1. MARCO TEÓRICO
1.4. Test de jarras
political and ritual spheres, although as we will see, these
are in the end dimensions of the same thing. Of the three it
is often ritual rivalries that are remembered most v i v idly today.
Explanations of conflict framed in ritual or magical terms must
obviously be treated with considerable caution, since they can
easily be no more than a convenient shorthand for a more complex
causation, or simply a device for explaining conflict away.
However, with the Swazi, there are signs that there are more
to such explanations than simply mystifying conflict of a more
material kind. S o b h u z a ’s attack on Mnjoli Magagula underlines
this point. When Sobhuza occupied central Swaziland, one of
his earliest campaigns was against M n j o l i fs branch of the
(4) Interview Mboziswa Mnisi; interview Mashabhane Magagula; interview Mhawu Gamedze, Loshina Gamedze, Moyeni Mamba, 29 June 1970, Mandlenya,Swaziland; interview Mandlabovu
Fakudze; interview Mjole Sifundza; interview Hehhane Ngwenya; Bryant, Olden T i m e s , 341-4; Kuper, A r i s t o c r a c y , 16; M.P., MS 1478, Miller, ^ h o r t History* 17; interview Mahloba G u m e d e .
(5) Interview Hehhane Ngwenya; interview Guzana Mncina; interview Loncayi Hlophe; interview Mahloba Gumede; interview Mankwempe Magagula.
doubly determined to break M n j o l i fs power were the rain-making
attributes he reputedly enjoyed. As a general rule in southern
Africa, Sotho chiefdoms have enjoyed a greater reputation for
rain-making than their Nguni counterparts, and Sobhuza was
sufficiently anxious to assure himself of M n j o l i fs medicines
to have him allegedly slit open when he thought they had been
swallowed (6). By this or some other means the M a g a g u l a 1s
rain-making powers were appropriated, and from this derived
much of his vaunted power in this field. However, what Sobhuza
neglected to do was to extend the same policy to other
Emakhandzambi1e chiefdoms, whose ritual authority remained
largely intact. The challenge that this came to represent to
royal authority is difficult to understand, unless one appreciates
the close identification between religious and political
activities in Swazi thought. In common with most other p r e
capitalist societies, nineteenth century Swazi society did not
conceptualise its various activities in terms of discrete and
sharply defined categories of religion, politics, economics and
so on. Religious and secular life were interwoven with each
other at all levels, and no hard and fast division existed in
every day life between religious and political roles.
Consequently, as in medieval Europe where religious schism was
automatically equated with political secession, in Swaziland
169
the assertion of independent religious or magical powers almost
invariably connoted an attempt to usurp political powers as
well. Moreover, because of the interchangeability of these
two fields of action, a political challenge was expressed as
often as not in religious or magical terms. The political
significance of this cosmology can be seen at its starkest in
the iNcwala celebrations, where ritual subordination to the king
was a declaration of personal loyalty, and where a failure to
participate represented an act of revolt (7). In much the same
way, the simple retention of magical and religious powers by
various of the Emakhandzambile chiefdoms was liable to be
interpreted by Mswati as a potential threat to his position,
for it not only challenged his ritual ascendency, but also
emphasised links with their independent past, which in turn
could be viewed as a kind of cultural separatism. As a result,
the desire to eliminate ritual autonomies figured prominently
in M s w a t i ’s motives for attacking Emakhandzambile chiefs. The
clearest and least ambiguous example can be found in the case
of the Mnisi, who were attacked because their pretensions as
rain-makers rivalled those of Mswati, but similar elements were
present in a number of other clashes (8). Thus, according to
some accounts, Shewula, the Sifundza chief, is supposed to have
compounded his other crimes by asserting his ritual autonomy,
while both the Mngometfulo and one section of the Mahlalela
seem to have underpinned their political ambitions with extensive
(7) Kuper, ’R i t u a l ’, 230, note 3, 239; Kuper, A r i s t o c r a c y , 223-5. (8) Interview Mboziswa Mnisi.
claims to magical and ritual powers (9).
Despite the emphasis placed on ritual factors in some accounts
of this period, it is also evident that Mswati was activated by
specifically political designs. Some kind of political or
institutional reform was certainly long overdue. Swaziland
remained the deeply stratified society it had been in S o b h u z a 1s
time, combining the elements of political exclusion at the centre
and a wide measure of autonomy outside, which was a ready-made
prescription for political unrest. Mswati tackled the problem
both positively and negatively by attempting to impose a greater
degree of integration, and by weakening the powers of the localities
to resist. Again the origins of these policies lie earlier in
his reign. Even before the 1847 invasion, Mswati set about
restructuring the administrative system by accelerating the
dispersal of Dlamini princes to the provinces; by mobilising
the regiments on a more permanent basis; and by setting up a
more comprehensive network of royal villages to monitor and
control a variety of local activities. Each of these measures
has been discussed in a previous chapter, as has the wave of
unrest that followed the reforms (10). Mswati was forced to
back-track for a while when faced with this resistence, but
once the capital was shifted from Ekufiyeni to Hhohho the process
was once again cautiously resumed. According to Tikuba, Mswati,
"constantly kept his regiments about him", and it is likely that
he sought an increasingly permanent mobilisation with the passage
(9) Interview Mjole Sifundza; Kuper, Arist o c r a c y , 198, note 1. (10) Above, 80, 84-7.
171
of time (11). The permanent presence of the regiments at the
royal capital conferred benefits of a variety of kinds. It