Fuerzas políticas, gubernamentales, y legales (P)

4.4.12.

Acknowledgement of the different approaches to sketching for design and fine art was evident. Schenk (2017), although fine art trained, bemoaned the elitism of that

establishment and its effect upon designers; “I do think designers should work from

observation, but not life drawing… the problem with drawing is the association with fine art specifically, and talent.” She added that design students generally, “saw drawing as life drawing and it put them off.” Powell, (2017), described its importance to games art and

animation, but also the way it was being eroded: “life drawing is clearly key for character

artists, which is a surprisingly hard sell… conventional, traditional art students get why we do it, everyone else doesn’t… the more technologically focused and less art focused the courses are, the less that culture is in place,” adding, “it will bite us in the arse one day.”

A lack of formality around the teaching of sketching was apparent. Schenk (2017) commented: “I don’t know how many courses actually teach drawing… it’s still on a need-to-

know basis.” When asked how his students acquired sketching skills, Booth (2017)

replied, “I wouldn’t say sketching in the sense that you and I research is formally taught.” Lerpiniere (2017) said her students must have “drawing as a visual research tool - they

have to draw all the way through,” individuals expected to develop their own approach.

McNicoll (2016) believed skills were often learned on an ad hoc basis: “I think that kind

of happens within other activities… things may be picked up… rather than (being) necessarily a targeted learning activity.” Booth (2017) described the self-directed aspect of learning and consolidation: “we rely on them enjoying it and choosing to continue practising on their

own.” Harding (2017) stated that sketching skill was developed through project-based

learning, “throughout the three years it is being maintained through the natural need and the

lessons that form that activity, as well as the design work.” However, despite this, she did

136

Syllabus structure was of interest: Schenk (2017) was the only subject to refer

specifically modular schemes, endorsing them as having “more definite content… because

you have to justify one module being different from another.” Lawson (2017) stated, “drawing, sketching, rendering, it's only the first term of the first year,” adding that “they should be spending 3 or 4 hours (per week) drawing.” He added that after this initial

teaching phase, students didn’t receive further formal tuition. Lerpiniere (2017) described a similar structure: “at the start of year one they do a five week block of drawing,

almost like a mini foundation to get them up to speed,” additionally, “a series of very directed workshops and very directed days of drawing,” informal tuition continuing into the second

year. A lack of time on the curriculum to teach required skills was cited as problematic, Lerpiniere (2017) stating: “we don’t have time to teach them that type of drawing,

observational drawing, they just have to go out and do it.”

Of specific skills, Harding (2016) described her first year programme: “technical drawing

in first term… perspective drawing … there (are) the drawing modules, the manual

techniques… perspective drawing and learning to add tone.” Lawson (2017) described “a command of perspective and the ability to render detail,” among the skills taught on his

course. Leblanc (2017) described her first year teaching, “acquiring a visual language…

and abilities to visually communicate… rudimentary classic sketching and drawing.” She also

stated that at this point, students were introduced “slowly but surely also to look at the

digital tools.” Lawson (2017) and Harding (2017) also described the addition of digital

tools during the first year. Fitton (2016) detailed the content of teaching: “CAD skills, 2-

D and 3-D, and editing-type software such as Photoshop, In-design.” The data regarding the

use of digital tools and its effect on sketch inhibition is presented fully in a later section.

Downs (2017) described an assertive approach to teaching – the concept of the ‘scary tutor.’ He maintained that “generating the persona of a slightly cranky uncle who is going to

actually keep poking you if you don't do it - it works.” Within his course, “everyone has to do everything - it's like basic training in the forces, no one gets to get away with anything because otherwise it hampers them as practitioners.” A similar approach was considered beneficial

137

by Fitton, (2016). Considering a self-directed approach she conceded that, “we’re all a bit

timid about pushing students to do things that they don’t want to do… sometimes people have to do things they don’t want to do because it’s good for them.” Leblanc (2017) was also firm

in her approach: “before I allow them to go anywhere else but sketching, they have to get to a

point where they put their ideas on paper one way or another.”

The maintenance of sketching and drawing skills throughout degree courses was little referred to by subjects. However, Fitton (2016) described “workshops within the visual

communication modules… this goes all the way through three years.” Stacey (N, 2017)

described a less formal approach: “as they move through the years and… into post-graduate

we expect their sketching and drawing skills to continue to improve.” Despite the variety of

tuition, Lawson (2017) lamented that students, “constantly remind you of their lacking, so

it's difficult to encourage, but they get very well taught.”

Powell (M. 2017) revealed an interesting insight into his teaching staff: “the visual part of

my course is run by people who graduated from fine art courses in the ‘90s: nobody taught them how to draw, so they are now trying to teach people to draw on the basis of no technical or theoretical framework.” He suggested an ideal scenario specifically for designers: “I would…employee a lot of very old-school, old-fashioned government art-school-taught lecturers who will go, ‘okay, I’m going to teach you how to draw - it’s very simple… here’s a sphere, here’s a cone… those are your basic forms,’ a systematic approach to teaching drawing

specifically for industry, mak(ing) it very clear that drawing in a fine art context is a different activity.”