• No se han encontrado resultados

Contains not less than 2.0% essential oil (1). Gas chromatography (19) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (20) methods for essential oil constituents are also available.

Major chemical constituents

Contains 2–5% essential oil, the major constituent of which is carvone (20–60%) (11, 21, 22). The carvone content in plants cultivated in India is reported to be 6% less than in those cultivated in Europe (9). Other char- acteristic terpenoid essential oil constituents include dihydrocarvone, 1,8-cineole, p-cymene, limonene, α-phellandrene, α-pinene and α-terpi- nene. The fl avonoids present include kaempferol-glucuronide (22, 23).

SMPvol3 layout.indd 35

36

WHO monographs on selected medicinal plants

Dillapiol is found in the essential oil obtained from plants cultivated in Egypt, India and Japan (24). Representative structures are presented below.

Medicinal uses

Uses supported by clinical data

None.

Uses described in pharmacopoeias and well established documents

Treatment of dyspepsia (25), gastritis and fl atulence (1, 26), and stomach ache (27).

Uses described in traditional medicine

As an aphrodisiac, analgesic, antipyretic, diuretic, emmenagogue, galacta- gogue, appetite stimulant and vaginal contraceptive. Treatment of diar- rhoea, asthma, neuralgia, dysuria, dysmenorrhoea, gallbladder disease, insomnia, hiatus hernia and kidney stones (9, 26–29).

Pharmacology

Experimental pharmacology

Antispasmodic and carminative activities

A 50% ethanol extract of Fructus Anethi inhibited acetylcholine- and his- tamine-induced contractions of guinea-pig ileum in vitro (30). The essen- tial oil, 50 mg/ml, reduced contractions of rabbit intestine (31). The essen- tial oil (containing the monoterpenes and phenylpropanes: dillapiol, myristicin and isomyristicin) (concentration not specifi ed) acted as a mild carminative and stomachic (32). The essential oil had carminative activity and reduced foaming in vitro, median effective concentration 2.0% (33).

Anti-infl ammatory and analgesic activities

A single topical application of an ethanol extract of the fruits, at a dose corresponding to 1.0 mg/20 μl of a 10.0-mg dried methanol extract dis- solved in 200.0 μl of ethanol, to the inner and outer surface of the ear of

c a r v o n e a n d e n a n t i o m e r O C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 1 , 8 - c i n e o l e O C H 3 H H 3 C H 2 C d i h y d r o c a r v o n e a n d e n a n t i o m e r O H H 3 C H 2 C C H 3 H C H 3 H 3 C C H 3 C H 3 C H 3 H H 3 C H 3 C H H 3 C H 2 C a n d e n a n t i o m e r C H 3 H 3 C C H 3 C H 3 H 3 C H 3 C H H

p-cymene (+)-limonene (-)-α-phellandrene α-pinene α-terpinene

SMPvol3 layout.indd 36

37 mice inhibited ear infl ammation induced by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol- 13 acetate by 60% (34). Ethyl acetate and hexane extracts of the fruits (concentration not specifi ed) were inactive in this assay. A 10% aqueous extract of the fruits and a 5% aqueous solution of the essential oil had analgesic effects in mice as assessed in the hot plate and acetic acid writh- ing tests. The action of the fruits at 1.0 g/kg body weight (bw) was com- parable with that of acetylsalicyclic acid at 200.0 mg/kg bw (35).

Miscellaneous effects

Intravenous administration of 12.5 mg/kg bw of a 70% dried ethanol ex- tract of the fruits, dissolved in normal saline, to dogs had a diuretic effect, with a 2.2-fold increase in urine output. Intravenous administration of 25.0 mg/kg bw of a 70% ethanol extract to dogs reduced blood pressure. Intravenous administration of 4.0 μl/kg bw of the essential oil induced diuresis in dogs lasting 80 minutes, with increased sodium and calcium ion excretion (36). Intravenous administration of 5.0–10.0 mg/kg bw of a 5% seed oil in saline to cats increased respiration volume and lowered blood pressure; intraperitoneal administration of 35.0 mg/kg bw of the seed oil to guinea-pigs induced anaphylactic shock (11). A single intragastric dose of 250.0 mg/kg bw of a 50% ethanol extract of the fruits to fasted rats re- duced blood glucose levels by 30% compared with controls (30).

Toxicology

In a report by a national regulatory authority “generally regarded as safe status” was granted to Fructus Anethi as a fl avouring agent in 1976 (37).

Clinical pharmacology

No information available.

Adverse reactions

Allergic reactions to Fructus Anethi including oral pruritus, tongue and throat swelling and urticaria, as well as vomiting and diarrhoea were re- ported in one patient with a history of allergic rhinitis (38).

Contraindications

Traditionally, extracts of fruits (seeds) have been used as a contraceptive and to induce labour (4). Furthermore, extracts of the fruits may have teratogenic effects (39). Therefore, the use of Fructus Anethi during preg- nancy and nursing is not recommended.

Warnings

No information available.

SMPvol3 layout.indd 37

38

WHO monographs on selected medicinal plants

Precautions

Carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, impairment of fertility

A chloroform–methanol (2:1) extract of the fruits was not mutagenic in concentrations up to 100.0 mg/plate in the Salmonella/microsome assay using S. typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100, with or without meta- bolic activation. A 95% ethanol extract was also without mutagenic activ- ity in the same test system (40).

An essential oil prepared from the fruits was cytotoxic to human lym- phocytes in vitro, and was active in the chromosome aberration and sister chromatid exchange tests in the same system. The oil was inactive in the

Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test in vivo

(41).

Pregnancy: non-teratogenic effects

See Contraindications.

Nursing mothers

See Contraindications.

Other precautions

No information available on general precautions or precautions concern- ing drug interactions; drug and laboratory test interactions; teratogenic effects during pregnancy; or paediatric use.

Dosage forms

Dried fruits for teas, essential oil and other galenical preparations for in- ternal applications. Store in a tightly sealed container away from heat and light.

Posology

(Unless otherwise indicated)

Average daily dose: Fructus Anethi 3 g; essential oil 0.1–0.3 g; or equiva- lent for other preparations (25).

References

1. African pharmacopoeia. Vol. 1. Lagos, Organization of African Unity, Scien- tifi c, Technical and Research Commission, 1985.

2. The Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia of India. Part I. Vol. II. New Delhi, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Department of Indian System of Medicine and Homeopathy, 1999.

SMPvol3 layout.indd 38

39

3. Issa A. Dictionnaire des noms des plantes en latin, français, anglais et arabe.

[Dictionary of plant names in Latin, French, English and Arabic.] Beirut, Dar al-Raed al-Arabi, 1991.

4. Trease GE. A text-book of pharmacognosy, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD, Williams

and Wilkins, 1939.

5. Youngken HW. Textbook of pharmacognosy, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA, Blakiston, 1950.

6. Zahedi E. Botanical dictionary. Scientifi c names of plants in English, French, German, Arabic and Persian languages. Tehran, Tehran University Publica-

tions, 1959.

7. Schlimmer JL. Terminologie médico-pharmaceutique et française-persane, 2nd ed. [French-Persian medico-pharmaceutical terminology, 2nd ed.] Tehran, University of Tehran Publications, 1979.

8. Namba T. The encyclopedia of Wakan-Yaku (Traditional Sino-Japanese

medicines) with color pictures. Vol. II. Tokyo, Hoikusha Publishing, 1994.

9. Farnsworth NR, ed. NAPRALERT database. Chicago, IL, University of Illinois at Chicago, 10 January 2001 production (an online database avail- able directly through the University of Illinois at Chicago or through the

Scientifi c and Technical Network (STN) of Chemical Abstracts

Services).

10. Wren RC. Potter’s new cyclopedia of botanical drugs and preparations. Saf- fron Walden, CW Daniel, 1988.

11. Leung AY, Foster S. Encyclopedia of common natural ingredients used in

food, drugs and cosmetics. New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons, 1996.

12. Launert E. Edible and medicinal plants of Britain and Northern Europe. London, Hamlyn Publishing Group, 1989.

13. Physician’s desk reference for herbal medicine. Montvale, NJ, Medical Economics Co., 1998.

14. Saber AH. Practical pharmacognosy, 2nd ed. Cairo, Al-Etemad Press, 1946. 15. Wallis TE. Textbook of pharmacognosy, 4th ed. London, J & A Churchill,

1960.

16. Quality control methods for medicinal plant materials. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1998.

17. European pharmacopoeia, 3rd ed. Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 1996. 18. Guidelines for predicting dietary intake of pesticide residues, 2nd rev. ed.

Geneva, World Health Organization, 1997 (WHO/FSF/FOS/97.7; available from Food Safety, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland). 19. Pino JA et al. Evaluation of fl avor characteristic compounds in dill herb

essential oil by sensory analysis and gas chromatography. Journal of Agricul-

tural and Food Chemistry, 1995, 43:1307–1309.

20. Mahran GH et al. GC/MS analysis of volatile oil of fruits of Anethum

graveolens. International Journal of Pharmacognosy, 1992, 30:139–144.

21. Rao BS, Sudborough JJ, Watson HE. Notes on some Indian essential oils.

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, Series A, 1925, 8:143–188.

SMPvol3 layout.indd 39

40

WHO monographs on selected medicinal plants

22. Hodisan V, Pepescu H, Fagarasan E. [Studies on Anethum graveolens. I. II. Chemical composition of essential oil from fruits.] Contributii Botanice,

Universitatea Babes-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca [Botanical Contributions, Babes-

Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca], 1980, 1980:263–266 [in Romanian]. 23. Racz G, Racz-Kotilla E, Szabo LG. Gyógynövényismeret – fi toterápia

alapjai. [Pharmacognosy – basic elements of phytotherapy.] Budapest,

Sanitas, 1992.

24. Khafagy SM, Mnajed HK. Phytochemical investigation of the fruit of Egyptian Anethum graveolens. I. Examination of the volatile oil and isola- tion of dillapiole. Acta Pharmaceutica Suecica, 1968, 5:155–162.

25. Blumenthal M et al., eds. The complete German Commission E monographs. Austin, TX, American Botanical Council, 1998.

26. Singh VP, Sharma SK, Khare VS. Medicinal plants from Ujjain District Madhya Pradesh – part II. Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Industry, 1980, 5:7–12.

27. Mokkhasmit M et al. Pharmacological evaluation of Thai medicinal plants.

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 1971, 54:490–504.

28. Brückner C. In Mitteleuropa genützte Heilpfl anzen mit milchsekretions- fördernder Wirkung (Galactagoga). [The use of medicinal plants with lactation-stimulating activity (galactagogues) in Central Europe.] Gleditschia, 1989, 17:189–201.

29. Heinrich M, Rimpler H, Barrera NA. Indigenous phytotherapy of gastro- intestinal disorders in a lowland Mixe community (Oaxaca, Mexico): eth- nopharmacologic evaluation. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 1992, 36:63– 80.

30. Dhar ML et al. Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: part I.

Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 1968, 6:232–247.

31. Shipochliev T. [Pharmacological investigation into several essential oils. I. Effect on the smooth musculature.] Veterinarno-Meditsinski Nauki, 1968, 5:63–69 [in Bulgarian].

32. Hänsel R et al., eds. Hagers Handbuch der pharmazeutischen Praxis. Bd 4,

Drogen A–D, 5th ed. [Hager’s handbook of pharmaceutical practice. Vol. 4,

Drugs A–D, 5th ed.] Berlin, Springer, 1992.

33. Harries N, James KC, Pugh WK. Antifoaming and carminative actions of volatile oils. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1978, 2:171–177.

34. Okuyama T et al. Studies on cancer bio-chemoprevention of natural resources. X. Inhibitory effect of spices on TPA-enhanced 3H-choline incor- poration in phospholipids of C3H10T1/2 cells and TPA-induced mouse ear edema. Zhonghua Yaoxue Zazhi, 1995, 47:421–430.

35. Racz-Kotilla E, Rotaru G, Racz G et al. Anti-nociceptive effect of dill (Anethum graveolens L.). Fitoterapia, 1995, 2:80–81.

36. Mahran GH et al. Investigation of diuretic drug plants. 1. Phytochemical screening and pharmacological evaluation of Anethum graveolens L.,

Apium graveolens L., Daucus carota L. and Eruca sativa Mill. Phytotherapy Research, 1991, 5:169–172.

SMPvol3 layout.indd 40

41

37. GRAS status of foods and food additives. Federal Register, 1976, 41:38644. 38. Chui AM, Zacharisen MC. Anaphylaxis to dill. Annals of Allergy, Asthma

and Immunology, 2000, 84:559–560.

39. Nath D et al. Commonly used Indian abortifacient plants with special refer- ence to their teratologic effect in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 1992, 36:147–154.

40. Rockwell P, Raw I. A mutagenic screening of various herbs, spices, and food additives. Nutrition and Cancer, 1979, 1:10–15.

41. Lazutka JR et al. Genotoxicity of dill (Anethum graveolens L.), peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) essential oils in human lymphocytes and Drosophila melanogaster. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2001, 39:485–492.

SMPvol3 layout.indd 41

42

Documento similar