CAPÍTULO 2: Procedimiento para evaluar el grado de satisfacción del cliente del
2.4 Fundamentación del procedimiento general 28
2.4.3 Fase 3: Validación y aplicación 34
Gaining consensus to be able to work in a school environment involves
different levels and layers of ethical concern (Blaxter, Hughes, & Tight, 2001, p.
158; Cohen, et al., 2007, pp. 51-59). In my project, I was helped by my
supervisor to meet up with two head teachers from the outset. Next, I met the
respective class teachers one month ahead of the actual project beginning.
The purpose of the research and the length of the research project were
discussed with them. The head teachers verbally authorised me to conduct the
research in their schools and committed to offer their full support, introducing
me to the teachers whom I was to liaison closely with during the field work,
reception staff, and peripheral facilities that I could use. On my side, I
processed the Criminal Record Bureau (CRB) checks well before going into the
schools.
When coming to the actual research sites, the class teachers introduced me
as a drama teacher, Miss Lo, to the children. I was also given some brief time
to introduce myself and to explain what I was going to bring them about drama
participation in the project. The social relationship thus was built up between
researcher/teacher and respondents/students, framed within a classroom
setting (Sarantakos, 2005, pp. 18-19).
Of all the research methods that I applied, filming and photography were the
two that could possibly expose children the most when publishing research
outcomes (Norman K. Denzin & Lincoln, 2008, p. 142). I informed the two class
teachers about image recording before any actual lessons took place. I also
asked their support to find out if there were any children that could not be
filmed or photographed.
Presenting data that were collected from other research methods, such as
interviews, children’s writing and drawing, their verbal interactions in drama
activities also involved another ethical concern with regard to confidentiality
(Cohen, et al., 2007, pp. 65,66; Sarantakos, 2005, p. 21). I chose to use
pseudonyms in order not to reveal children and teachers’ identities. This choice
reassured the participants and at the same time, maintained a humane
relationship that this project had at its heart. Nevertheless, in the case of school
B, children’s ethnic identification was indicated at times when presenting
C
HAPTER4: F
INDINGS ANDD
ISCUSSION 4.1 IntroductionThis chapter will consist of both findings and theoretical analysis of the data
collected from my four case studies, which consist of four drama schemes of
work based on four different traditional Chinese stories. I will present my
findings case by case and each will include data drawn from two schools,
examined sequentially, as the two schools were very different demographically.
The fourth case was completed in school A only.
There are three core research questions I am looking at:
a) how do two contrasting classes of English primary schoolchildren respond to
and make sense of stories drawn from the Chinese tradition, told and
performed in different ways?
b) how do they articulate, adapt and embody values provoked and engaged
with during their drama work and in related classroom activities?
c) a subsidiary question: what can I learn as an ethnic Chinese teacher-artist
from this process in order better to understand this aspect of my practice?
The findings and analysis, however, do not address the first two questions
separately because they are intimately connected. Reflections connected with
short section to specifically address it at the end of the chapter.
Structuring the chapter has been extremely challenging. My initial
investigation was guided by three prisms, namely cosmopolitanism,
transnationalism and hybridity, which guided and shaped my fieldwork. Once
the data was collected, my review was guided by an ethnographic approach,
using thick description to explain and interpret the two groups of children’s
responses to each story. While doing so, certain themes emerged which urged
me to re-scrutinise and reconceptualise under the over-arching lens of social
identity. Nevertheless, some of the themes were not applicable to both groups
of children or to each story.
Religion as a marker of identity was one of the broader themes that I
found evidence for in both groups of children. With group A, it emerged in the
third and fourth stories; with group B, it was concentrated in the third story.
Reader response theorywas a theme applicable only to school A. I have
therefore given a theorised introduction to these themes in the introduction and
pick them up later in the analysis.
Another thematic focus is entitled Gender: exploring gender differences
with regard to moral reasoning. The evidence here is drawn from school A in
analysis of this story in school A.
A brief though problematic discussion centres around ethnicity and relates
only to the introductory story with the children from school B.
Hybridity in performance is another overarching theme most specifically
with the children in school A relating to the second and the fourth stories.
The Four Case Studies:
I will now summarise the key teaching and initial research foci for each
drama scheme and the related research methods I applied in each.
The introductory story,From Bad to Good to Bad to Good, constitutes my
first case and centres around a specific Chinese understanding of life as laden
with contradictions. My initial research interests here were to see what sense
children made of this idea; if and how their understandings shifted after TiR;
and to see what role theatrical representation could play in narrative storytelling.
I analysed data from children’s dramatic representations, their writings and
drawings, from group interviews, edited transcription of the TiR and from my
own journal.
The second case is the story Monkey and the White Bone Demon. I was
interested to know how participatory drama might introduce this story to British
children in China. I wished to introduce children to some basic Chinese
conventions for characterization, integrating traditional Chinese ways of
performing into the more Western drama education tradition. Subsequently I
was interested in how children adapted, used or refused the Chinese
conventions and how their bodies articulated this. The data I used here were
edited transcripts from the lessons, images captured on video of the children’s
representations and my demonstrations and children’s writings.
The third case is the story ofLiang and his Magic Paint Brush. Here I was
particularly interested in the ambiguity of Liang, who can be seen as a hero of
the poor or as a prototype extremist. To address this point I used two activities
which provided my key source of data. I also have children’s still images, their
verbal responses in circle time and interviews.
The fourth story is aboutMazu, the Goddess of the Sea. I was interested
in how a class of white British children would respond to the concept of
polytheism; how conventional Chinese performing could illustrate the
characters and also enrich my storytelling practice; and to what extent children
would adapt the physicalisation learned here and in previous sessions to their
own representations. In order to answer these questions, I draw from edited
and children’s writings.