2. Resumen de las principales políticas contables
2.30 Estimaciones y juicios o criterios críticos de la Administración
As previously stated, this document identifies and
addresses four key areas which our government must correct
in order to make the NEP a viable program for improving our
Nation’s preparedness. Chapters II through V, which
address each key area, contain recommended actions
necessary to improve the shortfalls in each of those areas.
With DHS as the lead agency for administering the NEP, it
will be incumbent on it to implement the changes
identified. By following the framework and processes
contained in the NEP IMPLAN, the NEP with its full-scale
exercises should continue to grow and become more viable.
However, DHS faces other challenges in its attempt to
77
As stated previously in this chapter, funding is a
critical piece to fix in the NEP. Federal Organizations
must submit budget requirements for their exercise
participation. Then DHS must validate that the budget
requested supports the participation required of that
organization. These budget amounts must be included in the
President’s budget and eventually funded by Congress.
Fixing funding will go a long way in fixing interagency
participation.
The CAP Program must have the support and attention of
national leaders in order for it to be effective.
Implementing an effective CAP Program will be a significant
step forward in interagency participation since it will
require multiple organizations collaborating on ways to fix
policies and procedures at the Federal level. However,
this will not happen if National leaders do not require
these changes to occur.
By fixing exercise funding and implementing the CAP
system, interagency participation should naturally
increase. This will also contribute to improving stability
and predictability within the NEP. However, it will not
happen overnight. It will likely take years to get the NEP
to become an accepted and viable means for improving our
Nation’s preparedness in responding to a terrorist event or
a natural disaster. A better and tougher exercise program
makes us all better and tougher when the real event comes
78
79
LIST OF REFERENCES
Civil Contingencies Secretariat. Lessons Identified from UK Exercises and Operations – a Policy Framework. London: 2006,
http://www.ukresilience.info/upload/assets/www.ukresil ience.info/lessons_exercises2.pdf(accessed December 10, 2007).
'Lessons learnt' since London bombings.
http://www.epolitix.com/EN/News/200708/6b0359fb-8c96- 4b33-9c91-a8110d345e03.htm (accessed February 29, 2008).
National Emergency Management Association. Preliminary Analysis of the Budget for Fiscal Year 2008 for the Department of Homeland Security. Washington DC: 2008,http://www.nemaweb.org/?1811(accessed September 25, 2007).
The National Response Team. TOPOFF 2000 and National
Capital Region (NCR) After-Action Report. Washington DC: 2001, http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/dhs/TOPOFF- 2000-AAR.PDF(accessed October 6, 2007).
North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command. Exercise Summary Report: Ardent Sentry 06. Peterson Air Force Base, CO: 2006.
———.Joint Training and Exercise Planning Group. Colorado Springs, CO: 2006,
https://www.noradnorthcom.mil(accessed February 29, 2008).
———.Joint Universal Lessons Learned System.
https://www.noradnorthcom.mil/j7/julls(accessed 13 October 2007).
———.Master Exercise Summary Report: Vigilant Overview 04-2 and Unified Defense 04. Peterson Air Force Base, CO: July 2004.
80
———.NORAD-USNORTHCOM Exercise Issues - Worldwide Joint Training and Scheduling Conference. Peterson AFB, CO: March 2006,
http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/training/wjtsc06_1nncipr. ppt(accessed November 23, 2006).
Office of State and Local Government Coordination and
Preparedness. FY 2006 Program Budget Review.
Washington DC: Department of Homeland Security, http://www.nemaweb.org/?1378(accessed December 27, 2007).
———.National Exercise Program Update. Colorado Springs, CO: 2007.
Skinner, Richard L. “A Review of the Top Officials 3 Exercise.” Washington DC: 2005.
The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. New York: 2004.
United Kingdom Cabinet Office. Exercise Winter Willow. http://www.ukresilience.gov.uk/preparedness/exercises/ nationalcasestudies/winter_willow.aspx (accessed 29 Feb 2007).
U.S. Department of Defense. CJCS Guide 3501G, The Joint Training System: A Primer for Senior Leaders. Washington DC: 2006,
http://www.dtic.mil/cjcs_directives/cdata/unlimit/g350 1.pdf (accessed February 29, 2008).
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Exercise and
Training and Exercise Plans Workshop. Washington, DC: 2006.
———.Exercises and Training and Exercise Plan Workshops: Direct Support Applications and Users’ Handbook. Washington DC: 2006,
http://www.state.il.us/iema/training/Exercises/Exercis eDownloads/Application_for_Exercise_Funding.doc
81
———.Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program, “Volume 1: HSEEP Overview and Exercise Program Management.” Washington, DC: 2007,
https://hseep.dhs.gov/support/HSEEP%20Volume%20I%20021 507%20(Final%20Revision%20February%202007).pdf
(accessed October 6, 2007).
———.National Exercise Program. Washington DC: 2007, http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dhs/nep.pdf(accessed October 10, 2007).
———.National Exercise Program Implementation Plan. Washington DC: 2007.
———.National Preparedness Goal (Draft). Washington, DC: 2005,
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/InterimNationalPrepa rednessGoal_03-31-05_1.pdf (accessed November 20, 2006).
———.National Response Plan. Washington, DC: 2006,
http://www.dhs.gov/xprepresp/committees/editorial_0566 .shtm(accessed November 16, 2006).
———.National Strategy for Homeland Security. Washington, DC: 2002.
———.Top Officials (TOPOFF) Exercise Series: TOPOFF 2 – After Action Summary Report. Washington DC: 2003, http://www.armymars.net/ArmyMARS/EmergencyOps/Resource s/TOPOFF2_Report_Final_Public.PDF(accessed November 20, 2006).
U.S. General Accounting Office. Military Training: Potential to Use Lessons Learned to Avoid Past Mistakes Is Largely Untapped. Washington DC: 1995, http://www.gao.gov/archive/1995/ns95152.pdf(accessed
April 29, 2007).
U.S. House of Representatives. Practice Makes Perfect: Strengthening Homeland Security by Exercising
Terrorism Scenarios. Hearing before the Select Committee on Homeland Security, House of
Representatives, 108th Congress, 2nd Session. Washington DC: July 8, 2004.
82
U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Statement of Richard L. Skinner, Office of the Inspector General, Department of Homeland
Security. Washington DC: March 8, 2006.
University of Columbia. Public Health Emergency Toolkit: Planning, Designing, Conducting and Evaluating Local Public Health Emergency Exercises. New York: 2006.
White House. The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina:
Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: 2006,http://www.whitehouse.gov/reports/katrina-
lessons-
learned.pdf#search=%22the%20federal%20response%20to%20 hurricane%20katrina%3A%20lessons%20learned%22
(accessed May 20, 2006).
———.Homeland Security Presidential Directive/ HSPD-8: National Preparedness. Washington, DC: 2003,
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/12/200312 17-6.html(accessed November 20, 2006).
Yorkshire and the Humber Strategic Health Authority. Update on Pandemic Influenza. London: 2007,
http://www.yorksandhumber.nhs.uk/Library/BoardMeetings docs/2007_06_05/Papers/Enc%20H%20-
%20Pandemic%20Influenza%20Update.doc,(accessed 28 Feb 08).
83
INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST
1. Defense Technical Information Center Ft. Belvoir, VA
2. Dudley Knox Library
Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, VA
3. Director of Logistics and Engineering United States Northern Command
Peterson AFB, CO
4. Chief, Plans and Exercise Division Logistics and Engineering Directorate United States Northern Command
Peterson AFB, CO
5. Chief, Training and Exercise Branch Logistics and Engineering Directorate United States Northern Command
Peterson AFB, CO
6. Chief, Exercise Division
Training and Exercises Directorate United States Northern Command Peterson AFB, CO