DISCUSIÓN DE LOS RESULTADOS

■2 I b id * , e is .. 8t:«- Bi&0, ’8;3G , 2s:h9; a t* Mark 7 : 6 , 1 1 :1 3 ,

4:#, 7:l8r

:

, 14:37; at.. Jb#-11:34,. '

3 I b i d . , g* 149, a ti, Matthew 24:36 Qu v3 S t . Hark 1 3 :3 2 .

4 Ibidv, p*. 149, 3t»: John 3:34:-;

:

;

:

,

;

98

He e x h i b i t s tovmx^cls a l l f o o t s o f p liy s io a l n a tu r e th e x»eeeptiveness o f o -p e rfe c t s o n s h ip , so t h a t f o r eximpla# th e law s o f n a t u r a l w aste and grow th 'a re p o in te d o u t by Him w ith oonâiümoate aç cù rao y i n th e p a r a b le o f th e

sower# But lie n e v e r e n la rg e a o u r sto c k o f n a t u r a l

knowledge# p h y s ic a l, o r h isto x ^ ic a l o u t o f t h e ' ‘d iv in e 1

O m nisolenoc i" To c i t e ; t h e s e q u o ta tio n s i s n o t to

.imply th at" Gore i s i n t e r e s t e d e x c lu s iv e ly i n C h r i s t ’ s ig n o ra n c e ; suoEi an a s s e r t i o n would be q u ite f a ls e # lie i s iiito i’eBtecl i n e s t a b l i s h i n g a s f a c t ’ tiiie hm aanity o f O h fis t and H is d i v i n i t y : "The e v id e n c e s t h a t o u r Lord x’o a ï ï y l i v e d u irier him'iarM l i m i t a t i o n s a r e h s p l a i n

0B t h e e v id e n c e s t h a t i n and u nder th e p r o p e r ly human

n a tu r e He who spqko# and v/orkod, mid s u f f e r e d , was th e

Son o f God, one w ith th e F a th e r# " ^ s c r i p t u r e # th e

p rim ary so u rce o f ap%)eal,^ demands t h a t we i*eoognise

b o th fa c ts # Core th e n a s k s th e q u e s tio n s : "liow a re

1 Gore,, Hampton L e c tu r e s , p#, 150# T#B,# a t r o n g ,

A Mahubl o f Thoolop:y# %)* 121, s t a t e s : "The o b je c t

Of W v o l u t i o n , 'arid f o r t h i s

puz'poSG a mere a d d itio n to o u r know ledge, c r i t i c a l o r s c i e n t i f i c , would be r e a l l y i r r e l e v a n t *"

2 Ib id #

3 "#.# #tho whole h i s t o r i c a l p o s i t i o n and j u s t i f i c a t i o n o f the. s p é c i f i a form o f C h r i s t i a n i t y c a l l e d

A n g lican ism i s bound' Up with" i t s stren u b U s ap p e a l

to c c r i p t u r e . ;in th e a p p e a l we must be .s in c e re

99

th e phenomena to b e r e c o n c ile d In one c d n o e p tlo n t

how can wo im agine tExe c o n s i s t e n c y ,o f th e doclhoaci w ith

th e imnhood?"^ liis ansvxer l a - th e K en o tic Theory#

The K en o tic Theory i s Im p o rta n t to Oore f o r I t not, o n ly answ ers h i s g u e s tio n s b u t i t lik e w is e 'e m p lo y s th e e m p ir ic a l method o f I n q u i r y , w hich he f a v o u r s .

.s o 'f a r a s s c l e n t i f i o th e o lo g y has; i n - a n d f o r t h i s age à s p e c i a l i n t e l l e c t u a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y , ' i t i s to be

tr u e to f a c ts # Theology - C ir ris tia n th e o lo g y - may

be s a id to be a s r e a l l y in d u c tiv e a s p h y s ic a l s c ie n c e ; t h a t i s to say i t draw s c o n c lu s io n s from f a c t s o f

r e v e la tio n * " ^ W ith t h i s a s h i s acknow ledged m ethod,

Gore t u r n s to th e S c r i p t u r e s to d is c o v e r what f a c t s

a r e e v id e n t, a v a i l a b l e , and rev ea led # "Uimii s ta k e a b ly

i s o u r L ord t h e r e j ^ 's p e l o f at*. Jo h i^ p u t b e f o r e ,u s o s th e e t e r n a l Bon o f th e R a th e r in o a r h o to , and -u n m ista k ea b ly i a th e i n n e r , e s s e n t i a l u n i t y o f th e Bon and th e R a th e r and t h e i r c o n tin u a i a b id in g one i n t h e o t h e r t h e r e

i n s i a t c d upon, b u t i t a ls o a p p e a rs t h a t th e Bon o f th e 1 (k ire , Bampton L e c tu r es# p . 150#