DESCRIPCIÓN DE CARGOS

30

CROP YIELDS AND ¹⁵N RECOVERY OF RICE AND WHEAT GROWN SEQUENTIALLY WITH DIFFERENT CROP ESTABLISHMENT AND TILLAGE METHODS IN NEPAL

31 000 ha were cultivated under the rice–wheat system with an average productivity of 3.61 t ha^–

1 year^–1. This cultivated land increased up to 550 000 ha with a productivity of 4.2 t ha^–1 year^–

1 by the year 2000. Considering the potential productivity of the rice–wheat system to be 9.29 t ha^–1 year^–1, this information would indicate that only 50% of the potential productivity was achieved. Increased production through expanding the cultivated land area is not a long-term viable option to meet the food requirements of the country. Future increases in agricultural production will have to come through increased productivity from the existing agricultural land. Maintenance of soil fertility, improving water and nutrient use efficiency and crop management practices and increased profitability are among the main factors to be considered to bridge the wide yield gap and sustain productivity of the intensive rice–wheat cropping system.

Rice in the summer wet season and wheat in the winter dry season are traditionally grown under puddled and well-pulverized soil conditions, respectively. Many researchers have reported that puddled rice culture adversely affects the subsequent wheat crop with respect to aeration, soil-water movement and root penetration. Various novel crop establishment and tillage or land preparation methods to address the problems associated with puddling and conventional wheat planting have been tested. It was reported that direct seeded rice in a rice–wheat system produced a significantly higher straw yield and similar grain yield than that of transplanted rice and increased the straw and grain yield of the subsequent wheat crop [1].

Nutrients, in particular nitrogen (N), have a significant effect on improving cereal crop yield and quality. Intensive use of fertilizers is not yet common in Nepalese agriculture except in some small areas due to several local factors such as accessibility, affordability, awareness, profitability, etc. Crop recoveries of less than 50% and estimated losses of 30–40% are commonly reported in fertilizer N use efficiency investigations. For instance it was reported that 38.5–40.2% of the applied N was recovered by the wheat crop in a Typic Haplustert soil [2], and the urea-N utilization by mustard ranged from 46–55% and losses were 27–39% in a Typic Ustochrept [3]. In a nitrogen balance study in a maize–millet cropping system in the mid-hills zone of Nepal, <25% of the applied fertilizer N was recovered in maize with only 3% recovered in the following millet crop [4]. Approximately 33% of the applied fertilizer was unaccounted for in the soil–crop system at the maize harvest.

Working in a system approach, the influence of new crop establishment and tillage methods on nitrogen and water use efficiency (NUE and WUE) and changes in soil physical conditions need to be better understood to increase productivity and sustainability of the rice–

wheat cropping system. The objective of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the effects of selected crop establishment / tillage methods on rice and wheat yields, NUE, WUE and changes of soil physical conditions.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. EXPERIMENTAL SITE

The field experiment was run over four consecutive years (from 2002–03 to 2005–06 cropping cycles) under a rice–wheat system at the Agricultural Implement Research Centre, in Ranighat, Parsa, Nepal (Fig. 1). The soil at the experimental site was a silty loam and the main characteristics are given in Table 1.

32

2.2. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS

Mean monthly rainfall and air temperatures at the Parwanipur Agricultural Station, near to the experimental site are presented in Fig. 2a and Fig. 2b, respectively. The total annual rainfall during the experimental period ranged from 1524 to 2282 mm.

FIG. 1. Distribution of rice–wheat cropping belt areas in Nepal.

TABLE 1. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOIL (0–15 cm) OF THE EXPERIMENTAL SITE, RANIGHAT

Soil chemical characteristics Soil physical characteristics pH

Organic matter (g kg^–1) Total N (g kg^–1) P (mg kg^–1) K (mg kg^–1)

5.8 13.7 0.5 10.4 15.4

Bulk density (g cm^–3) Sand (g kg^–1)

Silt (g kg^–1) Clay (g kg^–1)

Moisture retention at field capacity (g kg^–1) Moisture retention at wilting point (g kg^–1) Hydraulic conductivity (mm hr^–1)

1.6 345 490 165 89.5 60.4 0.234

33 2.3. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/TREATMENTS

The experimental treatments were four crop establishment / tillage methods. They were replicated four times in a Randomized Complete Block design (RCBD). A detailed description is presented in Table 2. In rice, within each main plot of 14 × 8 m, micro plots (1

× 0.8 × 0.4 m for the flat treatment and 1.2 × 0.67 × 0.55 m in bed planting) with tin sheet sides were laid down. The height of the box was 10 cm above the soil surface. In wheat, micro plots of the same size as in the rice crop were established at new sites within the main plots and these were delineated with iron pegs and ropes. ¹⁵N-labelled urea (5 atom % ¹⁵N) at the appropriate rate for the crop (Table 3) was applied to the micro plots and plants were grown to maturity.

FIG. 2. Mean monthly rainfall (a) and maximum and minimum temperature (b) at Parwanipur weather station near to the experimental site.

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Precipitation (mm)

Month (a)

2002 2003 2004 2005

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

J F M A M J J A S O N D

TemperatureoC

Month

Maximum

Minimum

2002 2003 2004 2005

(b)

34

2.4. FIELD/CROP MANAGEMENT

Rice and wheat crops were grown within the management treatments. Rice received a total of 100 kg N ha^–1, 46 kg P2O5 and 48 kg K2O ha^–1 and wheat 120 kg N, 60 kg P2O5 and 60 kg K2O ha^–1. For rice the first split of 20 kg N, and all of the P and K were applied as a basal, and two more splits of 40 kg N were applied at tillering and panicle initiation. Wheat received the first split of 60 kg N ha^–1 and all of the P and K as a basal, and two more splits of 30 kg N ha^–1 as top dressings at tillering and jointing. The agronomic operations undertaken are presented in Table 3.

TABLE 2. DETAILS OF THE CROP ESTABLISHMENT TREATMENTS

Treatment Rice crop Wheat crop

PTFS/CT Manual transplanting on puddled flat bed in row at 20 x 20 cm, a conventional method (PTFS).

Well pulverized soil with tractor ploughing, harrowing, planking, broad-casting fertilizer, and wheat seeds and then planking as farmers’ practice (CT).

UPTB/D Manual transplanting on unpuddled bed made with FIRBS at 65 cm from one bed to another bed. Paired rows on each bed at 20 x 20 cm. Bed width and height maintained were 37 and 15 cm, respectively (UPTB).

Seeding wheat on bed after rice crop without disturbing the previously made bed but reshaping the bed with FIRBS keeping two rows of wheat on each bed (D).

UPDF/D Direct seeding of rice on unpuddled flat land previously ploughed and planked at 20 cm apart in row with tractor drawn seed drill (UPDF).

Wheat seeding with zero till drill without pre ploughing after rice in row, 20 cm apart (D).

UPDB/D Direct seeding of rice on unpuddled raised bed prepared with FIRBS at 65 cm from one bed to another bed. Paired rice rows on each bed at 20 cm from one row to another row (UPDB).

Seeding wheat at 20 cm apart in row on the bed after reshaping the bed with FIRBS attached seed drill and maintaining two rows of wheat on each bed (D).

35 TABLE 3. AGRONOMIC OPERATIONS CARRIED OUT DURING FOUR CROPPING SEASONS 2002–05

Agronomic operation

2002 2003 2004 2005

Rice Wheat Rice Wheat Rice Wheat Rice Wheat

Variety Sabitri Vrikuti Sabitri Vrikuti Sabitri Vrikuti Sabitri Vrikuti Seeding 24/5/02 23/11/02 27/5/03 23/11/03 2/6/04 28/11/04 9/6/05 12/11/05

T ' Planting 23/6/02 - 22/6/03 - 7/7/04 - 12/7/05 -

T ' dressing I 19/7/02 17/12/02 15/7/03 19/12/03 3/8/04 29/12/04 3/8/05 20/12/05 T ' dressing II 16/8/02 27/1/03 12/8/03 22/1/04 3/9/04 30/1/05 3/9/05 12/1/06 Harvesting 23/10/02 9/4/03 18/10/03 4/4/04 22/11/04 1/4/05 28/10/05 30/3/06 Soil sampling

I

21/6/02 - 20/6 and

14/7

- 5/7and

4/8/04

- 10/7and

2/8/05

20/12/05

Soil sampling II

16/8/02 24/1/03 11/8/03 29/1/04 29/8/04 29/1/05 2/9/05 12/1/06

Soil sampling III

29/10/02 11/4/03 17/10/03 5/4/04 22/11/04 2/4/05 29/10/05 2/4/06

Seed rate, (kg ha^–1)

40 120 40 120 40 120 40 120

N: P2O5: K2O (kg ha^–1)

100:46:48 120:60:60 100:46:48 120:60:60 100:60:60 120:60:60 100:46:48 120:60:60

2.5. PLANT AND SOIL SAMPLING AT HARVEST

At harvest time, grain and straw yields from the main plots where unlabelled urea was used were recorded.

Plant and grain samples of rice and wheat at harvest and post-harvest soil samples from three depths (0–15, 15–30, 30–45 cm) were collected from the microplots to determine

% ¹⁵N abundance. ¹⁵N analyses in soil and plant samples were carried out at the IAEA Seibersdorf Laboratory, Austria.

2.6. SOIL SAMPLING AND DETERMINATION OF SOIL MINERAL NITROGEN (NO3–

-N AND NH₄⁺-N)

Soil samples from four depths were taken at tillering in rice, jointing in wheat, and at harvest of each crop for mineral N determination. Composite soil samples from 0–15, 15–30, 30–60 and 60–90 cm depths of the experimental plots were taken with a tube auger and 120 ml of 2 M KCl was added to 40 g of fresh soil and immediately shaken for one hour in a reciprocating shaker. The extracted solutions were shipped to the laboratory and NO3–

-N was determined by colorimetry after reduction with cadmium (copperized cadmium reduction

36

method) while NH4+

-N was determined by semi micro distillation with MgO and titration of the distillate with standardized acid using bromocresol green and methyl red mixed indicator.

2.7. DETERMINATION OF SOIL BULK DENSITY AND POROSITY

A tube sampler of 21.9 mm internal diameter was used to take samples from each plot for measurement of bulk density and porosity. Duplicate samples were taken from the 0–15 cm depth in wheat but only 0–10 cm in rice. Samples were placed in aluminium foil and the moist soil weight recorded. They were then put in an oven at 105^oC for 24 hours and the oven dry weight recorded. Bulk density, total porosity and air filled porosity were determined following standard procedures.

2.8. EVALUATION (NUE AND WUE) PARAMETERS

Recoveries of applied ¹⁵N from soils and plants were calculated from the atom % ¹⁵N excess in the samples as follows:

Recovery of applied fertilizer N in plant (%) = {(% ¹⁵N excess in sample) / (% ¹⁵N excess in fertilizer)} × N in sample (%) × yield (kg ha^–1) × 0.01 × {100 / N rate (kg ha^–1)}. It is considered as index of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).

Recovery of applied fertilizer N in soil (%) = {(% ¹⁵N excess in sample) / (% ¹⁵N excess in fertilizer)} × N in soil sample (%) × soil weight (kg ha^–1) × 0.01× {100 / N rate (kg ha^–1)}.

Note: Weight of soil ha^–1 was calculated using the bulk density of the soil layer.

Water use efficiency (WUE) in wheat was determined in terms of kg grain m^–3 water used.

2.9. STATISTICAL ANALYSES

All data were subjected to analysis of variance. Comparisons of means were made using the Lsd test at P<0.05.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION