• No se han encontrado resultados

2. ASPECTOS GENERALES DE AUDITORÍA

2.5. Fases de ejecución de la auditoría

2.5.1. Planificación de la auditoría

2.5.1.1. Conocimiento del negocio

Standardised usability questionnaires (SUQs) are designed to assess a participant’s sat- isfaction with the perceived usability of products during or immediately after usability testing [231]. Hence, an SUQ can be used to assess the perceived usability of a software language. An SUQ usually undergoes psychometric qualification that reports measure- ments that can determine its reliability, validity and sensitivity [231,237].

Nunnally [237] and Lewis [238] agree that among several other advantages, an SUQ can offer the following benefits: i ) Objectivity – a standardised measurement can allow measurement statements of other practitioners to be independently verified by others; ii ) Replicability – an SUQ can make it easier to replicate a particular study through the usage of standardised methods; iii ) Quantification – notwithstanding that the ap- plication of statistical methods to multipoint scale data is a point of controversy, stan- dardised measurements allow usability practitioners and researchers to report results in finer detail that use mathematical and statistical methods so that results can be better understood; iv ) Economy – in spite of the substantial amount of work that is required when developing standardised measures, the measures in an SUQ becomes economical to use once they have been developed; v ) Communication – standardised measures allow usability practitioners and researchers to efficiently and effectively communicate their usability results; vi ) Scientific generalisation – SUQs provide a platform for standardis- ation that is essential for assessing the generalisability of results.

Several SUQs have been introduced over the past few decades [231, 238, 239]. These SUQs have been introduced primarily to assist in the assessment of usability following participation in scenario-based usability tests [231]. SUQs can be classified into two categories. The first category of SUQs includes those that administered immediately following the completion of a task or test-scenario within a study [231,240,241]. The

second category of SUQs includes those that are used for administration at the end of a study [231,241]. A posttest SUQ can be used as a post-study questionnaire in a study that evaluates a CIG modelling language. The rest of this section discusses some of the post-test SUQs that have undergone a psychometric evaluation process.

The questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (QUIS) is a post-study questionnaire that was first published in 1988 [242]. The original version of QUIS had 90 items that used a 10-step bipolar scale that was numbered from 0 to 9, and was aligned with the negative response on the left in addition to an off-scale ‘NA’ response to indicate non-availability [231]. A psychometric evaluation of the early version of the QUIS was reported for a short-form version of the questionnaire with 27 items covering usability aspects related to software, screen, terminology and system information, learning, and system capabilities [231, 242]. The evaluation showed evidence of construct validity and sensitivity although items in screen factor did not group as expected [231]. The current version of the QUIS is available in five languages (English, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish); in two lengths, short with 41 items and long with 122 items; and using a nine-point bipolar scale with an off-scale ‘NA’ response similar to the initial version [231]. A licence for the QUIS is required before usage of the questionnaire as follows: i ) A student licence requires 50 United States Dollars (USD50.00); ii ) An academic or non-profit license requires 200 United States Dollars (USD200.00); iii ) A commercial licence requires 750 United States Dollars (USD750.00) [231].

The software usability measurement inventory (SUMI) is a post-study SUQ that was introduced in the 1990s by the Human Factors Research Group at the University Col- lege Cork in Ireland [243, 244]. The SUMI is a 50-item questionnaire with a global scale based on 25 of the items five subscales for measuring efficiency, effectiveness, help- fulness, control and learnability [231, 244]. The SUMI contains a mixture of positive and negative statements for its items that are measured on a three-scale step namely: Agree, Undecided, and Disagree [244]. The SUMI is currently available in 12 lan- guages (Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Swedish, and Spanish) [231]. SUMI underwent a considerable amount of psychometric evaluation which provided some evidence of construct validity and sensi- tivity [231, 244]. Licences are required to allow one to use SUMI as follows: i ) One thousand Euros (EUR1000.00) for offline usage; ii ) Five hundred Euros (EUR500.00) for online usage; iii ) No fee for students [231].

The post-study system usability questionnaire (PSSUQ) is a post-study SUQ that was introduced in the early 1990s as an internal project at International Business Machines (IBM) Corporation [245]. The current version of the PSSUQ is a 19-item questionnaire with a single global scale and three subscales that measure system quality, information

quality and interface quality [246]. The items in PSSUQ are scored using values between one and seven, with lower scores indicating a higher degree of satisfaction [245,246]. The PSSUQ underwent a considerable amount of psychometric testing that provided some evidence of construct validity and sensitivity [245–247]. The PSSUQ does not require any licence fee for its use [231].

The system usability scale (SUS) is a post-test SUQ that was developed in the 1980s [232, 248]. The SUS is 10-item questionnaire that is scored using a five-step scale [248]. The scores from an SUS questionnaire are used to derive a single global scale [231,248]. The scores from an SUS questionnaire can also be used to reliably compute two subscales that can measure usability and reliability [249]. Like other more prominent SUQs in both research and practice, the SUS underwent a considerable amount of psychometric evaluations [231, 250]. The 10 SUS items were selected from a pool of 50 potential items [231, 248]. The psychometric tests provided evidence of reliability, sensitivity and validity [231]. The SUS does not require a licence fee as a prerequisite for its use [231,248].

The usability metrics for user experience (UMUX) is a recently developed four-item post- test SUQ that is based on a seven-point Likert scale designed to provide results on a single global scale that is similar to SUS [251]. The UMUX is organised around the ISO9421- 11 definition of usability [252]. The UMUX has a shorter form variant UMUX-LITE which only has two items that align it to the technology acceptance model [252, 253]. The UMUX has undergone limited psychometric evaluation. The validity, reliability and sensitivity of UMUX as an SUQ has been criticised [253–255]. A recent study that was conducted to evaluate the validity, reliability and sensitivity of UMUX provided some evidence of construct validity and sensitivity of the UMUX questionnaire [252].