REFERENCES
1. Divon MY, Ferber A. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry--an update. Semin Perinatol 2001;
25: 44-47.
2. Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Kenneth JL, Gilstrap L, Bloom SL, Wenstrom KD, eds. Williams Obstetrics. 22th Ed. 2005, McGraw-Hill: New York. 761-809.
3. Goldkrand J W, Moore DH, Lentz SU, Clements SP, Turner AD, Bryant JL. Volumetric flow in the umbilical artery: normative data. J Matern Fetal Med 2000; 9: 224-228.
4. Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Berntsen GK, Maltau JM, Kiserud T. Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 937-944.
5. Hanson MA, Spencer J, Rodeck CH, eds. Fetus and Neonate, Physiology and Clinical Applications: The Circulation. Doppler Ultrasonography: applications in clinical practice, ed. T.
BJ. 1993, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 323-339.
6. Fitzgerald DE, Drummand JE. Non-invasive measurement of the human circulation using ultrasound: a new method. BMJ.1977; 2:1450–1.
7. Seyam YS, Al-Mahmeid MS, Al-Tamimi HK .Umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry in intrauterine growth restriction and its relation to perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 77: 131-137.
52
8. Baschat AA, Weiner CP. Umbilical artery doppler screening for detection of the small fetus in need of antepartum surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:154-158.
9. Osungbade K.O, Ige O.K “Public Health Perspectives of Preeclampsia in Developing Countries: Implication for Health System Strengthening,” Journal of Pregnancy, vol. 2011.
10. Pattinson R.C, Norman K, Odendaal H.J. The role of Doppler velocimetry in the management of high risk pregnancies.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101:114-20.
53
11. Dornan JG Harper H. Where are we with Doppler? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994, 101:190-1.
12. Romero Arauz J.F, Ramos León J.C, Rivera Velásquez P, Álvarez Jiménez G, Molina Pérez C.J et al . Gynecol Obstet Mex. 2008 Aug; 76(8):440-9.
13. Yoon BH, Lee CM, Kim SW. An abnormal umbilical artery waveform: A strong and independent predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia. Am J Obs Gyn. 1994; 171:713-21.
14. Waa.S, Vinayak .Comparison of doppler studies in obstetrics with fetal outcome. East Afr Med J Vol. 87 No 12, 2010.
15. Ayyuba R, Abubakar I.S, Yakasai I.A. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry study on prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with hypertensive disorders in Kano, Nigeria. Niger J Basic ClinSci 2015; 12:95-104
16. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, the World Bank. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008.Geneva, World Health Organization, 2010.
17. Ahman E, Zupan J. Neonatal and perinatal mortality: country, regional and global estimates 2004. OMS 9241596147 9241596147.
18. Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, et al. (2010) .The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ 88: 31–38. Doi: 10.2471/blt.08.062554
19. Divon M.Y, Ferber A.Doppler evaluation of the fetus. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 45(4):1015-25.
20. Trudinger BJ Cook CM, Giles WB. Fetal umbilical artery waveforms and subsequent and subsequent neonatal outcome.Br J obstet gynecol 1991; 98:378-84.
54
21. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T .Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: Update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 ;( 1) CD007529.
22. Dixon M.Y, Girz B.A Lieblich T, Langer clinical management of the fetus markedly diminished umbilical artery end diastolic flow. AM J obstet gynecol 1989; 161:1523-7. 23 .Westergaard H.B, Langhoff-Roos J, Lingman G, Marsal K, Kreiner S et al. A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of metaanalyses in evidence-based obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 17:466–76.
24.Onyiriuka A.O, Okolo A.A. Perinatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia in Benin city;
Nigeria .Trop J obstet Gynecol ,2004 ;21:148-152.
25. Uzan J, Carbonne M, Piconne O, Asmar R, Ayoubi J.M et al . Preeclampsia: Diagnosis and management. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011; 7:467-74.
26. Hernández-Díaz S, Toh S, Cnattingius S. Risk of pre-eclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2009; 338:2255.
27. Meler .E, Figueras .F, Bennasar. M, Gomez .O .The prognostic role of uterine artery doppler investigation in patients with severe early onset preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;
202:559.
28. Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005 Mar 12; 330(7491): 565.
29. Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. The interval between pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med.2002; 346:33–38.
30. Wang J.X, Knottnerus A.M, Schuit G, Norman R.J, Chan A et al. Surgically obtained sperm, and risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia. Lancet.2002; 359:673–674.
31. Julian C.G. High altitude during pregnancy. Clin Chest Med.2011; 32:21–31.
55
32. Duley L. Preeclampsia, eclampsia and hypertension. BMJ Clin Evid. 2008; 2008: 1402.
33. Roberts J.M, Hubel C.A. The two stage model of preeclampsia: variations on the theme, Placenta.2009 Mar; 30 Suppl A: S32-7.
34. Andraweera P.H, Dekker G.A, Roberts C.T. The vascular endothelial growth factor family in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18:436–57.
35. Ekele B A. Use of Magnesium sulphate to manage pre-eclampsia and Eclampsia in Nigeria:
Overcoming the odds. Afr Med. 2009; 8(2): 73-75.
36. Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Hanssens M. The uterine spiral arteries in human pregnancy:
facts and controversies. Placenta.2006; 27(9-10):939–58.
37. Lyall F. The human placental bed revisited. Placenta 2002; 23(8–9):555–62.
38. Kong T.Y, De Wolf F, Robertson W.B, Brosens I. Inadequate maternal vascular response to placentation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and by small-for-gestational age infants. Br J Obstet & Gynecol. 1986 Oct; 93(10):1049–5.
39. Robertson W.B, Brosens I.A, Dixon HG. Placental bed vessels. Am J Obstet and Gynecol.
1973; 117(2):294–5.
40. Giles W.B, Trudinger B.J, Baird J. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: pathological correlation. Br J Obstet and Gynaecol. 1985; 92:31–8.
41. Mires G.J, Patel N.B, and Dempster J. Review: The value of fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in the prediction of adverse fetal outcome in high risk pregnancies. J Obstet and Gynaecol.2000; 10:261–70 74.
42. Mari G. Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics: from the diagnosis of fetal anemia to the treatment of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet and Gynecol. 2009;
200(6):613.e1–613.e9.
56
43. Evans D.H, McDicken W.N, Skidmore R, Woodcock J.P. Doppler Ultrasound: Physics, Instrumentation, and Clinical Applications. Chichester: Wiley, 1989.
44. Goldberg BB, Merton DA, Deane CR. An Atlas of Ultrasound Color Flow Imaging. London:
Martin Dunitz, 1997.
45. Rourke C, Hendrickx P, Roth U, Brassel F, Creutzig A et al. Color and conventional imagedirected ultrasonography: accuracy and sources of error in quantitative blood flow measurement. J Clin Ultrasound 1992; 20:187–93
46. Thompson R.S, Trudinger B.J, Cook C.M. A comparison of Doppler ultrasound waveform indices in the umbilical artery .Indices derived from the maximum velocity waveform.
Ultrasound Med Biol 1986; 12:835–44.
47.Arduini D, Rizzo G, Boccolini M.R, Romanini C, Mancuso S. Functional assessment of uteroplacental and fetal circulations by means of color Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9: 249–53
48. Maulik D, Yarlagadda P, Downing G. Doppler velocimetry in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1990; 17:163–86
49. Harman C.R, Baschat A.A. Comprehensive assessment of fetal wellbeing: which Doppler tests should be performed? Curr opin obstet Gynecol 2003; 15(2):147-57.
50. Huneke B, Holst A, Schroder H.J .Normal values for relative Doppler indices .A/B ratio;
resistance index and pulsatility index of the uterine artery and the umbilical artery in normal pregnancy. A longitudinal study .Geburtshilfe rauenheilkd 1995; 55 (11):616-22.
51. Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Reiss I, Gortner L, Weiner CP et al. Relationship between arterial and venous Doppler and perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16:407–13.
57
52. Ferrazzi E, Bozzo M, Rigano S, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19:140–6.
53. Wang K.G, Chen C.P, Yang J.M. Impact of reverse end-diastolic flow velocity in umbilical artery on pregnancy outcome after the 28th gestational week. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77:527–31.
54. Hecher K, Campbell S, Doyle P, and Harrington K. Nicolaides K. Assessment of fetal compromise by Doppler ultrasound investigation of the fetal circulation: arterial, intracardiac, and venous blood flow velocity studies. Circulation 1995;; 91:129–38.
55. Smith K, Sowmya K, Malathi T Study of doppler waveforms in pregnancy induced hypertension and its correlation with perinatal outcome. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2014:428 -433.
56. Gramillini D, Raboni S,Vadora E. Cerebral-Umbilical doppler ration as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynaecol, 1992; 416-20.
57. Fairlie F.M, More H.M, Walter J.J. Determinants of perinatal outcome in pregnancy induced hypertension with absent of umbilical artery end diastolic frequencies. Am J Obstet Gynaecol.1988; 71: 742-6.
58. Role of Doppler indices of the umbilical and middle cerebral artery in prediction of perinatal outcome in preeclampsia. Padmini C.P, Priyanka.D. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016:845 -849.
59. Hazra S.K, Dash k.k, Chaudhuri A. A prospective study of doppler velocimetry in pregnancy induced hypertension’. In a rural population in developing country, 2013; 2(2):127-31.
60. Komuhangi P, Byanyima.R.K. Case report in clinical medicine, 2013:554-561.
58
61. Merz, E. (2005) Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology. 2nd Edition, Mainz, Georg Thieme, New York, 507-513.
62. Devendra, A, Desai Sadhana, K., ShethPrem, N. and Prema, K. (2005) Significance of Umbilical Artery Velocimetry in perinatal outcome of growth restricted fetuses. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology of India, 55, 138-143.
63. Trudinger B.J, Cook C.M, Giles W.B, Corrrelly A, Thompson R.S et al. Umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in high-risk pregnancy-randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 1987; 1:188–
90.
64. Messawa M, Ma’ajeni.E, Ayaz.A. The role of doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancy; a comparative study .Niger med J 2012, 53:116-120.
65. Khalid .M, Wahab .S, Kumar.v. Doppler indices in prediction of fetal outcome in hypertensive pregnant women.NSOG 2011.
66. Yalti S, Oral O, Gurbuz .B. Ratio of middle cerebral to umbilical artery blood velocity in preeclamptic and hypertensive women in the prediction of poor perinatal outcome. Indian J med res 120, 2004, 44-50.
67. Rocca M.M, Said M, Khamis M.Y, Karkow T.A. The value of doppler study of the umbilical artery in predicting perinatal outcome in preeclamptic patient J obstet Gynecol 1995; 427-31.
68. Divon M.Y. Randomized controlled trials of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: How many are too many? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6:377-379.
69. Nelson JP, Alfirevic Z. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high-risk pregnancies (Cochrane review), in The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2000. Oxford: Update software.
70.Soregaroli M, Bonera R, Danti L, Dinolfo D, Taddei F et al. Prognostic role of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 11:199–203.
71. Hartung J, Kalache K.D, Heyna C. Outcome of 60 neonates who had ARED flow prenatally compared with a matched control group of appropriate-for-gestational age preterm neonates.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:566–72.
72. Araoye M.O. Subjects selection in research methodology with statistics for health and social sciences. Nathadex publishers 2004:115-222.
73. B. O Igbinedion, O. U Ogbeide, a comparative study of the second and third trimester of pregnancy, umbilical artery doppler velocimetry indices in benin-city.Ann Biomed Sci. Vol 14,
No. 1, Jan 2015.
59
74. Sibai B, Dekkar G, Kufermine M. Preeclampsia .Lancet, 2005; 365:785-799.
75. Ghulmiyyah L and Sibai B, “maternal mortality from preeclampsia/eclampsia, seminars in perinatology, 2012; 36:56-59.
76. Bibi ShahnazAali, M.D., Shahin Narooi3 M.D., Babak Mojtabaean4 M.D., Nouzar Nakhaee5 M.D.Screening utility of umbilical artery Doppler indices in patients with preeclampsia. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine Vol.8. No.4. p: 167-172, autumn 2010
77. Medhat Y. Anwer, Tark A. Karkar, Sally S. El-Tawab, Akram A. Deghady. Serum IL-6 and umbilical artery doppler indices in preeclamptic patients .Alexandria Journal of medicine (2017) 53, 35-40.
78. Smriti Agrawal*, Vinita Das, Anjoo Agarwal, Amita Pandey.Fetal Doppler for prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in preeclampsia in a low resource setting. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;5(10):3439-3443.
79. Swapnali C. Kshirsagar1, Sneha S. Shirodkar1, Sunil J. Yadav1, Umesh M. Zile. Role of Doppler indices in prediction of perinatal outcome in preeclampsia. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct; 5(10):3390-3397
80.Ozeren M, Dinc H, Ekmen U, Senekayli C, Aydemir V. Umbilical and middle cerebral artery Doppler indices in patients with preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999; 82:11-6 81.Alfred abuhamad, MD, Annette J. Sclater ,RDMS ,Eric j. Carlson, MD, Richard P. Umbilical artery doppler waveform notching. Matern-fetal Virginia Feb, 2002.
60