• No se han encontrado resultados

CONCLUSIONES A partir del análisis realizado se puede concluir que:

   C   A

   R   T    O   O

   ©   N

   P   H

   I   L

   W   I   T

   T   E

   2   0    1   6

“I have an existential dread of falling off your couch.”

30 PhilosophyNow December 2016/January 2017

found that those who found the will to endure the horrific con-ditions did so because they felt they had meaning in their lives.

Frankl’s conclusion invites us all to find meaning. Some-times this is easy, but when we’re in crisis it is painful. Long bouts of depression can leave us so isolated and exhausted that  any suggestion of finding meaning seems beyond possibility.

Frankl suggests that the final human freedom is “to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way” ( Man’s Search for Meaning , 1946). I believe that  Frankl’s focus on choice of 

attitude is the greatest wis-dom he could give us. He isn’t suggesting we can over-come death or disaster, but  merely that we can decide our attitude towards it. We don’t  have to rely on the govern-ment/the priest/the weather, etc etc. We ourselves can begin to change how we feel.

 We can take comfort from the possibility that life isn’t  something that is done to us;

then we can decide to explore the hows and whys, and of  course, the all-consuming

‘Why me?’

 Asking the question ‘Is my  life worthwhile?’ suggests we are looking for meaning. The question might occur to us because we are emotionally or psychologically tired from a

life that seems to be only about paying bills and answering to the whims of an unreasonable boss. Or it may come when we have a serious illness, or are about to be released from prison after serving ten years for murder. When we ask this question,  we are perhaps hoping that our life should be worthwhile. Or  we may be asking why it used to be but isn’t now. Alternatively,  we may feel it never was, and never can be.

Counselling Through Philosophy

People who have suffered serious abuse may need ‘formal’ dis-cussion to make sense of their lives. This can come in the shape of existential counselling, which is therapy through philosophical discussion provided by a trained counsellor. If  drugs block out the thoughts and feelings caused by abuse or other trauma, existential therapy does the opposite: it enables a person to think through what has happened, how it happened, and why it happened. Through existential counselling,

depressed people can become aware that they are now respon-sible for themselves, and use this knowledge positively. The relationship between the client and the counsellor reflects all good relationships: we learn what it means to say that there is another who can listen and debate with us, but also that we are ultimately responsible for our own thoughts and feelings. Also, like other relationships, it is finite, which makes it bittersweet.

In existential therapy in particular, the client will most likely 

be encouraged to reflect on one or all of the following: freedom and responsibility, isolation and meaninglessness, and the inevitability of death. This may sound negative, but the approach is positive. It depends on the theory that people can find meaning and can come to terms with the past now, and are therefore able to have a worthwhile future. With support from the counsellor the individual can face up to their fears and take responsibility. They can learn about their strengths and limita-tions. Existential therapy celebrates authenticity, and also

acknowledges how damned hard life can be. Van Deurzen-Smith (same person, different   year – this time 1997) suggests

in her book Existential Coun- selling in Practice that through

existentialist counselling, people can become truly alive, and that  only when “they begin to be ready for the recurrent chal-lenges, crises and troubles, do they start to be open to the depth of experience and reality  that comes with a true commit-ment to existence.”

 The truly liberating thing about  existential counselling – possi-bly about any philosophical dis-cussion on human existence – is that it doesn’t rely on diagnos-tic labels or on the medicaliza-tion of behaviour. A person isn’t ‘bipolar’ or ‘depressive’ or

‘borderline’; they are a unique human being reacting to a difficult world. The symptoms of, for example, borderline personality disorder, can be viewed as the results of rational responses in someone who has been sex-ually abused since childhood. She may feel she also would like the support of a medical doctor, and possibly medication; but for someone with such a history to have a serious, intimate, honest  conversation, as equals, with another person about their choices, their abilities, their possibilities, is to give them the chance to take control of a life that may have seemed forever out of con-trol. The journey won’t be easy, and the conversations will be painful. I am not talking about a quick fix self-help afternoon.

 We are looking at facing our fears head on, working out what   we must take responsibility for, and what we must accept that   we can’t change. It’s about giving up our victim status, and

becoming powerful. It’s exciting, it’s challenging. Its philosophy  for grow ups! It’s philosophy for the brave.

An Antidote To Junk Culture

 We live in a culture where rather than ask our grandma for the old family Christmas pudding recipe, people look online to see  what famous people put in theirs. To train our dogs, choose a

book, live a healthy life, we look to celebrities who are making money by telling us what to do, think and eat. We seek the answers to how to live life and how to be happy from the rich and famous, although they themselves are often also struggling

   W   O

   M   A    N   L    I   S    T   E    N   I    N   G

   ©   F   R   E    W   D .    B   A   K

   E   R

   I   I    I ,    2   0    0   9

December 2016/January 2017PhilosophyNow 31 to find their authentic selves. Through existential

ther-apy we can explore who we really are and find out what   we really want. Existential philosophy and existential

counselling can both be considered antidotes to this celebrity culture. Through philosophical discussion –  with a friend, a philosopher, or with an existential

counsellor – we can begin to answer the questions

‘What would make life worthwhile?’ and ‘How do I get  to that place?’ We can look back to what used to satisfy  us and see if that still works, and if not, find new  sources of meaning. We can also look at responsibility  – a very important issue for people who have been abused.

It may be thought that counselling in general, and existential counselling in particular, is only suitable for articulate, confident people. I strongly disagree. My   work with people in prison is the evidence. In fact, the

quirkier mind the better, and prison survivors often have a particularly individualistic, thinking-on-your-feet kind of way of looking at life. And as I said, they have had a long time to contemplate life’s meanings. One of my  most successful therapeutic relationships was with a pris-oner who was a traveller, or ‘pikey’, as she enjoyed describing herself. We looked at abuse and the meaning of life mostly through metaphor. Her aim was to make her life worthwhile. She learned what she could change and what she had to accept. Our starting point was both staring at the brick wall just outside the window.

Sometimes those who can talk and think well hide their fears behind their talking and thinking. I believe  very few of us are without anxiety. Instead of putting up

armour, we can bring down our barriers in discussion (please enjoy the almost mixed metaphor!). We can start  to look at questions in a new way, rather than trotting out the glib answers we have become familiar and com-fortable with. We can take time away from looking at  the constructs of our society, and look instead at our self-constructs. Instead of debating international poli-tics, we can look instead at our internal politics. This is not self-indulgence, rather it is self-knowledge. We can look at the way we react to situations and people, and decide that from now on, we will respond in a here-and-now way. We can dump any aspect of our public per-sona at any time. This can only be liberating.

If there is a meaning to life, shouldn’t we learn to understand it? If we are not choosing suicide, we are choosing existence. Existence is confusing and fright-ening. We need to reflect, and to talk to each other; to be humble and brave, and always question those plati-tudes handed to us which are announced as truths.

 Through philosophy, and in particular through existen-tial discussion and existenexisten-tial counselling, we can learn to be good at life. Philosopher, heal thyself.

© DR DAHLIAN KIRBY 2016

Dahlian Kirby obtained her PhD in Philosophy from Cardiff  University. She works as a counsellor, and teaches counselling  at Redcar and Cleveland College. She also runs therapeutic  writing courses.

SIMON+ FINNCARTOON© MELISSAFELDER2016 PLEASE VISIT SIMONANDFINN.COM

by

Melissa Felder 

32 PhilosophyNow December 2016/January 2017