Capítulo II Marco teórico1
2.3 Proceso administrativo
2.3.3 Descripción de puestos
Muscle foods pose considerably more challenges than other foods for development and successful application of spoilage detection methods. These include a highly complex food tissue matrix in which the microorganisms may be embedded and strongly attached, and from which they must be detached to detect and enumerate the microorganisms. This means the food must generally be placed in a liquid diluent and then physically manipulated to release the microorganisms into the liquid. This dilution effect obviously creates a need for a more sensitive detection method than a sample to which the method could be applied directly, such as a liquid food (i.e., milk). In addi-tion, the microflora is generally quite diverse and the dominant flora is very much dependent on the storage environment. At the early stage of the food process the levels of microorganisms on the raw muscle food may be as low as log 2.0 CFU g−1, thus posing additional challenges for the sensitivity of the detection method.
The gold standard method to predict spoilage remains the aerobic SPC, but it is still required by the industry that alternative methods are validated against this method. However, as previ-ously described in this chapter, the SPC is far from perfect and more rapid methods to predict spoilage are urgently needed by the muscle foods sector (fish, meat, and poultry industries). These alternative spoilage methods must generally give results that are comparable and validated against
“gold standard” cultural microbial methods. The methods must be sensitive, rapid, suited to online use, and at least semiautomated. They must be suited to routine use, without the need for highly skilled operators, as high staff turnover is often a major issue in the muscle food industry, and it is neither practical nor possible to keep retraining staff to carry out a test that is highly complex.
The muscle food sector has undoubtedly been the slowest sector in the food industry to take on board alternative technologies for spoilage prediction. However, they are now being com-pelled by their customers, regulatory authorities, and consumers to more accurately predict shelf life. This is even more pertinent with the continued market move toward chilled prepared foods with minimal preservatives and a short shelf life. Although there has been much research and development in the area of rapid spoilage detection methods, recent research on rapid microbial methods has tended to focus more on methods for identification of specific species of microor-ganisms rather than on the total microbial load. However, some of the emerging technologies developed, albeit for other applications, have enormous potential to be further developed for enumeration of the total microbial load and to predict spoilage. More research efforts should now be refocused in this direction using the newer technologies to overcome the hurdles that have to date prevented the widespread uptake of rapid methods to predict spoilage by the muscle food sector.
references
1. Bell, R.G., Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses. J Appl Microbiol 82, 292, 1997.
2. Elder, R.O., Keen, J.E., Siragusa, G.R., Barkocy-Gallagher, G.A., Koohmaraie, M. and Laegreid, W.W., Correlation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in feces, hides, and car-casses of beef cattle during processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 2999, 2000.
3. Ercolini, D., Russo, F., Torrieri, E., Masi, P. and Villani, F., Changes in the spoilage-related micro-biota of beef during refrigerated storage under different packaging conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 4663, 2006.
4. Hinton, A., Jr., Cason, J.A. and Ingram, K.D., Tracking spoilage bacteria in commercial poultry processing and refrigerated storage of poultry carcasses. Int J Food Microbiol 91, 155, 2004.
5. Borch, E., Kant-Muermans, M.L. and Blixt, Y., Bacterial spoilage of meat and cured meat products.
Int J Food Microbiol 33, 103, 1996.
6. Huis in’t Veld, J.H.J., Microbial and biochemical spoilage of foods: an overview. Int J Food Microbiol 33, 1, 1996.
7. Gustavsson, P. and Borch, E., Contamination of beef carcasses by psychrotrophic Pseudomonas and Enterobacteriaceae at different stages along the processing line. Int J Food Microbiol 20, 2, 1993.
8. Dainty, R.H., Edwards, R.A. and Hibbard, C.M., Time course of volatile compound formation dur-ing refrigerated storage of naturally contaminated beef in air. J Appl Bacteriol 59, 303, 1985.
9. Pin, C., Garcia de Fernando, G.D. and Ordonez, J.A., Effect of modified atmosphere composition on the metabolism of glucose by Brochothrix thermosphacta. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 4441, 2002.
10. Chenoll, E., Macian, M.C., Elizaquivel, P. and Aznar, R., Lactic acid bacteria associated with vacuum-packed cooked meat product spoilage: population analysis by rDNA-based methods. J Appl Microbiol 102, 498, 2007.
11. AOAC, Official Method of Analysis, 15th ed., AOAC, Washington, DC, 1990.
12. International Organization for Standardization, EN ISO 4833:2003, Microbiology of food and ani-mal feeding stuffs—horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms—colony count tech-nique at 30°C, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
13. Besnard, V., Federighi, M., Declerq, E., Jugiau, F. and Cappelier, J.M., Environmental and physico-chemical factors induce VBNC state in Listeria monocytogenes. Vet Res 33, 359, 2002.
14. AOAC, Official Method of Analysis, 16th ed., AOAC, Washington, DC, 1995.
15. Park, Y.H., Seo, K.S., Ahn, J.S., Yoo, H.S. and Kim, S.P., Evaluation of the Petrifilm plate method for the enumeration of aerobic microorganisms and coliforms in retailed meat samples. J Food Prot 64, 1841, 2001.
16. Dawkins, G.S., Hollingsworth, J.B. and Hamilton, M.A., Incidences of problematic organisms on Petrifilm aerobic count plates used to enumerate selected meat and dairy products. J Food Prot 68, 1506, 2005.
17. Beuchat, L.R., Copeland, F., Curiale, M.S., Danisavich, T., Gangar, V., King, B.W., Lawlis, T.L., Likin, R.O., Okwusoa, J., Smith, C.F. and Townsend, D.E., Comparison of the SimPlate total plate count method with Petrifilm, Redigel, conventional pour-plate methods for enumerating aerobic microorganisms in foods. J Food Prot 61, 14, 1998.
18. Feldsine, P.T., Leung, S.C., Lienau, A.H., Mui, L.A. and Townsend, D.E., Enumeration of total aerobic microorganisms in foods by SimPlate Total Plate Count-Color Indicator methods and con-ventional culture methods: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 86, 257, 2003.
19. Paulsen, P., Schopf, E. and Smulders, F.J., Enumeration of total aerobic bacteria and Escherichia coli in minced meat and on carcass surface samples with an automated most-probable-number method compared with colony count protocols. J Food Prot 69, 2500, 2006.
20. Kang, D.-H., Dougherty, R.H. and Fung, D.Y.C., Comparison of Pulsifier and Stomacher to detach microorganisms from lean meat tissues. J Rapid Methods Auto Microbiol 9, 27, 2001.
21. Duffy, G., Sheridan, J.J., McDowell, D.A., Blair, I. and Harrington, D., The use of Alcalase 2.5L in the acridine orange direct count technique for the rapid enumeration of bacteria in beef mince.
Lett Appl Microbiol 13, 198, 1991.
22. Duffy, G. and Sheridan, J.J., Viability staining in a direct count rapid method for the determination of total viable counts on processed meats. J Microbiol Methods 31, 167, 1998.
23. Hermida, M., Taboada, M., Menendez, S. and Rodriguez-Otero, J.L., Semi-automated direct epi-fluorescent filter technique for total bacterial count in raw milk. J AOAC Int 83, 1345, 2000.
24. D’Haese, E. and Nelis, H.J., Rapid detection of single cell bacteria as a novel approach in food micro-biology. J AOAC Int 85, 979, 2002.
25. Thore, A., Technical aspects of the bioluminescent firefly luciferase assay of ATP. Sci. Tools 26, 30, 1979.
26. McElroy, W.D., The energy source for bioluminescence in an isolated system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 33, 342, 1947.
27. Davidson, C.A., Griffith, C.J., Peters, A.C. and Fielding, L.M., Evaluation of two methods for moni-toring surface cleanliness-ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing. Luminescence 14, 33, 1999.
28. Aycicek, H., Oguz, U. and Karci, K., Comparison of results of ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing methods for the determination of surface cleanliness at a hospital kitchen. Int J Hyg Environ Health 209, 203, 2006.
29. Bossuyt, R., Determination of bacteriological quality of raw milk by an ATP assay technique.
Milchwissenschaft 36, 257, 1981.
30. Bossuyt, R., A 5 minute ATP platform test for judging the bacteriological quality of raw milk. Neth Milk Dairy J 36, 355, 1982.
31. Stannard, C.J. and Wood, J.M., The rapid estimation of microbial contamination of raw meat by measurement of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). J Appl Bacteriol 55, 429, 1983.
32. Siragusa, G.R., Dorsa, W.J., Cutter, C.N., Perino, L.J. and Koohmaraie, M., Use of a newly devel-oped rapid microbial ATP bioluminescence assay to detect microbial contamination on poultry car-casses. J Biolumin Chemilumin 11, 297, 1996.
33. Ellerbroek, L. and Lox, C., The use of neck skin for microbial process control of fresh poultry meat using the bioluminescence method. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 111, 181, 2004.
34. Firstenberg-Eden, R., Electrical impedance method for determining microbial quality of foods. In:
Foodborne Microorganisms and Their Toxins: Developing Methodology, Pierson, M.D. and Stern, N.J., Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 679, 1985.
35. Dziezak, J.D., Rapid methods for microbiological analysis of food. Food Technol 41, 56, 1987.
36. Firstenberg-Eden, R. and Tricarico, M.K., Impedimetric determination of total, mesophilic and psy-chrotrophic counts in raw milk. J Food Sci 48, 1750, 1983.
37. Hardy, D., Kraeger, S.J., Dufour, S.W. and Cady, P., Rapid detection of microbial contamination in frozen vegetables by automated impedance measurements. Appl Environ Microbiol 34, 14, 1977.
38. Firstenberg-Eden, R., Rapid estimation of the number of microorganisms in raw meat by impedance measurements. Food Technol 37, 64, 1983.
39. Ogden, I.D., Use of conductance methods to predict bacterial counts in fish. J Appl Bacteriol 61, 263, 1986.
40. Bollinger, S., Casella, M. and Teuber, M., Comparative impedance evaluation of the microbial load of different foodstuffs. Lebensm Wiss Technol 27, 177, 1994.
41. Heeschen, W., Sudi, J. and Suhren, G., Application of the Limulus test for detection of gram negative micro-organisms in milk and dairy products. In: Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology and Immunology, Habermahl, K.O., Ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 638, 1985.
42. Misawa, N., Kumamoto, K., Nyuta, S. and Tuneyoshi, M., Application of the Limulus amoebo-cyte lysate test as an indicator of microbial contamination in pork carcasses. J Vet Med Sci 57, 351, 1995.
43. Siragusa, G.R., Kang, D.H. and Cutter, C.N., Monitoring the microbial contamination of beef carcass tissue with a rapid chromogenic Limulus amoebocyte lysate endpoint assay. Lett Appl Microbiol 31, 178, 2000.
44. Gillie, J.K., Hochlowski, J. and Arbuckle-Keil, G.A., Infrared spectroscopy. Anal Chem 72, 71R, 2000.
45. Lin, M., Al-Holy, M., Chang, S.S., Huang, Y., Cavinato, A.G., Kang, D.H. and Rasco, B.A., Rapid discrimination of Alicyclobacillus strains in apple juice by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
Int J Food Microbiol 105, 369, 2005.
46. Lamprell, H., Mazerolles, G., Kodjo, A., Chamba, J.F., Noel, Y. and Beuvier, E., Discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus strains from different species of Staphylococcus using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Int J Food Microbiol 108, 125, 2006.
47. Oberreuter, H., Seiler, H. and Scherer, S., Identification of coryneform bacteria and related taxa by Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 91, 2002.
48. Mariey, L., Signolle, J.P., Amiel, C. and Travert, J., Discrimination, classification, identification of microorganisms using FT-IR spectroscopy and chemometrics. Vib Spectrosc 26, 151, 2001.
49. Ellis, D.I., Broadhurst, D., Kell, D.B., Rowland, J.J. and Goodacre, R., Rapid and quantitative detec-tion of the microbial spoilage of meat by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and machine learn-ing. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 2822, 2002.
50. Ellis, D.I., Broadhurst, D. and Goodacre, R., Rapid and quantitative detection of the microbial spoil-age of beef by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and machine learning. Anal Chim Acta 514, 193, 2004.
51. Lin, M., Al-Holy, M., Mousavi-Hesary, M., Al-Qadiri, H., Cavinato, A.G. and Rasco, B.A., Rapid and quantitative detection of the microbial spoilage in chicken meat by diffuse reflectance spectros-copy (600–1100 nm). Lett Appl Microbiol 39, 148, 2004.
52. Lin, M., Mousavi, M., Al-Holy, M., Cavinato, A.G. and Rasco, B.A., Rapid near infrared spectro-scopic method for the detection of spoilage in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fillet. J Food Sci 71, S18, 2006.
53. Holm, C., Mathiasen, T. and Jespersen, L., A flow cytometric technique for quantification and dif-ferentiation of bacteria in bulk tank milk. J Appl Microbiol 97, 935, 2004.
54. Flint, S., Walker, K., Waters, B. and Crawford, R., Description and validation of a rapid (1 h) flow cytom-etry test for enumerating thermophilic bacteria in milk powders. J Appl Microbiol 102, 909, 2007.
55. Gutierrez, R., Garcia, T., Gonzalez, I., Sanz, B., Hernandez, P.E. and Martin, R., Quantitative detec-tion of meat spoilage bacteria by using the polymerase chain reacdetec-tion (PCR) and an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Lett Appl Microbiol 26, 372, 1998.
56. Yost, C.K. and Nattress, F.M., The use of multiplex PCR reactions to characterize populations of lactic acid bacteria associated with meat spoilage. Lett Appl Microbiol 31, 129, 2000.
57. Goto, S., Takahashi, H., Kawasaki, S., Kimura, B., Fujii, T., Nakatsuji, M. and Watanabe, I., Detection of Leuconostoc strains at a meat processing plant using polymerase chain reaction. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi 45, 25, 2004.
58. Venkitanarayanan, K.S., Faustman, C., Crivello, J.F., Khan, M.I., Hoagland, T.A. and Berry, B.W., Rapid estimation of spoilage bacterial load in aerobically stored meat by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction. J Appl Microbiol 82, 359, 1997.
59. Bellin, T., Pulz, M., Matussek, A., Hempen, H.G. and Gunzer, F., Rapid detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli by real-time PCR with fluorescent hybridization probes. J Clin Microbiol 39, 370, 2001.
60. Wittwer, C.T., Herrmann, M.G., Moss, A.A. and Rasmussen, R.P., Continuous fluorescence moni-toring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. Biotechniques 22, 130–131, 134, 1997.
61. Mackay, I.M., Real-time PCR in the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect 10, 190, 2004.
62. Josefsen, M.H., Krause, M., Hansen, F. and Hoorfar, J., Optimization of a 12-hour TaqMan PCR-based method for detection of Salmonella bacteria in meat. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 3040, 2007.
63. Navas, J., Ortiz, S., Lopez, P., Jantzen, M.M., Lopez, V. and Martinez-Suarez, J.V., Evaluation of effects of primary and secondary enrichment for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes by real-time PCR in retail ground chicken meat. Foodborne Pathog Dis 3, 347, 2006.
64. Perelle, S., Dilasser, F., Grout, J. and Fach, P., Screening food raw materials for the presence of the world’s most frequent clinical cases of Shiga toxin-encoding Escherichia coli O26, O103, O111, O145 and O157. Int J Food Microbiol 113, 284, 2007.
65. Holicka, J., Guy, R.A., Kapoor, A., Shepherd, D. and Horgen, P.A., A rapid (one day), sensitive real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detecting Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef. Can J Microbiol 52, 992, 2006.
66. Nguyen, L.T., Gillespie, B.E., Nam, H.M., Murinda, S.E. and Oliver, S.P., Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in beef products by real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Foodborne Pathog Dis 1, 231, 2004.
67. Rudi, K., Moen, B., Dromtorp, S.M. and Holck, A.L., Use of ethidium monoazide and PCR in com-bination for quantification of viable and dead cells in complex samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 1018, 2005.
68. Guy, R.A., Kapoor, A., Holicka, J., Shepherd, D. and Horgen, P.A., A rapid molecular-based assay for direct quantification of viable bacteria in slaughterhouses. J Food Prot 69, 1265, 2006.
69. Pardue, M.L. and Gall, J.G., Molecular hybridization of radioactive DNA to the DNA of cytological preparations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 64, 600, 1969.
70. John, H.A., Birnstiel, M.L. and Jones, K.W., RNA–DNA hybrids at the cytological level. Nature 223, 582, 1969.
71. Giovannoni, S.J., DeLong, E.F., Olsen, G.J. and Pace, N.R., Phylogenetic group-specific oligodeoxy-nucleotide probes for identification of single microbial cells. J Bacteriol 170, 720, 1988.
72. Amann, R.I., Krumholz, L. and Stahl, D.A., Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. J Bacteriol 172, 762, 1990.
73. Amann, R., Fuchs, B.M. and Behrens, S., The identification of microorganisms by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12, 231, 2001.
74. Bottari, B., Ercolini, D., Gatti, M. and Neviani, E., Application of FISH technology for microbiologi-cal analysis: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73, 485, 2006.
75. Moter, A. and Gobel, U.B., Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for direct visualization of microorganisms. J Microbiol Methods 41, 85, 2000.
76. Zarda, B., Amann, R., Wallner, G. and Schleifer, K.H., Identification of single bacterial cells using digoxigenin-labelled, rRNA-targeted oligonucleotides. J Gen Microbiol 137, 2823, 1991.
77. Schonhuber, W., Fuchs, B., Juretschko, S. and Amann, R., Improved sensitivity of whole-cell hybrid-ization by the combination of horseradish peroxidase-labeled oligonucleotides and tyramide signal amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 3268, 1997.
78. Lehtola, M.J., Loades, C.J. and Keevil, C.W., Advantages of peptide nucleic acid oligonucleotides for sensitive site directed 16S rRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detection of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari. J Microbiol Methods 62, 211, 2005.
79. Jain, K.K., Current status of fluorescent in-situ hybridisation. Med Device Technol 15, 14, 2004.
80. Stender, H., Lund, K., Petersen, K.H., Rasmussen, O.F., Hongmanee, P., Miorner, H. and Godtfredsen, S.E., Fluorescence in situ hybridization assay using peptide nucleic acid probes for differentiation between tuberculous and nontuberculous Mycobacterium species in smears of Mycobacterium cultures.
J Clin Microbiol 37, 2760, 1999.
81. Fang, Q., Brockmann, S., Botzenhart, K. and Wiedenmann, A., Improved detection of Salmonella spp. in foods by fluorescent in situ hybridization with 23S rRNA probes: a comparison with conven-tional culture methods. J Food Prot 66, 723, 2003.
82. Gunasekera, T.S., Dorsch, M.R., Slade, M.B. and Veal, D.A., Specific detection of Pseudomonas spp.
in milk by fluorescence in situ hybridization using ribosomal RNA directed probes. J Appl Microbiol 94, 936, 2003.
83. Blasco, L., Ferrer, S. and Pardo, I., Development of specific fluorescent oligonucleotide probes for in situ identification of wine lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 225, 115, 2003.
84. Gardener, J.W. and Bartlett, P.N., Electronic Noses—Principles and Applications, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
85. Magan, N. and Sahgal, N., Electronic nose for quality and safety control. In: Advances in Food Diagnostics, Nollet, L.M.L., Toldrá, F. and Hui, Y.H., Eds., Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 119, 2007.
86. Blixt, Y. and Borch, E., Using an electronic nose for determining the spoilage of vacuum-packaged beef. Int J Food Microbiol 46, 123, 1999.
87. Du, W.X., Kim, J., Cornell, J.A., Huang, T., Marshall, M.R. and Wei, C.I., Microbiological, sensory, and electronic nose evaluation of yellowfin tuna under various storage conditions. J Food Prot 64, 2027, 2001.
88. Van Loey, A., Hendrickx, M., Ludikhuyze, L., Weemaes, C., Haentjens, T., De Cordt, S. and Tobback, P., Potential Bacillus subtilis alpha-amylase-based time–temperature integrators to evaluate pasteurization processes. J Food Prot 59, 261, 1996.
89. Mehauden, K., Cox, P.W., Bakalis, S., Simmons, M.J.H., Tucker, G.S. and Fryer, P.J., A novel method to evaluate the applicability of time temperature integrators to different temperature profiles. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 8, 507–514, 2007.
90. Guiavarch, Y., Zuber, F., van Loey, A. and Hendrickx, M., Combined use of two single-component enzymatic time–temperature integrators: application to industrial continuous rotary processing of canned ravioli. J Food Prot 68, 375, 2005.
91. Guiavarc’h, Y., Van Loey, A., Zuber, F. and Hendrickx, M., Development characterization and use of a high-performance enzymatic time–temperature integrator for the control of sterilization process’
impacts. Biotechnol Bioeng 88, 15, 2004.
92. Tucker, G.S., Brown, H.M., Fryer, P.J., Cox, P.W., Poole II, F.L., Lee, H.S. and Adams, M.W.W., A sterilisation time–temperature integrator based on amylase from the hyperthermophilic organism Pyrococcus furiosus. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 8, 63, 2007.
93. Ozdemir, M. and Floros, J.D., Active food packaging technologies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 44, 185, 2004.
94. Giannakourou, M.C., Koutsoumanis, K., Nychas, G.J. and Taoukis, P.S., Field evaluation of the application of time temperature integrators for monitoring fish quality in the chill chain. Int J Food Microbiol 102, 323, 2005.
95. Moore, C.M. and Sheldon, B.W., Use of time–temperature integrators and predictive modeling to evaluate microbiological quality loss in poultry products. J Food Prot 66, 280, 2003.
96. Moore, C.M. and Sheldon, B.W., Evaluation of time–temperature integrators for tracking poultry product quality throughout the chill chain. J Food Prot 66, 287, 2003.
97. Pettipher, G.L. and Rodrigues, U.M., Rapid enumeration of microorganisms in foods by the direct epifluorescent filter technique. Appl Environ Microbiol 44, 809, 1982.
98. Liberski, D.J.A., Bacteriological examinations of chilled, cured canned pork hams and shoulders using a conventional microbiological technique and the DEFT method. Int J Food Microbiol 10, 19, 1990.
99. Qvist, S.H. and Jakobsen, M., Application of the direct epifluorescent filter technique as a rapid method in microbiological quality assurance in the meat industry. Int J Food Microbiol 2, 139, 1985.
100. Walls, I., Sheridan, J.J. and Levett, P.N., A rapid method of enumerating microorganisms from beef, using an acridine orange direct-count technique. Irish J Food Sci Technol 13, 23, 1989.
101. Sheridan, J.J., Walls, I. and Levett, P.N., Development of a rapid method for enumeration of bacteria in pork mince. Irish J Food Sci Technol 14, 1, 1990.
102. Walls, I., Sheridan, J.J., Welch, R.W. and McDowell, D.A., Separation of microorganisms from meat and their rapid enumeration using a membrane filtration-epifluorescent microscopy technique.
Lett Appl Microbiol 10, 23, 1990.
103. Sierra, M.L., Sheridan, J.J. and McGuire, L., Microbial quality of lamb carcasses during processing and the acridine orange direct count technique (a modified DEFT) for rapid enumeration of total viable counts. Int J Food Microbiol 36, 61, 1997.
21
Microbial Foodborne Pathogens
Marios Mataragas and Eleftherios H. Drosinos
Contents
2.1 Introduction ... 22 2.2 Cultural Methods ... 22 2.2.1 Enumeration Methods ... 23 2.2.1.1 Plate Count... 23 2.2.1.2 Most Probable Number ... 24 2.2.2 Detection Methods ... 24 2.3 Alternative or Rapid Microbiological Methods ... 24 2.3.1 Methods with a Concentration Step ...25 2.3.2 Detection and Enumeration Methods ...25 2.4 Listeria monocytogenes ... 27 2.4.1 Detection of Listeria monocytogenes ... 27 2.4.2 Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes ... 29 2.4.3 Confirmation of Listeria monocytogenes ... 30 2.5 Escherichia coli O157:H7 ... 32 2.5.1 Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7... 32 2.5.2 Enumeration of Escherichia coli O157:H7 ... 34 2.5.3 Confirmation of Escherichia coli O157:H7... 34 2.6 Salmonella spp. ...35 2.6.1 Detection and Confirmation of Salmonella spp. ... 36 2.7 Staphylococcus aureus... 38 2.7.1 Enumeration and Confirmation of Staphylococcus aureus ... 38
2.8 Yersinia enterocolitica ... 40 2.8.1 Detection and Confirmation of Yersinia enterocolitica ... 40 2.9 Bacillus cereus ... 42 2.9.1 Enumeration and Confirmation of Bacillus cereus ... 42 2.10 Clostridium perfringens ... 44 2.10.1 Enumeration and Confirmation of Clostridium perfringens ...45 2.11 Campylobacter jejuni ...47 2.11.1 Detection and Confirmation of Campylobacter jejuni ...47 References ... 49
2.1 Introduction
Prevention of foodborne infections and intoxications are of paramount importance today. Hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP)-type food safety management systems are applied by food enterprises to achieve this goal. Validation of all control measures requires, among other activities, microbiological testing of food and environmental samples. The presence of pathogenic bacteria on raw meat (beef, lamb, and pork) and poultry is the result of their contamination from the live animal, equipment, employees, and environment. Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Yersinia enterocolitica, Escherichia coli (mainly E. coli O157:H7), Campylo-bacter jejuni, and Clostridium perfringens often occur on raw meat and poultry. These pathogens have been implicated in foodborne outbreaks associated with the consumption of meat and poul-try. C. jejuni frequently occurs on poultry meat, whereas E. coli is rarely found on this type of meat. However, beef has been implicated in many foodborne outbreaks associated with E. coli.
Salmonella and L. monocytogenes may be found on all types of meat, including beef, lamb, pork, and poultry, and Y. enterocolitica is usually present on pork meat surfaces [1,2]. Psychrotrophic pathogens such as L. monocytogenes and Y. enterocolitica are of great concern because they are able to reach high numbers at refrigerated temperatures, especially when products are kept under
Salmonella and L. monocytogenes may be found on all types of meat, including beef, lamb, pork, and poultry, and Y. enterocolitica is usually present on pork meat surfaces [1,2]. Psychrotrophic pathogens such as L. monocytogenes and Y. enterocolitica are of great concern because they are able to reach high numbers at refrigerated temperatures, especially when products are kept under