Capitulo III: ANÁLISIS DE LOS RESULTADOS DE LOS COLABORADORES DE COMPARTAMOS FINANCIERA SAB:
COMPARTAMOS FINANCIERA Y FINANCIERA CREAR
3.1 Declaraciones sobre expectativas de la Dimensión de Bienes Tangibles:
McKane fu rth er develops th is argument w ithin h is 1986
81.
In other words, i f a text ex h ib its a correct
chronology towards historical events in Jeremiah's day, and
is similar to other sentiment expressed within the book of
Jeremiah, i t is arguable that the text also originates from
Jeremiah.
82.
William McKane, "Relations Between Poetry and
Prose In The Book Of Jeremiah With Special Reference To
Jeremiah III 6-11 And XII 14-17",
S V T32 (1980), 220-
237.
commentary on J e r e m i a h .®4 He labels th e process which
had occurred with 3:1-13 an example of poetry "triggering"
or "generating" prose through the concept of a rolling
corpus th e o ry of t e x tu a l building w ith in Jeremiah.®®
McKane considers t h a t vv.14-17 have also been triggered by the existence of vv.1-13, th u s an example of poetry and
prose generating prose. V.18 presupposes the existence of
vv.14-17, and expands t h i s prose section, with the former section dating from th e exilic period, the la te r from the
p o s t- e x lll c period.®® Vv.19-25 are presented as being
words from Jeremiah®^ th o u g h th e y c o n s t i t u t e an
independent u n i t from vv.1-5, 12-13. Jeremiah 4:1-2 Is
considered an Independent unit authentic to Jeremiah.
In his 1979 work on dissonance th e o r y and th e prophetic t r a d iti o n s Robert Carroll makes a passing comment t h a t the poetic material within 3:l-4:2 Is most likely to be
asso cia te d w ith t h e e a r l i e s t p e rio d of J e r e m i a h 's
ministry.®® He ex pa nd s h i s comment In 1981 by
I d e n t i f y i n g t h e o r i g i n a l J e r e m ia n ic r e p e n ta n c e poem
materials (bound together by the thematic uses of the verb
64. William McKane, Jeremiah, Vol.I, ICC, T. &. T.
Clark, Edinburgh, 1986.
85. J b i d f ., 1x11, 64-69.
86. I D i d . , 76-77. V.18 Is considered to be an
attempt a t harmonization which will encompass both Israel
and Judah.
87. I D i d . , 77-83. McKane breaks t h i s u n i t Into
th r e e sections of speech from Yahweh (v v .1 9 -2 0 , 22a), th e
p ro p h et (V.21), and th e confession from th e p erson ifie d
community ( v v . 2 2 b - 2 5 ) .
88. Robert P. Carroll, When Prophecy Failed, SCM
miu) as being 3:1-5, 12b-13, 1 9 f 21-23; 4 :1-2.®9
C a rr o ll's 1966 J e r e m i a h c o m m e n t a r y 90 r e f l e c t s h i s
opinions concerning these verses from a broader research
base. He offers the possibility t h a t 3:12-4:2, because of
t h e i r usage of the aim material, might be a t t r i b u t e d to exilic circles which preached turning-repentance a f t e r the
d e s t r u c t i o n of Jerusalem.9i Vv.6-18 a r e t h e r e f o r e not
considered an Intrusion In the proposed poem of Stade (3:1-
5, 19f.). Thus vv.l2b-13, 19-20, 21-23, 4:1-2 a r e all
Independent poems which have been thematically grouped together, placed In t h e i r present configuration by a l a te r
editor. 3:1-5 relate to th e preceding Jeremianic discourse
of chapter 2, whereas 3:6-12a, 14-18 and 24-25 all date to
l a t e r r e d a c t l o n a l a c t i v i t y ,92 By proposing such a
stance, C arro ll extends himself beyond any previous
scholarly positions concerning the a u th e n tic ity and dating of t h i s section of Jeremiah.
Rainer Albertz’s 1982 consideration of Jeremiah 2-6 produces no new Insights into the possible dating of 3:1- 4:2.93 The major concern of his article Is to present a two phase chronology of the materials he considers were used
In t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n of J e r e m i a h 's f i r s t scro ll.9^
89. I d e m . , From Chaos to Covenant, SCM Press,
London, 1981, 73-74.
90. I d e m . , J e re m i a h , SCM Press, London, 1986. 91. I D i d . , 147.
92. I D i d . , 140-156.
93. Rainer Albertz, " J e r 2-6 und die F r u h z e i tv e r -
Kiindlgung Jeremias," Z A W 94 (1982), 20-47.
94. Following t h e examination of C. Rletzschel,
D a s P r o D l e m d e r U r r o l l e , G ûttersloher, Güttersloh, 1966, 130f., who considered the material which encompassed