I. INTRODUCCIÓN
1.2. MARCO TEORICO:
1.2.2. Resolución de problemas matemáticos
1.2.2.2. Importancia
When Charles Darwin publishes "The Origins of Species" there is great skepticism over his theory that all life "evolved" from a common ancestor. The un-testable, un-observable "theory of evolution" holds that a self-forming, single-cell creature, over a very long time, evolved into a fish - then an amphibian -then into a tree swinging ape - and then into a human being.
Mistaking observable adaptation for “Evolution”, Darwin predicts that in time, fossil evidence will reveal the billion year progression from ocean scum to swimsuit ‘super model’. After 150 years of digging, this chain of evidence has yet to materialize.
There are HUGE holes in Darwinism and his works are absolutely riddled with logical fallacies and rhetorical tricks. Yet, from its inception, Darwin has benefited from intense media and academic hype. To even mildly question ”evolution" will get one shouted down as "ignorant" and "uneducated". This alone is evidence of its flaws!
The cult-like acceptance of Darwinism has done much to destroy faith in a Supreme Creator - and therefore the moral standards that logically derive from such faith. History shows that a people not rooted in moral principles cannot sustain self-government. They will in time degenerate and fall easy prey to tyrants.
Therefore, the fact that Karl Marx in his 1873 work, "Das Kapital" writes a dedication to Charles Darwin, is not at all surprising:
"Darwin’s work suits my purpose in that it provides a basis in natural science for the historical class struggle.” (11)
And nor is that the first and only expression of Communist excitement over Darwinism:
November 27-30, 1859: Communist icon Friedrich Engels acquires of the very first copies and sends a letter to Marx telling him:
"Darwin, by the way, whom I'm just reading now, is absolutely splendid". (12)
73
December 19, 1860: Marx writes a letter to Engels telling him that Darwin’s book provides the natural-history foundation for the Communist viewpoint:
“These last four weeks, I have read all sorts of things. Among others, Darwin's book ….this is the book which contains the basis on natural history for our view.
(13) (emphasis added)
January 16, 1861: Marx writes an excited letter to his Communist friend Ferdinand Lassalle, the founder of the International Socialist movement in Germany:
“Darwin’s work is most important and suits my purpose in that it provides a basis in natural science for the historical class struggle.” (14) (emphasis added)
June 18, 1862: Marx had already re-read Origin of Species, and again writes to Engels: “I am amused at Darwin, into whom I looked again” (15)
1862: Marx quotes Darwin again within his ‘Theories of Surplus Value’:
"In his splendid work, Darwin did not realize that by discovering the 'geometrical progression' in the animal and plant kingdom, he overthrew the Malthus theory.”
(16)
German Communist leader Wilhelm Liebknecht later described just how excited the 19th Century Communist leaders all were about the new theory:
"When Darwin drew the conclusions from his research work and brought them to the knowledge of the public, we spoke of nothing else for months but Darwin and the enormous significance of his scientific discoveries.” (17) (emphasis added)
74
Engels, Marx, and Liebknecht. The Big 3 legends of 19th Century Communist subversion were all obsessed with Darwinism. Why?
Indeed, "evolution" is very good for Globalism. That explains the academic and media hype behind it, as well as why we are not allowed to question it.
In spite of its scientific flaws - such as the complete lack of fossil evidence for the transitional species, the impossibility of testing the evolution hypothesis, the impossibility of species adding and losing complex chromosomes, the unobservable event of life coming from non-life, the impossibility of DNA codes writing and re-writing new and never seen before sequences, the lack of any plausible explanation for the “evolution” of integrated complexity present in all living organisms, and the simple fact that cross-species evolution has never been observed (only minor adaptation of traits within a species has been observed) -
“evolution" is pushed as an indisputable fact and protected by extreme intellectual bullying as well as the force of law.
The purpose is to destroy man's faith in a Creative Intelligent Designer and the associated higher virtues that logically flow from such knowledge. In the vacuum left by "the death of God", a demoralized and degenerate people ‘worship’ the Government instead. As traditional families and cash strapped churches fade away, the Atheistic state takes over the charitable duties that strong families & churches used to provide. .
75
God vs Darwin: The Logical Supremacy of Intelligent Design Creationism
over Evolution
1- Darwin: Shhhh! You must not question 'Evolution"
2- The insanity of “Evolution” teaches that the lizard and the super-model evolved from the same common spontaneously forming one-cell ancestor.
76
1859 THE TERRORIST JOHN BROWN
In 1859, the abolitionist-terrorist John Brown attempts to raid a Federal armory in Harper’s Ferry, Virginia. His purpose is to start a violent liberation movement among enslaved Blacks. The effort fails and Brown is tried for treason against the Commonwealth of Virginia, murder, and inciting a slave insurrection. A few years earlier, Brown and his men had also massacred five White men in Kansas.
Brown is found guilty on all counts and hanged. Southerners believe that his rebellion is just the tip of the abolitionist iceberg and represented the wishes of the Republican Party to end slavery. The Harpers Ferry raid in 1859 escalates already existing tensions that, a year later, will lead to secession and the Civil War. Had it not been for unreasonable psychopaths like Brown, the South would, in due time, have phased out slavery without bloodshed – as other countries already had done.
The lunatic John Brown remains a heroic figure for modern day Marxists.
(Google: John Brown Marxism).
APRIL, 1861 NORTH VS SOUTH: THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR BEGINS
It might be a bit of an oversimplification to say that New World Order gang engineered the entire Civil War, aka The War Between the States, aka (in the South) The War of Northern Aggression. Regional differences of culture, interest and ideology existed since the founding of the American Republic (recall Hamilton vs Jefferson / Jackson vs Biddle).
77
The American system of mercantilism / protectionism profits the North at the expense of the South. The perpetuation of that system is a cause of friction between the two regions. Another factor is that self-righteous New Englanders despise the more libertarian and sometimes less educated citizens of the South.
Southerners are aware of this supercilious attitude, which in turn fuels resentment of the “Yankees”. Rothschild control. But those political & cultural differences between the industrial North and the agricultural South have long been an issue of concern. When tensions between the South and the U.S. Federal Government come to a boil, the southern states (Confederacy) begin to secede from the Union. In April of 1861, after provoking a Southern attack against the Feds at Fort Sumter (18), President Lincoln orders an invasion of the South.
Contrary to pop- history, the main issue of the Civil War is not about slavery.
At most, only about 3% of southerners hold slaves, and four of the Northern states are actually slave-holding states! President Lincoln does indeed oppose slavery, but he will later use the issue only as a propaganda tool to raise moral support for his true goal; saving and strengthening the Union / Federal government.