CAPÍTULO III: ANÁLISIS E INTERPRETACIÓN DE LOS RESULTADOS
3.4 Contrastación de la Hipótesis
3.4.2 Contrastación de las Hipótesis Específica
Aad, G. et al. (2015) Combined measurement of the Higgs Boson mass in pp collisions at s√ = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments. Physical Review Letters, 114, 191803.
Abriitis, Alison, McCook, Alison, Retraction Watch, (2017) Cash Bonuses for Peer-Reviewed Papers Go Global Science, August 10 2017
Adler, Jonathan, (2017) "Epistemological Problems of Testimony", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/testimony-episprob/ >.
Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press. Ahmed, Sara (2013), Making Feminist Points, Feministkilljoys https://feministkilljoys.com/2013/09/11/making-feminist-points/ September 11 2013
ATLAS Collaboration. 2012. “A Particle Consistent with the Higgs Boson Observed with the ATLAS Detector at the Large Hadron Collider,” Science, 338 (December 21), 1576–1582
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words: The William James lectures. OUP: Oxford
Bach, K. & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. MIT Press.
Bach, Kent (2008). Applying pragmatics to epistemology. Philosophical Issues 18 (1):68-88.
Bell Burnell, Jocelyn (1977) Petit Four, Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 302, 685-689
Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A.,
Wagenmakers, E. J., Berk, R., ... & Cesarini, D. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6.
Bennett, D. M., Taylor, D. M., (2003) Unethical Practices in Authorship of Scientific papers, Emergency Medicine. (15)3: 263-70
Bhandari M, Einhorn TA, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Who did what? (Mis)perceptions about authors’ contributions to scientific articles based on order of authorship. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery -American Volume 85A: 1605–1609.
Biagioli, M., (2003) Rights or Rewards: Changing Frameworks of Scientific Authorship in Biagoioli, M., and Galison, P. (eds), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, Routledge, London 253-80 Biagoioli, M., and Galison, P. (2003) Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, Routledge, London
Bird, Alexander (2010). Social knowing: The social sense of 'scientific knowledge'. Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):23-56.
Bird, Alexander (2014), ‘When is There a Group that Knows? Scientific Knowledge as Social Knowledge’. in: Jennifer Lackey (eds) Essays in Collective Epistemology. Oxford University Press (USA), pp. 42-63 Bright, Liam Kofi ; Dang, Haixin & Heesen, Remco (2018). A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers. Erkenntnis 83 (2):231-252
Bruner, Justin & O'Connor, Cailin (2018). Power, Bargaining, and
Collaboration. In T. Boyer, C. Mayo-Wilson & M. Weisberg (eds.), Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge.
Bruner, Justin P. (2013). Policing epistemic communities. Episteme 10 (4):403-416.
Castelvecchi, D. (2015) Physics paper sets Record with more than 5,000 Authors, Nature May 15 doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17567
Chartier, R., (2003) Foucault’s Chiasmus in Biagoioli, M., and Galison, P., (eds) Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, Routledge, London 13-30
Clark, Andy & Chalmers, David J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis (58)1:7-19.
CRediT (2018) CRediT https://casrai.org/credit/
Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and
philosophy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 855-871.
Dang, Haixin (MS) Epistemic Responsibility in Science
de Ridder, Jeroen (2014). Epistemic dependence and collective scientific knowledge. Synthese 191 (1):1-17.
Dotson, K. (2014). Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 115-138.
Douven, Igor (2006). Assertion, knowledge, and rational credibility. Philosophical Review 115 (4):449-485.
Einav, L., & Yariv, L. (2006). What's in a surname? The effects of surname initials on academic success. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1),
175-187.
Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, et al. (1998) Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer- reviewed medical journals. JAMA 280: 222–224.
Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., & DeAngelis, C. D. (2002). Authorship for research groups. JAMA, 288(24), 3166-3168.
Foucault M., (1980) What is an Author, In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. Bouchard, D. (ed), Bouchard, D, Simon, S (trans), Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 113- 138
Frandsen, T., and Nicolaisen, J. (2010) What is in a name? Credit
Assignments in different disciplines, Journal of Informatics, (4)4: 608-617 Franklin, R. E., & Gosling, R. G. (1953). Molecular configuration in sodium thymonucleate. Nature, 171(4356), 740.
Franklin, R. E., & Gosling, R. G. (1953). Molecular configuration in sodium thymonucleate. Nature, 171, 740-741.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Galison, P., (2003) The Collective Author, in Biagoioli, M., and Galison, P., (eds) Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, Routledge, London 325-50
Gerken, Mikkel (2015). The Epistemic Norms of Intra-Scientific Testimony. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (6):568-595.
Gilbert, Margaret (1987). Modelling collective belief. Synthese 73 (1):185- 204.
Gilbert, Margaret (1989). On Social Facts. Routledge.
Gilbert, Margaret P. (2004). Collective epistemology. Episteme 1 (2):95-- 107.
Gowers, T., & Nielsen, M. (2009). Massively collaborative mathematics. Nature, 461(7266), 879.
Grasswick, Heidi (2017) Epistemic Injustice in Science, in The Routledge Handbook of Epsitemic Injustice, Routledge, abingdon313-223
epistemic normativity. Cambridge University Press. Green, Adam (2012). Extending the credit theory of knowledge. Philosophical Explorations 15 (2):121 - 132. Green, Adam (2014). Deficient testimony is deficient teamwork. Episteme 11 (2):213-227.
Green, Adam (2014). Evaluating distributed cognition. Synthese 191 (1):79-95.
Grier, D. A. (2005). When computers were human. Princeton University Press.
Hanel, P., (2015) Why Scientific Publications should be Anonymous arXiv:1512.05382
Hassell, M.P. & May, R.M. (1974), Aggregation of predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability, Journal of Animal Ecology (43) 567- 594.
Heesen, Remco (2018) Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes reproducibility Problems Inevitable, The Journal of Philosophy
Huebner, B., Kukla,R., Winsberg, E., (2018) Making an Author in Radically Collaborative Research in Boyer-Kassem, K.,Mayo-Wilson, C,. Weisberg, M., (eds) Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge: New Essays OUP, Oxford 95-116
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICJME) (2018) Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors
http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/ defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. (2001). Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 409(6822), 860. Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are
false. PLoS medicine, 2(8), e124.
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS medicine, 2(8), e124.
Ioannidis, John,Klavans, Richard, Boyack, Kevin(2018) Thousands fo Scientists Publish a Paper every Five days, Nature 561, 167-169
of Fraunhofer’s Artisanal Optics and the German Republic of Letters, in Biagoioli, M., and Galison, P., (eds) Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, Routledge, London 113-132
Jaszi, P., And Woodmansee, M. (2003) Beyond Authorship: Refiguring Rights in Traditional Culture and Bioknowledge in Biagoioli, M., and
Galison, P., (eds) Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, Routledge, London 195-224
Johns, A., (2003) The Ambivalence of Authorship in Early Modern Natural Philosophy in Biagoioli, M., and Galison, P., (eds) Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, Routledge, London 67-90 Kitcher, Philip (1990). The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5-22.
Knorr Cetina, K., (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cam (MA)
Kremer, Michael (2016), Ideology and Knowledge-How: A Rylean PerspectiveTheoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 31 (3), 295-311
Kukla, R. (2012). “Author TBD”: Radical collaboration in contemporary biomedical research. Philosophy of Science, 79(5), 845-858.
Kwok, L. S. (2005). The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(9), 554-556. Lackey, J. (2018). Group Assertion. Erkenntnis, 83(1), 21-42.
Lackey, Jennifer (2008). Learning From Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B, and Woolgar S (1986) Laboratory Life, Princeton University Press
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian
collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533. List, Christian (2005). Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective. Episteme 2 (1):25-38.
Macfarlane, B. (2017). The ethics of multiple authorship: Power,
1194-1210.
Mallapaty, Smriti (2018) Paper Authorship goes Hyper Nature 30th Jan 2018
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737.
Marušić, A., Bošnjak, L., & Jerončić, A. (2011). A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. Plos one, 6(9), e23477.
Matheson, A. (2011). How industry uses the ICMJE guidelines to manipulate authorship—and how they should be revised. PLoS medicine, 8(8), e1001072.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery. American Sociological Review 22:635–659.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative
advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. isis, 79(4), 606-623. Minerva, F (2014a) New Threats to Academic Freedom, Bioethics, 28(4), 157-62
Minerva, F (2014b) Why Publishing Pseudonymously can Protect Academic Feedom, Bioethics, 28(4), 178-80.
Mitcheson, H., Collings, S., Siebers, RW., (2011 Authorship Issues at a New Zealand Academic Institution, International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, (2)3: 166-71
Moffatt, B. (2014a). Research funding and authorship: does grant winning count towards authorship credit? Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):683- 686.
Moffatt, B., (2013). Orphan Papers and Ghostwriting: The Case against the ICMJE Criterion of Authorship. Accountability in Research 20 (2): 59-71. Moffatt, Barton & Elliott, Carl (2007). Ghost Marketing: Pharmaceutical Companies and Ghostwritten Journal Articles. Perspectives in Biology and
Medicine 50 (1):18-31.
Morrison, P. S., Dobbie, G., & McDonald, F. J. (2003). Research
collaboration among university scientists. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(3), 275-296.
Mowatt, G., Shirran, L., Grimshaw, J. M., Rennie, D., Flanagin, A., Yank, V., ... & Bero, L. A. (2002). Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. Jama, 287(21), 2769-2771.
MozillaScience (2018) Paper Badger https://badges.mozillascience.org/ Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of
science. Research policy, 23(5), 487-521.
Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research policy, 23(5), 487-521.
Pignatelli B, Maisonneuve H, Chapuis F (2005) Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 578–581.
Polymath, D. H. J. (2010). Density hales-jewett and moser numbers. In An irregular mind (pp. 689-753). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Polymath, D. H. J. (2012). A new proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem. Annals of Mathematics, 1283-1327.
Polymath, D. H. J. (2014). The bounded gaps between primes Polymath project-a retrospective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.8361.
Polymath, D. H. J. (2014). Variants of the Selberg sieve, and bounded intervals containing many primes. Research in the Mathematical sciences, 1(1), 12.
Polymath, D. H. J., Castryck, W., Fouvry, É., Harcos, G., Kowalski, E., Michel, P., ... & Tao, T. (2014). New equidistribution estimates of Zhang type. Algebra Number Theory, 8(9), 2067-2199.
Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An
investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999- 2016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 486-502.
Ray, Debraj, and Arthur Robson. 2018. Certified Random: A New Order for Coauthorship. American Economic Review, 108 (2): 489-520.
shook the scientific world. Macmillan.
Rennie, D, M, Flanagin, R, M (1994) Authorship! Authorship! Guests, Ghosts, Grafters, and the Two-sided Coin, JAMA 271(6): 469-471 Rennie, D., Yank, V., & Emanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fails: a proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA, 278(7), 579-585.
Rescorla, M. (2009). Assertion and its constitutive norms. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(1), 98-130.
Resnik, D. B., Tyler, A. M., Black, J. R., Kissling, G.. (2016) Authorship Policies of Scientific Journals, J Med Ethics. (42)3:199-202. doi:
10.1136/medethics-2015-103171.
Reynolds, Steven L. (2002). Testimony, knowledge, and epistemic goals. Philosophical Studies 110 (2):139 - 161.
Reynolds, Steven L. (2008). Why we should prefer knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):79-93.
Reynolds, Steven L. (2017). Knowledge as Acceptable Testimony. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Roderick, G. K, Gillespie, R., G., (2002) Speciation and Phylogeography of Hawaiian Terrestrial Arthropods, Molecular Ecology (7), $: 529-531.
Rohwer, A., Young, T., Wager, E., & Garner, P. (2017). Authorship,
plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle- income country health researchers. BMJ open, 7(11), e018467.
Rubin, Hannah, O’Connor, Caillin (2018) Discrimination and Collaboration in Science Philosophy of Science 85:3, 380-402
Sarsons, H., (2017) Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 107(5): 141-145
Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Wamba, K., Wamba, P., & Wamba, N. (2007).
Welfare of apes in captive environments: comments on, and by, a specific group of apes. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 10(1), 7-19. Scharp, Kevin (2013). Replacing Truth. Oxford University Press UK.
Shapin, S. (1989). The invisible technician. American scientist, 77(6), 554- 563.
Seventeenth-Century England. University of Chicago Press.
Shapiro DW, Wenger NS, Shapiro MF. (1994) The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. JAMA; 271: 438 – 42.
Shaw,David (2016) The virus of Vagueness in Authorship, The Journal of Bioethical Inquiry , 13(3) 361–362
Shoemaker, David (2011) Attributability, Answerability, and
Accountability: Toward a Wider Theory of Moral Responsibility, Ethics, 121(3): 602-632
Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384.
Sobel, D. (2017). The Glass Universe: How the Ladies of the Harvard Observatory Took the Measure of the Stars. Penguin.
Sonnenwald, Diane H. "Scientific collaboration." Annual review of information science and technology 41.1 (2007): 643-681.
Sooryamoorthy, R. Scientometrics (2009) 80: 419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2074-z
Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology: Volume I: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge. OUP Oxford
Stanley, J. (2015). How propaganda works. Princeton University Press. Stanley, Jason (2012) The Practical and the Theoretical, The New York Times, Opinionator May 6th 2012
https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/06/the-practical-and-the- theoretical/
Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic literature, 34(3), 1199-1235.
Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic literature, 34(3), 1199-1235.
Street JM, Rogers WA, Israel M, Braunack-Mayer AJ (2010) Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences. Social Science & Medicine 70: 1458– 1465.
Strevens, M. (2003). The role of the priority rule in science. The Journal of philosophy, 100(2), 55-79.
Strevens, M. (2006). The Role of the Matthew Effect in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (2):159-170.
Terrall, M. (2003) The Uses of Anonymity in the Age of reason in Biagoioli, M., and Galison, P.,(eds) Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, Routledge, London 91-112
The Combahee River Collective (1997), "A Black feminist statement", in Nicholson, Linda, The second wave: a reader in feminist theory, New York: Routledge, pp. 63–70
TheBMJ (2018) Authorship and Contributorship
Thomason, R. W., & Trobaugh, T. (1990). Higher algebraic K-theory of schemes and of derived categories. In The Grothendieck Festschrift (pp. 247-435). Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.
Tomlinson, B., Ross, J., Andre, P., Baumer, E., Patterson, D., Corneli, J., ... & Torrance, A. (2012). Massively distributed authorship of academic papers. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 11-20). ACM.
Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J (2007) Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications. PLoS Biol (5)1: e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018
van de Poel, Ibo ; Royakkers, Lambèr & Zwart, Sjoerd D. (2015). Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands. Routledge.
Van Praag, C. M., & van Praag, B. (2008). The benefits of being economics professor A (rather than Z). Economica, 75(300), 782-796.
Waltman, L. (2012) An Empirical Analysis of the use of Alphabetical Authorship in Scientific Publishing, arXiv:1206.4863
Weiner, Matthew (2005). Must we know what we say? Philosophical Review 114 (2):227-251.
Weiner, Matthew (2007). Norms of assertion. Philosophy Compass 2 (2):187–195.
West, J. D., Jacquet, J., King, M. M., Correll, S. J., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PloS one, 8(7), e66212.
Williamson, T. (2001). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press on Demand
Winsberg, E., Huebner, B., & Kukla, R. (2014). Accountability and values in radically collaborative research. Studies in History and Philosophy of
Science Part A, 46, 16-23.
Winsberg, Eric (2018) Philosophy and Cliamte Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wislar, J. S., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., & DeAngelis, C. D. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ, 343, d6128.
Wray, K, Brad, and Andersen, Line, E. (MS-a) Collective Authors and Scientific Authorship Policies What Can we learn from Retraction Notices? Wray, K, Brad, and Andersen, Line, E. (MS-b) Retractions in Science
Wray, K. Brad (2001). Collective belief and acceptance. Synthese 129 (3):319-33.
Wray, K. Brad (2006). Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (3):505- 514.
Wray, K. Brad (2007). Who has scientific knowledge? Social Epistemology 21 (3):337 – 347.
Wray, K., B., (2018) The Impact of Collaboration on the Epistemic Cultures of Science, in Boyer-Kassem, K., Mayo-Wilson, C,. Weisberg, M.,(eds)
Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge: New Essays OUP, Oxford 117-134
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., Uzzi, B., (2007) The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge, Science, 316(5827):. 1036-1039 DOI: 10.1126/science.1136099
Zollman, K. J. (2018). The credit economy and the economic rationality of science. The Journal of Philosophy, 115(1), 5-33.
Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientic Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. Free Press, New York.