CREACIÓN DE BASE DE DATOS

In this paper, we surveyed past research associated with WSD. Both the knowledge-based and corpus-based techniques have been discussed. We also discussed the open issues in WSD research.

REFERENCES

1.  M. Lesk, Automatic Sense Disambiguation Using Machine Readable Dictionaries: How to Tell a Pine Cone from an Ice Cream Cone, In Proceedings of SIGDOC Conference, Toronto, Ontario, June, 1986.

2. D. Walker, 1987, Knowledge Resource Tools for Accessing Large Text Files, Machine Translation: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Sergei Nirenberg, (ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

3. P. F. Brown, S. A. DellaPietra, V. J. DellaPietra and R. L. Mercer, Word Sense Disambiguation Using Statistical Methods. Proceedings. Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 264– 70, 1991.

4. J. Guthrie , L. Guthrie, Y. Wilks, and H. Aidinejad, Subject dependent Co-occurrence and Word Sense Disambiguation, In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL, 1991.

5. J. Cowie, J. Guthrie and L. Guthrie, Lexical disambiguation using simulated annealing , In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING, 1992.

6. W. A. Gale, K. Church and D. Yarowsky, A method for disambiguating word senses in a Large corpus, Computers and the Humanities, Springer, 26, pages 415–439, 1992.

7. D. Yarowsky, Word sense disambiguation using statistical models of Roget's categories trained on large corpora, Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp.454–60, 1992.

8. E. Voorhees, Using WordNet to disambiguate word senses for text retrieval, In Proceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGDIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1993.

9. I. Dagan, and A. Itai, Word sense disambiguation using a second language monolingual corpus. Association for Computational Linguistics, 20(4): 563–96, 1994.

10. Resnik P., “Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in taxonomy”, In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, pages 448-453, 1995.

11. D. Yarowsky, Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods, In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Cambridge, MA, pages 189–196, 1995. 12. E. Agirre and G. Rigau, Word sense disambiguation using Conceptual Density, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics(COLING),. pages16-22, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1996. 13. H. T. Ng and H. B. Lee, Integrating Multiple Knowledge Sources to Disambiguate Word Sense: An Exemplar-

Based Approach. Proceeding of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-96), Santa Cruz, 1996.

14. R. J. Mooney, “Comparative Experiments on Disambiguating Word Senses: An illustration of the role of bias in machine learning”, In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 82-91, 1996.

15. Lin D., Using syntactic dependency as a local context to resolve word sense ambiguity, In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 64-71, 1997.

16. J. Jiang and D. Conrath, Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy, In Proceedings on 10th International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics, Taiwan, 1997.

17. A. Blum and T. Mitchell, Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training, In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, COLT, 1998.

18. C. Leacock and M. Chodorow, Combining local context and WordNet sense similarity for word sense identification, In C. Fellbaum, editor, WordNet: An electronic lexical database, pages 265-283, 1998.

19. G. Hirst and D. St-Onge, Lexical chains as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms, In C. Fellbaum, Editor, WordNet: An electronic lexical database, pages 305-332, 1998.

20. G. Towell and E. Voorhees, Disambiguating highly ambiguous words, Computational Linguistics, 24(1), pages 125-145, 1998.

21. G. Escudero, L. Marquez and G. Rigau, On the portability and tuning of supervised word sense disambiguation, In Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, EMNLP/VLC, Hong Kong, China, pages 172–180, 2000.

22. T. Pedersen, A Simple Approach to Building Ensembles of Naive Bayesian Classifiers for Word Sense Disambiguation, In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pages 63-69, 2000.

23. S. Banerjee and T. Pederson, An Adapted Lesk Algorithm for Word Sense Disambiguation Using WordNet, In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pages 136-145, 2002.

24. L. Y. Keok and H. T. Ng, An empirical evaluation of knowledge sources and learning algorithms for word sense disambiguation, In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP, Philadelphia, PA, pages 41–48, 2002.

25. S. Banerjee and T. Pederson, Extended gloss overlaps as a measure of semantic relatedness, In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, pages 805–810, 2003. 26. S. Patwardhan, S Banerjee and T. Pedersen, Using Measures of Semantic Relatedness for Word Sense

Disambiguation, In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, Mexico City, Mexico, pages 241-257, 2003.

27. C. A. Le, and A. Shimazu, High WSD accuracy using Naïve Bayesian classifier with rich features, PACILIC 18, Waseda University, Tokyo, 2004.

28. J. Veronis, Hyperlex: Lexical cartography for information retrieval, In Computer Speech and Language, 18(3), pages 223–252, 2004.

29. F. Vasilescu, P. Langlais and G. Lapalme, Evaluating Variants of the Lesk Approach for Disambiguation Words, In Proceedings of Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), pages 633-636, 2004. 30. N. Ide and Y.Wilks, “Making sense about sense”, In Word Sense Disambiguation: Algorithms and

31. M. Khapra, P.Bhattacharyya, S. Chauhan, S. Nair and A.Sharma, Domain Specific Iterative Word Sense Disambiguation in a Multilingual Setting, In Proceedings of International Conference on NLP (ICON08), Pune, India, 2008.

32. T. Baldwin, S. N. Kim F., Bond, S. Fujita, D. Martinez and T. Tanaka, A Reexamination of MRD-Based Word Sense Disambiguation, Journal of ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing (TALIP), 9(1), 2010, pages 1-21.

33. A.R. Rezapour, S. M. Fakhrahmad and M. H. Sadreddini, Applying Weighted KNN to Word Sense Disambiguation, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2011 Vol III WCE 2011, July 6 - 8, pp. 1834-1838, London, U.K, 2011.

34. Hindi Sense annotated Dataset http://www.tdil-dc.in/index.php?option=com_ download&task=showresource Details&toolid=1472&lang=en

35. Satyendra Singh & Tanveer J Siddiqui, Evaluating Effect of Context Window Size, Stemming and Stop Word Removal on Hindi Word Sense Disambiguation. in the Proceedings of International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management, CAMP'12, March 13-15, Malyasia, ISBN 978-1-4673-1091-8, IEEE, 2012.

36. Satyendr Singh, Vivek Kumar Singh, Tanveer J. Siddiqui, Hindi Word Sense Disambiguation using Semantic Relatedness measure, In Proceedings of 7th Multi-Disciplinary Workshop on Artificial Intelligence (MIWAI 2013), 9-11 Dec. 2013, Krabi, Thailand, pages 247-256, LNCS, Springer, 2013.

37. Satyendr Singh, Tanveer J. Siddiqui, Suneel K. Sharma, Naïve Bayes classifier for Hindi Word Sense Disambiguation, In Proceedings of 7th ACM India Compute Conference (Compute'14), Nagpur, India, 9 – 11 October, 2014, Article No. 1, ACM, 2014.

38. Satyendr Singh, Tanveer J. Siddiqui, Role of Semantic Relations in Hindi Word Sense Disambiguation, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICICT 2014), Kochi, India, 3-5 December, 2014, Elsevier Procedia Computer Science, Volume 46, Pages 1-1834,2015.

Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics & Informatics Vol. 7, No. 2, July-Dec., 2015 ISSN (Print) : 0975-7139

Scientific Journal Impact Factor SJIF (2014) : 4.1 ISSN (Online) : 2394-9309

ON NEW WEIGHTED DIFFERENCE-DIVERGENCE MEASURES