• No se han encontrado resultados

ESFERA TEMÁTICA G):

In document UNODC/CCPCJ/EG.6/2015/2 (página 29-33)

Like the federal statute, many states permit preventive pretrial

detention for individuals who have been arrested for certain more

serious crimes.

191

Some states even require detention in certain cases.

192

New Jersey was an exception to this rule until recently. In 2014,

New Jersey made comprehensive changes to its state bail laws. The

legislature passed a statute that shifts away from reliance on money

bail

193

and voters approved a constitutional amendment to permit

detention based on public safety concerns.

194

New York continues to be an outlier by prohibiting judges from

making discretionary decisions to deny bail based on public safety

concerns.

195

But that does not mean that there is not preventive

191. See, e.g, VT. STAT. tit. 13, § 7553 (2009) (“A person charged with an offense

punishable by life imprisonment when the evidence of guilt is great may be held without bail.”); N.M.CONST. art. II, § 13 (outlining situations [involving certain serious felonies] where courts may deny bail); S.C.CODE ANN. § 22-5-510 (Supp. 2015) (empowering courts to deny bail for

certain violent offenses); TEX.CONST. art. I, § 11a (same).

192. These are typically cases involving capital crimes. See, e.g., MICH.COMP.LAWS ANN. § 765.5 (West 2000) (“No person charged with treason or murder shall be admitted to bail if the proof of his guilt is evident or the presumption great.”); OHIO CONST. art. I, § 9 (“All persons shall be bailable . . . except for a person who is charged with a capital offense where the proof is evident or the presumption great . . . .”).

193. 2014 N.J. Sess. Law Serv. Ch. 31 (2014) (West) (including several new provisions that shift away from monetary bail).

194. Public Question Results, supra note 10 (amending constitution to eliminate constitutional right to bail and to permit judges to order pretrial detention based on public safety concerns). As amended, New Jersey Constitution, Article I, Paragraph 11 reads, in part:

All persons shall, before conviction, be eligible for pretrial release. Pretrial release may be denied to a person if the court finds that no amount of monetary bail, non- monetary conditions of pretrial release, or combination of monetary bail and non- monetary conditions would reasonably assure the person’s appearance in court when required, or protect the safety of any other person or the community, or prevent the person from obstructing or attempting to obstruct the criminal justice process.

The provision had previously stated: “All persons shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses when the proof is evident or presumption great.” N.J.STAT.ANN.CONST.ART. 1, ¶ 11 (repealed 2014).

195. See N.Y.CRIM.PROC.LAW § 510.30(2)(a) (McKinney 2012) (stating that judges setting bail “must consider the kind and degree of control or restriction that is necessary to

pretrial detention in New York; for some serious felonies, as a matter

of law, defendants are ordered detained until trial.

196

For other

offenses, however, New York judges are not permitted to consider a

defendant’s risk of dangerousness in making discretionary pretrial

detention decisions.

197

And yet they do.

In 2015, legislation was introduced that would permit judges to

consider an individual’s potential danger to the community when

deciding whether to detain an individual.

198

Those proposed changes

have not been adopted, but they have been supported by different

state and local officials, including, perhaps surprisingly, progressive

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio.

199

For now, New York judges

continue to be limited to considering flight risk in making

discretionary detention and release determinations.

In a range of state and federal cases, separate consideration of

flight risk and dangerousness is necessary for a judge to determine

secure [the defendant’s] court attendance when required”; the discretionary bail statute does not permit decisions based on public safety); see also People ex rel. Ryan v. Infante, 485 N.Y.S.2d 852, 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep’t 1985) (citing § 510.30(2)(a) and noting “that the purpose of bail is to secure the defendant’s appearance at all proceedings before the court”) (internal citation omitted); People v. Maldonado, 407 N.Y.S.2d 393, 395 (Crim. Ct. 1978) (“The statutory structure as to bail is quite clear in that requiring the defendant’s appearance is the major consideration in fixing the amount of bail. Danger to the community does not appear to be the primary concern of the bail structure.”).

196. N.Y. CRIM. PROC. LAW § 510.30(1)(b) (“Determinations of applications for recognizance or bail are not in all cases discretionary but are subject to rules, prescribed in article five hundred thirty and other provisions of law relating to specific kinds of criminal actions and proceedings, providing . . . that [in some cases an application] must as a matter of law be denied and the principal committed to or retained in the custody of the sheriff . . . .”).

197. See supra note 195.

198. S. 5167, 2015 Leg., 238th Sess. (N.Y. 2015) (The proposed amendments provide that “[w]ith respect to any principal, the court must consider the kind and degree of control or restriction that is necessary to secure his or her court attendance when required and to assure the safety of any other person or the community”) (emphasis added).

199. Mayor de Blasio’s support was announced in the wake of the murder of a five-year veteran officer of the New York Police Department by an individual who had been released prior to trial. See A.J. Baker & J. David Goodman, Suspect in Fatal Shooting of New York Officer Was on the Run for Weeks, Officials Say, N.Y. TIMES (Oct. 21, 2015), http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/22/nyregion/new-york-police-officer-randolph-holder- fatally-shot-east-harlem.html. The defendant was on bail at the time of the shooting and had most recently been arrested for a drug sale charge in late 2014. Id. Following the officer’s death, de Blasio expressed outrage at a press conference that the defendant had been sent to a drug rehabilitation program rather than traditionally incarcerated. De Blasio Calls For Changes In State Bail, Diversion Programs In Wake Of Officer’s Death, CBS N.Y. (Oct. 23, 2015), http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2015/10/23/de-blasio-diversion-program-changes/.

whether denying bail and ordering detention is appropriate. In other

words, in some cases, flight risk alone must be measured before

detention may be ordered. As explained in the next Section, statutes

governing the setting or pricing of bail also require independent

risk analysis.

In document UNODC/CCPCJ/EG.6/2015/2 (página 29-33)

Documento similar