El Estado y la ECS

To begin to document intersections between print and visual media practices;

12. How often do you use the computer? 13. Do you use the internet (www) to read

information about your favorite actors/heroines/ heroes/sporting stars/singers/bands/musicians? 14. Are there things you see and hear about on

television that you then go and read more about those things on the internet or in books? 15. Do you ever buy / borrow books or magazines

about your favorite films or performers? 16. What kinds of computer games do you like

to play?

17. Have you ever done fanfiction writing on line or with friends on paper?

18. What do you know about websites or blogs? To begin to identify human and material resources and affordances for reading and writing; (*see also section 1)

19. Do you see yourself as a reader?

20. Do your family members see you as someone who likes reading?

21. When you get gifts and presents from family members, do they often give you books that suit your interests?

22. When was the last time that a member of your family bought you a book?

To begin to document various reading and writing identities.

23. Here are some pictures of different people reading different things in different ways:

Which one of these pictures looks most like

something you would do?

Which one sort of looks like something you would do?

Which one looks least like you something you would do?

24. Some people feel that reading and writing are very important skills to have in order to be a successful and happy person in the world, other people say it doesn’t matter. What do you think about that?

WRITING

25. Do you write outside of school? 26. What do you write?

27. Why do you write? 28. How often do you write?

29. How good at writing are you? (Probe: not at all good… very good)

30. How often do you write just for fun?

31. What kinds of things do you write just for fun? Comic books

Teen ’zines

Newspaper (school, local, or other) contributions

Chapter books (not for school work) Information books (biographies, how-to books, science, books about different subjects) Picture books

Internet web pages Email

Bible, Catechism, Torah, Koran, or other religious writings

Poetry Music lyrics Letters or notes Catalog order forms

32. Do you write [insert the text participant named] with other people? What kinds of people? 33. Who do you write for?

34. Who reads the things you write?

35. What makes you really want to write something? 36. What makes you really not want to write something? 37. Do you ever write in order to help yourself or

other people get things done? (e.g., instructions, recipes, family mail).

■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

ACT (2006). Reading between the lines. Iowa City, IA: Author. http://www.act.org/path/policy/pdf/reading_report.pdf. Afterschool Alliance. (2004). Formal evaluations of the academic impact of afterschool programs. Washington, DC: Author. Alvermann, D. E. (2001). Reading adolescents’ reading identities: Looking back to see ahead. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 676-690.

Alvermann, D. E., & Rush, L. S. (2004). Literacy intervention programs at the middle and high school level. In T.L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 210-227). New York: Guilford.

Alvermann, D. E., & Hagood, M. C. (2000). Fandom and critical media literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43, 436-446.

Alvermann, D. E., Moore, D. W., & Conley, M. W. (1987). Research within reach: Secondary school reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Bain, R. (2000). Into the breach: Using research and theory to shape history instruction. In P. Seixas, P. Stearns & S. Wineberg (Eds.), Teaching, learning and knowing history: National and international perspectives (pp. 331-353). New York: New York University Press.

Bain, R. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in history textbooks and teachers. Teachers College Record.

Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Birmingham, J., Pechman, E.M., Russell, C.A., & Mielke, M. Shared Features of High-Performing After-School Progrmas: A Follow-Up to the TASC Evaluation. Washingon, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.

Bitz, M. (2004). The Comic Book Project: Forging alternative pathways to literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy (47)7, pp 574-586.

Blackburn, M. (1999). Agency in borderline discourses: Engaging in gaybonics for pleasure subversion and retaliation. Unpublished Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices: Guilford Publications.

Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 369-398.

Bruce, B. C. (2002). Diversity and critical social engagement: How changing technologies enable new modes of literacy in changing circumstances. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 1-18). New York: Peter Lang. Calhoon, M. B. (2006). Rethinking adolescent literacy instruction. Perspectives, 32(3), 31-35.

Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development (1992). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours. Report of the Task Force on Youth Development and Community Programs. New York: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilit. (1992). The jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291-315.

Cole, M., & Griffin, P. (1986). A sociohistorical approach to remediation. In S. deCastell, A. Luke, & K. Egan (Eds.), Literacy, society, and schooling (pp. 110-131). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Collier, L.M. (2004). Arguments for Success: A Study of Academic Debate in Urban High Schools of Chicago, Kansas City, New York, St. Louis and Seattle. Kansas City, MO: University of Missouri at Kansas City.

Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (2005). High school students with disabilities: Strategies for accessing the curriculum. New York: Corwin Press.

Dillon, D. R., & Moje, E. B. (1998). Listening to the talk of adolescent girls: Lessons about literacy, school, and lives. In D. A. Alvermann, K. A. Hinchman, D. Moore, S. Phelps & D. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives (pp. 193-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Dressman, M., Wilder, P., & Conner, J. C. (2005). Theories of failure and the failure of theories: A cognitive/sociocultural/ macrostructural study of eight struggling students. Research in the Teaching of English, 40, 8-61.