DESVENTAJAS DE LA ESTRUTURA FUNCIONAL
7.2 ESTUDIO II COOPERATIVA DE CAFICULTORES CAFICAICEDONIA LTDA.
geographically East-West* The sites in each of the sub-groups have a number of additional species in common*
5a South-West*
(Sites 427, 429, 430,, 431, 433, 436, 467) Andrepogon plumosus, Euolea schimperiy Euolea sp* 2072* Grewia mollis,^^ini-|-ii i v i-in -.ru uUJ4.m*^—-i.4-4iiuPljul *i- hji u.im..m>i.i i.ni i n WImii'idw iih, .1» » * . » . i<irjirj»^i>ic#iii»iip¥*»it*. «*** <»«?> *
iefegrantlllj idibioissus' erytlir.odes.i'' Toelea nobilie, Yernonia braohyoalyx.
3b, Southo . -
(Sites'404,-408, 411,' 413,; 413, 4X7) Buelea- latldans Euoloa sp * 8078 * ■ Grovifla^sImll Is ,' Lantana salvlfolia,
Polypodium phymatodes , Bhoieissue erythrbfles, Bit chela
duohesnei, Scut la: rnyrf Ina* ■
3c South Bast ♦ • '
(Sites 458, 460., 468, 464). Qrewla. mollis, Bhoiclasus orythrodes*
34 East.
(Sitos 438 , 440 , 448 , 444 , 446 , 448 , 450) Hiiolea latldahs, Qrewla. slmilis, Hippo or at ©a- afrloana, Bit oho la
duohesnel, R* macroearpa, Becamcne platystigo.a, Toolea nobillaAII T»' tricliooarpa* Yernonia brachycalyx, Msiphus puhescens*
Those thickets occur on anthills and irAn soils* The anthill soils are similar in colour and texture-to the
surrounding soils, are deep, well aerated and drained, mostly crumb-*structured and friable though some valley anthills have larger aggregates* Organic- matter and rooting, are abundant
in the topsoil and are apparent at some depth. The analyses
of these soils (Appendix B) show topsoil pH-of between 5*34 and 7*8, subsbils from -4*8 to 8*1;' bases-* phosphate, carbon and nitrogen are abundant or adequate* The mean values for bases., carbon, and nitrogen are lower for the soils associated
overlap of the bond It Ions, of these two; subgroups... . (.Subgroups >;
So and Sd-were not sampled for analysis)* ;
Bites ’4:27, 430 and 451 of group 3a have -adequate bases,
carbon and nitrogen but deficient phosphate* The remaining
sites of group; Sa and group '5b -have--abundant', bases ? carbon
and nitrogen.and adequate or abundant phosphate. Acacia
heb e o I ad o id e s was' recorded from, sites 487. and 451 only ~
two of the T?less fertile** anthills'5 while the following {!
species: were recorded, from* two op more of. the' Tmore; fertile1*
ahthillss. Acacia eampylacantha. Acacia seyal var» •1YJ.--r r i T . - t- - r — ...T ■ irit|W■ ri ji ji^ H n y n n m m nun i/ip nr'n itfn irg 7 <w ^^w >»,r^mi>miiiium)| mi f w* ^ •.***■-uwi i Wm — iwjijii o m multi mJuga,& m r
Acacia sp*, Acalypha bipartita, Albissgia malacQphylla a
irt -n r.rt.^'i^rrrrrn :'.T-U-inrr.r.rt.t.Tir - ." Timfrii m iw>ii»*up -*>ni.yinflHfri .’rrr > ~ Ymy wirnT *•*<?»***+*■*/•#*»/{* '>»ti'»*■-'***’ *
Alchornea corAlfOllaV- Antidesiaa meioc’arpum. Asparagus paulls
m . T.irr/t- ~ t — i r~ T ir n n n " '-:,)“ ' ~rnnrnr: iirL-.i~n.rni i-r r rr “ ,t .t t t ~ t '“i— r T f ‘ t * * w»w>w*i nn' w hitM*# !*1» ik•! Ni* ■ * m
jguilelmii,. M ’iSrim.'7rr: n i r i :r n r a ir~r". rr n r * - " i r r v - ^ j - ; . — nvrn.nir-.nn i n r r W i y m i ^ W r T 'T I r [ ganomuiti. sp. ,-r“y— rftt. A ., Braohiarla ■y i,TTfn'iT“ : : i- r r r t r T - t~i'.‘T lr ‘Li i — br izanth'a, Bridella... ... f ********
br id e 1 ilfo 1 ia 9 Oapparla * aoutissima-, Olausena ©xiisata, Oombretum^
r r ^ _ T ^ TIT|ir.|r~ r . -irr7 r n -ii...i .[jnilii.iiiim ;i nr T r .iju f i * < phhii ******** j . r r r t m r r i j-rr-TT itn -.itri * r iiiH rtTiir,» ~ r r iir^ ~ in ~ -i-r ,'" r ^ - ‘Jr T j - r n r r - ' — r ; " r ;n “ ‘ i r ir r +
binderanmu, Pommeling afrlcana,, Domboya rotundifolla - Pucloa
latldans.,- Glorloba simplex* Prewitt .& Imlltel-• Lant'ana ..^alvifolia^H Moriscus mc.er , Opilia coltldifolia, Panioum maximum.
Piliostigma thonhihgil,•; Bitcheia1 duchesnel , - ¥anguorla . y; acutHob a , W. aplcnlaf a/ anci Poly-podium phyiaatodes* Pew of
these,- however* ' ooOufc7oh more' thesis5 out*: of the 0 -tsmora fertile! anthills. nevertheless, this list indicates a connection
between nutrlet.it -status and-the species lists of the thickets :ti; of. sub-groups 3a and 3b*
Tlio' VA! soils .associated with- the northern Ttrergre.en %
Thicket (:&roup B) are'more, aoid and have, less carbon and . •-
sites 543, 545 and 346* All these sites and site 415 have acute phosphate deficiency*
The northern Evergreen Thickets also differ in their overhead climate * They are located in an area which receives less rainfall per annum, which is less humid throughout the year, and has a longer and more intense dry season* On the other hand they occur oh the first full-height hills south of the Lake Kioga-Biver Nile water expanse which probably
receives a higher rainfall than the surrounding lands* La addition there are the observed daily morning mists which persist until about 9 a*m*
Furthermore, the Northern Evergreen Thickets are of large extent and are protected from fire at their edges by occurrences of shallow soils .and ironstone pavements*
These peculiarities of soils, climate, and burning account‘for the individuality of the Mort&ern Evergreen Thickets* More accurate information on the climate and additional sampling of the soils and vegetation would be required for a detailed analysis of the interrelationships
of these communities*
The main division of the Southern Evergreen Thickets is geographical* Certain species, however, are restricted to anthills in valleys whilst others oocur only on anthills away from valleys* (Species which occur on one site only have not been considered)*
Species restricted to valley anthills: Acacia.
oampylaeautha. A*- lie'beolMoitles, Acacia aft1., Brldella W III n! r J * UN*l* WI >1 Ulil ii I *4 * \ _ # ,, „ - „ , , , , t , t m
eoXerbneuroides * / Gomkellha: afficana, Bombeya • rotundifolla,
Grewla ■ mo Ills ■ (mostly valley)-, Marl a c u b mao ex** Bboeniy - - h;
reolinata (recorded from 1 site ■but • widely observed),
PiliostiCTa thonnih&ii* 3feiphus- •abyssinica, Z* mauritlana*
iifci.HiMMr M *******.'1**!!*1*.* * W m1ttlrtniiii>iimin)>inw»i»M -it « n in i~ ■ n r • ~ ~iiii'n rtnm np , 11- ,i ' <»>p<il>>l<|<>wt>WW»Wfc|W* u h*. x*Mu * m iwi hm j * W > . i *i «*ti <*■». n » 1111. >*>» i»ii i>» 111 mum* »i,h *
Species restricted to bill ant bills: M ramomum ~ sp* A *,
Bersama •abyss inloa, Br id.e 1 la,; br id el Ilf o 1 ia-, Gapparls rothii* .....;; Ficus ■ oaponsis; Haploooelum fo 1 iolosum; ■ Xpomoea grant 11 (mostly.,-... ; non-valley), Opilia celtidifolla, Phyllanthus disco idous'*,
Tlmxea aethiopica, Vltex-fisoberl.
• '■ The only,'-other differences between valley and bill w anthill sitee‘rire.; bbe seasonal -waterlogging of. the surrounding Valley soils compared with well drained soils -round bill
anthills, the siae.of the thickets and the intensity of burning-'" There-are no- signlfleant 'differences- in the base , phosphate,
carbon or .nitrogen- content of their soils-, and their pH ranges ■ , are almost identical. Textures and structures are:.similar,
though some-valley anthills-have-larger aggregates - nuts ■ and clods ** in the lower layers* • Drainage and- aeration are’ generally good t but one profile taken from near the edge of a
valley anthill (site 404) does show impeded drainage at a depth =•'•
of 86 inches. -h
■ *■ The valley anthills are surrounded by seasonally water: * logged, soils yet are themselves well-drained . We are therefore faced with the question of how- they are drained*
One possibility is that they are well-drained by virtue
of ■increased evapo-transpiration.from better..structured5 soils
and the different vegetation type* This , o.ould be coupled, with
improved drainage due to their microrelief * •• * •
(a) - gravity drainage - partly away from anthill*
( b ) m increased evapotranspirat ion *
i.However, this does not'account for the absence of water: slogging in anthills at some depth below the level of the
surroundihg' water-table, or the moisthess' of anthill soils in
ry season*'
A number, of valleys were observed = to have a layer of coarse sand beneath their clayey- subsoils:
fh &*15
Toe&o\i_ 0-2. P Fine
strrtby L
oA
cA(
.SuBSolL Ft^e- £*rr<C>y CuAy
ton n,\r t — ) 2.
SA^S Z> •
Himerous. attempts ‘wore .made to bore-through anthills to . see. if they drained into this 'layer* The earliest of them; were unsuccessful. owing- -to .the depth of soil, over: the sandy layer-
starting a boring 'at' the bottom of a pit dug ih an anthill-
(Bite 460) * The sand' layer was reached bet ween 10 and XX feet
below the level of the'surfbunding valley after boring through a well-drained sandy clay loam*
Fig*14
• Woody species' are- absent "'from the more severely waters logged valleys (see group 11)* The hill thickets cover a number of anthills and the intervening ?S'A'9 soil* oh the other hand,, the valley•thickets are•restricted to single anthills* This difference is due to the waterlogging of the intervening valley soils*
There are two main reasons why the effects of burning are greater on valley thickets'than hill thickets and both are due to the waterlogging of. valley soils* First, the valley thickets are restricted to the area of well drained soil and s<
are more subject-to fire as their' area/edge ratios are less than those of the larger hill thickets* Second, the valley thickets are unable to fluctuate to an$ffro’*r'
The species restricted to valley anthills in the-south include Brldelia scleroneuroides, Grewla mollis, Zlsiphus
Northern*-.Declduotts. Thibket*. • The following.- species^ restricted to hill anthills, in -the south were found in the. Hortho3.n1
Evergreen Thicket.: Bridella brl&elilfolleu Crrewia -bIbxIIIs., and lilaploooelnm ,f o1iplosuffi*
The restriction of thickets to anthills in valleys Is due
in. part at least, to the-waterlogging of the surrounding soils However., the phenomenon is hot :. limited,-.:: to the- valleys;
thickets are also•concentrated about anthills .surrounded by well drained soils on hillsides and hilltops* Differences between the chemical and physical conditions of the soils of
anthills , and the .surrounding land. may •be ■.critical*
The analyses of each layer of the 11 anthill profiles sampled (sites’. 404, 400,/-411, 445., 41?-, 427, 429, 430, 431, 453, 456.) show more 0,11, Ca, Mg and K than the gorross
:ponding layers of the surrounding soils {sites 405, 407,.410, 412, 416, 426 j 425, 424., 428, 432, 455), with the following exceptions; .
404 has less •!% than- 405 in. the subsoil*. 408 has lose G than 407 .in the topsoil*
... 427' has les& }?g0g *. Oa than. 426 in the td.paoll* 4137 has loss ,0a*• .1C, than .426 in the subsoil* 436 has loss -Mg than 430 in the subsoil*.
... Also the anthill/soils .have .greater -porosity and better developed crumb structures* However,, thickets are not