• No se han encontrado resultados

1.9 Herramientas, tecnologías y metodología

1.9.6 Lenguajes de programación

The objective of the heat pump data base is to collect different heat pump models, which can then be proposed to the process in a systematic way.

4.3.1 General overview

The heat pump data base consists in several heat pump models, working with different fluids and equipped with different compressor technologies.

As it could be interesting to integrate the same technology several times and at different operating conditions, the heat pump data base provides this possibility.

New heat pump models (e.g. new refrigerants) can easily be added. Although the focus will be given on heat pumps with non-super critical fluids, the heat pump data base can also be extended to integrate modules of heat pumps working with mixtures of fluids or super critical fluids. It is even possible to include a specific heat pump technology with known operating conditions and investment costs.

The input parameters are the evaporation and the condensation temperatures. For a nominal flow-rate, the thermodynamical cycle is calculated and the computed values (superheat temperature, heat loads for condensation and evaporation and compressor power) are retrieved and used to define the input for the energy integration problem.

4.3.2 Heat pump modeling

The heat pump modules are modeled in the flow-sheeting software. For each compressor technology and refrigerant a model of a closed compression cycle heat pump is defined. Currently following refrigerants are defined: R-717, R-134a, R245fa, water. The thermodynamic methods have been

74 CHAPTER 4. HEAT PUMP TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR INTEGRATION

adapted for each refrigerant. Moreover, the results of the flow-sheeting tool have been compared and validated with the thermodynamic properties given in the Ashrae handbook (Handbook, 2009).

An example of the heat pump modeling (here a heat pump using a centrifugal compressor) is given in Figure 4.2. The operations can be briefly summarized:

ˆ Compression using electricity as driver (COMP CENTR 1)

ˆ Desuperheating from the outlet temperature of the compressor to its saturation temperature (HX 3 CENTR 1)

ˆ Condensation (HX 2 CENTR 1)

ˆ Subcooling (HX 5 CENTR 1); all cycles are systematically sub-cooled and it could even be possible to include this temperature difference as a decision variable in the optimization, when significant subcooling is considered.

ˆ Expansion (VALVE CENTR 1)

ˆ Evaporation (HX 1 CENTR 1)

ˆ Superheating (not shown on Figure 4.2, since this step is only considered for refrigerants that will enter in the liquid zone during compression; a typical example is the refrigerant R245fa). In practice however, all refrigerants are slightly superheated to avoid droplets in the compressor.

Figure 4.2: Example of heat pump modeling

For each refrigerant, 8 compressor technologies have been studied. In order to be able to have multi-stage heat pumps or parallel cycle, each cycle has been implemented 4 times. Shelton and

Grossmann (1986a) figured out that the mathematical formulation is identical for single and multi-stage refrigeration. To simplify the problem resolution, only single multi-stage heat pumps are modeled.

However, the analysis of the solutions and the final design of heat pumps can integrate multi-stage heat pumps, by combining several cycles with the same refrigerant.

4.3.3 Compressors and their operating conditions

There are two main categories of compressors: volumetric compressors, which increase the pressure by reducing the volume; and dynamic compressors, which convert the continuous transfer of the kinetic energy into a pressure rise. Figure 4.3 summarizes the different compressor types considered in this study.

Dynamic

compressors Volumetric compressors

Centrifugal

Axial

Scroll

Twin-screw Roots

Mono-screw Rotary Reciprocating

Figure 4.3: Dynamic and volumetric compressors (Favrat, 2006) (Zaid, 2008)

For each compressor, the operating conditions are reported in Table 4.1, where the volumetric flow-rates and pressures ranges and also typical efficiencies are shown (Zaid, 2008) (Favrat, 2006).

4.3.4 Temperature levels and decision variables

The temperature levels of a heat pump are optimized with the help of the adimensional param-eters k1,c and k2,c. They define the evaporation (Teva,c) and condensation (Tcond,c) levels of the heat pump as a function of the temperature range of a refrigerant f (Equations (4.1) and (4.2)).

These parameters correspond to the decision variables of the master problem and are chosen by the evolutionary algorithm. The calculation of the evaporation and condensation temperatures is illustrated in Figure 4.4.

Tcond,c= Tcond,max(f )− k1,c· (Tcond,max(f )− Teva,min(f )) (4.1)

76 CHAPTER 4. HEAT PUMP TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR INTEGRATION

Table 4.1: Operating conditions of compressors

Compressor Volume rate Pressure ratio Isentropic [m3/h] per stage [-] efficiency [-]

MIN MAX MIN MAX

Centrifugal 2 000 180 000 2.5 9 0.76

Axial 9 000 200 000 1.2 2 0.76

Scroll 600 15 000 3 8 0.6

Mono-screw 200 20 000 3 5 0.75

Twin-screw 300 35 000 3 5 0.75

Rotary 100 6 000 3 4 0.6

Root 0 15 000 1.9 2.1 0.5

Reciprocating 0 10 000 3 8 0.6

Teva,c= Teva,min(f ) + k2,c· (Tcond,c− Teva,min(f )) (4.2) Table 4.2 shows the theoretical temperature ranges of some available refrigerants. However, in

1 2 3

4

HP Evaporation HP Condensation

Compression Expansion

Enthalpy h Saturation

vapour curve (f) T

Tcond,c

Teva,c Tcond,max(f)

Teva,min(f)

Maximum condensation temperature

Minimum evaporation temperature

Figure 4.4: Heat pump temperature levels

practice it can be difficult to reach these limits due to technological constraints. k1 and k2 are fixed optimization parameters ([0,1[). The lower bound is 0 and the upper bound has to be smaller than 1 in order to guarantee two distinct temperature levels for Tcond,c and Teva,c. In order to increase the resolution speed, it is also possible to restrain both, the upper and the lower bound of k1 and k2.

4.3.5 Extension temperature levels - feasible compressor pressure ratios

This section shows how the pressure ratio of each compressor can be easily taken into account before doing the energy integration. Figure 4.5 demonstrates how the condensation and the evap-oration levels are defined in the master problem. As before, first the condensation temperature is

Fluid Tcond,max Teva,min k1 k2 R717 120 [°C] -60 [°C] 0-0.99 0-0.99 R134a 90 [°C] -60 [°C] 0-0.99 0-0.99 R245fa 150 [°C] -30 [°C] 0-0.99 0-0.99 water 360 [°C] 20 [°C] 0-0.99 0-0.99

calculated according to k1. Then, by thermodynamic calculation the corresponding pressure level is determined. With the defined minimum and maximum pressure ratio for a given compressor type the new bounds of the evaporation temperature levels (Teva,max0 and Teva,min0 ) are calculated as a function of the condensation pressure level. The evaporation temperature is finally calculated by Equation (4.3), which replaces the previous Equation (4.2).

Teva,c= Teva,min0 + k2,c· (Teva,max0 − Teva,min0 ) (4.3)

Figure 4.5: Choosing heat pump temperature levels

Two additional special cases have to considered in the approach. First, if only the new calculated evaporation temperature (Teva,min0 on Figure 4.5) is lower than minimum evaporation temperature (Teva,min(f )), then this value is attributed to Teva,min(f ). If both, the new calculated maximum and minimum temperature are lower than Teva,min(f ), the corresponding compressor is not suitable and removed from the potential solutions in this evaluation step.