CAPÍTULO 3. RESULTADOS DEL BALANCEO DE LOS CIRCUITOS
3.4 Circuito 3
3.4.1 Estimación de cargas y balanceo del circuito 3
Based on our working model of ring peeling (Figure 3.8A), our second prediction was that adf1 mutant cells would display septation defects, due to the hypothesised imbalance of tension around the ring. To test for this, we performed CW staining on WT, adf1-‐M2 and adf1-‐M3 cells, and quantified the different septa morphologies that we observed, performing separate analysis for fully-‐septated and partially-‐septated cells. For the fully septated cells, we saw only flat, hemispherical, or wavy septa in control cells. We reasoned that the wavy septa could be the result of non-‐uniform septum deposition, and therefore an indicator of non-‐uniform ring tension. By quantifying the relative proportion of each morphology, we found that the majority of WT cells displayed either hemispherical or flat septa, with a minority showing wavy septa (Figure 3.11A). In adf1-‐M2 and adf1-‐M3 cells, we saw a greater proportion of wavy septa compared to the control cells, and we also observed a number of cells that had either failed septation and undergone branching, displayed a misplaced hemispherical septum, or cells where the septum was particularly bright and messy, and it was difficult to determine a specific morphology (Figure 3.11A).
Next, we analysed the partially-‐septated cells, by looking for evidence of asymmetric septum deposition. We did so by visually examining the partially septated cells in our images, and looking for cells where bright CW staining (indicating deposition of septum material) was only visible partway around the cell circumference, or where septation was almost complete and the remaining hole in the septum was radially displaced from the centre of the division plane (Figure 3.11B and Figure
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Fraction adf1+ (N = 71) adf1-M2 (N = 246) adf1-M3 (N = 148) Not shown: 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Fraction adf1+ (N = 71) adf1-M2 (N = 246) adf1-M3 (N = 148) Not shown: (A)$ (B)$ adf1+% adf1"M3% adf1"M2% CW(staining(
(low(intensity(">(Cell(wall,(high(intensity(">(Septum)(
Par?al(septa( Strain( Symmetric( Asymmetric(
adf1+% 37/38( 1/38((2.6(%)( adf1"M2% 63/102( 39/102((38(%)( adf1"M3% 73/89( 16/89((18(%)( adf1+% adf1"M2% adf1"M3% CW(staining( (C)$
Figure$13:$Effect$of$adf1$mutants$on$septa;on$
(A) Quan?fica?on(of(septum(morphology(in(fully(septated(WT,(adf1"M2(and(adf1"M3(cells,(from(CW(staining(of(fixed(cells.(
Septa(were(categorised(as(being(straight,(hemispherical((data(for(these(two(not(shown),(wavy((white),(branched(and( failed(septa?on((light(grey),(misplaced(hemispherical((dark(grey),(or(bright(and(improperly(organised((black).(
(B) Representa?ve(images(of(symmetric(septa(in(WT(cells,(and(asymmetric(septa(in(adf1"M2(and(adf1"M3(cells,(from(CW(
staining(of(fixed(cells.(Images(have(been(segmented(into(low(and(high(intensity(regions,(to(represent(the(outer(cell(wall( and(the(division(septum,(respec?vely.(Table(shows(analysis(of(par?ally(septated(cells,(showing(the(propor?on(of(which( appeared(symmetric(or(asymmetric.(
(C) Corresponding(non"segmented(images(for(those(shown(in((B),(showing(CW(staining(of(septa(in(WT,(adf1"M2,(and(adf1"
M3(cells.(
Scale(bars(in(single(?mepoint(images(are(2(μm.(
Figure 3.11: Effect of adf1 mutants on septation.
(A) Quantification of septum morphology in fully septated WT, adf1-‐M2 and adf1-‐M3 cells, from CW staining of fixed cells. Septa were categorised as being straight, hemispherical (data for these two not shown), wavy (white), branched and failed septation (light grey), misplaced hemispherical (dark grey), or bright and improperly organised (black).
(B) Representative images of symmetric septa in WT cells, and asymmetric septa in
adf1-‐M2 and adf1-‐M3 cells, from CW staining of fixed cells. Images have been segmented into low and high intensity regions, to represent the outer cell wall and the division septum, respectively. Table shows analysis of partially septated cells, showing the proportion of which appeared symmetric or asymmetric.
(C) Corresponding non-‐segmented images for those shown in (B), showing CW staining of septa in WT, adf1-‐M2, and adf1-‐M3 cells.
3.11C). In WT cells we only observed 1/38 (2.6 %) partially-‐septated cells with asymmetric septum deposition. By contrast, in adf1-‐M3 cells we found that 16/89 (18 %) cells displayed asymmetric septum deposition, whilst in adf1-‐M2 cells this increased to 39/102 (38 %) of the partially septated cells (Figure 3.11B).
The observation that more adf1-‐M2 cells display asymmetric septum deposition than adf1-‐M3 cells makes sense, as adf1-‐M2 is the more severe of the two mutants, so it would presumably have the greater effect on ring tension during AMR contraction [66]. Whilst we did not quantify the degree of asymmetry, qualitative observations would also suggest that the partial septa in adf1-‐M2 cells were more asymmetric than those in adf1-‐M3 cells, especially when comparing cells at the later stages of septation (Figure 3.11B and Figure 3.11C). However, this raises the questions of why we observe slightly more aberrant septa in adf1-‐M3 cells when quantifying the fully septated cells (Figure 3.11A). Perhaps it is the case that a greater portion of the septa in adf1-‐M2 cells are so asymmetric that they are unable to successfully complete septation [134], which reduces the number of aberrant septa we observe when quantifying fully septated cells, and increases the portion of partially septated cells that are observed to be asymmetric.
As this data indicates that septum synthesis is defective in adf1 mutant cells, this also supports our working model that reduced actin turnover during AMR contraction leads to a non-‐uniform tension distribution around the ring, which then causes ring peeling to occur at regions of increased tension (Figure 3.8A).
3.12. Attempting to recreate and rescue the ring peeling