5. Aspectos Metodológicos
5.2. Diseño experimental
Ratings
1 Yes
2 No
3 Not evaluated or not reported
NA Not applicable
Outcome Measure Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score – Symptoms
subscale
Author’s Last Name Roos
Title of the Article Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score KOOS Development of a Self Administered Outcome Measure
Year 1998
PubMed ID: 9699158
Reviewer’s Name Travis Hamilton
Date of Review 7.13.11
Content Validity
Reported that items were generated by team of experts 1
Reported that items were developed from patient input 1
Reported that content was developed from statistical modeling NA
Evaluated floor and ceiling effect NA
If yes. <30% of sample scored at endpoint NA
Data normally distributed NA
Construct Validity
Correlated with a generic instrument/scale 1
If yes. Indicate instrument/scale and correlation coefficient SF-36; TABLE 3. - PF = .29 , RP = .27 , BP = .08 Correlated with theoretically similar scale NA
If yes. Indicate instrument/scale and correlation coefficient
Uncorrelated with theoretically distinct scale 1
If yes. Indicate instrument/scale and correlation coefficient SF-36; TABLE 3. - RE =-.17 , MH = .13 Tested specific hypothesis to demonstrate construct validity? NA
If yes. What is found? Criterion Validity
Correlated with “gold standard” NA
Predictive of a future outcome NA
If yes to either of above, report how this was demonstrated Internal Consistency
Evidence for acceptable internal consistency NA (eg.. Cronbach’s α > .60)
Test-Retest Reliability
Evidence for test-retest reliability (eg.. ICC>.70) 1
Indicate value: ICC: symptoms = .93
Testing interval (time between repeated measures) Within 9 days Interrater Reliability
Evidence for interrater reliability (eg..Kappa > .60) NA Indicate Value:
Responsiveness
Group level statistics reported (eg. Effect size. Standardized response mean. Guyatt’s responsiveness index. Regression model) 1
Report statistics: ES. SRM. Guyatt’s TABLE 5.
Individual level statistics reported (eg. Minimal detectable change.
Minimum clinically important change) NA
Report statistics:
Change in measure related to change in external standard NA Measure demonstrated change for patients who received known
efficacious treatment (indicate statistic) Table 4 Time interval between baseline and follow-up assessments 3 and 6 month Descriptive Features
Age range of sample 32 (18-46)
Number: 21 Sex Male 9 Female 12 Diagnosis ACL injury/surgery 1 PCL injury/surgery Other ligament injury/surgery + ACL Meniscus. Articuler artroscopy +ACL OA PF General knee pain Combined injury Sport related Cartilage degeneration or surgery
Provide normative data 2
Provide information about scoring and weighting of items: 1
Provided information about calculating with missing values: 1
Recall period (eg. “in the last month”) 1 week
Language(s) of instrument used in this report 1; English and Swedish Is this the first or primary report about this instrument? 1
KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE (KOOS) – Symptoms subscale
Ratings
1 Yes
2 No
3 Not evaluated or not reported
NA Not applicable
Outcome Measure Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score – symptoms
subscale
Author’s Last Name Roos
Title of the Article Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score KOOS validation of a Swedish version
Year 1998
PubMed ID: 9863983
Reviewer’s Name Travis Hamilton
Date of Review 7.13.11
Content Validity
Reported that items were generated by team of experts NA Reported that items were developed from patient input NA Reported that content was developed from statistical modeling NA
Evaluated floor and ceiling effect 1
If yes. <30% of sample scored at endpoint 1 Table 2.
Data normally distributed NA
Construct Validity
Correlated with a generic instrument/scale 1
If yes. Indicate instrument/scale and correlation coefficient SF-36. Table 4 - PF = .32 , RP = .14 , BP = .29 Correlated with theoretically similar scale 1
If yes. Indicate instrument/scale and correlation coefficient Lysholm. Table 4 Uncorrelated with theoretically distinct scale 1
If yes. Indicate instrument/scale and correlation coefficient SF-36. Table 4 - RE =.0 , MH = .04 Tested specific hypothesis to demonstrate construct validity? NA
If yes. What is found? Criterion Validity
Correlated with “gold standard” NA
Predictive of a future outcome NA
If yes to either of above, report how this was demonstrated Internal Consistency
Evidence for acceptable internal consistency 1
(eg.. Cronbach’s α > .60)
Test-Retest Reliability
Evidence for test-retest reliability (eg.. ICC>.70) 1
Indicate value: ICC: Symptoms = .84
Testing interval (time between repeated measures) Within 8 days Interrater Reliability
Evidence for interrater reliability (eg..Kappa > .60) NA Indicate Value:
Responsiveness
Group level statistics reported (eg. Effect size. Standardized response mean. Guyatt’s responsiveness index. Regression model) 1
Report statistics: ES. SRM. Guyatt’s ES: Symptoms = .93 Individual level statistics reported (eg. Minimal detectable change.
Minimum clinically important change) na
Report statistics:
Change in measure related to change in external standard na Measure demonstrated change for patients who received known
efficacious treatment (indicate statistic)
Time interval between baseline and follow-up assessments 3 months Descriptive Features
Age range of sample
Number: 142
Sex Table 1.
Male Female
Diagnosis Figure 1 and 2
ACL injury/surgery PCL injury/surgery Other ligament injury/surgery + ACL Meniscus. Articuler artroscopy +ACL OA PF General knee pain Combined injury Sport related Cartilage degeneration or surgery Provide normative data
Provide information about scoring and weighting of items: 1 Provided information about calculating with missing values: 1
Recall period (eg. “in the last month”) Past week Language(s) of instrument used in this report Swedish Is this the first or primary report about this instrument? 2
Notes:
KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE (KOOS) – Symptoms subscale
Ratings
1 Yes
2 No
3 Not evaluated or not reported
NA Not applicable
Outcome Measure Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score – Symptoms
Subscale
Author’s Last Name Xie
Title of the Article Cross cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese versions of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score koos in Asians with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore
Year 2006
PubMed ID: 16814575
Reviewer’s Name Travis Hamilton
Date of Review 7.14.11
Content Validity
Reported that items were generated by team of experts NA
Reported that items were developed from patient input NA; cultural adaptation Reported that content was developed from statistical modeling NA
Evaluated floor and ceiling effect 1
If yes. <30% of sample scored at endpoint 1
Data normally distributed NA
Was the document translated using standard procedure? 1
If yes. How? Forward and reverse translations by separate
translators. Construct Validity
Correlated with a generic instrument/scale 1
If yes. Indicate instrument/scale and correlation coefficient English SF-36: PF = .40 RB = .21 BP = .44/Chinese SF-36 PF = .31 RB = .18 BP = .43
Correlated with theoretically similar scale 1
If yes. Indicate instrument/scale and correlation coefficient EQ-5D; Table 4. Uncorrelated with theoretically distinct scale NA
If yes. Indicate instrument/scale and correlation coefficient English SF-36: RE = .14 MH = .23/Chinese SF-36 RE = .17 MH = .29
Tested specific hypothesis to demonstrate construct validity? NA
If yes. What is found? NA
Criterion Validity
Correlated with “gold standard” NA
Predictive of a future outcome NA
Internal Consistency
Evidence for acceptable internal consistency 1
(eg.. Cronbach’s α > .60)
Indicate value: α :Singapore English:, Symptoms = .70 Chinese: Symptoms = .64
Test-Retest Reliability
Evidence for test-retest reliability (eg.. ICC>.70) 1
Indicate value: ICC: Singapore English; Symptoms = .87
Chinese; Symptoms = .85 Testing interval (time between repeated measures) 6 days
Interrater Reliability
Evidence for interrater reliability (eg..Kappa > .60) NA Indicate Value:
Responsiveness
Group level statistics reported (eg. Effect size. Standardized response mean. Guyatt’s responsiveness index. Regression model) NA Report statistics: ES. SRM. Guyatt’s
Individual level statistics reported (eg. Minimal detectable change.
Minimum clinically important change) NA
Report statistics:
Change in measure related to change in external standard NA Measure demonstrated change for patients who received known
efficacious treatment (indicate statistic) NA Time interval between baseline and follow-up assessments NA Descriptive Features
Singapore English Chinese
Age range of sample 65.3 67.8
Number: 127 (test-retest = 47) 131 (test-retest = 55)
Sex Male 30 15 Female 97 116 Diagnosis ACL injury/surgery PCL injury/surgery Other ligament injury/surgery + ACL Meniscus. Articuler artroscopy +ACL OA 1
PF General knee pain Combined injury Sport related Cartilage degeneration or surgery
Provide normative data NA
Provide information about scoring and weighting of items: NA
Provided information about calculating with missing values: 1; no missing items
Recall period (eg. “in the last month”) Present
Language(s) of instrument used in this report 1; Chinese and Singapore English Is this the first or primary report about this instrument? 2