J. Nombramiento de los miembros de la Comisión de Verificación de Poderes
III. Intercambio general de opiniones
Abstract:
In this study a group of patients from ages twenty-five to fifty were chosen who displayed signs of worm eggs on coprolith (stool) analysis. The patients were divided into two groups of ten patients each.
One group received treatment with a combination homeopathic product known as Vermex, which
contains various homeopathics that stimulate the defenses of the system against parasitic intrusion, and also homeopathics that help to flush out the intestinal tract. The other group was given Standard Process enzyme therapy in a pill called Zymex, whose ability to rid the system of parasites through its enzymatic effects was claimed by various doctors.
The patients in each group were then remeasured. It was found that the Vermex product was successful in treatment, whereas the Standard Process product seemed to show no positive effect.
Key Words:
Intestinal parasites, Vermex, nematode.
Hypothesis:
It is our hypothesis that a homeopathic product can be utilized to stimulate the immune defenses of a human organism against intestinal parasites.
Methods and Materials:
3
Twenty patients were taken from a medical practice in which two lines of products were used:
one was a homeopathic, and the other an enzymatic therapy. The patients were random-sampled into two groups of ten patients each. One group was given instructions to take Vermex at ten drops, three times a day for three weeks. The other group was given Zymex enzymatic therapy, and told to take two pills after each meal for three weeks. The three-week period was chosen because most nematode eggs go through a twenty-one-day cycle. By using therapy for three weeks, we would expect the best results.
The nematode analysis was done by standard coprolith analysis, which was accomplished by taking a stool sample from each patient and extracting from it a section of the sample about the size of a large marble. This was then put into a sugar solution. The eggs would float to the top, and could be separated from the tube with a cover slip.
The eggs and egg parts were then counted to determine the approximate number of nematode eggs in each sample. In the table (see Appendix) the circles show us the number of nematode eggs discovered in each sample. In group 1, we can see that three cases had approximately twenty nematode eggs, four had eighteen, seventeen and nineteen, and three cases had ten eggs. In group 2, there are a similar number of nematode eggs.
During the three-week test period, the patients were asked to eat normally, and were given no other instructions. They returned after three weeks with stool samples. The test was repeated, and the x's in the figure show the number of remaining nematode eggs.
Results:
Neither the practitioner nor the coprolith analysis specialist was aware of which sample he was studying, or from which group they came. The results are shown in both figures. We can see that the Vermex was successful during the three-week period at lowering the number of nematode eggs appearing.
In the enzyme therapy group we see that there was no effect by the enzyme therapy on the nematode eggs. We conclude from this that the enzyme therapy does nothing to control nematode infestation, whereas the homeopathic helps the system deal successfully with these intestinal parasites.
Discussion:
As we have already outlined, the homeopathic product seems to be able to not only clean out the intestines, but also appears to stimulate the immune system to deal with the nematodes directly.
4
A SHORT STUDY OF COMPARISON FACTORS OF HOMEOPATHIC TREATMENT VERSUS ENZYMATIC
TREATMENT OF INTESTINAL PARASITES
5 --- BIBLIOGRAPHY ---
BOOKS
1. An Advanced Treatise in Quantum Biology. The Staff of Maitreya, Ltd. Acad. Press, 1989.
2. Towards a Bio-Quantum Matrix. The Staff of Maitreya, Ltd. Acad. Press, 1992.
3. Quantum Biophysics. The Staff of Maitreya, Ltd. Acad. Press, 1993.
4. Quantum Vibrational Medicine. The Staff of Maitreya, Ltd. Acad. Press, 1993.
5. Quantum Quality Control. The Staff of Maitreya, Ltd. Acad. Press, 1993.
6. Experimental Evidence for Homeopathy. The Staff of Maitreya, Ltd. Acad. Press, 1992.
7. Experimental Evidence for Homeopathy II. The Staff of Maitreya, Ltd. Acad. Press, 1992.
8. Homeopathy for Acupuncturists, Chiropractors and Naturopaths. The Staff of Maitreya, Ltd.
Acad. Press, 1993.
9. Homeopathy for Nutritionists. The Staff of Maitreya, Ltd. Acad. Press, 1993.
10. Essential Medicine. Edited by Ried Jones. Churchill Livingston, 1993.
11. Pharmacognosy (9th ed.). Tyler, Brady & Robbers. Lea Febiger, 1988.
12. Medical Botany. Lewis. Wiley, 1977.
13. Merck Manual (15th ed.). Edited by Berkow, M.D. Merck, Sharp and Dome Research Laboratories, 1987.
14. Pathophysiology: The Biological Principle of Disease. Smith and Thier. Saunders, 1981.
15. American Medical Association Home Medical Advisor. Edited by Clayman, Kunz and Meyer.
Random House, 1988.
16. Differential Diagnosis. Harvey and Bordley. Saunders, 1976.
17. Statistics Manual. Research Dept. US Naval Ordinance Test Station. Dover, N.Y., 1960.
18. The Essentials of Clinical Biochemistry. D. N. Barron. Elsevier Biomedical, Amsterdam, 1982.
19. Gray's Anatomy. Henry Gray, Royal College of Surgeons. Running Press, Philadelphia. 1974.
20. Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States. Homeopathic Pharmacopeia Convention of the United States, Washington, D.C. June 1993.
21. Physician's Desk Reference (3rd Ed.). Medical Economic Data, Inc. Montvale, N.J. 1992.
ARTICLES AND STUDIES
6
1. A Practical Definition of Homeopathy. Maitreya; Limerick, Ireland; 1993.
Title:
Chief Editor:
Judith Nagy, M.D.; Independent Medical Editor; Budapest, Hungary
Edited and Validated By:
Istvan Bandics, M.D.; Budapest, Hungary Gylila Panszki, M.D.; Budapest, Hungary
Illya Brenner, M.D.; Institute of Oncology, Kiev, Ukraine Peter Smith, LCH; Cornwall, England
Dima Sakharov, Ph.D.; Kiev, Ukraine Tony Hughes, D.A.c.; Dublin, Ireland Peter Bartlett, D.O.; London, England Attila Kiss, M.D.; Gyor, Hungary
Richard Atkinson, MCSP, State-registered Physical Therapist;
West Yorkshire, England
Christopher Hammond, MB. BS. LCH; Nottinghamshire, England Dr. Michael Gerber; Reno, Nevada; U.S.A.
Consultant:
Dr. Simon Gutl, M.D.; Hanover, Germany
Developed By:
The staff of Maitreya; Limerick, Ireland
This study was performed in 1994 at the Homeodignostica Research Facility in Budapest, Hungary. Revalidation and further clinical testing are currently being performed by medical doctors at the Homeodiagnostica Clinic in Budapest, Hungary, and by the doctors listed above.
© William Nelson 1994.