• No se han encontrado resultados

DEFENSA MOVIL

In document INTRODUCCION GENERALIDADES (página 181-186)

4.3 FUNDAMENTOS DE LAS OPERACIONES OFENSIVAS

5.16 DEFENSA MOVIL

Supplementary file 1: Online Appendix to Complex copula systems as suppletive allomorphy. [DOI]

References

Adger, David. 2013. A syntax of substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Adger, David & Gillian Ramchand. 2003. Predication and Equation. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3). 325-359.

Albarracín, Lelia Inés. 2011. La Quichua: Gramática, ejercicios, y diccionario Quichua-Castellano [Quechua: Grammar, exercises, and Quechua-Spanish dictionary]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Dunken.

Albó, Xavier. 1970. Social constraints on Cochabamba Quechua. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University disserta- tion.

Alderetes, Jorge R. 2001. El quichua de Santiago del Estero: Gramática y vocabulario [Santiago del Estero Quechua: Grammar and vocabulary]. Tucumán, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopulou, & Florian Schäfer. 2014. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Arche, María. 2006. Individuals in time. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Bach, Emmon. 1967. Have and be in English syntax. Language 43(2). 462-85.

Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical categories: verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Balusu, Rahul. 2014. The overt predicator -gaa in Telugu. Talk at the NYU Syntax Brown Bag, New York, NY.

Barker, Chris. 1995. Possessive descriptions. Stanford University: CSLI Publications.

Beavers, John, Elias Ponvert, & Stephen Wechsler. 2009. Possession of a controlled substantive: Light ‘have’ and other verbs of possession. Ms, UT Austin.

Belvin, Robert S. 1996. Inside events: The non-possessive meanings of possession predicates and the semantic conceptualization of events. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California dissertation.

Bentley, Delia. 2016. The existential pivot and the discourse-semantics-syntax interface. Talk at the Between EXISTENCE and LOCATION workshop, Tübingen University.

Bentley, Delia, Francesco Maria Ciconte, & Silvio Cruschina. 2015. Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bills, Garland D., Bernardo Vallejo C. and Rudolph C. Troike. 1969. An introduction to spoken Bolivian Quechua. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

sachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives and the struc- ture of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bobaljik, Jonathan & Uli Sauerland. 2017. *ABA and the combinatorics of morphological features. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003320.

Bonet, Eulalia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Cambridge, MA: Mas- sachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 591-656.

Bravo, Domingo A. 1956. El quichua santiagueño: Reducto idiomático argentino [Santiago Quechua: An Argentine linguistic fortress]. Tucumán: Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.

Brucart, Josep M. 2010. La alternancia ser/estar y las construcciones atributivas de localización [The ser/estar alternation and attributive locative constructions]. In Alicia Avellana (ed.), Actas del V Encuen- tro de Gramática Generativa. Neuquén [Proceedings of the 5th Generative Grammar Meeting], 115-152. Nequén, Argentina: Editorial Universitaria del Comahue.

Bruening, Benjamin. 2010. Double object constructions disguised as prepositional datives. Linguistic Inquiry 41(2). 287-305.

Bruening, Benjamin. 2013. By phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16(1). 1-41.

Caha, Pavel. 2009. The nanosyntax of case. Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø dissertation.

Camacho, José. 2012. Ser and estar : The individual/stage-level distinction and aspectual predication. In Juan Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea, and Erin O’ Rourke (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic linguistics, 453-477. Malden, MA and Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.

Carlson, Greg. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. New York, NY: Garland Publishers.

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Citko, Barbara. 2008. Small clauses reconsidered: Not so small and not all alike. Lingua 118. 261-295.

Clark, Eve. 1978. Locationals: Existential, locative and possessive constructions. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of human language volume 4: Syntax, 85-126. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Creider, Chet A. & Jane Tapsubei Creider. 1989. A grammar of Nandi. Hamburg, Germany: Buske.

Creissels, Denis. 2016. Existential predication in the world’s languages. Talk at the Between EXISTENCE and LOCATION workshop, Tübingen University.

Cuervo, Maria Cristina. 2003. Datives at large. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Dalmi, Gréte. 2013. The meaning of the zero copula in multiple be-system languages. Anna Bondaruk and Anna Malicka-Kleparska (eds.), Ambiguity: Multifaceted structures in syntax, morphology and phonology (Studies in Linguistics and Methodology, vol 5), 169-201. Lublin, Poland: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Deal, Amy Rose. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from “selection”. Syntax 12(4). 285-323.

De Clercq, Karen & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd. 2017. *ABA revisited: Evidence from Czech and Latin degree morphology. Glossa 2(1): 69. 1-32. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.371

Den Dikken, Marcel. 1997. Introduction: The syntax of possession and the verb ‘have’. Lingua 101. 129-150.

Den Dikken, Marcel. 1998. Predicate inversion in DP. In Artemis Alexiadou and Chris Wilder (eds.), Possessors, predicates, and movement in the Determiner Phrase. 177-214. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Den Dikken, Marcel. 1999. On the structural representation of possession and agreement: The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. In István Kenesei (ed.), Crossing boundaries. 137-178. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Den Dikken, Marcel. 2007. Phase extension: Contours of the theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1). 1-41.

Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Embick, David. 2010. Localism vs. globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Fábregas, Antonio. 2012. A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, problems, and proposals. Borealis 1(2). 1-71.

Fábregas, Antonio. 2014. On the locative reading of dimensional adjectives and the internal syntax of estar. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7(1). 3-41.

Francez, Itamar. 2007. Existential propositions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.

Francez, Itamar. 2009. Existentials, predication, and modification. Linguistics and Philosophy. 32(1). 1-50.

Francez, Itamar. 2010. Context dependence and implicit arguments in existentials. Linguistics and Philosophy. 33(1). 11-30.

Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68(3). 553-595.

Gallego, Ángel & Juan Uriagereka. 2007. A critique of phase extension, with a comparison to phase sliding. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1). 65-74.

Gallego, Ángel & Juan Uriagereka. 2016. Estar = Ser + X. Borealis 5(1). 123-156.

Green, Lisa. 2002. African American English. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Hale, Kenneth & Samuel Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Halle, Morris. 1997. Fission and Impoverishment. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30. 425-449.

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser. (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. 111-176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy dissertation.

Harley, Heidi. 1997. Logophors, variable binding, and the interpretation of have. Lingua 103. 75-84.

Harley, Heidi. 1998. You’re having me on!: aspects of have. semanticsArchive/TY3M2M5O.

Harley, Heidi. 2002. Possession and the double object construction. Yearbook of Linguistic Variation 2. 29-68.

Harley, Heidi. 2010. Affixation and the Mirror Principle. In Raffaella Folli & Christiane Ullbricht (eds.), Interfaces in Linguistics. 166-186. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Harley, Heidi. 2013. External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua 125. 34-57.

Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3). 225-276.

Hartmann, Jutta M. & Nataša Milićević. 2008. The syntax of existential sentences in Serbian. In Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertova & Petr Biskup (eds.), Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007 (= Linguistik International; 21), 131-142. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.

Harves, Stephanie. 2002. Unaccusative Syntax in Russian. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University dissertation.

Hazout, Ilan. 2004. The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 393-430.

Hengeveld, Kees. 1991. Tipología, diacronía, sincronía [Typology, diachrony, synchrony]. In Henk Haverkate, Kees Hengeveld, Gijs Mulder & Hella Olbertz (eds.), Exploraciones semánticas y pragmáticas del Español [Semantic and Pragmatic Explorations of Spanish] (Foro Hispánico 2.), 81-94. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Rodopi.

Higginbotham, James & Gillian Ramchand. 1996. The stage-level/individual-level distinction and the mapping hypothesis. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology, and Phonetics 2. 53-83.

Hoekstra, Teun. 1994. HAVE as BE plus or minus. In Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar; Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, 199-215. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

Hoekstra, Teun & René Mulder. 1990. Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predica- tion. The Linguistic Review 7(1). 1-80.

Irie, Koji. 1997. Possessive verbs in modern Icelandic. Tokyo University Linguistics Papers 16. 307-329.

Irwin, Patricia. 2012. Unaccusativity at the interfaces. New York, NY: New York University dissertation.

Irwin, Patricia. 2016. Verb meaning vs. structure: Who’s the boss? Talk at Swarthmore College.

Jung, Hakyung. 2011. The syntax of the Be-possessive. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Kastner, Itamar. 2016. Form and meaning in the Hebrew verb. New York, NY: New York University dissertation.

Kayne, Richard S. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Reprinted in Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals, 107-130. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Keenan, Edward. 1987. A semantic definition of indefinite NP. In Eric Reuland & Alice G.B. ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 286-317. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Koch, Peter. 2012. Location, existence, and possession: A constructional-typological exploration. Lin- guistics 50(3). 533-603.

Krajinović, Ana. 2016. Existence, location, possession, and copula in Malabar Indo-Portuguese. Talk at the Between EXISTENCE and LOCATION workshop, Tübingen University.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Greg Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, 125-175. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryk & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109-137. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

Krejci, Bonnie. 2014. What is raining? English weather it revisited. Talk at the 88th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Minneapolis, MN.

Kuno, Susumu & Preya Wongkhomthong. 1981. Characterizational and identificational sentences in Thai. Studies in Language 5(1). 65-109.

Lastra, Yolanda. 1968. Cochabamba Quechua syntax. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.

LaPolla, Randy & Chenglong Huang. 2003. A Grammar of Qiang, with Annotated Texts and Glossary. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.

Levinson, Lisa. 2011. Possessive WITH in Germanic: HAVE and the role of P. Syntax 14(4). 355-393.

Longa, Víctor M., Guillermo Lorenzo & Gemma Rigau. 1998. Subject clitics and clitic recycling: Locative sentences in some Iberian Romance languages. Journal of Linguistics 34(1). 125-164.

Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Maienborn, Claudia. 2005a. On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31(3). 275-316.

Maienborn, Claudia. 2005b. A discourse-based account of Spanish ser/estar. Linguistics 43(1). 155-180.

Maienborn, Claudia. 2007. On Davidsonian and Kimian states. In Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax, 107-130. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 4.2, Proceedings of the Penn Linguistics Colloquium. 201-225.

Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words. Handout, LOT Summer School.

Marantz, Alec. 2009. Resultatives and re-resultatives: Direct objects may construct events by themselves. Talk at the University of Pennsylvania Linguistics Speaker Series, Philadelphia.

Marantz, Alec. 2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua. 152-168.

Markman, Vita G. 2008. The case of predicates (revisited): Predicate instrumental in Russian and its restrictions. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 16(2). 187-246.

McCloskey, James. 2014. Irish existentials in context. Syntax 17(4). 343-384.

McNally, Louise. 1998. Existential sentences without existential quantification. Linguistics and Philoso- phy 21. 353-392.

Merchant, Jason. 2015. How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 46(2). 273-303.

Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential sentences in English. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3. 1-29.

Moro, Andrea. 1997. The raising of predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Myler, Neil. 2016. Building and interpreting possession sentences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Myler, Neil, Einar Freyr Sigurðsson & Jim Wood. 2014. Predicative possession builds on top of attributive possession: Evidence from Icelandic. Talk at the GLOW 37 Semantics Workshop on Possession, Brussels.

Nardi, Ricardo L. J. 2002. Introducción al quichua santiagueño [Introduction to Santiago del Estero Quechua]. San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina: Editorial Dunken.

Nevins, Andrew & Neil Myler. 2014. A brown-eyed girl. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, Papers in Honor of Sarah van Wagenen. Los Angeles, CA. Also available on LingBuzz: lingbuzz/002021.

Nevins, Andrew & Neil Myler. under revision. A relation-headed approach to participialized inalienable possession. Ms, University College London and Boston University.

Pantcheva, Marina. 2011. Decomposing path: The nanosyntax of directional expressions. Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø dissertation.

Partee, Barbara H. 1986. Unambiguous be in ambiguous pseudocleft. Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 16), 354-366.

Partee, Barbara H. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh, & Martin Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, 115-143. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.

Partee, Barbara H. 1999. Weak NPs in HAVE sentences. In Jelle Gerbrandy, Maarten Marx, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema (eds.), JFAK, a Liber Amicorum for Johan van Benthen on the occasion of his 50th Birthday, 39-57. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.

Pescarini, Diego. 2010. Elsewhere in Romance: Evidence from clitic clusters. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3). 427-444.

Postma, Gertjan. 1993. The syntax of the morphological defectivity of BE. HIL manuscripts 3. 31-67.

Pountain, Christopher. 1982. ESSERE/STARE as a Romance phenomenon. In Nigel Vincent & Martin Harris (eds.), Studies in the Romance Verb: Essays Offered to Joe Cremona on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, 139-160. London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm.

Preminger, Omer. 2009. Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic-doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4). 619-666.

Prezioso, Mabel & Rubén Torres. 2006. Quechua tukuypaj [Quechua for all]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Nuestra América.

Pustet, Regina. 2003. Copulas: Universals in the categorization of the lexicon. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002/2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Radkevich, Nina. 2010. On location: The structure of case and adpositions. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.

Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Richardson, Kylie. 2001. What secondary predicates in Russian tell us about the link between tense, aspect, and case. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 26. 1-25.

Richardson, Kylie. 2007. Case and aspect in Slavic. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Rimell, Laura D. 2012. Nominal roots as event predicates in English denominal conversion verbs. New York, NY: New York University dissertation.

Ritter, Elizabeth & Sara Thomas Rosen. 1997. The function of have. Lingua 101. 295-321.

Rothstein, Susan. 1999. Fine-grained structure in the eventuality domain: The semantics of predicative adjective phrases and BE. Natural Language Semantics 7(4). 347-420.

Rothstein, Susan. 2001. Predicates and their subjects. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

Roy, Isabelle. 2013. Nonverbal predication: Copular sentences at the syntax-semantics interface. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Sæbø, Kjell. 2009. Possession and pertinence: The meaning of have. Natural Language Semantics 17(4). 369-397.

Safir, Ken. 1982. Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2007. Agree and existential constructions. In José Camacho, Nydia Flores-Férran, Liliana Sánchez, Viviane Déprez, María José Cabrera (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2006: Selected Papers from the 36th Linguistic Symposium on the Romance Languages, New Brunswick, March-April 2006, 275-295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Smith, Peter W., Beata Moskal, Ting Xu, Jungmin Kang & Jonathan Bobaljik. 2016. Case and number suppletion in pronouns. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003110

Starke, Michal. 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. In Peter Svenonius, Gillian Ramchand, Michal Starke & Knut Tarald Taraldsen (eds.), Nordlyd 36.1., 1-6. Tromsø, Norway: CASTL.

Stassen, Leon. 1997. Intransitive predication. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Stassen, Leon. 2009. Predicative possession. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

World Atlas of Language Structures Online, http://wals.info/chapter/117. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Spanning. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001501.

Svenonius, Peter. 2016. Spans and words. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological Metatheory, 201-222. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1981. The possessive construction in Hungarian: A configurational category in a non- configurational language. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae 31. 261-289.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin E. Kiss (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian. (Syntax and Semantics 27), 179-274. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Tham, Shiao Wei. 2004. Representing possessive predication: Semantic dimensions and pragmatic bases. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.

Tsujioka, Takae. 2002. The syntax of possession in Japanese. New York, NY: Routledge.

Uriagereka, Juan. 2001. Adjectival clues. Talk at Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese/Hispanic Lin- guistics Symposium, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

van de Kerke, Simon C. 1996. Affix order and interpretation in Bolivian Quechua. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: University of Amsterdam dissertation.

Weber, David. 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

Welch, Nicholas. 2012. The bearable lightness of being: The encoding of coincidence in two-copula lan- guages. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary dissertation.

Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203-238.

Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Williams, Edwin. 2006. The subject-predicate theory of there. Linguistic Inquiry 37(4). 648-651.

Wood, Jim. 2014. Reflexive -st verbs in Icelandic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32(4). 1387-1425.

Wood, Jim. 2015. Icelandic morphosyntax and argument structure. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Wood, Jim & Alec Marantz. 2017. The interpretation of external arguments. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego. (eds.) The verbal domain, 255-278. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

In document INTRODUCCION GENERALIDADES (página 181-186)