ENDOGENEIDAD ENTRE LOS MECANISMOS DE GOBIERNO CORPORATIVO Y EL

All reflection intensities were measured at 110(2) K using a KM4/Xcalibur (detector: Sapphire3) with enhance graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) for 3 or a SuperNova diffractometer (equipped with Atlas detector) with Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) for 4 under the program CrysAlisPro (Versions 1.171.36.24 or 1.171.36.32 Agilent Technologies, 2012-2013). The same program was used to refine the cell dimensions and for data reduction. The structure was solved with the program SHELXS-2013 or SHELXS-2014/7 and was refined on F2 with SHELXL-2013 or SHELXL-2014/7.30 Analytical (3) or numerical

(4) absorption corrections based on a multifaceted crystal model were applied using CrysAlisPro. The temperature of the data collection was controlled using the system Cryojet (manufactured by Oxford Instruments). The H atoms were placed at calculated positions (unless otherwise specified) using the instructions AFIX 23, AFIX 43, AFIX 137 or AFIX 147 (only for 3) with isotropic displacement parameters having values 1.2 or 1.5 times Ueq of the attached C or O atoms. For 3, the H atoms attached to the major component of the disordered lattice water molecule (i.e., O1W) were found from difference Fourier maps. Their coordinates were refined freely but the O−H bond lengths and the H…H distance were restrained to be 0.84(3) and 1.33(3) Å using the DFIX instructions, respectively. The H atoms attached to the minor component (O1’) of the disordered lattice water molecule could not be retrieved.

3, Fw = 2365.03, elongated red plate, 0.40 × 0.24 × 0.05 mm3, triclinic, P-1 (no. 2), a = 11.4357(2), b = 15.3159(3), c = 17.6072(3) Å, α = 110.3534(19), β = 92.4345(17), γ = 102.7437(19)°, V = 2796.04(10) Å3 _{, Z = 1, Dx = 1.405 g cm}−3 _{, µ = 0.444 mm}−1_{, abs. corr.} range: 0.873−0.979. 34323 Reflections were measured up to a resolution of (sin θ/λ)max = 0.62 Å−1. 11276 Reflections were unique (Rint = 0.0750), of which 9507 were observed [I > 2σ(I)]. 803 Parameters were refined using 275 restraints. R1/wR2 [I > 2σ(I)]: 0.0436/0.1111. R1/wR2 [all refl.]: 0.0546/0.1172. S = 1.041. Residual electron density found between −0.67 and 0.97 e Å−3. The asymmetric unit contains one Ru complex, two ClO4- _{counterions, as well as some} lattice solvent molecules (hexane, water and acetonitrile). The structure is mostly ordered. The two perchlorate counterions are both disordered over two orientations, and the occupancy factors of the major components refine to 0.587(17) and 0.581(5). The hexane solvent molecule is found at sites of inversion symmetry (and therefore, only half of the molecule is crystallographically independent). The water molecule is found to be disordered over two

positions. The occupancy factor of the major component refines to 0.704(6). The checkCIF report generates 3 Alert level B that are concerned with the minor component of the disordered lattice water molecule. Because its occupancy factor is too low, the H atoms cannot be retrieved experimentally.

4, Fw = 1096.94, dark thick red lath, 0.31 × 0.15 × 0.08 mm3, triclinic, P-1 (no. 2), a = 13.6824(3), b = 13.6984(3), c = 14.2579(3) Å, α = 98.249(2), β = 101.025(2), γ = 115.285(2)°, V = 2294.10(9) Å3 , Z = 2, Dx = 1.588 g cm−3 , µ = 0.510 mm−1, abs. corr. range: 0.786−1.000. 35221 Reflections were measured up to a resolution of (sinθ/λ)max = 0.65 Å−1_{. 10524} Reflections were unique (Rint = 0.0299), of which 9340 were observed [I > 2σ(I)]. 743 Parameters were refined using 498 restraints. R1/wR2 [I > 2σ(I)]: 0.0369/0.0900. R1/wR2 [all refl.]: 0.0432/0.0945. S = 1.059. Residual electron density found between −0.64 and 0.90 e Å−3. The two PF6- counterions are found to be disordered over two orientations. The occupancy factors of the major components of the disorder refine to 0.917(3) and 0.821(8). The occupancy factor of the lattice solvent CH3CN molecule was refined freely, and its occupancy factor refines to 0.907(7).

REFERENCES

(1) Bonhôte, P.; Gogniat, E.; Tingry, S.; Barbé, C.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Lenzmann, F.; Comte, P.; Grätzel, M. Efficient Lateral Electron Transport inside a Monolayer of Aromatic Amines Anchored on Nanocrystalline Metal Oxide Films. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 1498-1507.

(2) Heimer, T. A.; D'Arcangelis, S. T.; Farzad, F.; Stipkala, J. M.; Meyer, G. J. An Acetylacetonate-Based Semiconductor−Sensitizer Linkage. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 5319-5324.

(3) Hu, K.; Meyer, G. J. Lateral Intermolecular Self-Exchange Reactions for Hole and Energy Transport on Mesoporous Metal Oxide Thin Films. Langmuir 2015, 31, 11164-11178. (4) Trammell, S. A.; Meyer, T. J. Diffusional Mediation of Surface Electron Transfer on TiO2.

J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 104-107.

(5) Moia, D.; Vaissier, V.; Lopez-Duarte, I.; Torres, T. S.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; O'Regan, B. C.; Nelson, J.; Barnes, P. R. F. The reorganization energy of intermolecular hole hopping between dyes anchored to surfaces. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 281-290.

(6) Wang, Q.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Cremer, J.; Bäuerle, P.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Grätzel, M. Cross Surface Ambipolar Charge Percolation in Molecular Triads on Mesoscopic Oxide Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5706-5713.

(7) Moia, D.; Cappel, U. B.; Leijtens, T.; Li, X.; Telford, A. M.; Snaith, H. J.; O’Regan, B. C.; Nelson, J.; Barnes, P. R. F. The Role of Hole Transport between Dyes in Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 18975-18985.

(8) Hu, K.; Robson, K. C. D.; Johansson, P. G.; Berlinguette, C. P.; Meyer, G. J. Intramolecular Hole Transfer at Sensitized TiO2 Interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8352-8355. (9) Hu, K.; Robson, K. C.; Beauvilliers, E. E.; Schott, E.; Zarate, X.; Arratia-Perez, R.; Berlinguette, C. P.; Meyer, G. J. Intramolecular and Lateral Intermolecular Hole Transfer at the Sensitized TiO2 Interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1034-1046. (10) Hanson, K.; Brennaman, M. K.; Ito, A.; Luo, H.; Song, W.; Parker, K. A.; Ghosh, R.;

Norris, M. R.; Glasson, C. R. K.; Concepcion, J. J.; Lopez, R.; Meyer, T. J. Structure– Property Relationships in Phosphonate-Derivatized, RuII Polypyridyl Dyes on Metal Oxide Surfaces in an Aqueous Environment. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 14837- 14847.

(11) Moia, D.; Leijtens, T.; Noel, N.; Snaith, H. J.; Nelson, J.; Barnes, P. R. F. Dye Monolayers Used as the Hole Transporting Medium in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Adv. Mater.

2015, 27, 5889-5894.

(12) Penner, R. M.; Gogotsi, Y. The Rising and Receding Fortunes of Electrochemists. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 3875-3876.

(13) Sutin, N. Nuclear, electronic, and frequency factors in electron transfer reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 275-282.

(14) Barbara, P. F.; Meyer, T. J.; Ratner, M. A. Contemporary Issues in Electron Transfer Research. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13148-13168.

(15) Swords, W. B.; Li, G.; Meyer, G. J. Iodide Ion Pairing with Highly Charged Ruthenium Polypyridyl Cations in CH3CN. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 4512-4519.

(16) O’Donnell, R. M.; Sampaio, R. N.; Li, G.; Johansson, P. G.; Ward, C. L.; Meyer, G. J. Photoacidic and Photobasic Behavior of Transition Metal Compounds with Carboxylic Acid Group(s). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3891-3903.

(17) Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods : Fundamentals and Applications. 2nd Edition ed.; Wiley: New York, 2001.

(18) Daum, P.; Lenhard, J. R.; Rolison, D.; Murray, R. W. Diffusional charge transport through ultrathin films of radiofrequency plasma polymerized vinylferrocene at low temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4649-4653.

(19) Marton, A.; Clark, C. C.; Srinivasan, R.; Freundlich, R. E.; Narducci Sarjeant, A. A.; Meyer, G. J. Static and Dynamic Quenching of Ru(II) Polypyridyl Excited States by Iodide. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 362-369.

(20) DiMarco, B. N.; O’Donnell, R. M.; Meyer, G. J. Cation-Dependent Charge Recombination to Organic Mediators in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C

2015, 119, 21599-21604.

(21) Ward, C. L.; O’Donnell, R. M.; DiMarco, B. N.; Meyer, G. J. Kinetic Resolution of Charge Recombination and Electric Fields at the Sensitized TiO2 Interface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 25273-25281.

(22) O’Donnell, R. M.; Sampaio, R. N.; Barr, T. J.; Meyer, G. J. Electric Fields and Charge Screening in Dye Sensitized Mesoporous Nanocrystalline TiO2 Thin Films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 16976-16986.

(23) Ardo, S.; Achey, D.; Morris, A. J.; Abrahamsson, M.; Meyer, G. J. Non-Nernstian Two- Electron Transfer Photocatalysis at Metalloporphyrin–TiO2 Interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16572-16580.

(24) Li, X.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Thelakkat, M.; Barnes, P. R. F.; Vilar, R. N.; Durrant, J. R. Spectroelectrochemical studies of hole percolation on functionalised nanocrystalline TiO2 films: a comparison of two different ruthenium complexes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 1575-1584.

(25) Wang, Q.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Grätzel, M. Molecular Wiring of Nanocrystals:  NCS-Enhanced Cross-Surface Charge Transfer in

Self-Assembled Ru-Complex Monolayer on Mesoscopic Oxide Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4446-4452.

(26) Chan, M.-S.; Wahl, A. C. Rate of electron exchange between iron, ruthenium, and osmium complexes containing 1,10-phenanthroline, 2,2′-bipyridyl, or their derivatives from nuclear magnetic resonance studies. J. Phys. Chem. 1978, 82, 2542-2549.

(27) Swierk, J. R.; McCool, N. S.; Saunders, T. P.; Barber, G. D.; Mallouk, T. E. Effects of Electron Trapping and Protonation on the Efficiency of Water-Splitting Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10974-10982.

(28) Brown, G. M.; Sutin, N. A comparison of the rates of electron exchange reactions of ammine complexes of ruthenium(II) and -(III) with the predictions of adiabatic, outer- sphere electron transfer models. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 883-892.

(29) Biner, M.; Buergi, H. B.; Ludi, A.; Roehr, C. Crystal and molecular structures of [Ru(bpy)3](PF6)3 and [Ru(bpy)3](PF6)2 at 105 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5197- 5203.

(30) Sheldrick, G. M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C 2015, 71, 3-8.