VI. PROCEDIMIENTOS ESPECÍFICOS
6.3. PROCDIMIENTO DE RESPUESTA
6.3.3.2. ETAPA DE PRIMERA RESPUESTA
1. Parties in interest may object to the Plan’s classification of Claims and Interests.
Bankruptcy Code section 1122 provides that a plan may place a claim or an interest in a particular class only if such claim or interest is substantially similar to the other claims or interests in such class. The Debtors believe that the classification of the Claims and Interests under the Plan complies with the requirements set forth in the Bankruptcy Code because the Debtors created Classes of Claims and Interests, each encompassing Claims or Interests, as applicable, that are substantially similar to the other Claims and Interests in each such Class. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will reach the same conclusion.
2. The Debtors may fail to satisfy vote requirements.
In the event that votes are received in number and amount sufficient to enable the Bankruptcy Court to confirm the Plan, the Debtors intend to seek, as promptly as practicable thereafter, Confirmation of the Plan. In the event that sufficient accepting votes are not received, the Debtors may seek to confirm an alternative chapter 11 plan. There can be no assurance that the terms of any such alternative chapter 11 plan would be similar or as favorable to the Holders of Allowed Claims and Holders of Allowed Interests as those proposed in the Plan.
3. The Debtors may not be able to secure Confirmation of the Plan. Bankruptcy Code section 1129 sets forth the requirements for confirmation of a chapter 11 plan, and requires, among other things, a finding by the Bankruptcy Court that: (a) such plan “does not unfairly discriminate” and is “fair and equitable” with respect to any non-accepting classes; (b) confirmation of such plan is not likely to be followed by a liquidation or a need for further financial reorganization unless such liquidation or reorganization is contemplated by the plan; and (c) the value of distributions to non-accepting holders of claims and equity interests within a particular class under such plan will not be less than the value of distributions such holders would receive if the debtors were liquidated under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.
There can be no assurance that the requisite acceptances to confirm the Plan will be received. Even if the requisite acceptances are received, there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will confirm the Plan. A non- accepting Holder of a Claim or Interest, or a Holder of a Claim or Interest that is deemed to reject the Plan, might challenge either the adequacy of this Disclosure Statement or whether the balloting procedures and voting results satisfy the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code or Bankruptcy Rules. Even if the Bankruptcy Court determined that this Disclosure Statement, the balloting procedures and voting results were appropriate, the Bankruptcy Court could still decline to confirm the Plan if it found that any of the statutory requirements for Confirmation had not been met. If the Plan is not confirmed, it is unclear what distributions, if any, Holders of Allowed Claims and Holders of Allowed Interests would receive with respect to such Claims and Interests.
The Debtors, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Restructuring Support Agreement, reserve the right to modify the terms and conditions of the Plan as necessary for Confirmation. Any such modifications could result in a less favorable treatment of any non-accepting Class, as well as of any Classes junior to such non-accepting Class, than the treatment currently provided in the Plan. Such a less favorable treatment could include a distribution of property to the Class affected by the modification of a lesser value than currently provided in the Plan or no distribution of property whatsoever under the Plan.
32
4. The conditions precedent to the Effective Date may not occur. As more fully set forth in Article VIII of the Plan, the Effective Date is subject to a number of conditions precedent. If such conditions precedent are not met or waived, the Effective Date will not occur. One of the conditions precedent to the occurrence of the Effective Date is that the aggregate amount of General Unsecured Claims shall not exceed $16 million, unless waived by the Requisite Consenting Noteholders. The Debtors believe that the amount of General Unsecured Claims will not exceed the $16 million cap as set forth in Article VIII of the Plan.
5. Nonconsensual Confirmation.
In the event that any Impaired Class of Claims or Interests does not vote to accept the Plan, or if an Impaired Class of Claims or Interests is deemed to reject the Plan, the Bankruptcy Court may nevertheless confirm the Plan at the Debtors’ request if at least one Impaired Class has accepted the Plan (with such acceptance being determined without including the vote of any “insider” in such class), and, as to each Impaired Class that has not accepted the Plan, the Bankruptcy Court determines that the Plan “does not discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable” with respect to the dissenting Impaired Classes. The Debtors intend to seek Confirmation over the deemed rejection of the Plan by Holders of Class 8 Claims. Although the Debtors believe that the Plan satisfies the nonconsensual Confirmation requirements of Bankruptcy Code section 1129(b), there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will reach the same conclusion. In addition, the pursuit of nonconsensual Confirmation or consummation of the Plan may result in, among other things, delay and increased expenses relating to Professional Fee Claims.
6. The Debtors may not be able to achieve their projected financial results.
The Financial Projections set forth on Exhibit C to this Disclosure Statement represent the Debtors’ best estimate of the Debtors’ future financial performance based on currently known facts and assumptions about the Debtors’ future operations as well as the U.S. and world economy in general and the industry segments in which the Debtors operate in particular. The Debtors’ actual financial results may differ significantly from the Financial Projections. If the Debtors do not achieve their projected financial results, the Debtors may lack sufficient liquidity to continue operating as planned after the Effective Date. Moreover, the financial condition and results of operations of the Reorganized Debtors from and after the Effective Date may not be comparable to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in the Debtors’ historical financial statements.
7. Certain tax implications of the Chapter 11 Cases.
Holders of Claims and Interests should carefully review Section XII hereof, “Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Plan,” to determine how the tax implications of the Plan and the Chapter 11 Cases may adversely affect the Reorganized Debtors and certain Holders of Claims and Interests. The tax consequences of this Plan are very complicated, especially for non-U.S. Holders of DIP Claims and Notes Claims.
8. The Debtors’ emergence from chapter 11 is not assured. While the Debtors expect to emerge from chapter 11, there can be no assurance that the Debtors will successfully reorganize or when this reorganization will occur, irrespective of the Debtors obtaining Confirmation of the Plan.
9. Confirmation and consummation may be delayed if the Debtors have to resolicit.
If the Debtors resolicit acceptances of the Plan from parties entitled to vote thereon, or if the Debtors are required to solicit the votes of the Holders of Claims that have been deemed to reject the Plan, Confirmation of the Plan could be delayed and possibly jeopardized. Nonconfirmation of the Plan could result in an extended chapter 11 proceeding, during which time the Debtors could experience significant deterioration in their relationships with trade vendors and major customers. Furthermore, if the Effective Date is significantly delayed, there is a risk that the Restructuring Support Agreement may expire or be terminated in accordance with its terms.
33