CAPITULO III: DISEÑO METODOLÓGICO
3.5 Instrumentos para recolección de información
Attachment theory is a means of describing the need and nature of people to
make and maintain close affectional bonds with others and explaining the
emotional distress that can result from separation or loss. A basic
assumption of attachment theory is that the survival of immature and
vulnerable infants at birth depends on an adult caregiver to protect and
nurture them. Infants and caregivers develop complementary behaviours that
maintain their proximity and relationship. Closeness in the relationship
promotes feelings of love and security whereas interruptions can initiate
anger and sadness. Bowlby (1982) argued therefore that attachment is an
Attachment theory was originally developed by Bowlby (1982) whose work
in child psychiatry led him to become dissatisfied with explanations of
childhood problems from the traditional Freudian perspective adhered to by
his colleagues. This was mainly because analysis of problems was
retrospective rather than being based on direct observation of children
(Wollheim, 1971). For a Freudian the patients account of past relationships
is seen to reflect fantasy as much as reality and Bowlby, while considering
himself a psychoanalyst, was determined to base his theorising on reliable
observations. The main difference in Bowlby’s approach was to look at the
relationships formed in childhood and track them to later patterns of
response. His ideas were initially rejected by the psychoanalytic
establishment but they have gradually become influential in the areas of
social development and relationships (Rutter, 1995).
Bowlby (1982) noted that Freud recognised the limits of retrospective
psychoanalysis, firstly, because the relative influence of different factors
causing problems were unknown and secondly because the factors identified
were not necessarily comprehensive. Bowlby argued that attachment theory
had parallels with a psychoanalytic view and could be seen as similar and
different for the following reasons:
• they share the concept of relationships being influenced by
trauma relating to an event or causal conditions,
• the agreement that early childhood is a particularly vulnerable
• they differ in the way they explain motivation behind
relationships,
• Freud's interest in the broader aspects of psychology would
mean that his attention would have been attracted to other
concepts and developments.
Bowlby (1982) developed the concept of attachment in relation to internal
working models and while retaining some ideas from psychoanalysis, ie. the
role of unconscious mental processes, repression as an active process
keeping them unconscious and the origins of neurosis in childhood as major
influences on behaviour.
Attachment theory has developed from the concept of 'object relations'
developed by others, eg. Klein and Winnicott, the main difference being in
the influences of other disciplines, eg. control theory, which have been used
to define instinctive behaviour. Instead of object relations Bowlby (1982)
used the term 'internal working model' to describe the mental or internal
representation of the world, past and present interpersonal interactions,
attachment figures and self. According to Bowlby (1982) past experiences
become internalised to form mental states or internal models which Main,
Kaplan and Cassidy (1985, p66) defined as " a set of rules for the
organisation of information relevant to attachment and for limiting access to
that information".
Internal working models allow a form of short - cut in mental processes,
previous experiences, situations and self without having to rethink every
situation from the beginning. Emotional and cognitive processes are actively
and continually represented and reappraised consciously and unconsciously
in the manner of a control system with a set goal, comparator and constant
feedback.
These mental representations rely on feedback and are seen as resistant to
change (Steele and Steele, 1994). However they also retain some flexibility
and may be modified in the light of development and experience
(Bretherton, 1999, Sroufe, 1988). The purpose of these representations
which include emotion, cognition, and behaviour enable a person to predict
how attachment figures will behave and how they view themselves.
Ideas about internal working models have changed since Bowlby (1982) first
suggested the notion in relation to attachment theory in 1969. Now they are
viewed as developing from early childhood and can be linked to another
developmental theorist, ie. Piaget. It has also been suggested that
interactions and real life events become Representations of Interactions that
have become Generalised (RIGs) and these form an intermediate stage
before new information is incorporated into internal working models
(Bretherton, 1999, Steele and Steele, 1994, Stem 1985).
The idea of instinctive behaviour is based on the idea of a biological control
which promotes proximity seeking in young children. Bowlby (1982)
viewed attachment as an instinctive behaviour in the same class of
behaviours as feeding or mating, with parallels in other species. There is
features can be seen in the care of infants and children and the attachment of
young to their parents; these are examples of instinctive behaviour. These
behaviours are not the same as those of animal species but can be seen to be
derived from them in a more complex and sophisticated form. Bowlby
(1982) identifies 4 main characteristics of instinctive behaviour:
• it follows a similar pattern in all members of a species / sex,
• it is a sequence that follows a predictable course,
• it contributes to self - preservation,
• it develops even when the circumstances for learning are scarce or
absent.
Instinctive behaviour is seen by Bowlby as environmentally stable, ie. as
long as the environment stays within an acceptable range of normal, the
behaviour will conform to a particular pattern. Attachment behaviour is used
to name observable regularities in behaviour which are essential for the
survival of human young.
The actual nature of the control system associated with attachment and how
it works is not yet explained. For example, although ideas have been
postulated it is still not clear exactly what initiates attachment behaviours
The main generalisations of attachment theory (Bowlby, 1981) are:
• attachment behaviours are biologically determined and result in
attracting or retaining the proximity of a particular person;
• The behaviour is seen as different from but as significant as feeding
and sexual behaviours;
• during a child's development attachment behaviour leads to the
making of firstly affectional bonds between child and parents and
then on to adult / adult bonds. The behaviour and bonds persist
throughout the life cycle. These bonds may also change or break
with, eg. loss and separation experiences (Bowlby, 1988);
• the goal of attachment is to maintain proximity / communication
with attachment figure/s through instinctive behaviour. The
achievement of the goal is self regulated and behaviour is adjusted to
elicit the required response;
• with a well established attachment bond behaviour will have adapted
and proximity or communication may only be required in states of
distress or change;
• the development, maintenance and renewal of attachment
relationships create intense emotions. Formation and maintenance of
a bond create joy and security. Equally the loss or threat of the loss
• attachment behaviour is considered to be a characteristic of not only
humans but also other species in order to improve survival rate, eg.
to protect from harm and to nurture offspring;
• caregiving is a behaviour which complements attachment and
is commonly shown not only by a parent to a child but also from
adult to adult in times of stress, eg. in relation to loss;
• the main influence on a person's attachment behaviour is the
experience with attachment figures during the early years of life;
infancy, childhood and adolescence. This in turn influences the
affectional bonds that are made during life;
• disturbed or insecure patterns of attachment can be present at any age
due to previous attachment experiences.