• No se han encontrado resultados

4. El derecho a la resistencia

4.2. Elementos para articular una noción

This article demonstrates how, just as large multinational enterprises (Franz et al., 2014; Halme et al., 2012; Hall et al., 2012), SMEs can also develop inclusive businesses models that are capable of facilitating the inclusion of BoP communities in value chains in African countries. By providing a qualitative analysis of the business model of three agribusinesses the article makes three contributions to the literature on SMEs and social exclusion in BoP communities. First, it complement previous claims (Allen et al., 2012; Blackburn and Ram, 2006; Cho et al., 2008) by providing empirical evidence on how the commercial objectives of the entrepreneurs are translated into

66

inclusive business models that prioritise the inclusion of small farmers in the agribusiness value chain. Evidence of inclusion include cost-effective engagement with individual fruit growers as producers and suppliers of Fairtrade certified fruits for the manufacture of juice (Africa Felix Juice), the provision of affordable and accessible finance to dairy farmers who are otherwise unable to access capital from traditional banks (UMATI Capital) and connecting rural farmers of fresh food crops to urban buyers enabling them to sell their products closest to points of harvest at prices that are higher than they previously sold (AGRO-HUB and Africa Felix Juice).

Second, it applies the theoretical lens of a business model (Baden-Fuller and Morgan, 2010; Zott et al., 2011) to uncover the nature of inclusive business models by SMEs that target BoP communities. While the importance of inclusive business models on poverty alleviation is widely recognised (Ngoasong et al., 2015) very little research has been conducted to understand the business model infrastructure that links value creating activities and stakeholder interactions to enhance value creation. The business model of Africa Felix Juice is built on a multi-stakeholder partnership involving a combination of contractual relationships with global, national and local stakeholders all of which share a common objective of raising social inclusion in poor communities. The business models of both UMATI CAPITAL and AGRO-HUB are built on digital technology and are different from traditional business models because all stakeholders’ products, marketing and distribution activities linked using a digital platform (Hair et al., 2012). Analysis of the operations of the three business models demonstrates that the challenges associated with social inclusion represent attractive market opportunities. What emerges is a story entrepreneurs who are able to spot such opportunities as well as mobilise the resources and stakeholder support needed to pursue them

Third, contrasting the three case studies reveals major challenges facing SMEs attempting to develop inclusive business models. One major challenge is the management of logistics, transport and local distribution channels to ensure value chain benefits for key stakeholders. As a result of in-house management logistics and local distribution AGRO-HUB faces serious additional challenges, such as high costs, long delays and insurance costs, all which are well documented as barriers to business performance (Christ & Ferrantino, 2011; Porter, 2014). On the other hand Africa Felix Juice outsources this to third party logistics provider and local agents (as middlemen). A recent study reports how the firm was unable to deliver a pre-signed export order to Brazil and thereby incurring huge losses ‘because of a lack of urgency by local agents to work with farmers overcome the logistics challenges associated with producing and supplying cashew nuts for juice production’ (FAO, 2013). Entrepreneurs and/or owner-managers of SMEs need to develop logistics capabilities and logistics outsourcing/in-sourcing (Cho et al., 2008) for delivery of physical products to end consumers if they are to effectively address the local needs of customers within their value chain (Theyel, 2013).

Another challenge is the role the technology infrastructure that enables inclusive business models to effectively address social inclusion for the poor, while remaining competitive. All three SMEs are taking advantage of developments in digital technology to achieve integration of different component parts of their business model to varying degrees. This is unsurprising as developments in the ICT infrastructure in Africa has created opportunities for SMEs to develop competitive digital solutions to combating poverty (Ngoasong, 2015; Nwagwu & Ibitola, 2010). By relying on digital technology that is accessible via mobile and computers, UMATIC Capital is able to create a fully integrated value chain of activities. However, this is costly. A store manager of AGRO HUB explained that ‘text messages and SMS in Cameroon is still very expensive. At 50 francs per message, sending a message to 1000 farmers will cost 50,000francs and that is very expensive for a company of our size’. More research is needed to understand the specific opportunities and challenges associated with inclusive business models that rely on digital technology to promote social inclusion BoP markets in Africa.

A third challenge is the role of government policies in encouraging SMEs to create inclusive business models. The awarding of a license to create of a special economic zone to a private firm in Sierra Leone for Africa Felix Juice, the developments in ICT infrastructure in Kenya and Cameroon (e.g. Ngoasong, 2015) for creating digital platforms are examples of how SMEs can take advantage of government policies to develop inclusive business models. Thus, we see successful inclusive business development in countries that are otherwise seen as risky and ever-changing for business. There are calls for similarly more specific government policies to target inclusive businesses as a way of addressing social exclusion, such as incentives for businesses that prioritise social inclusion

67

(Ngoasong et al., 2015) and for attracting investors that explicitly target social and environmentally focused SMEs (Dalberg, 2012). Söderbaum and Teal (2000) suggest that even with the right government policies, it is entrepreneurs and owner-managers of SMEs that will ultimately create inclusive business models. The three case studies developed provide important lessons for inclusive business development in BoP communities.

Finally, more in-depth research is needed to complement the findings from this research and improve our understanding of how inclusive businesses in BoP markets are created and operated in developing countries. A starting point could be a repeat of the same three case studies through a more detailed engagement with all representative stakeholders. For example, the views of stakeholders such as individual farmers, who represent the group most in need of inclusion in the agribusiness value chain are as important as those of entrepreneurs and owner-managers. Barki and Parente (2010: 12) suggests that there is an expectation for companies ‘embedded in BoP communities’. Although the findings from this study demonstrates how inclusive business models are structured to achieve embeddedness (e.g. using cooperatives to give farmers ownership of their own activities) more is needed to understand the opportunities and challenges associated with such embeddedness. In addition, the effects of raising social inclusion on the performance of inclusive business models require further research – e.g. examining their financial performance against the drive to create social impact.

REFERENCES

ACCION 2014. Accion Venture Lab Invests in Kenyan Start-up Umati Capital. Washington, (D.C., October 15, 2014)

Adeboye, T. 1996. Technology-oriented entrepreneurs in sub-Saharan Africa who are they and how are they involved in development and industrialization in Africa? Entrepreneurship and

Regional Development, 8(4): 297-320.

Agriculture for Impact 2014. Small and Growing. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition &

Development, 14(4): 2-25.

Allen, F., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Peria, M. S. M. 2012. The Foundations of Financial

Inclusion Understanding Ownership and Use of Formal Accounts. World Bank Policy

Research Working Paper No 6290, Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Amoako, I. O & Lyon, F. 2014. We don’t deal with courts’: Cooperation and alternative institutions shaping exporting relationships of small and medium sized enterprises in Ghana.

International Small Business Journal, 32(2): 117-139.

ATI 2014 African Trade Insurance Agency (ATI) backs new venture, Umati Capital (UCAP) that aims to revolutionise SME finance through the use of innovative technology (Press Release: NAIROBI, 5 March, 2014)

Barki, E. & Parente, J. 2010. Consumer Behaviour of the Base of the Pyramid Market in Brazil.

Greener Management International, 56: 11-23.

Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. S. 2010. Business Models as Models. Long Range Planning, 43(2- 3): 156-171.

Bischoff, C., & Wood, G. 2013. Micro and small enterprises and employment creation: A case study of manufacturing micro and small enterprises in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 30(4-05): 564-579.

Blackburn, R. & Ram, M. 2006. Fix or fixation? The contributions and limitations of entrepreneurship and small firms to combating social exclusion. Entrepreneurship and Regional

Development, 18(1): 73-89

Brooks, K., Zorya, S., Gautam, A., & Goyal, A. 2013. Agriculture as a Sector of Opportunity for

Young People in Africa. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Chetty, S. K., Partanen, J., Rasmussen, E. S., & Servais, P. 2014. Contextualising case studies in entrepreneurship: A tandem approach to conducting a longitudinal cross-country case study.

68

Cho, J. J-K., Ozment, J., & Sink, H. 2008. Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e-commerce market. International Journal of Physical Distribution and

Logistics Management,38(5): 336-359.

Christ, N., & Ferrantino, M. J. 2011. Land Transport for Export: The Effects of Cost, Time, and Uncertainty in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 39(10): 1749-1759.

Crellin, R. 2013. What Indigo has learned… Agriculture. Indigo Trust Available online (25/03/2013) <http://indigotrust.org.uk/2013/03/25/what-indigo-has-learned-agriculture/>

(Accessed: 14/12/2014)

Dalberg, 2012. Assessment of Impact Investing Policy in Senegal. A Report by Dalberg Global Development Advisors. December 2012.

Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of

Management Journal, 32(3): 543-576.

Eisenhardt, K. M. & Graebner, M. 2007. Theory Building from cases: Opportunities and Challenges.

Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25-32.

FAO, 2013. Case studies on Remuneration of Positive Externalities (RPE)/Payments for

Environmental Services (PES). Prepared for the Multi-stakeholder dialogue 12-13

September 2013, Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome.

Franz, M., Felix, M., & Trebbin, A. 2014. Framing smallholder inclusion in global value chains – case studies from India and West Africa. Geographica Helvetica, 69(4): 239-247.

Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. 2012. Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5): 531-543.

Golja, T. & Požega, S. 2012. Inclusive Business - What It Is All About? Managing Inclusive Companies. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2(1): 22-42.

Freiling, J. & Dressel, K. 2014. Exploring constrained rates of adoption of total cost of ownership models: A service-dominant logic analysis. International Small Business Journal,published online March 12, 2014, doi:10.1177/0266242613519118.

Fraser, S., Bhaumik, S. K. & Wright, M. 2015. What do we know about entrepreneurial finance and its relationship with growth? International Small Business Journal, 33(1): 70-88.

Hall, J., & Matos, S. 2010. Incorporating impoverished communities in sustainable supply chains.

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1/2): 124-147.

Hall, J., Matos, S., Sheehan, L., & Silvestre, B. 2012. Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid: A Recipe for Inclusive Growth or Social Exclusion? Journal of Management

Studies, 49(4): 785-812.

Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P. 2012. Innovation for Inclusive Business: Intrapreneurial Bricolage in Multinational Corporations. Journal of Management Studies,49(4): 743-784. Herlau, H., & Tetzschner, H. 1994. Regional development: who are the problem owners?

Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 6(2): 161-175.

Javalgi, R. G., Todd, P. R., Johnston, W. J., & Granot, E. 2012. Entrepreneurship, muddling through, and Indian Internet-enabled SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 65(6): 740-744.

Kimbu, A. N. & Ngoasong, M. Z. 2013. Centralized Decentralization of Tourism Development: A Network Perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 40(1): 235-259.

Koh, H., Karamchandani, A., & Katz, R. 2012. From Blueprint to Scale: The Case for Philanthropy

in Impact Investing. Monitor Institute Report. Monitor Group.

Lockett, N., Jack, S., & Larty, J. 2013. Motivations and challenges of network formation: Entrepreneur and intermediary perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 31(8): 866-889.

Louisevickers 2012. Grants Awarded to Cameroon Projects supported by ActivSpaces. Available online (01/10/2012) <http://indigotrust.org.uk/2012/10/01/grants-awarded-to-cameroon- projects-supported-by-activ-spaces/> (Accessed: 21/06/2014)

McMullen, J. 2011. Delineating the domain of development entrepreneurship: A market-based approach to facilitating inclusive economic growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and

Practice,35(1): 185-215.

Moremi Initiative 2013. Two MiChange Projects Shortlisted for World Summit Youth Award (29/08/2013) <http://moremiinitiative.org/wp/2013/08/29/welcome-to-our-beta-site/> (Accessed: 19/06/2014)

69

Naudé, W., Gries, T., Wood, E., & Meintjies, A. 2008. Regional determinants of entrepreneurial start- ups in a developing country. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,20(2): 111-124. Ngoasong, M. Z. 2015. Digital Entrepreneurship in an Emerging Market: the role of ICTs and

local context. 42ndAcademy of International Business UK&I Chapter Conference, 16-18 April

2015, Manchester Metropolitan University

Ngoasong, M., Paton, R. and Korda, A. 2015. Impact Investing and Inclusive Business Development

in Africa: A research agenda. IKD Working Paper No 76, The Open University, Milton

Keynes.

Nwagwu, W. & Ibitola, T. 2010. Aspects of size and geography of an African cyberspace. South

African Journal of Library & Information Science 76(2): 168-180.

Porter, G. 2014. Transport Services and Their Impact on Poverty and Growth in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of Recent Research and Future Research Needs. Transport Reviews, 34(1): 25-45

Prahalad, C. K. 2005. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

Robson, P., Akuetteh, C., Stone, I., Westhead, P., Wright, M. 2013. Credit-rationing and entrepreneurial experience: Evidence from a resource deficit context. Entrepreneurship and

Regional Development, 25(5-6): 349-370.

Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. 2012. Cross-border entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional

Development, 24(3-4): 95-104.

Söderbaum, M., & Teal, F. 2000. Skills, Investment and Exports from Manufacturing Firms in Africa.

Journal of Development Studies, 37(2): 13-43.

Theyel, N. 2013. Extending open innovation throughout the value chain by small and medium-sized manufacturers. International Small Business Journal, 31(3): 256-274.

Tolstoy, D. 2014. Differentiation in foreign business relationships: A study on small and medium-sized enterprises after their initial foreign market entry. International Small

Business Journal, 32(1):17-35.

Walther, O. 2012. Traders, agricultural entrepreneurs and the development of cross-border regions in West Africa. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(3-4): 123-141.

Williams, C. C. 2010. Spatial variations in the hidden enterprise culture: Some lessons from England.

Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(5): 403-423.

World Bank, 2014 Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size

Enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. 2011. The business model: recent developments and future research.

70

E X P L O R I N G B U S I N E S S I N C U B AT I O N I N TA N Z A N I A

KRISTINA HENRICSON BRIGGS