• No se han encontrado resultados

3.2. Modelo teórico de la Propuesta

3.2.8.4. Integración de las acciones para contribuir a la formación

The aim of this thesis is to find new cellular biomarkers in whole blood, which improve the risk stratification of cardiovascular disease patients. Chapters 2 to 5 respectively investigate monocyte subsets, T cell subsets, neutrophil subsets and cytokines as potential biomarkers for cardiovascular disease, furthermore chapter 6 investigates the influence of smoking on circulating biomarkers in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Chapter 1 References

1. Levy D. Combating the epidemic of heart disease. JAMA 2012; 308(24): 2624–2625. doi:10.1001/

jama.2012.164971.

2. Moran AE et al. Temporal trends in ischemic heart disease mortality in 21 world regions, 1980 to 2010:

the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Circulation 2014; 129(14): 1483–1492. doi:10.1161/CIRCU- LATIONAHA.113.004042.

3. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Measuring the global burden of disease. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(5): 448–457.

doi:10.1056/NEJMra1201534.

4. Lozano R et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990

and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380(9859): 2095–2128. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.

5. Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS

Med 2006; 3(11): e442. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442.

6. Fuster V, Mearns BM. The CVD paradox: mortality vs prevalence. Nat Rev Cardiol 2009; 6(11): 669.

doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2009.187.

7. Laslett LJ et al. The worldwide environment of cardiovascular disease: prevalence, diagnosis, therapy,

and policy issues: a report from the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60(25 Suppl): S1–49. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.002.

8. Nabel EG, Braunwald E. A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med

2012; 366(1): 54–63. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1112570.

9. Heidenreich PA et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a poli-

cy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123(8): 933–944. doi:10.1161/ CIR.0b013e31820a55f5.

10. Libby P, Theroux P. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2005; 111(25): 3481–3488.

doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.537878.

11. Davies MJ. Stability and instability: two faces of coronary atherosclerosis. The Paul Dudley White Lec-

ture 1995. Circulation 1996; 94(8): 2013–2020.

12. Stary HC. Macrophage foam cells in the coronary artery intima of human infants. Ann N Y Acad Sci

1985; 454: 5–8.

13. Stary HC. Evolution and progression of atherosclerotic lesions in coronary arteries of children and

young adults. Arteriosclerosis 1989; 9(1 Suppl): I19–32. Available at: http://europepmc.org/abstract/ MED/2912430.

14. Wentzel JJ et al. Endothelial shear stress in the evolution of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vas-

cular remodelling: current understanding and remaining questions. Cardiovasc Res 2012; 96(2): 234– 243. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvs217.

15. Davignon J, Ganz P. Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004; 109(23 Suppl

1): III27–32. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000131515.03336.f8.

16. Dai G et al. Distinct endothelial phenotypes evoked by arterial waveforms derived from atherosclero-

sis-susceptible and -resistant regions of human vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101(41): 14871–14876. doi:10.1073/pnas.0406073101.

17. Nakashima Y et al. Upregulation of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 at atherosclerosis-prone sites on the en-

Introduction

18. Cai H, Harrison DG. Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: the role of oxidant stress. Circ

Res 2000; 87(10): 840–844.

19. Hink U et al. Mechanisms underlying endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Circ Res 2001;

88(2): E14–22. doi:10.1161/01.RES.88.2.e14.

20. Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999; 340(2): 115–126. doi:10.1056/

NEJM199901143400207.

21. Skalen K et al. Subendothelial retention of atherogenic lipoproteins in early atherosclerosis. Nature

2002; 417(6890): 750–754. doi:10.1038/nature00804.

22. Virmani R et al. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification 

scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20(5): 1262–1275.

23. Steinberg D, Witztum JL. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb

Vasc Biol 2010; 30(12): 2311–2316. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179697.

24. Libby P et al. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature 2011;

473(7347): 317–325. doi:10.1038/nature10146.

25. Cybulsky MI, Gimbrone MAJ. Endothelial expression of a mononuclear leukocyte adhesion molecule

during atherogenesis. Science 1991; 251(4995): 788–791. doi:10.1126/science.1990440.

26. Drexler H. Nitric oxide and coronary endothelial dysfunction in humans. Cardiovasc Res 1999; 43(3):

572–579.

27. Drexler H, Hornig B. Endothelial dysfunction in human disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1999; 31(1): 51–60.

doi:10.1006/jmcc.1998.0843.

28. Ley K et al. Getting to the site of inflammation: the leukocyte adhesion cascade updated. Nat Rev Im-

munol 2007; 7(9): 678–689. doi:10.1038/nri2156.

29. De Villiers WJ, Smart EJ. Macrophage scavenger receptors and foam cell formation. J Leukoc Biol 1999;

66(5): 740–746.

30. Linton MF, Fazio S. Class A scavenger receptors, macrophages, and atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol

2001; 12(5): 489–495. doi:10.1097/00041433-200110000-00003.

31. Napoli C et al. Fatty streak formation occurs in human fetal aortas and is greatly enhanced by mater-

nal hypercholesterolemia. Intimal accumulation of low density lipoprotein and its oxidation precede monocyte recruitment into early atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest 1997; 100(11): 2680–2690. doi:10.1172/JCI119813.

32. Stary HC. Lipid and macrophage accumulations in arteries of children and the development of athero-

sclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72(5 Suppl): 1297S–1306S.

33. O’Keefe JHJ et al. Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: lower is better and physiologically

normal. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43(11): 2142–2146. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.046.

34. Tabas I et al. Subendothelial lipoprotein retention as the initiating process in atherosclerosis: update

and therapeutic implications. Circulation 2007; 116(16): 1832–1844. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONA- HA.106.676890.

35. Hartiala O et al. Adolescence risk factors are predictive of coronary artery calcification at middle age:

the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60(15): 1364–1370. doi:10.1016/j. jacc.2012.05.045.

36. Stamler J et al. Relationship of baseline serum cholesterol levels in 3 large cohorts of younger men

to long-term coronary, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality and to longevity. JAMA 2000; 284(3): 311–318. doi:10.1001/jama.284.3.311.

Chapter 1

37. Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature 2000; 407(6801): 233–241. doi:10.1038/35025203.

38. Dalager S et al. Artery-related differences in atherosclerosis expression: implications for atherogenesis

and dynamics in intima-media thickness. Stroke 2007; 38(10): 2698–2705. doi:10.1161/STROKEA- HA.107.486480.

39. Kolodgie FD et al. Is pathologic intimal thickening the key to understanding early plaque progression

in human atherosclerotic disease? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007; 27(5): 986–989. doi:10.1161/ ATVBAHA.0000258865.44774.41.

40. Myoishi M et al. Increased endoplasmic reticulum stress in atherosclerotic plaques associated with

acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 2007; 116(11): 1226–1233. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONA- HA.106.682054.

41. Seimon TA et al. Atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins trigger CD36-TLR2-dependent apoptosis in mac-

rophages undergoing endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Metab 2010; 12(5): 467–482. doi:10.1016/j. cmet.2010.09.010.

42. Tabas I. Macrophage death and defective inflammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol

2010; 10(1): 36–46. doi:10.1038/nri2675.

43. Gautier EL et al. Macrophage apoptosis exerts divergent effects on atherogenesis as a function of lesion

stage. Circulation 2009; 119(13): 1795–1804. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.806158.

44. Moore KJ, Tabas I. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell 2011; 145(3): 341–355.

doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.005.

45. Clarke MCH, Bennett MR. Cause or consequence: what does macrophage apoptosis do in atheroscle-

rosis? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2009; 29(2): 153–155. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179903.

46. Clarke MCH et al. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells induces features of plaque vulnerability

in atherosclerosis. Nat Med 2006; 12(9): 1075–1080. doi:10.1038/nm1459.

47. Moreno PR et al. Neovascularization in human atherosclerosis. Circulation 2006; 113(18): 2245–2252.

doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.578955.

48. Sluimer JC, Daemen MJ. Novel concepts in atherogenesis: angiogenesis and hypoxia in atherosclerosis.

J Pathol 2009; 218(1): 7–29. doi:10.1002/path.2518.

49. Sluimer JC et al. Hypoxia, hypoxia-inducible transcription factor, and macrophages in human athero-

sclerotic plaques are correlated with intraplaque angiogenesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51(13): 1258– 1265. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.025.

50. Kumamoto M et al. Intimal neovascularization in human coronary atherosclerosis: its origin and

pathophysiological significance. Hum Pathol 1995; 26(4): 450–456. doi:10.1016/0046-8177(95)90148- 5.

51. Barger AC et al. Hypothesis: vasa vasorum and neovascularization of human coronary arteries. A pos-

sible role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 1984; 310(3): 175–177. doi:10.1056/ NEJM198401193100307.

52. Eriksson EE. Intravital microscopy on atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein e-deficient mice establishes

microvessels as major entry pathways for leukocytes to advanced lesions. Circulation 2011; 124(19): 2129–2138. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.030627.

53. Sluimer JC et al. Thin-walled microvessels in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques show incom-

plete endothelial junctions relevance of compromised structural integrity for intraplaque microvascu- lar leakage. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53(17): 1517–1527. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.056.

Introduction

349(24): 2316–2325. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa035655.

55. Glagov S et al. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med

1987; 316(22): 1371–1375. doi:10.1056/NEJM198705283162204.

56. Montalescot G et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the

Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013; 34(38): 2949–3003. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296.

57. McGill HCJ et al. Effects of serum lipoproteins and smoking on atherosclerosis in young men and

women. The PDAY Research Group. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth. Arte- rioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17(1): 95–106.

58. Davies MJ. The pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes. Heart 2000; 83(3): 361–366.

59. Hamm CW et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients pre-

senting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevatio. Eur Heart J 2011; 32(23): 2999–3054. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236.

60. Falk E et al. Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists’ view. Eur Heart J 2013; 34(10):

719–728. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs411.

61. Burke AP et al. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died

suddenly. N Engl J Med 1997; 336(18): 1276–1282. doi:10.1056/NEJM199705013361802.

62. Newby AC. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition therapy for vascular diseases. Vascul Pharmacol 2012;

56(5-6): 232–244. doi:10.1016/j.vph.2012.01.007.

63. Den Dekker WK et al. Mast cells induce vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis via a toll-like receptor

4 activation pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012; 32(8): 1960–1969. doi:10.1161/ATVBA- HA.112.250605.

64. Sato K et al. TRAIL-expressing T cells induce apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells in the athero-

sclerotic plaque. J Exp Med 2006; 203(1): 239–250. doi:10.1084/jem.20051062.

65. Boyle JJ et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha promotes macrophage-induced vascular smooth muscle cell

apoptosis by direct and autocrine mechanisms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23(9): 1553–1558. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000086961.44581.B7.

66. Van der Wal AC et al. Site of intimal rupture or erosion of thrombosed coronary atherosclerotic plaques

is characterized by an inflammatory process irrespective of the dominant plaque morphology. Circula- tion 1994; 89(1): 36–44. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.89.1.36.

67. Kolodgie FD et al. The thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque: the major precursor le-

sion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr Opin Cardiol 2001; 16(5): 285–292. doi:10.1097/00001573- 200109000-00006.

68. Gough PJ et al. Macrophage expression of active MMP-9 induces acute plaque disruption in apoE-de-

ficient mice. J Clin Invest 2006; 116(1): 59–69. doi:10.1172/JCI25074.

69. Stone GW et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011;

364(3): 226–235. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1002358.

70. Falk E. Plaque rupture with severe pre-existing stenosis precipitating coronary thrombosis. Character-

istics of coronary atherosclerotic plaques underlying fatal occlusive thrombi. Br Heart J 1983; 50(2): 127–134.

71. Burke AP et al. Effect of risk factors on the mechanism of acute thrombosis and sudden coronary death

Chapter 1

72. Goncalves I et al. Short communication: Dating components of human atherosclerotic plaques. Circ

Res 2010; 106(6): 1174–1177. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.211201.

73. Hansson GK. Immune mechanisms in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001; 21(12):

1876–1890.

74. Libby P et al. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002; 105(9): 1135–1143. doi:10.1161/

hc0902.104353.

75. Geissmann F et al. Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory proper-

ties. Immunity 2003; 19(1): 71–82. doi:10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00174-2.

76. Woollard KJ, Geissmann F. Monocytes in atherosclerosis: subsets and functions. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010;

7(2): 77–86. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2009.228.

77. Auffray C et al. Blood monocytes: development, heterogeneity, and relationship with dendrit-

ic cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2009; 27(December 2008): 669–692. doi:10.1146/annurev.immu- nol.021908.132557.

78. Auffray C et al. Monitoring of blood vessels and tissues by a population of monocytes with patrolling

behavior. Science 2007; 317(5838): 666–670. doi:10.1126/science.1142883.

79. Carlin LM et al. Nr4a1-dependent Ly6C(low) monocytes monitor endothelial cells and orchestrate

their disposal. Cell 2013; 153(2): 362–375. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.010.

80. Sunderkotter C et al. Subpopulations of mouse blood monocytes differ in maturation stage and inflam-

matory response. J Immunol 2004; 172(7): 4410–4417. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.7.4410.

81. Hilgendorf I et al. Ly-6Chigh monocytes depend on Nr4a1 to balance both inflammatory and repara-

tive phases in the infarcted myocardium. Circ Res 2014; 114(10): 1611–1622. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESA- HA.114.303204.

82. Yona S et al. Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under

homeostasis. Immunity 2013; 38(1): 79–91. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.12.001.

83. Swirski FK et al. Monocyte accumulation in mouse atherogenesis is progressive and proportional to

extent of disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103(27): 10340–10345. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604260103.

84. Averill LE et al. Enhanced monocyte progenitor cell proliferation in bone marrow of hyperlipemic

swine. Am J Pathol 1989; 135(2): 369–377.

85. Tolani S et al. Hypercholesterolemia and reduced HDL-C promote hematopoietic stem cell proliferation

and monocytosis: studies in mice and FH children. Atherosclerosis 2013; 229(1): 79–85. doi:10.1016/j. atherosclerosis.2013.03.031.

86. Murphy AJ et al. ApoE regulates hematopoietic stem cell proliferation, monocytosis, and monocyte

accumulation in atherosclerotic lesions in mice. J Clin Invest 2011; 121(10): 4138–4149. doi:10.1172/ JCI57559.

87. Boring L et al. Decreased lesion formation in CCR2-/- mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initia-

tion of atherosclerosis. Nature 1998; 394(6696): 894–897. doi:10.1038/29788.

88. Soehnlein O et al. Distinct functions of chemokine receptor axes in the atherogenic mobiliza-

tion and recruitment of classical monocytes. EMBO Mol Med 2013; 5(3): 471–481. doi:10.1002/ emmm.201201717.

89. Combadiere C et al. Combined inhibition of CCL2, CX3CR1, and CCR5 abrogates Ly6C(hi) and Ly-

6C(lo) monocytosis and almost abolishes atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice. Circulation 2008; 117(13): 1649–1657. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.745091.

Introduction

oscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010; 30(2): 186–192. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.198044.

91. Hanna RN et al. NR4A1 (Nur77) deletion polarizes macrophages toward an inflammatory phenotype

and increases atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2012; 110(3): 416–427. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.253377.

92. Hamers A a J et al. Bone marrow-specific deficiency of nuclear receptor Nur77 enhances atherosclero-

sis. Circ Res 2012; 110(3): 428–438. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.260760.

93. Chao LC et al. Bone marrow NR4A expression is not a dominant factor in the development of ath-

erosclerosis or macrophage polarization in mice. J Lipid Res 2013; 54(3): 806–815. doi:10.1194/jlr. M034157.

94. Hanna RN et al. The transcription factor NR4A1 (Nur77) controls bone marrow differentiation and the

survival of Ly6C- monocytes. Nat Immunol 2011; 12(8): 778–785. doi:10.1038/ni.2063.

95. Van Furth R, Cohn ZA. The origin and kinetics of mononuclear phagocytes. J Exp Med 1968; 128(3):

415–435. doi:10.1084/jem.128.3.415.

96. Jakubzick C et al. Minimal differentiation of classical monocytes as they survey steady-state tissues and

transport antigen to lymph nodes. Immunity 2013; 39(3): 599–610. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.007.

97. Guilliams M et al. Alveolar macrophages develop from fetal monocytes that differentiate into long-

lived cells in the first week of life via GM-CSF. J Exp Med 2013; 210(10): 1977–1992. doi:10.1084/ jem.20131199.

98. Epelman S et al. Embryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through

distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity 2014; 40(1): 91–104. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.019.

99. Hashimoto D et al. Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with min-

imal contribution from circulating monocytes. Immunity 2013; 38(4): 792–804. doi:10.1016/j.immu- ni.2013.04.004.

100. Schulz C et al. A lineage of myeloid cells independent of Myb and hematopoietic stem cells. Science

(80- ) 2012; 336(6077): 86–90. doi:10.1126/science.1219179.

101. Ginhoux F et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages.

Science 2010; 330(6005): 841–845. doi:10.1126/science.1194637.

102. Robbins CS et al. Local proliferation dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis.

Nat Med 2013; 19(9): 1166–1172. doi:10.1038/nm.3258.

103. Aiello RJ et al. CCR2 receptor blockade alters blood monocyte subpopulations but does not affect atherosclerotic lesions in apoE(-/-) mice. Atherosclerosis 2010; 208(2): 370–375. doi:10.1016/j.athero- sclerosis.2009.08.017.

104. Calin MV et al. Effect of depletion of monocytes/macrophages on early aortic valve lesion in experi-

mental hyperlipidemia. Cell Tissue Res 2009; 336(2): 237–248. doi:10.1007/s00441-009-0765-2.

105. Guo J et al. Repopulation of apolipoprotein E knockout mice with CCR2-deficient bone marrow pro-

genitor cells does not inhibit ongoing atherosclerotic lesion development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25(5): 1014–1019. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000163181.40896.42.

106. Mills CD et al. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol 2000; 164(12): 6166–

6173. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166.

107. Murray PJ et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines.

Immunity 2014; 41(1): 14–20. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008.

108. Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol 2008; 8(12): 958–969. doi:10.1038/nri2788.

Chapter 1

109. Martinez FO et al. Transcriptional profiling of the human monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and polarization: new molecules and patterns of gene expression. J Immunol 2006; 177(10): 7303– 7311. doi:10.1016/S1077-9108(08)70760-6.

110. Wolfs IMJ et al. Differentiation factors and cytokines in the atherosclerotic plaque micro-environment

as a trigger for macrophage polarisation. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106(5): 763–771. doi:10.1160/TH11- 05-0320.

111. Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol

2011; 11(11): 723–737. doi:10.1038/nri3073.

112. Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest 2012; 122(3):

787–795. doi:10.1172/JCI59643.

113. Martinez FO et al. Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol 2009; 27: 451–483. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132532.

114. Bouhlel MA et al. PPARgamma activation primes human monocytes into alternative M2 macrophages

with anti-inflammatory properties. Cell Metab 2007; 6(2): 137–143. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2007.06.010.

115. Kadl A et al. Identification of a novel macrophage phenotype that develops in response to atherogenic

phospholipids via Nrf2. Circ Res 2010; 107(6): 737–746. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.215715.

116. Ley K et al. Monocyte and macrophage dynamics during atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol

2011; 31(7): 1506–1516. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.221127.

117. Mantovani A et al. Macrophage diversity and polarization in atherosclerosis: a question of balance. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2009; 29(10): 1419–1423. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.180497.

118. Peled M, Fisher EA. Dynamic Aspects of Macrophage Polarization during Atherosclerosis Progression

and Regression. Front Immunol 2014; 5: 579. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00579.

119. Amulic B et al. Neutrophil function: from mechanisms to disease. Annu Rev Immunol 2012; 30: 459–

489. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074942.

120. Mantovani A et al. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat

Rev Immunol 2011; 11(8): 519–531. doi:10.1038/nri3024.

121. Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol 2006; 6(3): 173–182. doi:10.1038/nri1785.

122. Soehnlein O, Lindbom L. Phagocyte partnership during the onset and resolution of inflammation. Nat

Rev Immunol 2010; 10(6): 427–439. doi:10.1038/nri2779.

123. Luo HR, Loison F. Constitutive neutrophil apoptosis: mechanisms and regulation. Am J Hematol 2008;

83(4): 288–295. doi:10.1002/ajh.21078.

124. Soehnlein O. Multiple roles for neutrophils in atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2012; 110(6): 875–888. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.257535.

125. Drechsler M et al. Hyperlipidemia-triggered neutrophilia promotes early atherosclerosis. Circulation

2010; 122(18): 1837–1845. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.961714.

126. Rotzius P et al. Distinct infiltration of neutrophils in lesion shoulders in ApoE-/- mice. Am J Pathol

2010; 177(1): 493–500. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2010.090480.

127. Eriksson EE et al. Direct viewing of atherosclerosis in vivo: plaque invasion by leukocytes is initiated by

the endothelial selectins. FASEB J 2001; 15(7): 1149–1157. doi:10.1096/fj.00-0537com.

128. Pereira HA et al. CAP37, a neutrophil granule-derived protein stimulates protein kinase C activity in

endothelial cells. J Leukoc Biol 1996; 60(3): 415–422.

Introduction

endothelial monolayers. Microvasc Res 2003; 66(1): 38–48. doi:10.1016/S0026-2862(03)00010-4.

130. Taekema-Roelvink ME et al. Proteinase 3 enhances endothelial monocyte chemoattractant protein-1

production and induces increased adhesion of neutrophils to endothelial cells by upregulating intercel- lular cell adhesion molecule-1. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12(5): 932–940.

131. Eiserich JP et al. Myeloperoxidase, a leukocyte-derived vascular NO oxidase. Science 2002; 296(5577):

2391–2394. doi:10.1126/science.1106830.

132. Nicholls SJ, Hazen SL. Myeloperoxidase and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25(6): 1102–1111. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000163262.83456.6d.

133. Soehnlein O et al. Mechanisms underlying neutrophil-mediated monocyte recruitment. Blood 2009;

114(21): 4613–4623. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-06-221630.

134. Ionita MG et al. High neutrophil numbers in human carotid atherosclerotic plaques are associated with characteristics of rupture-prone lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010; 30(9): 1842–1848. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.209296.

135. De Nooijer R et al. Lesional overexpression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 promotes intraplaque hem-

orrhage in advanced lesions but not at earlier stages of atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006; 26(2): 340–346. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000197795.56960.64.

136. Bobryshev Y V. Dendritic cells and their role in atherogenesis. Lab Invest 2010; 90(7): 970–984. doi:10.1038/labinvest.2010.94.

137. Lichtman AH. T cell costimulatory and coinhibitory pathways in vascular inflammatory diseases. Front Physiol 2012; 3(February): 18. doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00018.

138. Hansson GK et al. Detection of activated T lymphocytes in the human atherosclerotic plaque. Am J

Pathol 1989; 135(1): 169–175. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?ar- tid=1880219&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

139. Zhou X et al. Evidence for a local immune response in atherosclerosis. CD4+ T cells infiltrate le-

Documento similar