Suggested questions to be used for contractor safety assessment upon contract completion:
1. Which senior person in the company responsible for safety has been involved in our contract?
2. Was contractor's local safety statement provided to all employees?
3. What safety surveillance of our contract by the contractor's company safety organization was carried out during the contract period? Did we receive any copies of reports generated?
4. How many persons on average were employed by the contractor on our site? What was the contractor’s accident frequency rate during the contract period: e.g. !" !# $! % &
How many minor (i.e. no lost-time) accidents occurred during the contract?
5. Did any major injuries or fatal accidents occur to contractor personnel during the contract period? If so, how many?
6. Did the contractor carry out any specific safety training of personnel other than our "site orientation training"?
7. Did you receive any safety publications issued by the contractor to personnel ?
8. Were contractor vehicles and plant in good, well maintained condition throughout the contract?
9. How well did the contractor comply with assessment of substances harmful to health requirements?
a. Did you receive information on all hazardous materials he brought onto site? b. Did you have copies of assessments of effects of potentially hazardous
substances and necessary precautions?
c. Did contractor comply with assessments and any additional requirements required to ensure safety of contractor and other personnel
REFERENCES
[1] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA-TECDOC-919 Management of Procurement Activities in a Nuclear Installation,” IAEA, Vienna, 1996.
[2] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), Plant Support Engineering : Obsolescence Management, Product 1016692, Palo Alto: EPRI, 2008.
[3] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-2/2, Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Commissioning and Operation, Vienna: IAEA, 2011.
[4] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “Safety Reports Series No. 65 Application of Configuration Management in Nuclear Power Plants,” IAEA, Vienna, 2010.
[5] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Safety Fundamentals No. SF-1 Fundamental Safety Principles,” IAEA, Vienna, 2006.
[6] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Safety Requirements GS-R3 The Management System for Facilities and Activities,” IAEA, Vienna, 2006.
[7] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Safety Guide No. GS-G-3.1 Application of the Management System for Facilities and Activities,” IAEA, Vienna, 2006.
[8] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “The Management System for Nuclear Installations, IAEA Safety Standards Series Safety Guide No. GS-G-3.5,” IAEA, Vienna, 2009.
[9] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, SST-01 Training Course on Management Systems based on GS-R-3, Module 2– Why have an Integrated Management System, Vienna: IAEA, 2007. [10] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Safety Reports Series No. 69 : Management
System Standards : Comparison between IAEA GS-R-3 and ISO 9001:2008,” IAEA, Vienna, 2012. [11] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Safety Reports Series No.70 : Management
System Standards: Comparison between IAEA GS-R-3 and ASME NQA-1-2008 and NQA-1a-2009 Addenda,” IAEA, Vienna, 2012.
[12] ASME INTERNATIONAL (ASME), ASME NQA-1 Quality assurance requirements for nuclear facility applications., New York: ASME, 2012.
[13] INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO), “Quality Management Systems: Requirements, ISO 9001:2008,” ISO, Geneva, 2008.
[14] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA-TECDOC-1740 Use of a Graded Approach in the Application of the Management System Requirements for Facilities and Activities,” IAEA, Vienna, 2014.
[15] CANADIAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (CSA), N286.1-00, Procurement Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plants, Mississauga: CSA, 2000.
[16] CANADIAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION, CSA N286-12 - Management system requirements for nuclear facilities, Mississauga: CSA, 2012.
[17] CANADIAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (CSA), CAN3-Z299.0-86 (R2007) Guide for Selecting and Implementing the CAN3-Z299-85 Quality Assurance Program Standards, Mississauga: CSA, 1986. [18] CANADIAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (CSA), CAN3 Z299.4-85 (R2007) Quality Assurance
Program - Category 4, Mississauga: CSA, 1985.
[19] CANADIAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (CSA), CAN3 Z299.3-85 (R2007) Quality Assurance Program - Category 3, Mississauga: CSA, 1985.
[20] CANADIAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (CSA), CAN3 Z299.2-85 (R2007) Quality Assurance Program - Category 2, Mississauga: CSA, 1985.
[21] CANADIAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (CSA), CAN3-Z299.1-85 (R2007) Quality Assurance Program - Category 1, Mississauga: CSA, 1985.
[22] STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Finland, Guide YVL 1.4 Management Systems for Nuclear Facilities, Helsinki: STUK, 2008.
[23] AFCEN, RCC-E Design and Conception Rules for Electrical Equipments of Nuclear Islands, Paris: AFCEN, 2012.
[24] AFCEN, AFCEN/RCC- : RPP N° 1 Règle en Phase Probatoire N°1 Système de Management Nucléaire, La Défense, France: AFCEN.
[25] ATOMIC ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD, AERB/NPP/SC/QA (Rev. 1) AERB SAFETY CODE Quality Assurance in Nuclear Power Plants, Mumbai: AERB, 2009.
[26] ATOMIC ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD, AERB/SG/QA-2- Quality assurance in the procurement of items and services for nuclear power plants, Mumbai: AERB, 1998.
[27] ATOMIC ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD, “AERB/SG/QA-3- Quality assurance in the manufacture of items for nuclear power plants,” AERB, Mumbai, 1998.
[28] INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO), “ISO 9004:2009 Managing for the sustained success of an organization -- A quality management approach,” ISO, Geneva, 2009. [29] INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO), “ISO 14001:2004
Environmental Management systems - Requirements with guidance for use,” ISO, Geneva, 2004.
[30] NUCLEAR QUALITY STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (NQSA), NQSA NSQ-100 version 0, Nuclear Safety and Quality Management System – Requirements, Neuilly sur Seine: NQSA, 2011.
[31] NUCLEAR QUALITY STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (NQSA), NSQ-110 Version 0, CORRESPONDENCE MATRIX NSQ-100 vs GS-R-3, Neuilly sur Seine: NQSA, 2012.
[32] NUCLEAR QUALITY STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (NQSA), NSQ-140 Version 0, CORRESPONDENCE MATRIX NSQ-100 vs RD-0034, Neuilly sur Seine: NQSA, 2012.
[33] NUCLEAR QUALITY STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (NQSA), NSQ-150 Version 0, TABLE DE CORRESPONDANCE NSQ-100 vs AFCEN / RPP-1, Neuilly sur Seine: NQSA, 2013.
[34] FEDERAL NUCLEAR AND RADIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY OF RUSSIA (GOSATOMNADZOR), “OPB -88/97 NP-001-97 (PNAE G- 01 011-97) General Regulations on Ensuring Safety of Nuclear Power Plants,” GOSATOMNADZOR, Moscow, 1997.
[35] FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL, INDUSTRIAL,AND NUCLEAR SUPERVISISION SERVICE (ROSTECHNADZOR), “NP-082-07 Nuclear Safety Rules for Reactor Installations of Nuclear Power Plants,” ROSTECHNADZOR, Moscow, 2007.
[36] FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL, INDUSTRIAL,AND NUCLEAR SUPERVISISION SERVICE (ROSTECHNADZOR), “NP-061-05 Safety Rules for Storage and Transportation of Nuclear Fuel at Nuclear Facilities,” ROSTECHNADZOR, Moscow, 2005.
[37] NATIONAL NUCLEAR REGULATOR (SOUTH AFRICA), “RD-0034: Quality and Safety Management Requirements for Nuclear Installations, R0,” NNR, 2008.
[38] Office of Nuclear Regulation, “NG-TAST-GD-077 Rev 2 : Procurement of Nuclear Safety Related Items or Services,” UK ONR, Bootle , UK, 2013.
[39] OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATION (UK), NS-TAST-GD-049 Rev. 4 Licensee Core and Intelligent Customer Capabilities, Bootle , UK: ONR, 2013.
[40] BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTE, “BS OHSAS 18001:2007 Occupational health and safety management systems. Requirements,” BSI, London, 2007.
[41] OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, “10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants,” OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, Washington, DC, 2005.
[42] OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, 10 CFR Part 21, Reporting of defects and noncompliance, Washington: OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, 2012.
[43] American National Standards Institute (ANSI), “ANSI N45.2.13 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTROL OF PROCUREMENT OF ITEMS AND SERVICES FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS,” ANSI, 1976.
[44] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), EPRI Analysis and Comparison of ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001:2000 with 10CFR50, Appendix B, Report 1007937, Palo Alto: EPRI, 2003. [45] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), An Overview of Other Industry Experience with
the ISO 9000 Quality Management System, Report 1008258, Palo Alto: EPRI, 2003.
[46] NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE (NEI), NEI 06-14A Revision 7 Quality Assurance Program Description, Washington: NEI, 2010.
[47] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA General Safety Guide No. GSG-4 Use of External Experts by the Regulatory Body, Vienna: IAEA, 2013.
[48] THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT, “Contract and Supplier Management Assessment tool,” THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT, Edinburgh.
[49] THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT, “Strategically Positioning the Commodity,” THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT, Edinburgh.
[50] THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT, “The Strategic Positioning Action Plan,” THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT, Edinburgh.
[51] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Guidelines for the Procurement and Receipt of Items for Nuclear Power Plants (NCIG-15), report NP-6629,” EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, 1990.
[52] NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE (NEI), NEI industry Wide Process Description MS001-MS006, Material and Services Process Description and Guideline AP-908, Rev. 2, Washington: NEI, 2003. [53] CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY INSTITUTE (CII), Global Procurement and Materials Management, An
eGuide to effective Project Implementation, Implementation Resource IR 257-2, Austin: CII, 2011. [54] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), Nuclear Maintenance Applications
Center:Guidelines for Addressing Contingency Spare Parts at Nuclear Power Plants, Technical Report 1013472, Palo Alto: EPRI, 2006.
[55] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), Procurement Benchmarking and Performance Measures Report Revision 2, TR-106102, Palo Alto: EPRI, 1997.
[56] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Plant Support Engineering: Guidelines for the Technical Evaluation of Replacement Items in Nuclear Power Plants, 1008256, Rev 01, formerly EPRI NP-6406,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2006.
[57] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), Reference Document: Information Regarding Procurement Specifications for Nuclear Power Plant Bulk Chemicals, Report 1022558, Palo Alto: EPRI, 2011.
[58] AREVA NP, “Join the UK Nuclear Renaissance, Procurement & Quality Process,AREVA NP UK Supplier Day, March 16th Birmingham,” Birmingham, 2009.
[59] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA NE Series NG-T-4.1 Issues to Improve the Financing of Nuclear Power Plants,” IAEA, Vienna, 2009.
[60] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA NE Series NG-T-4.2 Financing of New Nuclear Power Plants,” IAEA, Vienna, 2008.
[61] VEDP International Trade, “Fast Facts Incoterms 2010,” Virginia Economic Development Partnership, Richmond.
[62] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Guideline for the Utilization of Commercial Grade Items in Nuclear Safety Related Applications (NCIG-07), NP-5652,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 1988. [63] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Actions to Improve the Detection of
Counterfeit and Fraudulently Marketed Products (Generic Letter 89-02),” USNRC, Washington, 1989. [64] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Advanced Nuclear Technology: Supplier
Quality Management for New Nuclear Plant Construction Projects,” EPRI, Pal Alto, CA, 2013.
[65] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), Guidelines for Performance-Based Supplier Audits (NCIG-16), Report NP-6630, Palo Alto: EPRI, 1990.
[66] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Information Notice No. 88-35 : Inadequate Licensee Performed Vendor Audits,” USNRC, Washington, 1988.
[67] SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, “Factory acceptance testing guideline Version 1.0,”
25 08 2006. [Online]. Available:
http://www.sp.se/sv/index/services/functionalsafety/Documents/Factory%20acceptance%20testing%20g uideline%20Process.pdf. [Accessed 25 02 2014].
[68] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA Safety Guide No. NS-G.2.9 Commissioning for Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna: IAEA, 2003.
[69] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA NE Series NP-T-2.10 Commissioning Guidelines for Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna: IAEA, 2015.
[70] G. Ward, The Project Manager's Guide to Purchasing, Aldershot: Gower Publishing Limited, 2008. [71] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series NG-T-3.9 Invitation
and Evaluation of Bids for Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna: IAEA, 2011.
[72] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Construction Technologies for Nuclear Power Plant Projects, Nuclear Energy Series NP-T-2.5, Vienna: IAEA, 2012.
[73] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-6, Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material,” IAEA, Vienna, 2012.
[74] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Safety Guide No. TS-G-1.4 The Management System for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Materialfor,” IAEA, Vienna, 2008.
[75] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 9, Implementing Guide, Security in the Transport of Radioactive Material,” IAEA, Vienna, 2008.
[76] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Packaging, Shipping Storage, and Handling Guidelines for Nuclear Power Plants, Report TR-107101,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 1997.
[77] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Guidelines for Determining In-Storage Maintenance of Items for Nuclear Facilities (NCIG-18), Report NP-6896,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 1991. [78] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Plant Engineering:Guidelines for Establishing,
Maintaining, and Extending the Shelf Life Capability of Limited Life Items (NCIG-13), Report NP-6408 / 1022959,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2011.
[79] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Shelf life of elastomeric components, EPRI NP-6608,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 1994.
[80] US Department of Defense, “MIL-HDBK-695E Department of Defense Handbook: RUBBER PRODUCTS RECOMMENDED SHELF LIFE,” US Department of Defense, Philadelphia, 2011. [81] SAE INTERNATIONAL, “AS1933 Rev. A, Age Controls for Hose Containing Age-Sensitive
Elastomeric Material,” SAE International, Warrendale, 1998.
[82] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), Issues Related to the Inter-Utility Transfer of Material, EPRI Report TR-102544, Palo Alto: EPRI, 1993.
[83] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Supplemental Guidance for the Application of EPRI Report NP-5652 on the Utilization of Commercial Grade Items (TR-102260),” EPRI, Palo Alto, 1994.
[84] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA TECDOC-1078 Technical support for nuclear power operations, Vienna: IAEA, 1999.
[85] Royal Academy of Engineering, Nuclear Lessons Learned, London: Royal Academy of Engineering on behalf of Engineering the Future, 2010.
[86] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Safety Guide No. NS-G-2.3 Modifications to Nuclear Power Plants,” IAEA, Vienna, 2001.
[87] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Critical Characteristics for Acceptance of Seismically Sensitive Items (CCASSI) (TR-112579),” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2000.
[88] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Dedicating Commercial-Grade Items Procured From ISO 9000 Suppliers, Report 1003105,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2001.
[89] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Guide For Sampling in the Commercial-Grade Item Acceptance Process, TR-017218-R1,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 1999.
[90] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Inspection Procedure 38703, “Commercial Grade Dedication,” dated April 8, 1996,” USNRC, Washington, 1996.
[91] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Inspection Procedure 43004, “Inspection of Commercial-Grade Dedication Programs,”dated October 3, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML071860546),” USNRC, Washington, 2007.
[92] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Information Notice No. 83-79 : Apparently Improper Use of Commercial Grade Components in Safety-Related Systems,” USNRC, Washington, 1983.
[93] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Information Notice No. 87-66: Inappropriate Application of Commercial-Grade Components,” USNRC, Washington, 1987.
[94] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Information Notice No. 88-95 : Inadequate Procurement Requirements Imposed by Licensees on Vendors,” USNRC, Washington, 1988. [95] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Information Notice No. 92-51:
Misapplication and Inadequate Testing of Molded-Case Circuit Breakers,” USNRC, Washington, 1992. [96] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Information Notice No. 96-40:
Deficiencies in Material Dedication and Procurement Practices and in Audits of Vendors,” USNRC, Washington, 1996.
[97] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2011-01: COMMERCIAL-GRADE DEDICATION ISSUES ISSUES,” USNRC, Washington, 2011. [98] US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), “GUIDANCE FOR COMMERCIAL GRADE
DEDICATION,” USDOE, Washington, 2011.
[99] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. NS-R-2 Safety of Nuclear Power Plants : Operation, Vienna: IAEA, 2000.
[100] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA-TECDOC-1335 Configuration management in nuclear power plants,” IAEA, Vienna, 2003.
[101] INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATORS (INPO), AP-929 Rev. 1, Configuration Control Process Description, Atlanta: INPO, 2005.
[102] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Ageing Management for Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA Safety Standards Series Safety Guide NS-G-2.12, Vienna: IAEA, 2009.
[103] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), Plant Support Engineering:Obsolescence Management A Proactive Approach, EPRI Report 1015391, Palo Alto: EPRI, 2007.
[104] H. T. LeCompte, “USA/STARS Alliance Obsolescence Project (EOS) Outsourcing Replacement Evaluations, presentation at 2011 JUTG Summer Meeting,” DTE Energy, Minneapolis, 2011.
[105] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), Plant Support Engineering: Proactive Obsolescence Management, EPRI Report 1019161, Palo Alto: EPRI, 2009.
[106] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Guideline for Reverse Engineering, TR- 107372,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 1998.
[107] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Implementing Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems in the Modernization of Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NP-T-1.4, Vienna: IAEA, 2009.
[108] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA-TECDOC-1389 Managing modernization of nuclear power plant instrumentation and control systems, Vienna: IAEA, 2004.
[109] P. G. Tipping, Ed., Understanding and Mitigating Aging in Nuclear Power Plants: Materials and Operational Aspects of Plant Life Management, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2010.
[110] B. Patel, “Vendor Quality Program for Critical Equipment & Major Purchases, Progress Energy presentation given at EPRI Procurement Forum Agenda, August 23-25, 2011 Minneapolis, MN,” Minneapolis.
[111] W. Ware, “EPRI JUTG Procurement Forum Off-Site Repair of Large Critical Assets August 24, 2011, Southern Company Presentation,” Southern Company, Minneapolis, 2011.
[112] INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATORS (INPO), “INPO 11-006 : Guidance for Owner Oversight of New Plant Component Fabrication,” INPO, Atlanta, 2011.
[113] WORLD NUCLEAR ASSOCIATION, “The World Nuclear Supply Chain : Outlook 2030,” World Nuclear Association (WNA), London, 2012.
[114] CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY INSTITUTE (CII), IPRA International Project Risk Assessment, Implementation Resource 181-2, Austin: CII, 2003.
[115] S. Kidd, “Localisation of supply – how can it work?,” Nuclear Engineering International, 10 2012. [116] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Nuclear Power Plant Personnel and its Evaluation:
A Guidebook, TRS No 380, Vienna: IAEA, 1996.
[117] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Project Management in Nuclear Power Plant Construction: Guidelines and Experience, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NP-T-2.7, Vienna: IAEA, 2012.
[118] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA Safety Guide No. NS-G-1.1 Software for Computer Based Systems Important to Safety in Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna: IAEA, 2000.
[119] ASME INTERNATIONAL (ASME), “ASME NQA-1 Subpart 2.7, Quality Assurance Requirements for Computer Software for Nuclear Facility Applications,” in ASME NQA-1 Quality Assurance
Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications, New York, ASME, 2012, pp. 75-79.
[120] CANADIAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (CSA), N290.14-07 (R2012) - Qualification of Pre- Developed Software for Use in Safety-Related Instrumentation and Control Applications in Nuclear Power Plants, Mississauga: CSA, 2012.
[121] CANDU OWNER'S GROUP (COG), COG-95-179-STD, Guide for the Qualification of Software Products, Toronto: COG, 1995.
[122] AFCEN, “C 5200 Computer-based system development,” in RCC-E Design and Conception Rules for
Electrical Equipments of Nuclear Islands, La Défense, France, AFCEN, 2012.
Instrumentation and control important to safety - Classification of instrumentation and control functions, Geneva: IEC, 2009.
[124] INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION, IEC 60880 ed2.0 Nuclear power plants - Instrumentation and control systems important to safety - Software aspects for computer-based systems performing category A functions, Geneva: IEC, 2006.
[125] INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION, IEC 62138 ed1.0 Nuclear power plants - Instrumentation and control important for safety - Software aspects for computer-based systems performing category B or C functions, Geneva: IEC, 2004.
[126] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Technical Reports Series No. 384, Verification and Validation of Software Related to Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control, Vienna: IAEA, 1999.
[127] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Guideline on Evaluation and Acceptance of Commercial Grade Digital Equipment for Nuclear Safety Applications TR-106439,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 1996.
[128] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Evaluating Commercial Digital Equipment for High-Integrity Applications: A Supplement to EPRI Report TR-106439, Report TR-107339,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 1997.
[129] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Generic Qualification of Commercial Grade Digital Devices: Lessons Learned from Initial Pilots, Report 1001452,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2001.
[130] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 17 Technical Guidance Reference Manual Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities, Vienna: IAEA, 2011.
[131] B. Lydon, “Is the Automaton Industry Enabling Cyber-Attacks?,” 17 02 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.automation.com/portals/industrial-networks-field-buses/is-the-automaton-industry-enabling- cyber-attacks-
1?utm_source=bronto&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Is+the+Automaton+Industry+Enabling+Cyber- Attacks%3F&utm_content=Industrial+%26+Fieldbus+Networ. [Accessed 18 03 2014].
[132] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 13, Nuclear Security Recommendations on Physical Protection of Nuclear Materials and Nuclear Facilities (INFCIRC/225/Revision 5), Vienna: IAEA, 2011.
[133] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-2/1 Safety of Nuclear Power Plants : Design, Vienna: IAEA, 2012.
[134] Department of Homeland Security, National Cyber Security Division, “INL/EXT-06-11516 Version 3., Cyber Security Procurement Language for Control Systems Version 1.8,” Department of Homeland Security, National Cyber Security Divisio, Washington, 2008.
[135] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Cyber Security Procurement Methodology, Rev. 1, Report 3002001824,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2013.
[136] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Cyber Security Procurement - Application of the Methodology, First Example: Single Loop Controller, Report 3002001735,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2013. [137] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Cyber Security Procurement — Application of
the Methodology, Second Example: Feedpump Turbine Speed Control, Report 3002001823,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2013.
[138] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Cyber Security Procurement—Application of the Methodology Third Example: Digital Feedwater Control, Report 3002002069,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2013.
[139] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), Cyber Security Procurement Methodology, EPRI report 1025824, Palo Alto: EPRI, 2012.
[140] CANADIAN STANDARDS ASSOCIATION, N286.7-99 (R2012) - Quality Assurance of Analytical, Scientific and Design Computer Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Mississauga: CSA, 2012.
[141] INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION, Information Technology — Security Techniques — Evaluation Criteria for IT Security, ISO/IEC 15408-1:2009, Geneva: IEC, 2009.
[142] INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF AUTOMATION (ISA), ANSI/ISA-62443-1-1 (99.01.01)-2007 Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems Part 1: Terminology, Concepts, and Models, Research Triangle Park: ISA, 2007.
[143] INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF AUTOMATION (ISA), ANSI/ISA-62443-2-1 (99.02.01)-2009 Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems: Establishing an Industrial Automation and
Control Systems Security Program, Research Triangle Park: ISA, 2009.
[144] INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF AUTOMATION (ISA), ANSI/ISA-62443-3-3 (99.03.03)-2013 Security for industrial automation and control systems Part 3-3: System security requirements and security levels, Research Triangle Park: ISA, 2013.
[145] INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ORGANIZATION (ISO), ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information technology -- Security techniques -- Information security management systems -- Requirements, Geneva: ISO, 2013.
[146] INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ORGANIZATION (ISO), ISO/IEC 27002:2013 Information technology -- Security techniques -- Code of practice for information security controls, Geneva: ISO, 2013.
[147] KOREA INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR SAFETY, Cyber Security of Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems in Nuclear Facilities, KINS/GT-N09-DR, Seoul : KINS, 2007.
[148] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), IEEE 7-4.3.2-2010 : IEEE Standard Criteria for Digital Computers in Safety Systems of Nuclear Power Generating Stations, Piscataway: IEEE, 2010. [149] NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE (NEI), Cyber Security Plan for Nuclear Power Reactors, NEI 08-09
(Rev. 6), Washington: NEI, 2010.
[150] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “REGULATORY GUIDE RG 5.71, Cyber Security Programs for Nuclear Facilities,” USNRC, Washington, 2010.
[151] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA-TECDOC-1169 Managing Suspect and Counterfeit Items in the Nuclear Industry,” IAEA, Vienna, 2000.
[152] CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY INSTITUTE (CII), “RS264-1 – Product Integrity Concerns in Low-cost Sourcing Countries: Counterfeiting within the Construction Industry, Version 1.1,” (CII), Austin, 2010. [153] D. Geralde, “CSA-NEMA ANTI-COUNTERFEITING UPDATE February 18, 2010,” 2010. [Online].
Available: http://www.nema.org/Policy/Anti-Counterfeiting/Documents/Presentation_on_Anti- counterfeiting.pdf. [Accessed 05 03 2014].
[154] US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), “Suspect/Counterfeit Items Awareness Training, Rev. 6,” US DOE, Washington, 2007.
[155] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Success Story : Utilities Strengthen Protections Against Counterfeit and Fraudulent Components, 3002001791,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2013.
[156] OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, “NEA/CNRA/R(2011)9 Operating Experience Report: Counterfeit, Suspect and Fraudulent Items,” OECD, Paris, France, 2011.
[157] ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE (RCMP), “RCMP investigators seize millions in counterfeit products in 2012,” 19 03 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/fep-pelf/ipr-dpi/report- rapport-2012-eng.htm. [Accessed 05 03 2014].
[158] “Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, 3 December 2010,” 2010.
[159] ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (EPRI), “Plant Support Engineering: Counterfeit, Fraudulent, and Substandard Items : Mitigating the Increased Risk, Report 1019163,” EPRI, Palo Alto, 2009.
[160] J. Villasenor and M. Tehranipoor, “The Hidden Dangers of Chop-Shop Electronics,” 20 09 2013. [Online]. Available: http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/processors/the-hidden-dangers-of- chopshop-electronics/?utm_source=techalert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=100313. [Accessed 05 03 2014].
[161] CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION (CNSC), “REGDOC 3.1.1 Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants,” CNSC, Ottawa, 2014.
[162] OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, “NEA/CNRA/R(2011)4 The Nuclear Regulator's Role in Assessing Licensee Oversight of Vendor and Other Contracted Services,” OECD-NEA, Paris, 2011. [163] OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, “NEA/CNRA/R(2012)7Regulatory oversight of Non-
confirming, Counterfeit, Fraudulent and Suspect Items (NCFSI) Final NCFSI Task Group Report,” OECD-NEA, Paris, 2013.
[164] Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co.(KHNP), “Managing the supply chain:Challenges and Overcoming in Korean nuclear industry, Presentation given at Technical Meeting on Topical Issues in the Development of Nuclear Power Infrastructure, 4-7 February 2014, Vienna, Austria,” KHNP, Vienna, 2014.
[165] Nuclear Utility Management and Resources Council (NUMARC), “NUMARC 90-03 Nuclear Procurement Program Improvements,” NUMARC, 1990.
[166] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Information Notice No. 83-01: Ray Miller, Inc.,” USNRC, Washington, 1983.
[167] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, IE Bulletin No. 83-07: APPARENTLY FRAUDULENT PRODUCTS SOLD BY RAY MILLER,, Washington: USNRC, 1983. [168] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Bulletin 87-02: Fastener Testing to
Determine Conformance with Applicable Material Specifications,” USNRC, Washington, 1987.
[169] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, “Bulletin 88-05: Nonconforming Materials Supplied by Piping Supplies, Inc. at Folsom, New Jersey And West Jersey Manufacturing