Consecuencias económicas

3.1 CM Firm Experience: Each Proposer is to submit information on a total of three (3) similar or relevant projects. For each project, the Proposer is to complete the CM Experience Form* provided in Forms Package, Attachment A). *Note: All Proposers are required to use the CM Experience Form format; however, Proposers may elect to reproduce the form.

The project submission shall include the following: Project Name and Location;

Project Owner, Contact Person and Telephone Number; Construction Start and Project Completion Date;

Construction Cost

Contract Method (i.e., DBB/GC, CMAR or DB) Project Gross Square Footage

Project Acreage;

Brief Project Description;

Project Setting (i.e., university, etc.);

Names of Proposed Key Personnel (per #1.2 above) who were involved in the project and the assigned role for each (higher consideration is given if

proposed key people were involved in the submitted projects and, particularly in the proposed role); and,

Similarities of the submitted project to the University’s project.

Note: If the Proposing CM firm is a joint venture firm, the following applies: Of the three (3) projects submitted, two (2) projects MUST be from the majority joint venture party and the third project from the minority joint venture party.

Projects must meet the criteria noted below as well as the following items in order to be considered:

a. Project Type: All three (3) submitted projects must include roadways, pedestrian ways, plazas and/or other open space elements;

b. Project Size: All three (3) submitted projects must have (1) Project Construction Costs that exceed $4 million; and, (2) Project acreage that is at least four (4) acres.

c. Project Delivery Method: One of the three (3) submitted projects must have been done using the Construction Management at Risk (CMAR) method with higher consideration given if this is the case for the other two (2) projects as well.

d. Project Completion Date: All projects submitted under this category must be done by the proposing firm and must be a maximum of ten (10) years old based on the project completion date with higher consideration given to projects less than five (5) years old. Note: With each of these three (3) projects, Proposers are to provide project

RFP #BC-20857-C ARTICLE 2 - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL 0300/11

(Please note: The Construction Management at Risk (CMAR) or Construction Management with GMP (CM with GMP) project delivery method are synonymous and are defined to be that method in which the Construction Manager is retained to provide pre-construction and

construction services to the Owner as described in this RFP document (Section 00400) inclusive of constructing the facility under a guaranteed maximum price. Construction Management Agency is not included in the definition of CMAR or CM with GMP.)

The projects submitted under this category are to be similar in size, function and complexity to the University’s project. The criteria used in the evaluation of these projects includes, but is not limited to, the factors noted below with a greater degree of consideration given based on the extent to which these factors are applicable to the projects submitted (See Section 00400 and the Project Program for the specifics of the University project):

Best consideration will be given to submitted projects with the following characteristics: - Include major roadway elements that balance improved traffic flow with safe, low

speed vehicular travel.

- Feature solutions that address safety issues at points of vehicular and pedestrian intersections.

- Promote alternative forms of transportation, especially bicycles and buses.

- Promote the use of landscape design elements that further the goals of the Project. - Successfully use roadway, building, signage, lighting, landscape, and other natural

and built elements to create a focal element worthy of a principal campus entrance. Higher consideration will be given if the following factors are also in evidence:

- The project includes a new campus entrance;

- The project client was a higher education institution;

- The project includes renovation of an existing roadway with a phased construction approach and with traffic flow maintained during construction;

- The project maximized safety to the campus community;

- The construction of the project was phased;

- The project minimized impact to water quality during construction; and,

- The project delivery method was Construction Management at Risk (CMAR) as defined in this RFP document.

All proposers are to base their responses on their three (3) most recently completed projects that reflects the characteristics above along with the schedule and CM services required under this RFP.

RFP #BC-20857-C ARTICLE 2 - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL 0300/12 3.2 Firm References: **

a. Firm Project References from submitted projects (in #2.1 above):

(1) Provide a reference for each of the projects submitted under the firm experience category above (#2.1). Provide contact name, address, and telephone number for each reference. Such references are to be from different projects; that is, only one reference per project is allowed and the reference must be someone from the project owner’s organization.

(2) The University reserves the right to verify all information given, if it so chooses, as well as to check any other sources available. As well, the University may utilize itself as a reference even if not provided as such by the Proposer.

(3) Please be sure that accurate information is provided and that the contact person is capable of speaking to your firm's capability in performing the services

required. References will be held in the strictest of confidence.

Additional Firm Project References: Please provide two additional project references including name of company, contact name, and phone number. These references will be used only in the event the University is unable to contact one or more of the three projects given above (in #2.2.a).

Please include with these references, a list of applicable projects with a brief description of each inclusive of dollar size and date completed.

**NOTE: All references of the Key People and the Firm will be checked during the Second Phase Technical Evaluation. Only the short listed proposers will have their references contacted, however, all proposers responding must furnish this information within their Technical Proposals.

4. PROFILE OF PROPOSER: Provide the information requested below on your firm. Please note: If the Proposer is a local office of a parent company, the information requested under #4.2 and #4.3 are to be provided on the local office only who will be managing this contract not on the parent organization, unless the parent organization is the Proposer.

[Note: If the Proposer is a joint venture, the information requested in all subcategories (#4.1, #4.2 and #4.3) are to be provided on all parties. In addition, please note that the information provided under this category of Profile of Proposer will be evaluated for each joint venture party based on its percentage of the joint venture firm.]

4.1 Company Background: Provide a brief but informative history of your firm inclusive of (i) how your firm was established; (ii) how your firm has developed/evolved over the years, (iii) type of work done, (iv) client base, (v) year in which your firm commenced providing

Construction Management at Risk services, (vi) number of employees inclusive of a breakdown among office and field and supervisory and non-supervisory, (vii) your firm's bonding capacity via confirmation from your firm’s insurance agent or bonding company

RFP #BC-20857-C ARTICLE 2 - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL 0300/13

(with higher consideration if from the bonding company or entity with the power of attorney from the bonding company), and (viii) your firm’s Dun & Bradstreet Report inclusive of rating or the most recent Financial statement (with higher consideration given if audited financial statement provided).

Note: If joint venture, provide (i) history of joint venture experience for all parties and (ii) specifically history of this joint venture relationship inclusive of the reasoning for the

establishment of the joint venture on this project and (iii) a listing of all joint venture parties and each party's percentage of the joint venture firm. In addition, the joint venture Proposer is to identify the responsible JV party for each of the CM services to be provided during the Pre- Construction and Construction phases of the Project.

4.2 Complete the "Annual Sales Volume/Completed Projects form" on a per year basis for the last three (3) years [2009, 2010, and 2011] and indicate what percentage of such work is CM at risk*, GC, DB or other (name). (This information is to be about the responsible branch office only, not the parent organization.) *Note: See definition of CM at risk provided above in the RFP.

4.3 Complete the "Current Workload form" (found in Attachment A of the Forms Package) on which you are to list current projects on which your firm is committed, the dollar volume of each, the time frame for each, and the Project Manager and Field Superintendent. In addition, please describe your firm's ability to accomplish the proposed services on this project within specified time frames in the space provided on this form.

(This information is to be from the responsible branch office only, not the parent organization, unless the parent organization is the Proposer.)

Note: If the selected proposer is a joint venture firm, a copy of the signed, joint venture

agreement must be provided to the University for its review and approval prior to issuance of the Notice to Proceed. In addition, no changes can be made to the joint venture agreement without the written approval of the University.

4.4 Provide the proposer’s Experience Modifier Ratio (EMR) for the last three (3) years (2009, 2010, and 2011).