• No se han encontrado resultados

Having initiated these ideas and transformed them into practical

realities what was lacking as far as Howard and his ’Garden City

Dream’ was concerned was official recognition by the government. Even

though these ideas were developed as far back as the end of 19th

century they were not officially recognised for almost forty five

years^S. The destruction caused by the first world war was so great

t h a t t h e g o v e r n m e n t h a d to e m b a r k on a f u l l s c a l e p o s t w a r

reconstruction programme. Housing problem was top of the list of

socio-economic issues to be tackled by the government. London was

daily becoming over populated and the existing physical and social

t h i s t i m e t h a t t h e G a r d e n C i t y a d v o c a t e s c r i e d louder for a

comprehensive government solution to these problems.

It is clear, from the above paragraph, that the nature of the

problem was unmistakable and the Garden City advocates took advantage

of the situation and reiterated the need for a coordinated plan of all

f a c i l i t i e s at a n e w site w h e r e land w a s c h e a p as a g a i n s t the

unnecessary extension of the existing towns and cities which was

costing the government and the people more money than would have cost

them in a new virgin land with more space for planning and a healthy

environment.46 Many committees and commissions of inquiry were set up

by the government and various recommendations made (which included a

recommendation that Garden cities be founded.4^ but for well over ten

years nothing spectacular occurred. The founder of the Garden City

movement did not live to see when and how his brilliant ideas were

finally adopted by the government. He died in the year 1928 leaving

the responsibility of propagating his ideas to his close associates -

F. J. Osborn and C. B. Purdom. Raymond Unwin and Barry Parker were

yet another set of Howard's followers who did so much to develop his

ideas.

There were hopes and expectations by the Garden City advocates

when in 1931 the Greater London Regional Planning Committee, in a

report by Raymond Unwin, recommended the building of satellite towns

as a matter of urgency.48 This was particularly important because it

was a sign of renewed action at government level as far as the

question of building new communities was concerned. There was also

another committee under Lord Marley48 which sat for four years and

r e c o m m e n d e d t h e a d o p t i o n of the G a r d e n City. D e s p i t e t h e s e

indeed no action w o uld have been taken if it were not for the

intolerable overcrowding in London by 1937. (During the tenure of

Neville Chamberlain as the Prime Minister).

In a desperate attempt to solve the problems the Prime Minister

a p pointed a R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n under Sir Mont a g u e Barlow. This

Commission had two main objectives, (i) It was going to examine fully

the causes of distribution of industrial population, (ii) it was also

going to examine the effects of over concentration of industries and

population in large towns and cities.50 This commission was described

as:

The Barlow commission expressed far more comprehensive approach to town planning than any previous published official document and plainly indicated the need for great changes.5^

This commission recommended, among other things, the need for a new

central authority as well as the need for national action so as to

secure a number of things: the continued re-development of congested

urban areas: the decentralisation and dispersal of industries and

industrial population from such areas. It is important to note here

that not even this comprehensive work by the Barlow commission was

able to trigger any meaningful action on the side of the government as

regards the building of new towns. This was also noted by Osborn

where he said:

There were government-printed reports, available to all. But up to 1941 they might as well have been printed in Sanskrit for all their effect on the minds of the public or the sectional planners. What made the country planning conscious was the bombing of our cities in 1940-1941.52

Thus the bombing of London necessitated quick action. Winston

94