• No se han encontrado resultados

In conclusion, modern Katuic languages have by and large preserved the disyllabic character of the PK word canon. The contrastivity of sesquisyllabicity is maintained outside of Kuay, where Khmer contact has influenced the loss of this contrast and the development of phonological sesquisyllables in at least some varieties. Disyllabicity was even reinforced in the eastern range of Katuic by the development of presyllable vowel quality contrasts. Nevertheless, there is evidence that the Katuic languages have not been immune to the inexorable typological drift towards sesquisyllabicity and eventual monosyllabicity in Southeast Asia. This can be seen in the near loss of these same presyllable vowel quality contrasts in Bru and Katu and in the general erosion of the presyllable rime which has affected every modern Katuic language, except perhaps for Pacoh.

The derivational morphological system of PK was almost without a doubt more productive than those of its modern descendants, some of which retain only fossilized evidence of such a system. Nevertheless, morphological derivation remains common and partially productive in the central, mountainous areas where Pacoh, WKatu and Kriang are spoken even as contact with more strictly isolating prestige languages has led to a leveling of the PK morphophonological paradigm in favor of syntactic strategies in the more peripheral areas. Certain PK affixes were retained from PAA, including nominalizing infixes (*-an-, *-rn-, *-nn-, *-mp-, *-r-, *-N-) the reciprocal prefix (*tr-) and the causative prefix (*pa-). Others were either PK internal innovations or were borrowed in through contact with other prestige languages such as Chamic or Khmer.

The findings of this paper have implications for the morphological reconstruction of PAA and for our understanding of the historical contact between the Katuic languages and their geographical neighbors in the Bahnaric and Vietic sub-groups of AA, in Khmer and in Chamic. It is hoped that this paper will make a small contribution in these areas of ongoing linguistic research.

References

Alves, Mark. 2006. A grammar of Pacoh: A Mon-Khmer language of the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Alves, Mark. 2007. Pacoh pronouns and grammaticalization clines. In SEALSXIII: Papers from the

Thirteenth Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2003, ed. by Shoichi Iwasaki, Andrew

Simpson, Karen Adams, and Paul Sidwell, 1–12. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Alves, Mark. 2014. A survey of derivational morphology in the Mon-Khmer language family. In The Oxford

Handbook of Derivational Morphology, ed. by Rochelle Lieber and Pavel Stekauer, 520–44. Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Banker, Elizabeth. Bahnar affixation. Mon-Khmer Studies 1:99–117.

Blust, Robert. 2013. The Austronesian languages: Revised edition. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.

Butler, Becky. 2015a. Approaching a phonological understanding of the sesquisyllable with phonetic evidence from Khmer and Bunong. In The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the

Art, ed. by N.J. Enfield and Bernard Comrie 443–99. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Butler, Becky. 2015b. Bunong. The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages, ed. by In Matthias Jenny and Paul Sidwell, 719–45. Leiden: Brill.

Conver, Johanna, Mackenzie Conver, and Jonathan Schmutz. 2017. Lexicon of Ta’oiq. Unpublished. Costello, Nancy. 1966. Affixes in Katu. Mon-Khmer Studies 1:63–86.

Costello, Nancy. 1971. Ngữ-Vựng Katu. [Katu Vocabulary]. Saigon: Trung Tâm Học-Liệu: Bộ Giáo-Dục. Costello, Nancy. 1998. Affixes in Katu of the Lao P.D.R. Mon-Khmer Studies 28:31–42.

Diffloth, Gérard. 1982. Registres, dévoisement, timbres vocaliques: leur histoire en Katouique. [Registers, devoicing and vocalic registers: their history in Katuic]. Mon-Khmer Studies 11:47–82.

Diffloth, Gérard. 1984. The Dvaravati-Old Mon language and Nyah Kur. Monic Language Studies 1. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.

Enfield, N.J. and Gérard Diffloth. 2009. Phonology and sketch grammar of Kri, a Vietic language of Laos.

Ferlus, Michel. 1971. Simplification des groupes consonantiques dans deux dialectes Austroasiens du Sud- Laos. [The simplification of consonant clusters in two Austroasiatic dialects of Southern Laos].

Bulletin de la Societé de Linguistique de Paris 66:389–403.

Ferlus, Michel. 1971. La langue Souei: Mutations consonantiques et bipartition du système vocalique. [The Souei language: Consonant mutations and the splitting of its vowel system]. Bulletin de la Société de

Linguistique de Paris 66:379–88.

Ferlus, Michel. 1974a. Délimitation des groupes linguistiques Austroasiatiques dans le centre Indochinois. [Determining the Austroasiatic language groups in central Indochina]. Asie du Sud-Est et Monde

Insulindien 5:15–23.

Ferlus, Michel. 1974b. La langue Ong, mutations consonantiques et transphonologisations. [The Ong language, consonant mutations and trasphonologizations]. Asie du Sud-Est et Monde Insulindien 5:113–21.

Ferlus, Michel. 1979. Formation des registres et mutations consonantiques dans les langues Mon-Khmer. [The formation of registers and consonant mutations in the Mon-Khmer languages]. Mon-Khmer

Studies 8:1–76

Gehrmann, Ryan and Johanna Conver. 2015. Katuic phonological features. Mon-Khmer Studies 44:lv–lxvii. Gehrmann, Ryan, Feikje van der Haak, and Jennifer Engelkemier. 2016. Lexicon of Kriang Tha Taeng.

Unpublished.

Gehrmann, Ryan. 2015. Vowel height and register assignment in Katuic. Journal of the Southeast Asian

Linguistic Society 8:56–70.

Gehrmann, Ryan. 2016. The West Katuic languages: Comparative phonology and diagnostic tools. MA thesis. Chiang Mai: Payap University.

Gehrmann, Ryan. 2017a. Katuic presyllable vowel contrasts. Paper presented at the 7th International

Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics, Christian-Albrechts Universität, Kiel, Sept. 29 – Oct. 1 2017. Gehrmann, Ryan. 2017b. The historical phonology of Kriang, a Katuic language. Journal of the Southeast

Asian Linguistics Society 10(1):114–139.

Gradin, Dwight. 1976. Word affixation in Jeh. Mon-Khmer Studies 5:25–42.

Henderson, Eugenie. 1952. The main features of Cambodia pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental

and African Studies 14(1):149–174.

Hoàng Văn Hành and Tạ Văn Thông. 1998. Tiếng Bru-Vân Kiêu. [The Bru-Van Kieu Language]. Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Khoa Học Xã Hội.

Huffman, Franklin. 1972. The boundary between the monosyllable and the disyllable in Cambodian. Lingua 29:54–66.

Huffman, Franklin. 1976. The register problem in fifteen Mon-Khmer languages. In Austroasiatic Studies, ed. by Philip N. Jenner, Laurence C. Thompson, and Stanley Starosta, 575–90. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.

Jenner, Philip and Saveros Pou. 1980–81. A lexicon of Khmer morphology. Mon-Khmer Studies 9–10. Jenny, Matthias, Tobias Weber and Rachel Weymuth. 2015. The Austroasiatic languages: A typological

overview. In The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages, ed. by Matthias Jenny and Paul Sidwell, 13– 143. Leiden: Brill.

L-Thongkum, Theraphan. 2001.

ภาษาของนานาชนเผ่าในแขวงเชกองลาวใต

. Phasa khong nanachon phaw nai khweng

sekong lao tai. [Languages of the tribes in Xekong province southern Laos]. Bangkok: The Thailand

Research Fund.

Matisoff, James. 1973. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Consonant Types and Tone, ed. by L.M. Hyman, 71–96. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.

Miller, John and Carolyn Miller. 2017. Bru-English-Vietnamese-Lao Dictionary. SIL International. Online:

http://bru.webonary.org/.

Olsen, Niel H. 2015. Kơho-Sre. Austroasiatic comparative-historical reconstruction. In The Handbook of

Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2015. Typologizing sesquisyllabicity. In The Languages of Mainland Southeast

Asia: The State of the Art. ed. by N.J. Enfield and Bernard Comrie, 500–28. Berlin: De Gruyter

Mouton.

Reid, Lawrence. 1994. Morphological evidence for Austric. Oceanic Linguistics 33(2):323–44.

Sidwell, Paul and Felix Rau. 2015. Austroasiatic comparative-historical reconstruction. In The Handbook of

Austroasiatic Languages, ed. by Matthias Jenny and Paul Sidwell, 221–363. Leiden: Brill.

Sidwell, Paul and Pascale Jacq. 2003. A Handbook of Comparative Bahnaric, Vol. 1: West Bahnaric. Pacific Linguistics 551. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Sidwell, Paul. 2005. The Katuic languages: Classification, reconstruction and comparative lexicon. Studies in Asian Linguistics 58. Munich: Lincom Europa.

Sidwell, Paul. 2008. Issues in the morphological reconstruction of Proto-Mon-Khmer. In Morphology and

Language History: In Honor of Harold Koch, ed. by Claire Bowern, Bethwyn Evans, and Luisa

Miceli, 251–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Sidwell, Paul. 2009. Classifying the Austroasiatic languages: History and state of the art. Munich: Lincom Europa.

Sidwell, Paul. 2015. Local drift and areal convergence in the restructuring of Mainland Southeast Asian languages. In The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, ed. by N.J. Enfield and Bernard Comrie, 51–81. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Sidwell, Paul. 2015. Austroasiatic classification. In The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages, ed. by Matthias Jenny and Paul Sidwell,144–220. Leiden: Brill.

Smith, Kenneth and Paul Sidwell. 2015. Sedang. In The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages, ed. by Matthias Jenny and Paul Sidwell, 789–836. Leiden: Brill.

Smith, Ronald. 1970. Ngeq rhyme dictionary (Vietnam Data Microfiche Series no. VD45-75). SIL Unpublished database.

Smith, Ronald. 1973. Reduplication in Ngeq. Mon-Khmer Studies 4:85–111.

Solntseva, Nina. 1996. Case-marked pronouns in the Ta’oih language. Mon-Khmer Studies 26:33–36. Srivises, Prasert. 1978. Kui (Suai) – Thai – English dictionary. Jerry W. Gainey and Theraphan L.

Thongkum (eds.). Bangkok: Indigenous Languages of Thailand Research Project, Chulalongkorn University Language Institute.

Sulavan, Khamluan, Thongpheth Kingsada, and Nancy Costello. 1998. Katu-Lao-English Dictionary. The Ministry of Information and Culture and The Institute of Research on Lao Culture, Lao P.D.R. Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 1983. Kammu phonology and morphology. Lund: Gleerup.

Vera Scholvin and Judith Meinschaefer