• No se han encontrado resultados

CAPÍTULO II. MARCO TEÓRICO

2.2. MODELOS Y TEORÍAS ACERCA DEL TEMA A TRATAR.

2.2.3. LAS COMPETENCIAS

2.2.3.4. EL PROYECTO TUNING LATINOAMÉRICA Y SUS COMPETENCIAS.

Group revenue Components’ absolute profits/(losses) Group total assets

Scoping and coverage

4. Our application of materiality and an overview of the scope of our audit

The materiality for the Group Financial Statements as a whole was set at $248m. This has been determined with reference to a benchmark of Group profit before taxation, which we consider to be one of the principal considerations for members of the Company in assessing the financial performance of the Group. Materiality represents 7.6% of Group profit before tax and 5.0% of Group profit before tax adjusted for this year’s significant intangible asset impairment as disclosed in Note 9. We agreed with the Audit Committee to report to it all corrected and uncorrected misstatements we identified through our audit with a value in excess of $12m, in addition to other audit misstatements below that threshold that we believe warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.

Audits for Group reporting purposes were performed by component auditors at seven key reporting components in the following countries: the UK, the US, Sweden, China, Japan, Germany and France. In addition, specified audit procedures (predominantly the testing of transaction processing and review controls) for Group reporting purposes were performed at the Group’s shared service centres (both in-house and outsourced) in the UK, Malaysia, Romania and India. The coverage achieved by these Group procedures is shown in the charts below.

The audits undertaken for Group reporting purposes at the key reporting components of the Group were all performed to lower materiality levels set individually for each component which ranged from $8m up to $188m.

Detailed audit instructions were sent to all the auditors in key components and shared service centres. These instructions covered the significant audit areas that should be covered by these audits (which included the relevant risks of material misstatement detailed above) and set out the information required to be reported back to the Group audit team. The Group audit team visited

the key locations in the following countries to discuss key risks and audit strategy: the UK, the US, Sweden and Japan. Video and telephone conference meetings were also held with the auditors at these locations and all other key reporting components that were not physically visited. In addition, detailed specified procedures instructions were sent to all audit teams for work to be carried out at the shared service centre locations. Reporting by exception is also obtained from the majority of the other subsidiaries where a local statutory audit is required, but are not included in scope for audit or specified audit procedures Group reporting.

Profit before tax plus

significant impairment Materiality

$248m Whole financial statements materiality

$188m Range of materiality at seven key components ($8m-$188m) $12m Misstatements reported

to the Audit Committee $4,979m

Materiality of the Group Financial Statements

However, perhaps the most extensive use of diagrams in our sample was in KPMG’s auditor’s report on Astra Zeneca which includes the two diagrams reproduced below.

2

and

Financial Statements | Auditor’s Reports

AstraZeneca Annual Report and Form 20-F Information 2013

130

Group revenue Components’ absolute profits/(losses) Group total assets

Key Components 66% Shared Service Centre22% Not covered by Audit Work

Key Components66% Shared Service Centre 23% Not covered by Audit Work

Key Components88% Shared Service Centre6% Not covered by Audit Work

Scoping and coverage

4. Our application of materiality and an overview of the scope of our audit

The materiality for the Group Financial Statements as a whole was set at $248m. This has been determined with reference to a benchmark of Group profit before taxation, which we consider to be one of the principal considerations for members of the Company in assessing the financial performance of the Group. Materiality represents 7.6% of Group profit before tax and 5.0% of Group profit before tax adjusted for this year’s significant intangible asset impairment as disclosed in Note 9. We agreed with the Audit Committee to report to it all corrected and uncorrected misstatements we identified through our audit with a value in excess of $12m, in addition to other audit misstatements below that threshold that we believe warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.

Audits for Group reporting purposes were performed by component auditors at seven key reporting components in the following countries: the UK, the US, Sweden, China, Japan, Germany and France. In addition, specified audit procedures (predominantly the testing of transaction processing and review controls) for Group reporting purposes were performed at the Group’s shared service centres (both in-house and outsourced) in the UK, Malaysia, Romania and India. The coverage achieved by these Group procedures is shown in the charts below.

The audits undertaken for Group reporting purposes at the key reporting components of the Group were all performed to lower materiality levels set individually for each component which ranged from $8m up to $188m.

Detailed audit instructions were sent to all the auditors in key components and shared service centres. These instructions covered the significant audit areas that should be covered by these audits (which included the relevant risks of material misstatement detailed above) and set out the information required to be reported back to the Group audit team. The Group audit team visited

the key locations in the following countries to discuss key risks and audit strategy: the UK, the US, Sweden and Japan. Video and telephone conference meetings were also held with the auditors at these locations and all other key reporting components that were not physically visited. In addition, detailed specified procedures instructions were sent to all audit teams for work to be carried out at the shared service centre locations. Reporting by exception is also obtained from the majority of the other subsidiaries where a local statutory audit is required, but are not included in scope for audit or specified audit procedures Group reporting.

Profit before tax plus

significant impairment Materiality

$248m Whole financial statements materiality

$188m Range of materiality at seven key components ($8m-$188m) $12m Misstatements reported

to the Audit Committee $4,979m

2