15. Diversidad taxonómica (DIVspp), especies amenazadas y especies indicadoras (DIVvul)
2.4.2 Indicadores complementarios
L. Hou1,3, E. Nilsson3, K. Dixen2, J.B. Hansen2, A. Vaag3 and M.O. Nielsen1
1Department of Basic Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of
Copenhagen, Denmark
2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
3Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark
Introduction
Maternal nutrition restriction during late gestation influences foetal development, and impacts glucose-insulin homeostasis in adult offspring. Additionally, intrauterine under-nutrition followed by postnatal over-nutrition leads to rapid catch-up growth, altered adiposity, and impaired glucose tolerance in young age (Ozanne and Hales, 2005; Hernandez-Valencia and Patti, 2006). Skeletal muscle is an important site for glucose and fatty acid catabolism, and reduced glucose uptake and intra-muscular lipid accumulation are related to impaired insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle (DeFronzo and Tripathy, 2009; Kraegen and Cooney, 2008). The aim of this experiment was to demonstrate if foetal programming leads to changes in catabolic preferences in skeletal muscle.
Materials and methods
Twenty twin-pregnant Shropshire ewes were fed either an Norm (~requirements) or Low (50% of requirements) diet the last 6 weeks of gestation (term=147d). From 3-days until 6-months of age, twin lambs were assigned to each their feeding: CONV (moderate hay feeding) or HCHF (high- fat-high-carbohydrate) supplemented with milk replacer between 0-8 weeks of age. From 6 to 24 months of age, sheep were raised on the same moderate grass based diet. Biopsies of m. longissimus
dorsi were obtained post mortem at either 6 or 24 months of age. Target genes mRNA levels were
measured by qPCR, and were grouped into four categories: (1) glucose metabolism: INSRβ, IRS1, and GLUT4, (2) regulators of oxidation: PPARα and PPARδ, (3) coordinators: PGC1α and PGC1β, and (4) mitochondrial FA oxidation regulators: CPT1b and UCP3. ACTB served as an endogenous control. All samples were run in triplicate, and expression data were calculated by using the ΔΔCt method and expressed as a ratio to the ACTB reference. The data were analyzed by the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS (v9.2, SAS institute, USA). Variables in the statistical models included age at slaughtering (6 or 24 months old), maternal diet (Norm or Low), and postnatal diet (CONV or HCHF), and their interactions as fixed effects; and interaction of the factors ewe_no and lamb_no was included as random effect. Normality of data was achieved by logarithm-transformation and outliers identified based on residual plots. Presented results are expressed as least squares means (LSM) with standard error of mean (SEM) of logarithm-transformed data. The PDIFF option in SAS was used to generate comparisons between treatment means.
Results
Postnatal HCHF feeding significantly up-regulated the mRNA level of genes involved in both glucose uptake (INSRβ, IRS1 and GLUT4), mitochondrial FA oxidation regulators (CPT1b and
UCP3), as well as the metabolic coordinator PGC1β. Expression of these genes were not affected
by age (except for a downregulation of INSRβ with age), or by prenatal diet despite the fact that the animals fed the HCHF diet in early postnatal life had been switched back to a low-fat moderate diet for 18 months before the sampling in young adult life (24 months of age). Increased mRNA levels were found also for skeletal muscle PGC1 β, PPARα and PPARδ in response to the HCHF diet and the postnatal dietary effect appeared to be more pronounced in young as compared to older animals. However, this pattern of development was influenced also by the prenatal diet, although not in a
Conclusion
Postnatal nutrition is a determinant of the metabolic pattern of skeletal muscle during early life and has long-term implications for the metabolic pattern later in life even after dietary correction. The increased expression of glucose uptake related genes would be a compensatory mechanism to counteract lowered insulin sensitivity (results not shown). The effects of intrauterine nutrition restriction were observed on the metabolic regulators (PPARs) and PGC1β but not other genes analyzed. Prenatal nutrition did not appear to have major influence on gene expression in early postnatal life, but the metabolic long-term adaptive response to an adverse diet early in postnatal life was apparently influenced. Foetal nutrition may have implications for the metabolic flexibility to adapt to a postnatal over-nutrition environment.
References
DeFronzo, R.A. and D. Tripathy, 2009. Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. Care. 32, Suppl 2, S157-163.
Hernandez-Valencia. M. and M.E. Patti, 2006. A thin phenotype is protective for impaired glucose tolerance and related to low birth weight in mice. Arch. Med. Res. 37, 813-817.
Kraegen, E.W. and G.J. Cooney, 2008. Free fatty acids and skeletal muscle insulin resistance. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 19, 235-241.
Ozanne, S.E. and C.N. Hales, 2005. Poor fetal growth followed by rapid postnatal catch-up growth leads to premature death. Mech. Ageing. Dev. 126, 852-854.
Table 1. Sheep m. longissimus dorsi mRNA expression of target genes as affected by late gestation maternal diet (Low or Norm), postnatal diet (conventional moderate CONV or high-carbohydrate- high-fat HCHF) and age (6 or 24 months).
Postnatal1 CONV HCHF
IRS1 0.12±0.04a 0.26±0.04b
GLUT4 -0.12±0.04a 0.06±0.04b
CPT1b -0.10±0.04a 0.08±0.04b
UCP3 -0.13±0.06a 0.05±0.06b
Postnatal-age2 CONV-6 CONV-24 HCHF-6 HCHF-24
INSRβ -0.03±0.04c -0.17±0.04d 0.09±0.04abd -0.02±0.04b
Postnatal3 CONV HCHF
Maternal-age: Low 6 Low 24 Norm 6 Norm 24 Low 6 Low 24 Norm 6 Norm 24
PGC1β -0.11±
0.07abc -0.16±0.06abc -0.24±0.06ac -0.02±0.07bc -0.12±0.07abc 0.04±0.07b 0.03±0.07bc 0.00±0.07bc
PPARα -0.18±
0.07a 0.02±0.06b -0.03±0.06ab -0.13±0.07ab -0.01±0.07ab -0.12±0.07ab 0.03±0.07b 0.06±0.07b
PPARδ 0.02±
0.09bc 0.04±0.08bc 0.22±0.08ab -0.12±0.09bc 0.32±0.09a -0.07±0.09bc 0.19±0.08a 0.06±0.09abc Data are presented as LSM ± SEM of logarithm-transformed data. Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). HCHF up-regulated IRS1, GLUT4, CPT1b, UCP3 (1) and INSRβ (P<0.05); INSRβ was also up-regulated with age (P<0.05); PGC1β: Lowest value in CONV-Norm-6, lower than HCHF-Norm-6, HCHF-Norm-24, HCHF-Low-24, and CONV-Norm-24 (P<0.05), highest value in HCHF-Low-24, higher than HCHF-Norm-6 and CONV-Low-6 (P<0.05); PPARα: Lowest value in CONV-Low-6, lower than HCHF-Norm-6, CONV-Low-24 and HCHF-Norm-24 (P<0.05), highest value in HCHF-Norm-24, higher thanCONV-Low-6 (P<0.05). PPARδ: Lowest value in CONV-Norm-24, lower than HCHF-Low-6, HCHF-Norm-6, and CONV-Norm-6 (P<0.05), highest value in HCHF-Low-6, higher than CONV-Low-6, CONV-Low-24, HCHF-Low-24, and CONV-Norm-24 (P<0.05).