La evolución de los remolcadores y sus equipos

50PLUS (2017), Omdat ouderen het niet meer pikken!

Aalberts, C. (2011), ‘Politiek: Presentatie minstens zo belangrijk als inhoud’. Kennislink. Access: [https://www.nemokennislink.nl/publicaties/politiek-presentatie-minstens-zo-belangrijk-als-inhoud/]. Aas, K. (2007). ‘Analyzing a world in motion, global flows meet criminology of the other’, Theoretical

criminology, SAGE Publications, Vol. 11, Issue 2, Oslo.

Almeida, V. (2016), Cyberspace Governance Concepts and Framework, Cambridge: Harvard University.

Ayres, L. & Kavanaugh, K & Knafl, K. (2003), ‘Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis’, Qualitative Health Research.

Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008), ‘Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers’, The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559.

BBC (2018), ‘Cyber-Security’, Access: [https://www.bbc.com/news/topics/cz4pr2gd85qt/cyber-security].

Betz, D. (2017), Cyberspace and the State: Towards a Strategy for Cyber-Power, UK: Routledge.

Biezen van, I. (2004), ‘Political Parties as Public Utilities’, Party Politics, Vol. 10, No. 6, SAGE publications. Bolleyer, N. (2011), ‘The Influence of Political Parties on Policy Coordination’, Governance: An international journal of policy, administration and institutions, Vol. 24, No. 3.

Bolter, J. (1984), Turing’s man: Western culture in the computer age, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

Brink, H. Van den (1984), ‘Politieke partijen en participatie, in: Het belang van politieke partijen’, Groningen: Xeno, p. 134-145.

CBS CSM (2017), Een eerste verkenning van dreigingen, incidenten en maatregelen, Den Haag: CBS.

CBS (2018), ‘Internet; Toegang, Gebruik en Faciliteiten’, Access:

[http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=83429NED&D1=0,2-5&D2=0,3- 6&D3=0&D4=a&HDR=T&STB=G1,G2,G3&VW=T].

CDA (2017), ‘Keuzes voor een beter Nederland’.

Choucri, N, (2013), Co-Evolution of Cyberspace and International Relations: New Challenges for the Social

Sciences’, Explorations in Cyber International Relations.

CPB (2017), Budgettaire maatregelen beschreven: Economische effecten doorgerekend, Den Haag, CPB, Xerox.

CU (2017), Hoopvol Realistisch: Voorstellen voor een samenleving met toekomst.

D66 (2017), Verkiezingsprogramma 2017-2021.

Deloitte (2018). ‘General Data Protection Regulation’, Access:

[https://www2.deloitte.com/nl/nl/pages/risk/topics/gdpr-general-data-protection-

regulation.html?id=nl:2ps:3adw:4bv_search:5eng:6gdpr_exact-1081407832-52951650215-

gdpr&gclid=Cj0KCQjw3InYBRCLARIsAG6bfMRYYmo_HJ7XD16vGyMEwNkZn7x3MOxYnDp6XdOt_Efi 2wot-Xlh3vcaAmOREALw_wcB].

DENK (2017), Denkend aan Nederland.

Deth van, J. & Vis, J. (2006), Regeren in Nederland: het politieke en bestuurlijke bestel in vergelijkend

Dunk, Von der. H. (1984), De partijen en de parlementaire democratie in het interbellum, Het belang van

politieke partijen. Groningen: Xeno.

Eggenschwiler, J. (2017), ‘Accountability challenges confronting cyberspace governance’, Internet Policy

Review, Journal on internet regulation, Vol. 6, Issue 3, University of Oxford, UK.

Enroth, H. (2014), ‘Governance: The art of governing after governmentality’, European Journal of Social

Theory, Vol. 17(1), 60-76, Sweden.

Fiegerman, S. (2018), ‘Facebook has gotten too big for Mark Zuckerberg’, Money.cnn.com. Access: [http://money.cnn.com/2018/03/23/news/companies/facebook-power-data/index.html].

Flick, U. (2014), An introduction to qualitative research, Sage publications ltd.

Forsyth, J. & Pope, M. (2014), ‘Structural Causes and Cyber Effects: Why international order is inevitable in cyberspace’, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Winter 2014.

FVD (2017), Verkiezings Programma 2017-2021.

Greenfield, P. (2018), ‘The Cambridge Analytica files: the story so far’, The guardian, Access: [https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/26/the-cambridge-analytica-files-the-story-so-far]. GroenLinks (2017), Tijd voor verandering.

Haan den, J. (2007), Architecture, a definition, The Enterprise Architect, Access: [http://www.theenterprisearchitect.eu/blog/2007/05/15/architecture-a-definition/].

Hansen, L. & Nissenbaum, H. (2009), ‘Digital Disaster, Cyber Security and the Copenhagen School’, International Studies Quarterly, December 2009.

Investopedia (2018), ‘What is ‘Market’’, Access: [https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/market.asp]. Janda, K. (2013), ‘Do Party Systems Matter? Governance through modern political parties’, Harvard International Review, Spring 2013.

Jayawardane, S. (2015), ‘Cyber Governance: Challenges, Solutions, and Lessons for Effective Global Governance’, The Hague Institute for Global Justice, Policy Brief 17.

Kirchwey, G. & Garner, J. (1905), ‘LEGISLATION’, The New International Encyclopedia. Koole, R. (2000), ‘Interne Partijdemocratie en Representatie’, DNPP Jaarboek 2000, p. 41-59. Koppenjan, J. & Klijn, E. (2015), Governance Networks in the Public Sector, Routledge.

Krasner, S. (2001), ‘Abiding Sovereignty’, International Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, 229-251. Landman, T. (2008), Issues and Methods in comparative politics, Taylor & Francis ltd.

Lapinski, M. & Rimal, R. (2006), ‘An Explication of Social Norms’, Communication Theory, Vol. 15, Issue 2, p. 127-147.

Lessig, L. (1998), ‘The New Chicago School’, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. XXVII, June 1998, Chicago.

Lessig, L. (1999), ‘The law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach’, Harvard Law Review Association, Vol.

113, No. 2.

Lessig, L. (2006), Code: Version 2.0, New York, Perseus Books Group.

Liaropoulos, A. (2016), ‘Exploring the Complexity of Cyberspace Governance: State Sovereignty, Multi-

Lipschits, I. (1984), ‘Functies van politeke partijen’, Het belang van politieke partijen, Groningen, Xeno, p. 13- 22.

Marsden, C. (2011), Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in

Cyberspace, Cambridge University Press.

Matlosa, K. & Shale, V. (2008), Political parties programma handbook, EISA, Johannesburg. Merriam-Webster (2018), ‘Definition of Architecture’, Access: [https://www.merriam-

webster.com/dictionary/architecture].

Min. BZ (2018), Het publieke belang van politieke partijen: Eindrapport. Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en

Koninkrijksrelaties, Den Haag.

Morgan, S. (2018), ‘Fake news, disinformation, manipulation and online tactics to undermine democracy’,

Journal of cyber policy, Vol. 3, Issue 1.

NCSC (2018), ‘Wat is het NCSC?’ Access: [https://www.ncsc.nl/organisatie].

NCTV CSBN (2017), Cybersecurity beeld Nederland, Den Haag: NCTV.

NCTV NCSA (2018), Nederlandse Cybersecurity Agenda: Nederland Digitaal Veilig, NCTV Rijksoverheid.

NRC (2018), ‘Ook cyberoorlog verdient een plaats in internationaal recht’, Access:

[https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2018/02/23/ook-cyberoorlog-verdient-een-plaats-in-internationaal-recht-a1593301]. Ottis, R. & Lorents, P. (2010),’ Cyberspace: Definition and implications in Proceedings of the 5th _{International}

Conference on Information Warfare and Security’, Academic Publishing Limited, Dayton, US, p. 267-270). Perritt, H. (1998), ‘The internet as a threat to sovereignty? Thoughts on the internet’s role in strengthening national and global governance’, Global Legal Studies, 423.

Pheijffer, M. (2017), ‘Op gebied van cybersecurity mag rol van overheid wel wat groter worden’, FD Opinie. Access: [https://fd.nl/opinie/1220206/op-gebied-van-cybersecurity-mag-rol-van-overheid-wel-wat-groter- worden].

PVDA (2017), Een verbonden samenleving.

PVDD (2017), Plan B: Hou vast aan je idealen.

PVV (2017), Verkiezingsprogramma: Nederland weer van ons!

Scally, D. (2018), ‘On May 25th _{GDPR comes into force for Europe’s 500m citizens’; Irish Times. Access:}

[https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/on-may-25th-gdpr-comes-into-force-for-europe-s-500m- citizens-1.3500363].

SGP (2017), Stem Voor Het Leven.

Sigholm, J. (2013), ‘Non-state actors in cyberspace operations’, Journal of Military Studies, 4(1).

SP (2017), Programma voor een sociaal Nederland voor de verkiezingen van 15 maart 2017.

Spinello, R. (2010), Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace, Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Strate, L. (1999), ‘The varieties of cyberspace: Problems in definition and delimitation’, Western Journal of

Communication, 63:3, 382-412.

Taylor, E. (2015), ‘The internet is run by an unaccountable private company; This is a problem’, The Guardian, Access: [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/21/icann-internet-us-government].

Telegraaf (2018), ‘Grootste DDoS-aanval ooit’, Access: [https://www.telegraaf.nl/tech/1740512/grootste-d-do-s- aanval-ooit].

Toshkov, D. (2015), ‘Research Design in Political Science’, Palgrave Macmillan.

Voerman, G. (1992), ‘Politieke partijen en belangengroepen’, Burger en Politiek. Stenfert Kroese, Leiden, p. 77- 92).

VTM Groep (2016), Internet is basisbehoefte in Nederland, Access: [https://www.vtmgroep.nl/nieuws/internet- als-basisbehoefte-in-nederland].

VVD (2017), Zeker Nederland.

8. Appendix

All 13 party programs have been coded. Due to the great number of pages these programs are not included here. They can be requested by email: [email protected]

Explanation Figure 1

Based on the data extraction in chapter 4, three groups have been conducted. This has been done to qualify the parties based on the extracted data. It has been found that on qualitative and quantitative differences the political parties can be divided. Type 1 includes the parties which have the most and clear aspirations concerning cyberspace governance. Type 2 includes the moderate parties and type 3 the parties expressing the least cyberspace governance aspirations. By qualifying the parties into these groups an overview is provided.

Explanation of the Clusters

For translating the extracted data into findings and conclusions, relevant clusters have been made. These are based on the values provided in the theories combined with the extracted data. Its function is to create an overview of the found data. It is therefore not adopted from other researches or academics but created during (and for) the qualification of the analyzed cases. A positive effect of the clustering is that overviews such as provided in Figure 3 (p.63) can provide concise and usable insights. A downside of the clusters is that these have not been acknowledged by other researchers.