In this subsection, because it has a few verses, I will subject the entire section to close reading.
The passage under consideration is Exodus 20:22-26: “Then the LORD said to Moses, “Tell the Israelites this: ‘You have seen yourselves that I have spoken to you from heaven: Do not make any gods to be alongside me; do not make for yourselves gods of silver or gods of gold. Make an altar of earth for me and sacrifice on it your burnt offerings, your sheep and goats and your cattle. Wherever I cause my name to be honoured, I will come to you and bless you. If you make an altar of stones for me, do not build it with dressed stones, for you will defile it if you use a tool on it. And do not go up to my altar on steps, lest your nakedness be exposed on it.”
The first cultic law I look into is the one which prohibited the making of gods to stand alongside YHWH, whether these gods were of silver or gods of gold (Exod 20:23). This law was an emphatic command against setting idol gods in rivalry to YHWH since YHWH was Israel’s only God (Durham, 1987: 319). This prohibition against making idols and the instructions for building of altars together focus on the subject of how the divine presence was to be experienced by the people in the future (Fretheim, 2003: 96). This law in summary conveyed to Israel the point that YHWH alone is God and is the only one they should worship if they were to constantly enjoy His Presence.
The second cultic law called on Israel to make an altar of earth for Him and sacrifice on it burnt offerings and fellowship offerings. The LORD then promised: ‘wherever I cause my name to be honoured, I will come and bless you.” (Exod 20:24). The essence of this commandment is the message that YHWH Himself would choose the place where altars of sacrifice would be built and that He would come in person to His people assembled and bless them (Durham, 1987: 319). The altars were not supposed to be constructed at will, except in those places where God had revealed His name and only these would be legitimate places of worship (Childs, 1974: 466). God’s blessings were assured to Israel on condition they
worshipped Him through the offering of sacrifices on altars but not through the construction of metallic images (Fretheim, 2003: 522).
God required altars to be made of earth and to be at places He Himself would choose. If the Israelites conducted their sacrifices in such places and avoided idolatry and worshipped YHWH alone as God, His blessings would come upon Israel.
The command against climbing up an altar with steps was an anti-Canaanite law (Durham, 1987: 320). In Childs’ (1974) view, the prohibition was directed against adopting Canaanite altars which were made of finished stone (1974: 466). Fretheim (2003: 97) argued that these laws were appropriate since the whole thrust of the Sinai covenant was the establishment of a special relationship between God and Israel.
The consensus of scholars cited above, suggests that the prohibition of using carved out stones was necessitated by the fact that it was a Canaanite practice. Israelites were supposed to worship YHWH differently from the way the Canaanites worshipped their deities. According to the scholars cited the instructions on making cultic objects pointed to YHWH as the only God who demanded to be worshipped in a particular way by His people Israel if His blessings were to follow them. In other words, Israel’s security in the land and her prosperity as a nation depended on how the people approached God in worship.
YHWH’s demand to be worshipped as the only God implied that He alone was supposed to rule in every sphere of Israel’s life, which entailed the political, the social, the economic and the religious. In other words, when it came to the economic sphere which included property ownership and land, human beings were not supposed to regard themselves as ultimate owners with absolute control, but they had to reckon with the reality of God’s sovereignty in all these matters.
The law against idolatry and worshipping in non-Canaanite style (Exod 20: 22-20) was given at national level but it was to be implemented at the individual, familial level or community level because this is the level where decisions to obey or to disobey God took place.
One can conclude that whereas the laws against idolatry pointed to YHWH alone as God, to be glorified in life, the Sabbath year was the special temple in time set apart to contemplate about Him and worship Him alone as God. The Law against idolatry and the Sabbath year Law called the nation of Israel to strict monotheism, the acknowledgement and the
worshipping of YHWH alone as God. The Sabbath year, as time set apart by God for divine use, was meant to challenge the people to do away with any other deities. Idolatry in its most common form of manmade gods was to be done away with. Idolatry in its subtle form as the obsession of a person’s life with something to the point where that object or thing dethrones God from His proper place in life was also to be done away with. In this way the Sabbath year stood as a bulwark against the idols of materialism that drive men and women to use inhuman means to acquire material possessions. These are practices that received sharp prophetic indictments in the eighth century in the following words. “Woe to you who add house to house and join field to field till no place is left and you live alone in the land. The LORD Almighty has declared in my hearings: ‘Surely the great houses will become desolate, the fine mansions left without occupants. A ten acre vineyard will produce only a bath of wine, a homer of seed only an ephah of grain.” (Isa 5:8-10; see also Amos 5:11-12).