1 In the opinion of the directors of Phylogica Limited (the Company):
(a) the financial statements and notes and the audited remuneration disclosures that are contained in the
Remuneration Report in the Directors’ Report, set out on pages 19 to 25, are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
(i) giving a true and fair view of the financial position of the Consolidated Entity as at 30 June 2010
and of its performance, as represented by the results of operations and its cash flows, for the financial year ended on that date; and
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
(iii) the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in note 2 (a); and
(b) The audited remuneration disclosures of the Remuneration Report in the Directors’ Report (page 19
to 25) comply with Australian Accounting Standard AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures; and
(c) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they
become due and payable.
2 The directors have been given the declarations by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer for the
financial year ended 30 June 2010 pursuant to Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Dated at Perth this 24th day of September, 2010 Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors:
Bruce mcHarrie
iNDePeNDeNt AuDitOR’S RePORt
to the members of PHYlOgiCA limiteD
Report on the financial Report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Phylogica Limited (“the company”), which comprises the statement of financial position as at 30 June 2010, and the statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows for the year ended on that date, a summary of significant accounting policies, other explanatory notes and the directors’ declaration of the consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year as set out on pages 27 to 51.
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the
Corporations Act 2001. This responsibility includes establishing and maintaining internal controls relevant to the
preparation and fair presentation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.
In Note 2(a), the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101: Presentation of Financial
Statements, that the consolidated financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards. Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the company’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
Our audit did not involve an analysis of the prudence of business decisions made by directors or management. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.
Auditor’s Opinion
In our opinion:
(a) the financial report of Phylogica Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
(i) giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2010
and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting
Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
(b) the consolidated financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as
disclosed in Note 2(a).
Report on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 19 to 25 of the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2010.The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Auditor’s Opinion
In our opinion the Remuneration Report of Phylogica Limited for the year ended 30 June 2010 complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
HlB mann Judd
Chartered Accountants
N g Neill
Partner
Perth, Western Australia 23 September 2010
This statement outlines the main corporate governance practices in place throughout the financial year, which comply with the ASX Corporate Governance Council recommendations, unless otherwise stated.
As the framework of how the Board of Directors at Phylogica Limited (“Company”) carries out its duties and obligations, the Board has considered the eight principles of corporate governance as set out in the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations.
Principle 1 – lay solid foundations for management and oversight
Companies should establish and disclose the respective roles and responsibilities of Board and management.
Recommendation 1.1: Companies should establish the functions reserved to the Board and those delegated to senior executives and disclose those functions.
The Directors monitor the business affairs of the Company on behalf of Shareholders and have formally adopted a corporate governance policy which is designed to encourage Directors to focus their attention on accountability, risk management and ethical conduct.
The Company’s main corporate governance policies and practices are outlined below:
tHe BOARD Of DiReCtORS
The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for corporate governance of the Company. The Board develops strategies for the Company, reviews strategic objectives and monitors performance against those objectives. The goals of the corporate governance processes are to:
(a) maintain and increase Shareholder value;
(b) ensure a prudential and ethical basis for the Company’s conduct and activities; and
(c) ensure compliance with the Company’s legal and regulatory objectives.
Consistent with these goals, the Board assumes the following responsibilities:
(a) developing initiatives for profit and asset growth;
(b) reviewing the corporate, commercial and financial performance of the Company on a regular basis;
(c) acting on behalf of, and being accountable to, the Shareholders; and
(d) identifying business risks and implementing actions to manage those risks and corporate systems to assure
quality.
The Company is committed to the circulation of relevant materials to Directors in a timely manner to facilitate Directors’ participation in the Board discussions on a fully-informed basis.
COmPOSitiON Of tHe BOARD
Election of Board members is substantially the province of the Shareholders in general meeting. However, subject thereto, the Company is committed to the following principles:
(a) the Board is to comprise Directors with a blend of skills, experience and attributes appropriate for the Company
and its business; and
(b) the principal criterion for the appointment of new Directors is their ability to add value to the Company and its
business.
No formal nomination committee or procedures have been adopted for the identification, appointment and review of the Board membership, but an informal assessment process, facilitated by the Chairman in consultation with the Company’s professional advisors, has been committed to by the Board.