country will naturally be tied up in its past. For Russia specifically, whose entire concept of reality is based on longevity —on rejecting and outlasting opponents— half-hearted external efforts to force change can only be expected to strengthen the Muscovite narrative.

82

References

Abrams, Neil A., and M. Steven Fish. 2015. "Policies First, Institutions Second: Lessons from Estonia’s Economic Reforms." Post-Soviet Affairs 31 (6): 491-513.

Acemoglu D., Hassan T.A., and Robinson J.A. 2011. "Social Structure and Development: A Legacy of the Holocaust in Russia." Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (2): 895-946. Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and

Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power,

Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.

Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2013. “Economics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (2): 173–92.

Acemoglu, Daron, Davide Ticchi, and Andrea Vindigni. 2011. “Emergence and Persistence of Inefficient States.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (2): 177–2

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation." The American Economic

Review 91, no. 5 (2001): 1369-401.

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2002. “Reversal of Fortune:

Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income.” The Quarterly

Journal of Economics, Vol. 117, No. 4, pp. 1231-1294.

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2005. “Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-run Growth. In Philippe Aghion and Steven N. Durlauf (eds.) Handbook

of Economic Growth, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Alesina, Alberto, and Paola Giuliano. 2015. "Culture and Institutions." Journal of Economic

Literature 53 (4): 898-944.

Anzoategui, Diego, William Easterly, and Steven Pennings. 2016. “How much long-run economic growth happens at the country level?” Development Research Institute. New York University. http://www.nyudri.org/research-index/2016/growthcountrylevel Aoki, Masahiko. 2006. “Mechanisms of Endogenous Institutional Change” SIEPR Discussion

Paper No. 05-13.

Berger, Daniel, Alejandro Corvalan, William Easterly, and Shanker Satyanath. 2013. “Do Superpower Interventions Have Short and Long Term Consequences for

83

Churchill, Winston. “The Russian Enigma,” BBC Broadcast, London. October 1, 1939. http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html

Clark, Gregory. 2007. A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Presdemocrs.

Constant, Benjamin. 1988 (originally published 1819). “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns,” In B. Fontana (ed.), Political Writings. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy; Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dennison, Tracy K. 2014. "The Institutional Context of Serfdom in England and Russia." In Briggs Chris, Kitson P. M., and Thompson S. J. (eds.), Population, Welfare and

Economic Change in Britain, 1290-1834 249-68. Boydell and Brewer.

Di Tella, Rafael, and Robert MacCulloch. 2006. “Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1): 25–46.

Diamond, Jared M. 1997. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: Norton.

Domar, Evsey D. 1970. "The Causes of Slavery or Serfdom: A Hypothesis." The Journal of

Economic History 30 (01): 18-32.

Easterly, William, and Ross Levine. 2003. "Tropics, Germs, and Crops: How Endowments Influence Economic Development." Journal of Monetary Economics 50 (1): 3-39. Easterly, William. 2008. “Institutions: Top Down or Bottom Up?” The American Economic

Review 98 (2): 95–99.

Fish, M. Steven. 2005. Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fish, M., and Omar Choudhry. 2007. "Democratization and Economic Liberalization in the Postcommunist World." Comparative Political Studies 40 (3): 254-282.

Fukuyama, Francis. 2011.The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution.New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Gallup, John Luke, and Jeffrey D. Sachs with Andrew D. Mellinger. “Geography and Economic Development.” In Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1998 (April), The World Bank: Washington, DC.

Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1955. “The Problem of Economic Development in Russian

Intellectual History of the Nineteenth Century.” In Ernest J. Simmons (ed.) Continuity

84

Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. “Agrarian Policies and Industrialisation of Russia, 1861-1917.” In the Cambridge Economic History of Europe. Vol. 2, part 2. Cambridge.

Giuliano, Paola, and Nathan Nunn. 2013. "The Transmission of Democracy: From the Village to the Nation-State." American Economic Review 103 (3): 86-92

Glaeser, Edward L, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2004. “Do Institutions Cause Growth?” Journal of Economic Growth 9 (3): 271–303.

Goldman, Marshall I. 1994. Lost Opportunity: Why Economic Reforms in Russia Have Not

Worked. New York: W.W. Norton.

Gorodnichenko, Yuriy, and Gerard Roland. 2016. "Culture, Institutions and the Wealth of Nations." Review of Economics and Statistics (March).

Granville, Christopher. 2001. “The Political and Social Environment of Economic Policy.” In Brigitte Granville and Peter Oppenheimer (eds.), Russia’s Post-Communist Economy, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Guiso, Luigi, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales. 2006. "Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?" Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2): 23-48.

Haber, Stephen. 2008. “Authoritarian Government.” In Barry R. Weingast and Donald A. Wittman (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haber, Stephen. 2012. “Where Does Democracy Thrive: Climate, Technology, and the Evolution of Economic and Political Institutions.” Stanford University and NBER, Draft of August 24, 2012. http://stephen-haber.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Haber-Where-Does- Democracy-Thrive.pdf

Halperin, Charles J. 1985. Russia and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval

Russian History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hayek, F. A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” The American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–30.

Henry P.B, and Miller C. 2009. “Institutions Versus Policies: A Tale of Two Islands.” American

Economic Review 99 (2): 2.

Hoffman, Philip T. 2015. Why Did Europe Conquer the World? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hosking, Geoffrey A. 2011. Russia and the Russians: A History. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

85

Ilyin, Mikhail. 2015. “Russian Perspectives on Democracy, Political Emancipation, and Integrity.” In Adam Przeworski (ed.) Democracy in a Russian Mirror, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Kahan, Arcadius, and Richard. Hellie. 1985. The Plow, the Hammer, and the Knout: An

Economic History of Eighteenth-Century Russia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kahan, Arcadius, and Roger Weiss. 1989. Russian Economic History: The Nineteenth

Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kingston-Mann, Esther. 1999. In Search of the True West: Culture, Economics, and Problems of

Russian Development. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Kuran, Timur. 2008. “Institutional Causes of Economic Underdevelopment in the Middle East: A Historical Perspective” In Janos Kornai, Lazzlo Matyas, and Gerard Roland (eds.),

Institutional Change and Economic Behavior, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez‐de‐Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W Vishny. 1998. “Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy 106 (6): 1113–55.

La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez‐de‐Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W Vishny. 1999. “The Quality of Government” The Journal of Law, Economics, and

Organization 15 (1): 222–22.

La Porta, Rafael. "The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins." Journal of Economic

Literature 46, no. 2 (2008): 285-332.

Ledeneva, Alena V. 1998. Russia's Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking, and Informal

Exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Leontovitsch, Victor, and Александр Исаевич Солженицын. 2012. The History of Liberalism

in Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Linz, Juan J. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy, Volume 1, Number 1, winter, pp. 51-69.

Lotman, U. M. and Boris Andrevitch. 1985. “Binary Models in the Dynamics of Russian Culture to the End of the Eighteenth Century.” In Alexander D. Nakhimovsky and Alice Stone Nakhimovsky (eds.), The Semiotics of Russian Cultural History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Lowes, Sara, Nathan Nunn, James A. Robinson, and Jonathan Weigel. 2015. "The Evolution of Culture And Institutions: Evidence From The Kuba Kingdom." Working Paper

Series 21798: NBER.

Mainwaring, Soctt. 1993. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination.” Comparative Political Studies 26(2):198-228.

86

Markevich, Andreĭ, Ekaterina V. Zhuravskaya, and Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain). 2015. Economic Effects of the Abolition of Serfdom: Evidence from the Russian

Empire. Discussion paper series / Centre for Economic Policy Research, no. 10395;

Discussion paper (Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain)), no. 10395. London, UK: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Matthews, Owen. 2016. “Vladimir Putin’s Secret Weapon” Newsweek (June 15).

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/06/24/why-russians-love-vladimir-putin-470432.html Migranyan, Andranik. 2015. “Peculiarities of Russian Politics.” In Adam Przeworski (ed.)

Democracy in a Russian Mirror, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, David Wallace Carrithers, and Thomas Nugent. 2001 (1748).The Spirit of Laws. Kitchener, Ont.: Batoche.

Moore, Barrington. 1967. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in

the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.

Morrell, Dan. July-August 2012. “Why Nations Fail” Harvard Magazine. http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/07/why-nations-fail

Натхов, Т. В., and Л. И. Полищук. 2017. "Политэкономия институтов и развития: как важно быть инклюзивным." Институт экономики РАН, 2017. – 55 c

https://inecon.org/docs/Natkhov_Polishuk_paper_20170221.pdf

Neuman, Scott. 2013. “Death and Tax Evasion: The Strange Case of Sergei Magnitsky” NPR (July 11). http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/07/11/201120083/death-and- tax-evasion-the-strange-case-of-sergei-magnitsky

Newcity, Michael. 1997. “Russian Legal Tradition and the Rule of Law.” In Jeffrey Sachs and Katharina Pistor (eds.), The Rule of Law and Economic Reform in Russia. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

North, Douglass C., John Joseph. Wallis and Barry R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social

Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History.

Nunn, Nathan. 2009. The Importance of History for Economic Development. Working paper series, no. 14899. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Ogilvie, Sheilagh. 2007. "'Whatever Is, Is Right'? Economic Institutions in Pre-Industrial Europe." The Economic History Review, New Series, 60, no. 4: 649-84.

Ostrowski, Donald G. 1998. Muscovy and the Mongols: Cross-Cultural Influences on the Steppe

87

Pastukhov, Vladimir. 2002. “Law under Administrative Pressure in Post-Soviet Russia” Eastern

European Constitutional Review 66 (11): 66-74.

Pipes, Richard. 1995. Russia under the Old Regime. 2nd ed. New York: Penguin Books.

Porter, Michael E. 2000. “Attitudes, Values, Beliefs, and the Microeconomics of Prosperity.” In Lawrence E. Harrison, and Samuel P. Huntington (eds.), Culture Matters: How Values

Shape Human Progress, New York: Perseus Books Group.

Poushter, Jacob. 2015. “6 charts showing how Russians see their country and the world.” Pew

Research Center, June 12. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/12/6-charts-

showing-how-russians-see-their-country-and-the-world/

Przeworski, Adam. 2004. “The Last Instance: Are Institutions the Primary Cause of Economic Development?” Archives Européennes De Sociologie / European Journal of Sociology /

Europäisches Archiv Für Soziologie 45 (2): 165–88.

Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against populism. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Robinson, James. 2017. “Earth 2.0 Is Income Inequality Inevitable?” Freakonomics Radio, April

19 (16:45). http://freakonomics.com/podcast/earth-2-0-income-inequality/

Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi. 2004. "Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development." Journal of

Economic Growth 9 (2): 131-165.

Rodrik, Dani. 2014. "When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations." Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (1): 189-208.

Roland, Gerard. 2008. “Fast-Moving and Slow-Moving Institutions” In Janos Kornai, Lazzlo Matyas, and Gerard Roland (eds.), Institutional Change and Economic Behavior, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rosefielde, Steven. 2005. "Illusion of Transition: Russia's Muscovite Future." Eastern Economic

Journal 31 (2): 285-299.

Rosefielde, Steven. 2005. "Russia: An Abnormal Country." The European Journal of

Comparative Economics 2 (1): 3-16.

Sachs, Jeffrey, and Katharina. Pistor. 1997. “Introduction: Progress, Pitfalls, Scenarios, and Lost Opportunities.” In Jeffrey Sachs and Katharina Pistor (eds.), the Rule of Law and

Economic Reform in Russia. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Sachs, Jeffrey. 2003. Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income.

Working paper series, no. 9490. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Sachs, Jeffrey. March 2012. “What I did in Russia.” Jeffreysachs.org. http://jeffsachs.org/2012/03/what-i-did-in-russia/

88

Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr Isaevich, and Yermolai. Solzhenitsyn. 1995. “The Russian Question" at

the End of the Twentieth Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Steffens, Lincoln. 2011. “Lincoln Steffens: Muckraker’s Progress” New York Times, article written by Kevin Baker (May 13).

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/15/books/review/lincoln-steffens-muckrakers- progress.html

Stickley, Andrew, Sara Ferlander, Tanya Jukkala, Per Carlson, Olga Kislitsyna, and Ilkka Henrik Mäkinen. 2009. "Institutional Trust in Contemporary Moscow." Europe-Asia Studies 61 (5): 779-796.

van der Ploeg, Frederick. 2011. "Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?" Journal of Economic

Literature 49 (2): 366-420.

Weber, Max. 1930. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner. Willmott, H. P.The Great Crusade : A New Complete History of the Second World War. Rev.

Ed. ed. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 2008.

Wright, Gavin, and Jesse Czelusta. 2004. "Why Economies Slow: The Myth of the Resource Curse." Challenge 47 (2): 6-38.