4. Análisis y diseño de la aplicación de software
4.1. Análisis del sistema
4.1.1. Documento de requisitos de usuario
To validate the finding that CCR6 is upregulated on activated B cells in vitro, CCR6 expression was analysed on B cell subsets in vivo. WT mice were immunised with NP-KLH and the splenic B cell population was examined seven days later by flow cytometry, at the peak of the humoral response. Rare antigen-specific responding B cells were easily identified from the remaining peripheral B cell population using anti-λ Ig antibodies, as NP specifically induces λ-IgL antibody production250,251. As mentioned previously, CD38 and GL7 expression identifies peripheral B cells. Specifically, five distinct subsets can be identified: CD38+ GL7- naïve B cells, CD38+ GL7+ precursor B cells, CD38-
GL7+ GC B cells, CD38- GL7- plasma cells and CD38hi GL7- memory B cells23,24,28. The gating
strategy used to identify these subsets is displayed in Fig. 3.2.1a. Briefly, lymphocytes and singlets were selected based on the forward and side scatter properties of the cells. Form here, λ+ B cells were selected and separated into the five B cell subsets based on their expression of CD38 and GL7. Using this strategy, CCR6 expression was quantified on each B cell subset, as shown in Fig. 3.2.1b.
This analysis revealed that naïve B cells expressed a moderate level of CCR6 (Fig. 3.2.1b, c). The GC B cells had a significantly lower expression of CCR6 compared to both naïve B cells and memory B cells (Fig. 3.2.1b, c). Plasma cells were also found to express low to moderate levels of CCR6 (Fig. 3.2.1b, c). This expression profile concurs with that previously documented in the literature185,186,190. Interestingly, CCR6 expression was significantly higher on precursor B cells than on GC and plasma cells (Fig. 3.2.1b, c). The high expression of CCR6 on precursor B cells, which arise after naïve B cells become activated, supports the previous in vitro finding that CCR6 is upregulated on activated B cells.
Figure 3.2.1. CCR6 is highly expressed by CD38+ GL7+ precursor B cells in vivo WT mice were i.p. immunised with 100µg of NP-KLH for 7 days. Responding B cells were identified by their expression of λ-Ig and delineated based on their expression of CD38 and GL7: 1) CD38- GL7- plasma cells, 2) CD38+ GL7- naïve B cells, 3) CD38hi GL7- memory B cells, 4) CD38+ GL7+ precursor B cells and 5) CD38- GL7+ GC B cells (a). Representative images of CCR6 expression on B cell subsets are displayed (b). The mean fluorescence intensity of CCR6 expression on each B cell subset was quantified by flow cytometry (c). Figure represents data collected from 2 independent experiments (n=9 mice/genotype).
Having observed that CCR6 is expressed by CD38+ GL7+ precursor B cells in vivo, I next examined
whether CCR6 is expressed by B cells during interactions with Th cells. To achieve this, a combination of cell sorting and immunofluorescence was used. To visualise CCR6 expression, a CCR6.eGFP knock-in mouse was used, which expresses GFP where CCR6 would normally be expressed. Mice were immunised for six days with SRBC, a potent inducer of TD humoral immune responses. T-B cell conjugates were then isolated using forward scatter properties, along with B220 and CD4 expression. Despite the low frequency of conjugates present in vivo during a normal humoral response, it was possible to isolate intact conjugates after mild fixation using the MoFlo® Astrios™ cell sorter. Once sorted, conjugates were examined for GFP expression using the confocal microscope. GFP expression was observed on the B cell of T-B cell conjugates, as predicted, but also, surprisingly, on the T cell of T-B cell conjugates (Fig. 3.2.2). The fact that CCR6 is expressed by T-B cell conjugates suggests that CCR6 has a broader function than simply B cell activity. However, it is important to note that not all observed conjugates expressed GFP, indicating that CCR6 is not an absolute requirement for T-B cell conjugate formation and the subsequent differentiation of B cells. In further support of this, is the previous finding that CCR6-/- B cells are
Figure 3.2.2. CCR6 is expressed by T-B cell conjugates in vivo
CCR6-eGFPmice were i.p. immunised with SRBC. T-B cell conjugates were isolated 6 days later using the MoFlo® Astrios™ cell sorter. Conjugates were selected using the forward scatter parameters, as well as B220 and CD4 expression. Prior to sorting, samples were fixed in 2% formaldehyde for 30 minutes. Purified conjugates were air-dried onto slides and imaged using the confocal microscope (n=1). Images show 3 distinct T-B cell conjugates. Objective magnification: top panel 40x, bottom panel 20x; Scale bars are 10µm.
To investigate the formation of T-B cell conjugates in the absence of CCR6, WT and CCR6-/- mice
were immunised with NP-KLH for 42 days and T-B cell conjugates were quantified by flow cytometry throughout this period. As before, T-B cell conjugates were identified using forward scatter parameters, B220 and CD4 expression (Fig. 3.2.3a). This analysis demonstrated that T-B cell conjugates are still formed in the CCR6-/- mice (Fig. 3.2.3a, b). In fact, at days 14 and 21 post antigen challenge, CCR6-/- mice had a significantly higher frequency of T-B conjugates than WT mice (Fig. 3.2.3b). However, for the remaining response, the CCR6-/- mice produced an equivalent number of T-B cell conjugates to WT mice (Fig. 3.2.3b). Overall, these results demonstrate that CCR6 is not essential for T-B cell conjugate formation, but may contribute to B cell differentiation in the early humoral response.
Fig. 3.2.3. Quantification of T-B cell conjugates in vivo
WT and CCR6-/- mice were i.p. immunised with 100ug of NP-KLH for 42 days. Flow cytometry was used to examine T-B cell conjugates, which were identified by their forward scatter parameters, as well as B220 and CD4 expression (a). The frequency of T-B cell conjugates was quantified at days 5, 7, 10, 14, 21 and 42 following challenge. Figure represents data collected from 1 experiment (n=4 mice/genotype).
Mann – Whitney two-tail t-test, *significant at p<0.05