II. REVISIÓN DE LITERATURA
2.2 MARCO TEÓRICO
2.2.3 PROCESO EJECUTIVO
2.2.3.7 EJECUCIÓN FORZADA
The conclusions which can be drawn about therapy and prevention of childhood
disorders on the basis of the present study must, by necessity remain extremely
tentative. Yet, to the extent that symptoms within a general population may provide
an analogue of clinical distress, and attributions about hypothetical situations an
analogue for children’s explanations of real-life events, the present study’s findings
suggest that childhood depression, social and general anxiety may well be similarly
associated with pessimistic attributional style, and hence benefit from the same
therapeutic strategies.
Should fiiture research establish that children’s attributional style acts as a cognitive
diathesis for distress, this would have considerable implications for service
development. Thus children identified as “at risk” from future psychopathology on the
basis of their attributional style could be targeted for early intervention. Such
interventions might not only attempt to modify children’s attributional bias through the
use of cognitive-behavioural strategies, but also lessen the stressfulness of events they
experience, either at home or at school (Alloy et al, 1989)
In fact whether attributional style proves to be important as a diathesis for clinical
disorders may not necessarily have any implications for the effectiveness of strategies
derived from the model. Thus several cognitive vulnerability models, but particularly
that of Beck (1967, 1976) have been the source of highly effective therapeutic
constructs. Somewhat surprisingly however given the extent o f research concerning
the association between pessimistic attributional style and both clinical and sub-clinical
levels of depression, relatively few attempts have been made to examine their clinical
implications (Forsterling, 1990).
Thus although attributional retraining programmes have been used within laboratory
based studies to alleviate children’s learned helplessness, there have been few
consistent efforts to generalise their findings to a clinical setting. More importantly,
those few studies incorporating attributional retraining have typically concerned adults
(DeRubeis & Hollon, 1995), and attempts to transfer these strategies to a child
population have generally proved unsuccessfiil (Kendall, 1991).
Although attributional theory itself does not appear to have led to the generation of
therapeutic strategies, it is possible that its similarity to other cognitive theories may
provide a useful indication of future directions. Thus Seligman (1981) points out the
parallels between the tendency to make internal, stable and global attributions for
failure postulated by the reformulated learned helplessness theory and Beck’s (1967,
1976) cognitive triad. Thus the bias of depressed individuals towards internal
attributions for failure is characteristic of their negative view o f themselves, the
stability of their attributions leads them to perceive the future as hopelessly negative,
whilst the globality of their attributions for negative events leads them to perceive a
wide range of situations pessimistically.
Many of the therapeutic strategies suggested by Beck and his colleagues (Beck, Rush,
therefore be relevant to children’s pessimistic attributional style. In particular,
techniques aimed at challenging individual’s perceptions of events through the
introduction of new or previously unacknowledged information may also impact upon
their attributions. Thus for example a therapist might encourage a child to seek out
information which challenges their internal, stable attributions for failure through the
use of behavioural tests. Given the present study’s demonstration of the strong
association between children’s explanation for positive events and distress, the former
may well provide an important focus for intervention. Thus therapeutic strategies
aimed at increasing both the frequency and saliency of such events for children,
together with encouraging children to view them in a relatively optimistic light may
prove particularly effective. Certainly Needles and Abramson (1990) have suggested
that those distressed adults who tend to attribute positive events to stable and global
causes, appeared more likely to recover on encountering with such events, than those
who perceive them in more pessimistic terms.
Children’s attributions may also critically determine the form an intervention must take
in order to have meaning for them. Sobol and Earn (1985) have suggested that the
way in which children perceive or interpret events is likely to effect the efficacy of any
behavioural intervention. Thus those children who make more “internal’ attributions
for success might well respond best to a self-instructional treatment program whereas
those who view failure in terms of external and uncontrollable factors might benefit
from a program of structured external reinforcement. Given that the present study
indicates children experiencing high levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms
respond best to some form of cognitive intervention, in which they are encouraged to
provide more realistic explanations for important life events.
It is of course possible that children’s attributional styles are relatively unimportant
within either the development or mediation of children’s distress. As Peterson (1991)
points out, causal explanations certainly do not exhaust the thoughts that determine
any individual’s behaviour. However, given the robust associations which have been
demonstrated between children’s attributional style and their symptoms of depression
and now, anxiety, what such research does provide is a useful jumping off point for
future studies. As our body of knowledge about children’s expands, so increasingly
sophisticated models of disorder will emerge, and with them, a clearer understanding