Ghararasatechnicallegaltermreferstoparticularformsofuncertaintythat
symmetricallyaffectthecounterpartiestocommercialtransactionsinwhichbothparties exchangecountervalues.Thus,ghararwouldnotdirectlyapplytocontractslikegifts.
Somejurists,however,alsoemploythewordghararinthesenseoffraud.IbnRushd
fraud(ghabn)whosecauseisgharar.”120Infact,formIoftherootgh-r-r refersto
fraud.121Conversely,thewordgharīr,fromtheformfa‘īl,whichcommonlyhasthesame meaningastheformIpassiveparticiple,meanstobesomeone’strustedconfident
(kafīl).122Afullsurveyofthelexicographicaltraditionofthisrootisnotgermanehere
sincethesedefinitionsdonotdirectlyfigureinthediscoursesofmyjurists.
Notwithstandinghisequatingfraudwithgharar,IbnRushddevotesanother
sectionofthechapteronsalestoadiscussionoffraud(tadlīs)orpotentiallosses (ḍarar).123 Inthissectiononfraud,IbnRushddiscussesthefollowingsales:1)athird
120IbnRushd,Bidāya,vol.3,p.1198.
121Abū NaṣrIsmā‘īlb. Ḥammādal-Jawharī,Tājal-lughawa-ṣiḥāḥ al-‘arabīya,ed.Imīl Badī‘Ya‘qūbandMuḥammadNabīl Ṭarīfī (Beirut:Dāral-Kutubal-‘Ilmīya,1999),s.v.gh-r-r;E. Fagnan,AdditionsauxDictionairesArabes(Beirut:LibrairieduLiban,1960),s.v.gh-r-r;Edward W.Lane,Arabic-EnglishLexicon(London:WilliamsandNorgate,1865),s.v.gh-r-r;J.G.Hava,
Al-Farā’idal-Durrīya(Beirut:CatholicPress,1951),s.v.gh-r-r;Muḥammadb.Durayd,Kitāb Jamharatal-lugha,ed.Ramzī MunīrBa‘lbakkī (Beirut:Dāral-‘Ilmli’l-Malāyīn,1987),s.v.r-gh-
gh;Muḥammadb.Mukarramb.Manẓūr,Lisānal-‘arab(Beirut:Dāral-Bayrūt,1957),s.v.gh-r-r; MuḥammadMurtaḍā al-Zabīdī,Tājal-‘Arūs,ed.‘Abdal-SattārAḥmadFarrāj(Kuwait:Maṭba‘at
Ḥukūmatal-Kuwayt,1974),s.v.gh-r-r;Muḥammadb.Ya‘qūbal-Firūzābādī,Qāmūsal-muḥiṭ, (Beirut:Dāral-Jīl,1970),s.v.gh-r-r;R.Dozy,SupplémentauxDictionnairesArabes,3rded. (Leiden:E.J.Brill,1967),s.v.gh-r-r.Wehrcontainsasimilardefinition.See,HansWehr,
DictionaryofModernWrittenArabic,ed.J.M.Cowan(Ithaca:SpokenLanguageServices,Inc., 1994),s.v.gh-r-r.Thepre-IslamicpoetImru’al-QaysemploysformIV,agharra,inhisfamous
mu‘allaqatodescribehowhischaractermayhavedeceivedawomanintohatinghim.Imru’al-
Qays,DiwānImri’al-Qays,ed.MuḥammadAbū al-FaḍlIbrāhīm,3rded.(Cairo:Dāral-Ma‘ārif, 1969),p.13,l.20. InoneoftheearliestliteraryusesofthisrootinprosethatIhavelocated, Jāhiẓ usesthisverbinthissense.Abū Uthmānb.BaḥrJāhiẓ,Kitābal-Bukhalā’,2ed.(Damascus: Dāral-Yaqẓaal-‘Arabīya,1963),p.45.
122Ibn‘Abbād,Muḥīṭ;gh-r-r;IbnDurayd,Jamharat,s.v.r-gh-gh;al-Firūzābādī,Qāmūs, s.v.gh-r-rLane,Arabic-English,s.v.gh-r-r;IbnManẓūr,Lisān,s.v.gh-r-r;Al-Zabīdī,Tāj,s.v. gh-r-r.Foradiscussionofthisnounform,seeW.Wright,AGrammaroftheArabicLanguage, eds.W.RobertsonSmithandM.J.deGoeje,3rded.,2vols.in1(NewYork:Cambridge UniversityPress,1967), vol.1,pp.136,146.
123CoulsonarguesthatthewordtadlīscomesfromtheByzantineGreek“dolos”since bothwordssharethesamemeaningandrootd-l-s.Accordingtohim,thistermisoneexampleof howMuslimjuristsadoptedalargeportionoftechnicalterminologyandinstitutionslikethewaqf
partymakingacounterofferafterthecounterpartieshaveagreeduponthetermstoasale (bay‘al-rajul‘alā akhīhi),2)meetingacaravantoconductatransactiononthehighway insteadofthecitymarket(talaqqī al-rukkāb),3)acity-dwellerconductingbusinesswith oronbehalfofabedouin(bay’al-ḥāḍirli’l-bādī),1244)andsubmittingfalsebidsinan
auction(bayal-najash)inordertodriveuptheprice.125Interestingly,inthesectionabout fraud,hedoesnotusethetermgharartodescribetransactions. IbnQudāmaandShīrāzī
alsousetaghrīrandtadlīstodiscusstheselastthreetransactions.126
Althoughghararandfraudarisefromuncertainty,thereisanimportantstructural
differenceinthedistributionofuncertaintyinbothcases.IbnQudāmastatesthatwhena sellerdefraudsabuyer,“hehidesadefectwhichheknowssothatthebuyerimaginesit doesnotexist.”127Withfraud,onecounterpartyexploitsitscertaintyagainstan
unsuspectingcounterparty.Thisisthesamekindofcertaintyanduncertaintyfoundin worksuṣūlal-fiqhandkalām.
124 Althoughmostjuristsprohibitthesetransactionsinordertoprotectpeoplefrom fraud,whomthislawattemptstoprotectfromfraudandwhyareissuesofdebateamongjurists. Forexample,toIbnRushd,thegoodsofbedoiunsarenearlyfreefromtheirperspectivassothat theywilltakealowerprice.However,ifcity-dwellershelpthemgetthebestpricethiswillharm theurbanpopulationatlarge.See,IbnRushd,Bidāyavol.3,pp.1229-1230.Ibn Ḥazmrejects theseargumentsandinsteadclaimsthattheProphetprohibitedthesesalestoprotectbedouin frompossiblefraud.See,Ibn Ḥazm,Muḥallā,vol.8,p.453,¶1469.Khiraqī,aprominent
Ḥanbalī jurist, statesthatthissaleisvoidifthebedouinmakesacity-dwellerhisagent,doesnot knowtheprevailingmarketpriceofthegood,andintendedtosellthegoodintown.However,if oneofthesestipulationsisnotmetthesaleislicit.IbnQudāma,however,arguesthatacity-
dwellermaybuyforabedouinsinceitprotectsthebedouinfrombeingexploited.See,Ibn Qudāma,Mughnī,vol.4,p.163,¶¶.3072-3073.
125IbnRushd,Bidāyavol.3,pp.1227-1232.
126IbnQudāma,Mughnī,vol.4,p160,¶.3067;Shīrāzī,Muhadhdhab,vol.3,p.144. 127IbnQudāma,Mughnī,vol.4,¶.2984,p114.Arabicreads,katamahu‘anal-mushtarī
ma‘a‘ilmihibihiawghaṭṭāhu‘anhubi-mā yūhimal-mushtarī ‘adamahu.Bājī makesasimilar statement.SeeBājī,Muntaqā,vol.6,p.532.
Ontheotherhand,inthemoreusualdiscussionsofghararthatIwillexamine
below,uncertaintywithrespecttosomeelementofthetransactionaffectsboth
counterpartieswhoareconsciousoftheiruncertainty.Duethesymmetricaldistributionof uncertaintyamongthecounterparties,juristsoftencomparecontractscharacterizedby
gharartoformsofgamblingaswewillseeinthefollowingchapterinmoredetail.Like
ribā,ghararalsoposesanethicalproblemforjurists.Inthecaseofribā,juristsdonot thinkthatitisethicalforonetoreceiveaprofitwithoutassuminganycommercialand legalliability.Inthecaseofgharar,juristsdonotthinkthatitisethicalforonetoeither
profitorlosemoneybecauseofuncertaintywithrespecttocertainelementsofthe transaction.Inthefollowingsection,wewillbegintoexaminewhatcommercial uncertaintyisfromtheperspectiveofjurists.