8. Datos obtenidos y análisis de resultados
8.3. Datos específicos del profesorado
x x x x x x x x x Algebra Problems 1. (3x2 + 2x + 10)(3x) = 2. (2x + y)(3x - y) =
3. Factor: 16y2 - 40yz + 25z2 4. Find X 5. 18x2 + (24x / 3x) = 6. Factor: x2 + 6x + 9 7. Solve for x: (1/5)(x) + 10 – 25 = 0 8. (-6x2y4) / (3x5y3) = Answers Alg1. Alg2. Alg3. Alg4. 6 Alg5. Alg6. Alg7. 75 Alg8.
Individual Differences and Manipulation Check Scales Post-Experiment Accountability Manipulation Check
I believe I will be evaluated on the decision making strategies I utilized (and not on the accuracy of the outcomes) I believe I will be evaluated on the accuracy of my final predictions (and not on the decision making strategies I utilized) [PAOA1] The researchers will ask me to explain the decision making strategy I used to make my final predictions. The researchers will ask me to explain why my final predictions were right or wrong. [PAOA2] The researchers are more concerned with how I made my decisions and the effectiveness of my decision making strategies. The researchers are more concerned with whether my predictions are ultimately right or wrong. [PAOA3]
predictions are inaccurate, I may still be evaluated favorably if the strategy I used to make my decisions was sound. strategies I used to make my decisions are sound, I will still be evaluated unfavorably if my final decisions are ultimately wrong. [PAOA4]
Please describe in the box below how you went about making your predictions Why did you choose to make your predictions in this way?
4. [Measures of rational/analytic reasoning – Novak & Hoffman, 2008]
While making my predictions… Disagree
strongly
Agree strongly 1. I reasoned things out
carefully. [Analytic1]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. I tackled the task systematically.[Analytic2]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. I figured things out logically. [Analytic3]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4. I approached the task analytically.[Analytic4]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5. I was very focused on the steps
involved in doing it. [Analytic5] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6. I applied precise rules to deduce my
final predictions. [Analytic6] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. I was very focused on what I was doing to arrive at my final
predictions. [Analytic7]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8. I was very aware of my thinking process.[Analytic8]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9. I arrived at my final predictions by carefully assessing the information in front of me. [Analytic9]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5. [Emotions] Not at all Very Happy [Happy] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Contented [Content] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gloomy [Gloomy] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Tense [Tense] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Good [Good] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Agreeable [Agreeable] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Discouraged [Discouraged] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Peaceful [Peaceful] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Upset [Upset] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mad [Mad] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Disgusted [Disgusted] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fearful [Fearful] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Stressed [Stressed] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5. Need for cognition scale
[Need for cognition (shortened), Cacioppo, Petty, & Kao, 1984] [Randomize items]
Strongly
disagree
Strongly agree
1. I would prefer complex to simple
problems. [NCog1]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. I like to have the responsibility of
handling a situation that requires
a lot of thinking. [NCog2]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. Thinking is not my idea of
fun.* [NCog3]
something that is sure to challenge my thinking
abilities.*[NCog4]
5. I try to anticipate and avoid
situations where there is likely a chance I will have to think in
depth about something.*[NCog5]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6. I find satisfaction in deliberating
hard and for long hours. [NCog6]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. I only think as hard as I have
to.*[NCog7]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8. I prefer to think about small, daily
projects to long-term
ones.* [NCog8]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9. I like tasks that require little
thought once I’ve learned
them.* [NCog9]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10.The idea of relying on thought to
make my way to the top appeals
to me.[NCog10]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11.I really enjoy a task that involves
coming up with new solutions to
problems.[NCog11]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
12.Learning new ways to think
doesn’t excite me very
much.* [NCog12]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
13.I prefer my life to be filled with
puzzles that I must
solve. [NCog13]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
14.The notion of thinking abstractly
is appealing to me. [NCog14]
15.I would prefer a task that is intellectual, difficult, and
important to one that is somewhat important but does not require
much thought. [NCog15]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
16.I feel relief rather than
satisfaction after completing a task that required a lot of mental
effort.* [NCog16]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
17.It’s enough for me that something
gets the job done; I don’t care
how or why it works.* [NCog17]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
18.I usually end up deliberating
about issues even when they do not affect me personally. [NCog18] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Big 5 Strongly disagree Strongly agree 1. I get chores done right away. [Consc1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. I often forget to put things back in
their proper place. [Consc2]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. I like order. [Consc3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4. I make a mess of things [Consc4] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. I sympathize with others’
feelings. [Agree1]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6. I am not interested in other people’s problems. [Agree2]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. I feel others’ emotions. [Agree3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. I am not really interested in
others. [Agree4]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9. I am the life of the party. [Extro1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10. I don’t talk a lot. [Extro2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
parties.[Extro3]
12. I keep in the background. [Extro4] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13. I have a vivid imagination. [Open1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14. I am not interested in abstract
ideas. [Open2]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
15. I have difficulty understanding abstract ideas. [Open3]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
16. I do not have a good imagination. [Open4]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
17. I have frequent mood swings [Neuro1]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
18. I am relaxed most of the time. [Neuro2]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
19. I get upset easily. [Neuro3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 20. I seldom feel blue. [Neuro4] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Fluid Intelligence Measure Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT)
Please answer the following questions: [Frederick, 2005, Journal of Economic
Perspectives]
(a) A bat and a ball cost $1.10 in total. The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost? ______ [5 cents] [CR1]
(b) If it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 widgets, how long would it take 100 machines to make 100 widgets? ______ [5 minutes] [CR2]
(c) In a lake, there is a patch of lily pads. Every day, the patch doubles in size. If it takes 48 days for the patch to cover the entire lake, how long would it take for the patch to cover half of the lake? ______ [47 days] [CR3]
Cognitive Motivation Measure Actively Open Minded Thinking (AOMT)
Strongly
disagree
Strongly agree 1. Allowing oneself to be convinced by
an opposing argument is a sign of good character
2. People should take into consideration evidence that goes against their beliefs.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3.People should revise their beliefs in
response to new information or evidence.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4. Changing your mind is a sign of weakness.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5. Intuition is the best guide in making decisions
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6. It is important to persevere in your beliefs even when evidence is brought to bear against them.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. One should disregard evidence that conflicts with one's established beliefs.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8. People should search actively for reasons why their beliefs might be wrong.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9. It is more useful to pay attention to those who disagree with us than to pay attention to those who agree.
References
Agrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2005). Motivated Reasoning in Outcome-Bias Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 798-805.
Alesina, A., & Cukierman, A. (1987). The Politics of Ambiguity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(4), 829-850.
Arkes, H. R. (1981). Impediments to Accurate Clinical Judgment and Possible Ways to Minimize Their Impact. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(3), 323-330.
Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and Benefits of Judgment Errors: Implications for Debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 486-498.
Arkes, H. R. (2001). Overconfidence in Judgmental Forecasting. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 495-515): Boston, MA: Springer.
Arkes, H. R., Dawes, R. M., & Christensen, C. (1986). Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), 93-110.
Arkes, H. R., Faust, D., Guilmette, T. J., & Hart, K. (1988). Eliminating the Hindsight Bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 305-307.
Arkes, H. R., Wortmann, R. L., Saville, P. D., & Harkness, A. R. (1981). Hindsight Bias Among Physicians Weighing the Likelihood of Diagnoses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 252-254.
Armstrong, J. S., Green, K. C., & Soon, W. (2008). Polar Bear Population Forecasts: A Public-Policy Forecasting Audit. Interfaces, 38(5), 382-405.
Ashton, R. H. (1992). Effects of Justification and a Mechanical Aid on Judgment Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(2), 292-306.
Augenblick, N., & Rabin, M. (2013). Testing for Excess Movement in Beliefs. Working paper.
Barnes, A. (2016). Making Intelligence Analysis More Intelligent: Using Numeric Probabilities. Intelligence and National Security, 31(3), 327-344.
Baron, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988). Outcome Bias in Decision Evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 569-579.
Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (1994). Reference Points and Omission Bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 475-498.
Bilgin, B., & Brenner, L. (2013). Context affects the interpretation of low but not high numerical probabilities: A hypothesis testing account of subjective
probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 118-128.
Bondt, W. F., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the Stock Market Overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793-805.
Bostian, A. A., Holt, C. A., & Smith, A. M. (2008). Newsvendor “Pull-to-Center” Effect: Adaptive Learning in a Laboratory Experiment. Manufacturing & Service
Operations Management, 10(4), 590-608.
Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The Oxford Handbook Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brennan, N. M., Solomon, J., Brennan, N. M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate
Governance, Accountability and Mechanisms of Accountability: An Overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885-906.
Brier, G. W. (1950). Verification of Forecasts Expressed in Rerms of Probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78(1), 1-3.
Brtek, M. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2002). Effects of Procedure and Outcome
accountability on interview validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 185- 191.
Brun, W., & Teigen, K. H. (1988). Verbal Probabilities: Ambiguous, Context-Dependent, or Both? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(3), 390- 404.
Bruner, J. S., & Potter, M. C. (1964). Interference in Visual Recognition. Science, 144(3617), 424-425.
Budescu, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S. (1985). Consistency in Interpretation of Probabilistic Phrases. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 391- 405.
Budescu, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S. (1990). Dyadic Decisions with Numerical and Verbal probabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(2), 240-263.
Budge, I. (1994). A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally. British Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 443-467.
Camerer, C. F. (1987). Do Biases in Probability Judgment Matter in Markets? Experimental Evidence. The American Economic Review, 7(5), 981-997. Cheibub, J. A., & Przeworski, A. (1999). Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for
Economic Outcomes. In A. Prezeworski, S. Stokes, & B. Manin (Eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (Cambrdige Studies in the Theory of Democracy, pp. 222-250). Cambrdige: Cambrdige University Press. Chirumbolo, A., Areni, A., & Sensales, G. (2004). Need for Cognitive Closure and
Politics: Voting, Political Attitudes and Attributional Style. International Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 245-253.
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J., & Willham, C. F. (1991). The Hindsight Bias: A Meta- Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48(1), 147- 168.
Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1988). Politics, Markets, and the Organization of Schools. American Political Science Review, 82(04), 1065-1087.
Clarke, R. (1946). An Application of the Poisson Distribution. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 72(3), 481.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are Humans Good Intuitive Statisticians After All? Rethinking Some Conclusions From the Literature on Judgment Under
Uncertainty. Cognition, 58(1), 1-73.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory Focus and StrategicInclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.
Curley, S. P., & Yates, J. F. (1985). The Center and Range of the Probability Interval as Factors Affecting Ambiguity Preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(2), 273-287.
De Bondt, W. F., & Thaler, R. H. (1994). Financial Decision-Making in Markets and Firms: A Behavioral Perspective. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 9, 385-410.
De Dreu, C. K., Beersma, B., Stroebe, K., & Euwema, M. C. (2006). Motivated Information Processing, Strategic Choice, and the Quality of Negotiated Agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 927-943. De Langhe, B., van Osselaer, S. M., & Wierenga, B. (2011). The Effects of Process and
Outcome Accountability on Judgment Process and Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 238-252.
Dhami, M. K., Mandel, D. R., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Improving Intelligence Analysis with Decision Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 753-757.
Doherty, M. E., Mynatt, C. R., Tweney, R. D., & Schiavo, M. D. (1979). Pseudodiagnosticity. Acta Psychologica, 43(2), 111-121.
Druckman, J. N. (2001a). Evaluating Framing Effects. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(1), 91-101.
Druckman, J. N. (2001b). The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225-256.
Dubnick, M. (2014). Accountability as Cultural Keyword. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schellemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (pp. 23- 38).
Dutt, P., & Mitra, D. (2005). Political Ideology and Endogenous Trade Policy: An Empirical Investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 59-72. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Edmondson, A. C. (2002). Managing the Risk of Learning: Psychological Safety in Work Teams. Cambridge, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
Edmondson, A. C., Kramer, R. M., & Cook, K. S. (2004). Psychological Safety, Trust, and Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Lens. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, 10, 239-272.
Edwards, W. (1954). The Theory of Decision Making. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 380-417.
Edwards, W. (1956). Reward Probability, Amount, and Information as Determiners of Sequential Two-Alternative Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52(3), 177-188.
Edwards, W. (1968). Conservatism in Human Information Processing. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Formal Representation of Human Judgment, (pp. 17-52). New York, NY: Wiley.
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1985). Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference. Psychological Review, 92(4), 433-461.
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643-669.
Erev, I., Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. V. (1994). Simultaneous Over-And Underconfidence: The Role of Error in Judgment Processes. Psychological Review, 101(3), 519-527.
Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight is Not Equal to Goresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(3), 288-299.
Fischhoff, B., & Beyth, R. (1975). I Knew it Would Happen: Remembered Probabilities of Once—Future Things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 1-16.
Fraser, C. (1971). Group Risk-Taking and Group Polarization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(4), 493-510.
Fraser, C., Gouge, C., & Billig, M. (1971). Risky Shifts, Cautious Shifts, and Group Polarization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 7-30.
Friedkin, N. E. (1999). Choice Shift and Group Polarization. American Sociological Review, 64(6), 856-875.
Friedman, J. A., Lerner, J. S., & Zeckhauser, R. (2017). Behavioral Consequences of Probabilistic Precision: Experimental Evidence from National Security Professionals, 71(4), 803-826.
Friedman, J. A., & Zeckhauser, R. (2012). Assessing Uncertainty in Intelligence. Intelligence and National Security, 27(6), 824-847.
Friedman, J. A., & Zeckhauser, R. (2015). Handling and Mishandling Estimative Probability: Likelihood, Confidence, and the Search for Bin Laden. Intelligence and National Security, 30(1), 77-99.
Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1998). Toward a Theory of Accountability in
Organizations and Human Resource Management. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. JAI Press.
Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (2004). Advancing Accountability Theory and Practice: Introduction to The Human Resource Management Review Special Edition. Human Resource Management Review, 14(1), 1-17.
Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A Literature Review of the Anchoring Effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 35-42.
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases”. European Review of Social Psychology, 2(1), 83-115.
Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684-704. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart: Oxford
Gilovich, T. D., & Griffin, D. W. (2010). Judgment and Decision Making. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
Gilovich, T. D., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The Hot Hand in Basketball: On The Misperception of Random Sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 295-314. Goodman, J. S., Wood, R. E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Feedback Specificity, Information
Processing, and Transfer of Training. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 253-267.
Green, K., & Armstrong, J. S. (2007). Global Warming: Forecasts by Scientists Versus Scientific Forecasts. Energy & Environment, 18(7), 997-1021.
Green, K. C., & Armstrong, J. S. (2008). Uncertainty, The Precautionary Principle and Climate Change. Available on-line at publicpolicyforecasting.com and other web sites.
Green, K. C., Armstrong, J. S., & Soon, W. (2009). Validity of Climate Change Forecasting For Public Policy Decision Making. International Journal of Forecasting, 25(4), 826-832.
Green, M. C., Visser, P. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with Accountability Cross- Pressures: Low-Effort Evasive Tactics and High-Effort Quests for Complex Compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1380-1391. Hagafors, R., & Brehmer, B. (1983). Does Having to Justify One's Judgments Change the
Nature of The Judgment Process? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31(2), 223-232.
Hahn, U., & Warren, P. A. (2009). Perceptions of Randomness: Why Three Heads are Better Than Four. Psychological Review, 116(2), 454-461.
Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., Ferris, G., Hochwarter, W., Kacmar, C., & Bowen, M. (2003). Accountability in Human Resources Management. In L. L. Neider & C.
Schriesheim (Eds.), New Directions in Human Resource Management (pp. 29- 63).
Hamm, R. M. (1991). Selection of Verbal Probabilities: A Solution For Some Problems of Verbal Probability Expression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48(2), 193-223.
Hammond, K. R., & Summers, D. A. (1965). Cognitive Dependence on Linear and Nonlinear Cues. Psychological Review, 72(3), 215-224.
Hammond, K. R., Summers, D. A., & Deane, D. H. (1973). Negative Effects of Outcome-Feedback in Multiple-Cue Probability Learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9(1), 30-34.
Handy, C. B. (1995). The Age of Unreason. New York, NY: Random House. Haran, U., Ritov, I., & Mellers, B. A. (2013). The Role of Actively Open-Minded
Thinking in Information Acquisition, Accuracy, and Calibration. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 188-201.
Hastie, R. (2001). Problems For Judgment and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 653-683.
Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1984). Persuasive Arguments Theory, Group Polarization, and Choice Shifts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(2), 260-268. Hobbes, T. (1969). Leviathan, 1651. Menston, England: Scolar Press.
Hoffman, A. J. (2011). Talking Past Each Other? Cultural Framing of Skeptical and Convinced Logics in The Climate Change Debate. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 3-33.
Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight Bias: A By-Product of Knowledge Updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 566-581.
Hollnagel, E. (2000). Looking For Errors of Omission and Commission or The Hunting of The Snark Revisited. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 68(2), 135-145. Hursch, C. J., Hammond, K. R., & Hursch, J. L. (1964). Some Methodological
Considerations in Multiple-Cue Probability Studies. Psychological review, 71(1), 42-60.
Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1141-1151.
Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1161-1166.
Jost, J. T. (2006). The End of the End of Ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651- 670.
Jost, J. T., & Amodio, D. M. (2012). Political Ideology as Motivated Social Cognition: Behavioral and Neuroscientific Evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36(1), 55-64. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political Ideology: Its Structure,
Functions, and Elective Affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Exceptions That Prove
Ideological Incongruities and Political Snomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 383-393.
Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated with Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989-1007.
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126-136.
Kahan, D. M. (2016). The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1: What Politically Motivated Reasoning is and How to Measure it. In R. A. Scott & M. C. Buchmann (Eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Wiley.
Kahan, D. M. (2017). Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity- Protective Cognition. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2973067 Kahan, D. M., & Corbin, J. C. (2016). A Note on The Perverse Effects of Actively Open-