• No se han encontrado resultados

Independence indicators

A+ Any company with no recorded shareholder with an ownership over 24.99% (either direct or total), also companies with 6 or more identified shareholders whose ownership percentage is known.

A As above, but includes companies with 4 or 5 identified shareholders. A- As above, but includes companies with 1 to 3 identified shareholders.

B+ Any company with no recorded shareholder with an ownership percentage (either direct or total) over 49.99%, but having one or more shareholders with an ownership percentage over 24.99%, also companies with 6 or more identified shareholders whose ownership percentage is known.

B as above but includes companies with 4 or 5 identified shareholders. B- as above but includes companies with 1 to 3 identified shareholders.

C Any company with a recorded shareholder with an ownership (either direct or total) over 49.99%. The C indicator is also given to a company when a source indicates that the company has an Ultimate Owner.

U Companies not falling into the categories above, indicating an unknown degree of independence.

Continuous ownership concentration variables

C1 Percentage ownership of the largest shareholder C3 Combined ownership of the largest 3 shareholders C5 Combined ownership of the largest 5 shareholders C10 Combined ownership of the largest 10 shareholders C20 Combined ownership of the largest 20 shareholders H Herfindahl index of up to top 20 shareholders

Dichotomous control-type variables

OC1 Dummy = 1 if the largest shareholding exceeds (>=) 5% OC2 Dummy = 1 if the largest shareholding exceeds (>=) 10% OC3 Dummy = 1 if the largest shareholding exceeds (>=) 20% OC4 Dummy = 1 if the largest shareholding exceeds (>=) 30% OC5 Dummy = 1 if the largest shareholding exceeds (>=) 50% OC6 Dummy = 1 if the largest shareholding equals 100%

OC90 The probability that the largest shareholding can secure majority support in a contested vote exceeds 90% using probabilistic model.

OC95 The probability that the largest shareholding can secure majority support in a contested vote exceeds 95% using probabilistic model.

OC99 The probability that the largest shareholding can secure majority support in a contested vote exceeds 99% using probabilistic model.

Owner identities

A Insurance B Banks

C Industrial companies D Individuals or families, unnamed

E Mutual & pension funds/nominees/trusts/trustees F Financial companies

I One of more known individuals or families J Foundations/research institutes L Bulk lists of companies and private owners M Employees/managers/directors S Public authorities, states, governments

Z General public (only applies to publicly listed companies)

Power of multiple large shareholders H_diff =(OW1-OW2)2+(OW2-OW3)2

OW1: Largest shareholdings; OW2: Second largest shareholdings; OW3: Third largest shareholdings

H_con =OW12+OW22+OW32

Definitions for OW1, OW2 and OW3 are as above.

SV Shapley value solution for the largest shareholder in a three large shareholder voting game

Performance Variables

ROA Return on assets ratio = (Net Income before Preferred Dividends + ((Interest Expense on Debt-Interest Capitalized) * (1-Tax Rate))) / Last Year's Total Assets ROC Return on invested capital ratio = (Net Income before Preferred Dividends +

((Interest Expense on Debt - Interest Capitalized) * (1-Tax Rate))) / (Last Year's Total Capital + Last Year's Short Term Debt & Current Portion of Long Term Debt)

ROE Return on equity ratio = (Net Income before Preferred Dividends - Preferred Dividend Requirement) / Last Year's Common Equity

PMG Gross profit margin = Gross Income / Net Sales or Revenues

PMO Operating profit margin = Operating Income / Net Sales or Revenues TQ Tobin’s Q = Market capitalization/total assets

MTB Market to book ratio = Market capitalization / ordinary capital reserves

Other variables

SizeTA Log(total assets)

Lev Leverage ratio = Long term debt/total assets

IAInt Intangiable assets intensity = Intangible assets/total assets

Beta Market risk variable, which is the beta coefficient of the Security Characteristic Line:

ra = αa + βa rm + εi

where ra is the return of an individual asset, and rm is the return of a market portfolio (a representative stock index). Returns are calculated as monthly changes in market prices.

CInt Capital intensity = Total capital % total assets

FCF Free cash flow = Log(net cash flow – capital expenditures)

Industry classifications

N11 Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas; service activities incidental to oil and gas extraction excluding surveying

N13 Mining of metal ores N14 Other mining and quarrying

N15 Manufacture of food products and beverages

N18 Manufacture of wearing apparel; dressing and dyeing of fur N21 Manufacture of pulp, paper and paper products

N22 Publishing, printing and reproduction of recorded media

N23 Manufacture of coke, refined petroleum products and nuclear fuel N24 Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products

N25 Manufacture of rubber and plastic products

N26 Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products N27 Manufacture of basic metals

N28 Manufacture of fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment N29 Manufacture of machinery and equipment n.e.c.

N30 Manufacture of office machinery and computers

N31 Manufacture of electrical machinery and apparatus n.e.c.

N32 Manufacture of radio, television and communication equipment and apparatus N33 Manufacture of medical, precision and optical instruments, watches and clocks N34 Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers

N35 Manufacture of other transport equipment N36 Manufacture of furniture; manufacturing n.e.c. N40 Electricity, gas, steam and hot water supply N41 Collection, purification and distribution of water N45 Construction

N50 Sale, maintenance and repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles; retail sale of automotive fuel

N51 Wholesale trade and commission trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles

N52 Retail trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles; repair of personal and household goods

N55 Hotels and restaurants

N60 Land transport; transport via pipelines N61 Water transport

N62 Air transport

N64 Post and telecommunications

N65 Financial intermediation, except insurance and pension funding N67 Activities auxiliary to financial intermediation

N70 Real estate activities

N71 Renting of machinery and equipment without operator and of personal and household goods

N72 Computer and related activities N73 Research and development N74 Other business activities21

N75 Public administration and defence; compulsory social security N90 Sewage and refuse disposal, sanitation and similar activities N92 Recreational, cultural and sporting activities

N93 Other service activities

21 These activities include legal, accounting, book-keeping and auditing activities; tax consultancy; market research and public opinion polling; business and management consultancy; holdings; architectural and engineering activities and related technical consultancy; technical testing and analysis; advertising; labour recruitment and provision of personnel; investigation and security activities; industrial cleaning; other business activities n.e.c.

Reference

Agrawal, A. and Chadha, S. (2006). Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 371-406.

Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377-397.

Almazan, A., Hartzell, J., Starks, L. (2005). Active institutional shareholders and cost of monitoring: evidence from executive compensation. Financial Management, 34, 4, 5-34.

Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A. and Lin, J. W. (1999). Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, 55, 81-106.

Antle, R., Smith, A. (1986). Measuring executive compensation: Methods and an application. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 269-325.

Arellano, M. (2003). Panel Data Econometrics, Oxford University Press

Barnhart, S. W., and Rosenstein, S. (1998). Board composition, managerial ownership, and firm performance: An empirical analysis. Financial Review, 33, 1-16.

Baumol, W. J. (1959). Business Behaviour, Value and Growth, Macmillan

Bennedsen, M., Wolfenzon, D. (2000). The balance of power in closely held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 113-139.

Benston, G. J. (1985). The validity of profit-structure studies with particular reference to the FTCs Line of Business Data. American Economic Review, 75, 37-67.

Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, MacMillan, New York.

Bhagat, S., Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. Business Lawyer, 54, 921-963.

Bothwell, J. L. (1980). Profitability, risk and the separation of ownership from control. Journal of Industrial Economics, 28, 3, 303-311.

Boudreaux, K. J. (1973). Manageralism and risk-return performance. Southern Economics Journal, January, 366-372.

Brickley J. A., Lease R. C. and Smith C. W. Jr. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 267-291.

Boards:1997-2003. Working paper, Cornell University.

Chhaochharia, V., Grinstein, Y. (2005). (b). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The impact of the 2002 Governance Rules. Working Paper, Cornell University.

Cho, M. H. (1998). Ownership structure, investment and the corporate value: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 47, 1, 103-121.

Cole, R. A. and Mehran, H. (1998). The effect of changes in ownership structure on performance: Evidence from the thrift industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 50, 3, 291-317.

Coles, J. L., Lemmon, M. L., Meschke, J. F. (2003). Structural models and endogeneity in corporate finance: The link between managerial ownership and corporate performance. Working paper, SSRN.

Cubbin, J. and Leech, D. (1983). The effect of shareholding dispersion on the degree of control in British companies: theory and evidence. Economic Journal, 93, 351-369.

Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R. (1992). Financial performance of founder-managed versus professionally managed small corporations. Journal of Small Business Management, 30, 2, 25-35.

Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J. G. (1981). Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypothesis. Econometrica, 49, 781-791.

Demsetz, H. and Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 3, 209-233.

Dewenter, K., Malatesta, P. H. (2001). State-owned and privately owned firms: An empitical analysis of profitability, leverage and labor intensity. American Economic Review, 91, 1, 320-334.

D’Souza, J., Megginson, W. L. (1999). The financial and operating performance of privatized firms during the 1990s. The Journal of Finance, 54, 4, 1397-1438.

Eckel, C., Vermaelen, T. (1986). Internal regulation: The effects of government ownership on the value of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 29, 2, 381-404.

Elliott, J. W. (1972). Control, size, growth, and financial performance in the firm. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7, 1309-1320.

Ely, K. M. (1991). Interindustry differences in the relation between compensation and firm performance variables. Journal of Finance, 5, 1489-1505.

Faccio, M., Lang, L. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 365-395.

Faccio, M., Lang, L., Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91, 54-78.

Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288-307.

Ferreira, M. A. and Matos, P. (2007). Institutional investor type, earnings management and benchmark beaters. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 267-299.

Ferreira, M. A. and Matos, P. (2008). The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 499-533.

Firth, M., Fung, P. M. Y., Rui, O. M. (2002). Simultaneous relationships among ownership, corporate governance, and financial performance. Working paper, SSRN.

Fisher, F. M., McGowan, J. J. (1983). On the misuse of accounting rates of return to infer monopoly profits. American Economic Review, 73, 82-97.

Ghemmavat, P., Khanna, T. (1998). The nature of diversified business groups: A research design and two case studies. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 35-62.

Gomes, A., and Novaes, W. (1999). Multiple large shareholders in corporate governance. Working paper, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, University of Pennsylvania, PA.

Gomes, A., and Novaes, W. (2005). Sharing of control as a corporate governance mechanism. PIER Working Paper 01-029.

Green, C. J. (1989). Model comparison when the endogenous variable is uncertain: An application of non-nested testing procedures. Economics Letters, 31, 349-354.

Greene, W. H. (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th edition, Prentice Hall International, Inc.

Grossman, S. and Hart, O. (1980). Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 1, 42-63.

Guercio, D. D. and Hawkins, J. (1999). The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, 52, 3, 293-340. Han, K. C. and Suk, D. Y. (1998). The effect of ownership structure on firm

performance: Additional evidence. Review of Financial Economics, 7, 2, 143-155.

Hart, O. D., Holmstrom, B. (1987). The theory of contracts. In Advances of Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress, ed. Bewley, Cambridge University

Press.

Hausman, W. J., Neufeld, J. L. (1991). Property rights versus public spirit: Ownership and efficiency of U.S. electric utilities prior to rate-of-return regulation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 3, 414-424.

Hermalin, B. E., Weisbach, M. S. (1987). The effect of board composition on corporate performance. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Hermalin, B. E., Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Apr, 7-26.

Himmelberg, C. P., Hubbard, R. G., Palia, D. (1999) Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership structure and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 353-384. Himmelberg, C. P., Hubbard, R. G., Love, I. (2004). Investor protection,

ownership, and the cost of capital. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2834, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=303969.

Holderness, C. G., Sheehan, D. P. (1988). The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 317-346.

Holl, P. (1977). Control type and the market for corporate control in large U.S. corporations. Journal of Industrial Economics, 25, 259-438.

Holmstom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91.

Holmstrom, B., Milgrom, P. (1983). Aggression and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica, 51, 7-45.

Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., Yui, D., Wan, W. P. (2001). Restructuring strategies of diversified business groups: Differences associated with country institutional environment. In Hitt, M.A., Freeman, R.E. and Harrison, J.S. (eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, Oxford: Blackwell, 433-463.

Hou, K., Robertson, D. (2000). Towards a property rights view of ownership.

Working paper, http://www.cob.ohio-state.edu/fin/faculty/hou/government_ownership.pdf

Hundley, G., Jacobson, C. K. (1998). The effects of the Keiretsu on the export performance of Japanese companies: Help or Hindrance? Strategic Management Journal, 19, 10, 927-937.

Jacquemin, A. and Ghellinck, E. de. (1980). Familial control, size and performance in the largest French firms. European Economic Review, 13, 81-91.

James, H. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6, 1, pp.41-55.

Jayaraman, N., Khorana, A., Nelling, E., Covin, J. (2000). CEO founder status and firm financial performance: Narayanan. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 12, 1215-1224.

Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.

Jensen, M. C., Murphy, K. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 225-264.

John, K., Senbet, L.W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 371-403.

Johnson, S., Ryan, H. E., Tian, Y. S. (2003). Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud. Working paper, Louisiana State University.

Johnson, W. B., Magee, R. P., Nagarajan, N. J. and Newman, H.A. (1985). An analysis of the stock price reaction to sudden executive deaths: implications for the managerial labour market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 151-174.

Kamerschen, D. R. (1968). The influence of ownership and control on profit rates. American Economic Review, 58, 432-447.

Kester, C. W. (1992). Industrial groups as systems of contractual governance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 8, 3, 24-44.

Khanna, T., Palepu, K. (1999). Is group membership profitable in emerging markets: An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55, 867-892.

Kole, S. (1996). Managerial ownership and firm performance: Incentives or rewards. Advances in Financial Economics, 2, 111-149.

Krivogorsky, V. (2006). Ownership, board structure, and performance in continental Europe. International Journal of Accounting, 41, 176-197.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2002). (a). Government ownership of banks. The Journal of Finance, 57, 1, 265-302.

finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, pp. 1113-1155.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (2002). (b), Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57, 1147-1170.

Larner, R. J. (1970). Management Control and the Large Corporation. Dunellen Publishing Co. Inc.

Leech, D. and Leahy, J. (1991). Ownership structure, control type classifications and the performance of large British companies. Economic Journal, 101, 1418-1437.

Lehman, E., Weigand, J. (2000). Does the governed corporation perform better? Governance structures and corporate performance in Germany, European Finance Review, 4, 157-195.

Lemmon, M. L. and Lins, K. V. (2003). Ownership structure, corporate governance and firm value: evidence from the east Asian financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 58, 4, August, 1445-1468.

Levin, S. G. and Levin, S. L. (1982). Ownership and control of large industrial firms: some new evidence. Review of Business and Economic Research, Spring, 37-49.

Lindenberg, E. B. and Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin’s Q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business, 54, 1-32.

Loderer, C., Martin, K. (1997). Executive stock ownership and performance: tracking faint traces. Journal of Financial Economics, 45, 223-255.

Maher, M., Andersson, T. (2000). Corporate governance: Effects on firm performance and economic growth. In Renneboog, L., McCahery, J., Moerland, P., Raaijmakers, T. (eds.), Convergence and Diversity of Corporate Governance Regimes and Capital Markets, Oxford University Press.

Marshall, A. (1932). Industry and Trade, London.

Mathiesen, H. (2002). Managerial ownership and financial performance. Ph.D dissertation, Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.

Maug, E. (1998). Large shareholders as monitors: Is there a trade-off between liquidity and control? Journal of Finance, 53, 65-98.

Maury, B., Pajuste, A. (2004). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking and Finance, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 22 September 2004.

McConaughy, D. L., Mishra, C. S., Walker, M. C., Henderson, G. V. (1998). Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics, 7, 1, 1-19.

McConaughy, D. L., Matthews, C. H., Fialko, A. S. (2001). Founding family controlled firms: Performance, risk and value. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 1, 31-49.

McConnell, J. J. and Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 595-612. McConnell, J. J. and Servaes, H. (1995). Equity ownership and the two faces of

debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 39, 131-157.

McEachern, W. A. (1975). Managerial control and performance, Lexington Books, Mass.

Mehran, H. (1995) Executive compensation structure, ownership and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38, No.2, pp.163-184.

Milnor, J., Shapley, L. (1978). Values of large games II: Oceanic games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 3, 290-307.

Mirrlees, J. A. (1976). The optimal structure of incentives and authority within an organization. Bell Journal of Economics, 7, 105-131.

Mishra, C., Randy, T., Jensen, J. (2001). The effect of founding family influence on firm value and corporate governance: A study of Norwegian firms. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 12, 3, 235-259.

Monsen, R., Chiu, J. S. and Cooley, D. E. (1968). The effect of separation of ownership and control on the performance of the large firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, June, 435-451.

Morck, R., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 292-315.

Murali, R. and Welch, J. B. (1989). Agents, owners, control and performance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Summer 1989, 385-398.

Murphy, K. J. (1985). Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: an empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 11-42.

Nesbitt, S. (1994). Long-Term Rewards from Shareholder Activism: A Study of the CalPERS Effect. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Winter, 75-80. Pagano, M., Roell, A. (1998). The choice of stock ownership structure: Agency

costs, monitoring, and the decision to go public. Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 188-225.

Palia, D. (2001). The endogeneity of managerial compensation in firm valuation: A solution. Review of Financial Studies, 14, 735-764.

4, 293-303.

Pedersen, T. and Thomsen, S. (2003). Ownership structure and value of the largest European firms: The importance of owner identity. Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 1, 27-55.

Peng, L., Roell, A. (2003). Executive pay, earnings manipulation and shareholder litigation. Unpublished paper, Baruch College, NY and Princeton University, N.J.

Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237-265.

Radice, H. K. (1971). Control type, profitability and growth in large firms. Economic Journal, Sept., 547-562.

Rediker, K. J., Seth, A. (1995) Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 85-99.

Round, D. K. (1976). The effect of the separation of ownership and control on large firm profit rates in Australia: an exploratory investigation. Rivista Internazionale Di Scienze Economiche e Commercial, 23, 426-436.

Seifert, B., Gonenc, H., Wright, J. (2002). The international evidence on performance and equity ownership by insiders, blockholders, and institutions. EFMA 2002 London Meetings, http://ssrn.com/abstract=314276.

Shirley, M., Walsh, P. (1998). Public versus private ownership: The current state

of the debate.World Bank Working Paper www.econ.worldbank.org/files/1175_wps2420.pdf .

Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. (1986). , Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488.

Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. (1989). Management entrenchment: the case of manager specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25, 123-139. Short, H. (1994) Ownership, control, financial structure and the performance of

firms. Journal of Economics Surveys, 8, 203-249.

Short, H. and Keasey, K. (1999). Managerial ownership and the performance of firms: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5, 79-101. Singh, M. and Davidson III, W. N. (2003). Agency costs, ownership structure and

corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 5, 919-947.

Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations, Modern Library ed., New York, Modern Library, Inc.

Documento similar