Los enfoques de las políticas públicas para mujeres y las políticas de

There are several suggestions for Perum BULOG Divre Jatim and future research.

1. Perum BULOG Divre Jatim may consider the result of supply chain performance measurement as a feedback to improve it supply chain performance.

2. In a subsequent study, improvement recommendation by using simulation and cost analysis of the failure mitigation process are suggested to give better comprehensive improvement recommendation for Perum BULOG Divre Jatim supply chain performance.

APPENDIX

Appendix B. AHP Questionnaire Recapitulation Objective Right on Quantity Right on Target Right on Quality Right on Price On- Time Complete Administration Right on Quantity 8 1 8 7 7 Right on Target 1/8 1/7 3 3 5 Right on Quality 1 7 7 7 7 Right on Price 1/8 1/3 1/7 1/3 1/2 Right On-Time 1/7 1/3 1/7 3 1/2 Complete Administration 1/7 1/5 1/7 2 2 Right on Quantity RL 1.1 RL 1.2 RL 1.3 RL 1.1 5 7 RL 1.2 1/5 3 RL 1.3 1/7 1/3 Right On-Time RL 5.1 RL 5.2 RL 5.1 1 RL 5.2 1

CHAPTER VII

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

This chapter consist of conclusions obtained from supply chain performance measurement and failure mode and effect analysis that have been done in the previous chapter. This chapter also provide suggestion for Perum BULOG DIvre Jatim to improve its supply chain performance.

7.1

Conclusion

The conclusion of this research are:

1. The supply chain performance measurement model for Perum BULOG Divre Jatim is made based on SCOR model. The indicators are identified based on the SCOR attribute, which is reliability-responsiveness-asset management, and the objectives of Perum BULOG Divre Jatim. Perum BULOG Divre Jatim has six objectives that need to be achieved which are on-time, right quantity, right quality, right price, right target and complete documentation. Based on the research conducted, there are eleven indicators that have been identified and will be used to measure the supply chain performance of Perum BULOG Divre Jatim which fulfill the objectives of Perum BULOG Divre Jatim and can be applied in Perum BULOG Divre Jatim.

2. Based on the supply chain performance measurement conducted by using eleven indicators that have been identified, Perum BULOG Divre Jatim has scored 75.45% out of 100% which is categorized in yellow according to traffic light system.

3. Based on the failure mode and effect analysis, there is two failure that categorized as high failure or critical that need to be mitigated, namely: the decreased of rice quality and delays in orders delivery. To avoid the potential failure that might affect the performance of Perum BULOG Divre Jatim, there are several improvement suggestions such as: coordinating with PT. JPL to have exclusive contract which is dedicated only in the distribution of subsidized rice for Raskin program, coordinating with the government to re-evaluate the policy

of rice absorption from the local farmer, coordinating with Perum Bulog in another divre or sub-divre to allocate the exceeding rice into their warehouse and coordinating with PT.JPL to repair the inoperable truck.

7.2

Suggestion

There are several suggestions for Perum BULOG Divre Jatim and future research.

1. Perum BULOG Divre Jatim may consider the result of supply chain performance measurement as a feedback to improve it supply chain performance.

2. In a subsequent study, improvement recommendation by using simulation and cost analysis of the failure mitigation process are suggested to give better comprehensive improvement recommendation for Perum BULOG Divre Jatim supply chain performance.

REFERENCES

Ariyanti, V., 2012. Supply Chain Redesign dengan Metode ARIS-SCOR dan

Simulasi pada Industri Pengolahan Makanan (Studi Kasus: PT. Kelola Mina Laut), Surabaya: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

Arvitrida, N. I., 2008. Simulasi Koordinasi Supply Chain Pisang: Studi Kasus

Pisang Mas dari Lumajang, Surabaya: Program Magister Teknik

Industri-ITS.

Beamon, B. M., 1999. Measuring supply chain performance. International

Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), pp. 275-292.

Chopra, S. & Meindl, P., 2007. Supply Chain Management Strategy, Planning

and Operation. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson

Prentice Hall.

Estampe, D., Lamouri, S., Paris, J. L. & Brahim-Djelloul, S., 2010. International Journal Production Economics. A framework for analysisng supply chain

performance evaluation model, Volume 142, pp. 247-258.

Gunasekaran, A., C.Patel & McGaughey, R. E., 2004. A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of production

economics, Issue 87, pp. 333-347.

Hall, M., 2010. Root Cause Analysis: A Tool for Closer Supply Chain Integration

in Construction, United Kingdom: School of Management, University of

Bath.

Hellstrom, D. & Johnsson, M., 2002. 14th Annual NOFOMA Conference. s.l., s.n. Hugos, M., 2003. Essentials of Supply chain management. New Jersey: John

Willey & Sons Inc.

Hwang, Y.-D., Lin, Y.-C. & Jr, J. L., 2008. The performance evaluation of SCOR sourcing process-The case study of Taiwan's TFT-LCD industry.

International Journal Production Economics, Issue 115, pp. 411-423.

Mahto, D. & Kumar, A., 2008. Application of Root Cause Analysis in

Improvement of Product Quality and Productivity. Journal of Industrial

Engineering and Management, 01(02), pp. 16-53.

Mendoza, J. A. P.-., 2014. International Journal of Information Management.

Analytical hierarchy process and SCOR model to support supply chain re-design, Issue 34, pp. 634-638.

Palma-Mendoza, J. A., Neailey, K. & Roy, R., 2014. Business Process re-design methodology to support supply chain integration. International Journal

of Information Management, 2(34), pp. 167-176.

Parsana, T. S. & Patel, M. T., 2014. A Case Study: A Process FMEA Tool to Enhance Quality and Efficiency of Manufacturing Industry. Bonfring

International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 4(3), pp. 145-152.

Pujawan, I. N., 2010. Supply Chain Management. 2nd ed. Surabata: Guna Widya. Saaty, R., 1987. The Analytical Hierarchy Process-What it is and How it is used.

Math Modelling, 9(3-5), pp. 161-176.

Saaty, T. & Vargas, L., 2012. Models, methods conceptsc& applications of the

analytical hierarchy process. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.

Supply Chain Council, 2012. SCOR; Supply Chain Operations Reference Model. 11th ed. USA: Supply Chain Council, Inc.

Tako, A. & Robinson, S., 2012. The application of Discrete Event Simulation and System Dynamic in The Logistics and Supply Chain Context.

International Journal of Decision Support System, Volume 52, pp. 802-

815.

Tomic, B. & Brkic, V. S., 2011. Effective Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Action Process. Jounal or Engineering Management and

Competitiveness, 1(1/2), pp. 16-20.

Turban, E. et al., 2012. Electronic commerce a managerial and social perspective. Vanany, I., Suwignjo, P. & Yulianto, D., 2005. Design of Supply Chain

Performance Measurement System for Lamp Industry. 1st International

Conference on Operations and Supply Chain Management, pp. 78-86.

Wolk, A., Dholakia, A. & Kreitz, K., 2009. Building a performance measurement

system using data to accelerate social impact. Cambridge,MA: Root

Cause.

Zainuddin & Vanany, I., 2015. Supply Chain Analysis dengan Model SCOR dan Simulasi pada Engineering-To-Order (ETO) (Studi Kasus: PT.X).

BIOGRAPHY

Profita Sari Aji was born in Surabaya, June 27th 1994. She received her formal education at SDN Kertajaya XII No. 219 from 2000-2006, SMPN 19 Surabaya from 2006-2009, and SMAN 15 Surabaya from 2009-2012. In 2012, she was accepted in Industrial Engineering Department, Institute Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya and in July 2016 she finished her undergraduate study.

During her study, the author joined the international class for eight semesters. She also enrolled as the staff of education and welfare department during her second year, and become the vice president of Industrial Engineering Youth Club in her third year. The author can be contacted by email in: [email protected]