• No se han encontrado resultados

8.4 Vector-Valued Lagrangian Dynamics

Let Q be a smooth manifold, letC(Q) be the space of paths τ : I 󰋵 Q for some fixed interval I = [a, b]⊆ R, and let L : T Q 󰋵 V be a smooth function which we will call the Lagrangian. The aim of this section is to investigate those paths τ : I ⊆ R 󰋵 Q which constitute the critical points of the V -valued Lagrangian action,

S(τ ) =

󰁝 b a

L( ˙τ ) dt, τ ∈ C(Q)

As a matter of terminology, a critical point of the action S is any path γ ∈ C(Q) for which dsdS(γs)󰀏󰀏

s=0 = 0 with respect to every variation γs that fixes the endpoints of γ.

Our approach is to consider instead the spaceC(Q)⊆ C(T Q) of paths γ : I 󰋵 T Q which arise as the velocity vector field ˙τ for some curve τ ∈ C(Q). That is, C(Q) is the image of the space of paths C(Q) by the map

C(Q) −󰋵 C(T Q) τ 󰀁−󰋵 ˙τ

Note that this map is injective and thus forms an equivalence between C(Q) and

C(Q). Under this identification, we consider the Lagrangian action on C(Q),

8.4. VECTOR-VALUED LAGRANGIAN DYNAMICS

If X is tangent to a variation with fixed endpoints, then the boundary term vanishes and d ˙L(πX) = 0 for all variations X tangent to C(Q) along a critical point γ of the

Then −H is a Hamiltonian function for the vector field ˙γ along γ.

Proof. We will adapt the approach of [61] to our V -valued context. Define the function S : I 󰋵 V by

Since ˙γ is an infinitesimal variation of γ, Theorem 8.7 implies that

dS(t) = θL

󰀃˙γ(a)󰀄

− θL󰀃

˙γ(t)󰀄

where θL=FLθ. Thus,

L˙γθL =−d dtθL

󰀃γ(t))󰀄

= d

dtdS(t) = dL󰀃 γ(t)󰀄

and so

−ι˙γωL= ι˙γL =L˙γθL− dι˙γωL= d(L− ι˙γθL)

We conclude that L− ι˙γθL= L− FL(γ) γ is a Hamiltonian function for ˙γ along γ.

Part III

The Moduli Space of Flat

Connections

In the final part of this dissertation, we turn our attention once more to the space of connections. While Chapter 9 employs the framework of Part II, and Section 10.1 requires Chapter 3, the remaining material can be read immediately after Chapter 2 and a knowledge of only the definition of the symplectic volume.

In Chapter 9 we apply the theory of Part II to characterize the space of connections A(P ) on a G-principal bundle P over a manifold M of dimension at least 3. In particular, we show that A(P ) possesses a natural vector-valued symplectic structure, that the moduli space of flat connections M(P ) is the symplectic reduction of A(P ) with respect to the action of the gauge group, and that the reduced form takes values in H2(M ). Utilizing the language of characteristic forms, we obtains similar results for a variant of this vector-valued symplectic structure. In Chapter 10 we compute the volume of the moduli spaceMG(M ) of flat G-connections on M , first in the case that G is abelian, and second in the case that G is semisimple and π1M is free abelian.

In Chapter 11 we show that if Σ ⊆ M is a distinguished embedded surface in M, then there is a symplectic immersion of the moduli space MG(M ) intoMG(Σ), thus yielding information on the possible structure of MG(M ). We refer to the second half of Section 1.1 for an outline of the main results.

Chapter 9

The Reduction of the Space of Connections

Let M be a smooth manifold of dimension greater than 2, let G be a Lie group with Ad-invariant metric 〈 , 〉 on its Lie algebra g, and let P be a fixed G-principal bundle on M .

Before proceeding, let us briefly review the relevant notation from Chapter 9. We denote byA(P ) the Ω1(M, adP )-affine space of connections on P . For each A∈ A(P ), we frequently utilize the identification

1(M, adP )−󰋵 T AA(P )

given by

αA= d

dtA + tα󰀏󰀏

t=0, A∈ A(P ), α ∈ Ω1(M, adP )

where + denotes the action of Ω1(M, adP ) on A(P ). In other words, we identify α∈ Ω1(M ) ∼= T01(M ) with the induced vector field α∈ X(A(P )).

The exterior covariant derivative dA: Ωk(M, g)󰋵 Ωk+1(M, g) is given by

dAσ(X1, . . . , Xk+1) = dσ(hAX1, . . . , hAXk+1SS)

where hA : T P 󰋵 A is the fiberwise projection induced by the splitting A⊕ V (P ), where V (P ) is the vertical tangent bundle of P . Since dA preserves the subspace of tensorial forms in Ω(P, g) of type AdP , we may also consider dA : Ωk(M, adP ) 󰋵 Ωk+1(M, adP ). Many of the results of this chapter rely on the property that

d(α∧ β) = dAα∧ β + (−1)deg αα∧ dAβ

See [2]. Finally, we write Bk(M ) for the space of k-coboundaries on M . That is,

Bk(M ) = d Ωk−1(M )≤ Ωk(M )

9.1. THE MODEL SPACE 󰀃

1(M ),∧󰀄

9.1 The Model Space 󰀃

1

(M ), ∧ 󰀄

In this section we will consider two distinct vector-valued symplectic structures on Ω1(M ).

Let Σ be a compact oriented surface. We have seen that the vector space Ω1(Σ) carries a natural symplectic structure: namely,

ω(α, β) =

󰁝

Σ

α∧ β, α, β ∈ Ω1(Σ)

The aim of this chapter is to determine a suitable generalization of this symplectic form to the case where dim M ≥ 3.

The most natural vector-valued symplectic structure on Ω1(M ) is the wedge prod-uct ∧. The following proposition establishes that ∧ is indeed a Ω2(M )-valued sym-plectic form on Ω1(M ).

Proposition 9.1. Let M be a manifold with boundary of dimension at least 2. The wedge product

U ⊆ M, and let αi ∈ C(U ) be given by

α =󰁛

i

αidxi

For each k ≤ n,

0 = α∧ dxk =󰁛

i

αidxi∧ dxk

Since n ≥ 2, for each i ≤ n there is a k ≤ n with k ∕= i, and thus dxi ∧ dxk ∕= 0 so that αi = 0. Since our choice of U was arbitrary, we conclude that α = 0.

It turns out that this symplectic structure is too fine for our purposes. The action of C(M ) on Ω1(M ) given by

f · α = df + α

is not in general Hamiltonian with respect to symplectic structure ω obtained by lifting

∧ to the fibers of T Ω1(M ). The issue is settled by reducing the space of coefficients from Ω2(M ) to Ω2(M )/B2(M ). To show this, we first establish a technical lemma.

Lemma 9.1. (i) Let U be a vector space with dim U ≥ 3 and let w ∈ Λ2U . If u∧ w = 0 for all u ∈ U then w = 0.

(ii) Let M be a manifold with dim M ≥ 3. If θ ∈ Ω2(M ) satisfies d(f θ) = 0 for all f ∈ C(M ), then θ = 0.

ij

9.1. THE MODEL SPACE 󰀃

1(M ),∧󰀄

(i, j ≤ n) so that

w = 󰁛

i,j≤N

wijei∧ ej

For each k ≤ n, we have

0 = ek∧ ω = 󰁛

i,j≤n

wijek∧ ei∧ ej

Since n≥ 3, for every pair of distinct i, j ≤ n we can find a k ≤ n with k ∕= i, j.

Consequently, ek∧ ei∧ ej ∕= 0 and thus wij = 0.

(ii) Since d(1· θ) = 0, we have

df ∧ θ = d(fθ) = 0

for all f ∈ C(M ). Fix p∈ M and observe that α ∧ θp = 0∈ Λ3(TpM ) for all α = dfp ∈ TpM . Now part (i) yields θp = 0.

Proposition 9.2. Let M be a compact manifold of dimension at least 3. The assign-ment

ω : Ω1(M )⊗ Ω1(M )−󰋵 Ω2(M )/B2(M )

defined by

ω(α, β) = α∧ β + B2(M ), α, β ∈ Ω1(M )

is an Ω2(M )/B2(M )-valued symplectic structure on Ω1(M ) if and only if dim M ≥ 3 or M is a closed orientable surface.

Proof. The cases where dim M = 0, 1 are clear. Suppose for the moment that dim M ≥ 3. Let α ∈ Ω1(M ) and assume that α∧ γ ∈ B2(M ) for all γ ∈ Ω1(M ). Let β ∈ Ω1(M ) and observe that

d(α∧ fβ) = d󰀅

f (α∧ β)󰀆

∈ B2(M )

for all f ∈ C(M ). Thus α∧ β = 0 by Lemma 9.1. Since our choice of β was arbitrary, the nondegeneracy of the wedge product yields α = 0.

Finally, suppose that M = Σ is a closed compact orientable surface and equip Σ with an orientation and a Riemannian structure g. Let ∗ : Ω1(Σ) 󰋵 Ω1(Σ) denote the Hodge star operator. Let α∈ Ω1(Σ) and observe that if

α∧ β ∈ B2(Σ)

for all β ∈ B2, then, in particular,

󰀂α󰀂2dvol = α∧ ∗α ∈ B2(Σ)

and thus

󰁝