PROVINCIA: TRUJILLO DEPARTAMENTO: LA LIBERTAD
Temporal 11 seg.J a 20041a de la corrien1e móxima del medidor
5.06 libras 12.30 kgl 7,38 libras 13.35 kgl
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORMS FOR CLASS I AND II EMPLOYEES OF APDCL/APGCL/AEGCL Section A: Employee Details
To be filled by employees at the beginning of the year
Name of Employee Date of Birth
Department/Cadre Designation
Function Date of Joining in current post
Place of Posting Educational Qualification
Name of Recording Officer Designation of Recording Officer
Name of Reviewing Officer Designation of Reviewing Officer
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Section B: Employee Training Need Assessment
To be filled in by employee and recording officer at the beginning of the year
Employee Name: Designation: Place of Posting:
List of Training Programs undertaken in previous year
S No Name of Program Duration
List of Training Needs not met in the previous year
S No Name of Program requested for
List down behavioral and technical programs you wish to undergo by mid year
S No Behavioral Trainings Technical Trainings
List down behavioral and technical programs you wish to undergo by end year
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Section C: Employee Performance Assessment
To be filled in by the employee, recording officer at the beginning of year for performance planning to be filled by employee, recording officer and reviewing officer at the end of the year for rating and feedback
Part 1: Functional Traits
S No KPI/Functional Target Attached Weight Annual Target Achievement Rating by Recording Officer Reviewing Rating by Officer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Total 100% Annual Rating (weighted aggregate)
Rating on a scale of 1 – 5 for each performance parameter, with least importance assigned to 1 and highest importance to 5.
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Part 2: Behavioural Traits
S No Behavioural Trait Attached Weight Achievement Recording Rating by Officer Rating by Reviewing Officer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Total 100% Annual rating (Weighted Aggregate)
Rating on a scale of 1 – 5 for each performance parameter, with least importance assigned to 1 and highest importance to 5.
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Part 3: Potential Assessment
S No Potential Trait Recording Rating by Officer
Rating by Reviewing
Officer 1 Leadership: Can take up higher responsibilities & coordinate work processes
2 Entrepreneurial Skills: Can work on new ides with available resources 3 Decision Making & Risk Taking: Takes right decisions at
right time, avoids taking rapid decisions, takes calculated risk, work with good blend of analysis.
4 System Orientation: Ability to conceptualize & develop
systems to ensure implementation and monitoring of processes & information flow. 5 Vision & Strategic Thinking: To develop and promote the vision of UGVCL of the
future to others and facilitate realization of the vision.
Total 100% Annual Rating (simple Average) Acceptance by employee and recording officer at the beginning of the year
Name of Employee Name of Recording Officer
Date Date
Signature Signature
Year End: After rating by recording officer
Name of officer Date Signature
Year End: After rating by reviewing officer
Name of officer Date Signature
Rating on a scale of 1 – 5 for each performance parameter, with least importance assigned to 1 and highest importance to 5.
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Section D: Self and support assessment To be filled in by the employee at the end of the year
Briefly describe any significant accomplishment by you in the appraisal year, preferably not listed in KPIs already
Briefly describe any hurdles in terms of work culture, effort or support you faced in achieving any target
What are your long term career aspirations?
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Section E: employee performance summary
To be filled in by the recording, reviewing and accepting officer at the end of the year
Judgment Parameter Weight to each
Parameter Final Rating by Recording Officer Final Rating by Reviewing Officer Functional 60%
Behavioural 20%
Potential 20%
Total 100% Summation (Final rating on each parameter * weight to parameter)
For Recording Officer
Please compile clear feedback about overall performance of the employee, explaining the key considerations that went into reaching the final score. Also elaborate on the rating of “Unsatisfactory / Poor” with respect to specific development plan if applicable
For Reviewing Officer
Please compile clear feedback about overall performance of the employee, explaining the key considerations that went into reaching the final score
Would you recommend the employee for job rotation? Transfer?
Yes No Yes No
For Accepting Officer: Please accept/modify the performance of the employee. Also provide final comments on the employee’s performance.
Name of Recording Officer Date and Signature Name of Reviewing Officer Date and Signature Name of Accepting Officer Date and Signature
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
MID YEAR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORMS FOR CLASS I AND II EMPLOYEES OF APDCL/APGCL/AEGCL
S No KPI/Functional Target Annual Target Achievement till now recording officer Comments of
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Corrective actions suggested for employee to achieve final targets:
Support required from organization to help employee achieve annual targets:
& ' # "
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORMS FOR CLASS III EMPLOYEES OF APDCL/APGCL/AEGCL Section A: Employee Details
To be filled in by the employee at the beginning of the year
Name of Employee Date of Birth
Department/Cadre Designation
Function Date of Joining in current post
Place of Posting Educational Qualification
Name of Recording Officer Designation of Recording Officer
Name of Reviewing
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Section B: Employee Training Need Assessment
To be filled in by the employee and recording officer at the beginning of the year
List of Training Programs undertaken in previous year
S No Name of Program Duration
List of Training Needs not met in the previous year
S No Name of Program requested for
List down behavioral and technical programs you wish to undergo by mid year
S No Behavioral Trainings Technical Trainings
List down behavioral and technical programs you wish to undergo by end year
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Section C: Employee Performance assessment
To be filled in by the employee, recording officer at the beginning of the year during performance planning To be filled by the employee, recording officer and reviewing/accepting officer at the end of the year during final
rating Part 1: Functional Traits
S No KPI/Functional Target Attached Weight Annual Target Achievement Recording Officer Rating by
Rating by Reviewing/ Accepting Officer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Total 100% Annual Rating (weighted
aggregate)
Rating on a scale of 1 – 5 for each performance parameter, with least importance assigned to 1 and highest importance to 5.
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Part 2: Behavioural Traits
S No Behavioural Trait Recording Rating by Officer Rating by Reviewing/ Accepting Officer 1 Initiative
5 A self starter, does not require more than general instructions 4 Take initiative in clear & simple matters 3 Sometimes requires specific instruction 2 Always requires specific instruction 1 Always specific instructions along with follow up to get work done 2 Judgment
5 Quick & sound 4 Generally good
3 Dependable in matter of a routine nature 2 Liable to make errors
1 Cannot make judgment independently
3 mindedness Open
5 High degree of receptivity to other ideas
4 Generally receptive to new ideas & suggestions 3 Receptive but somewhat influenced by routine/tradition 2 Limited acceptance & receptivity to new ideas 1 Narrow minded, resentful to suggestions 4 Integrity
5 Extremely honest 4 Always honest
3 No adverse performance 2 Doubtful, needs cross checking 1 Dishonest
5 Punctuality
5 More than regular 4 Very Regular 3 Not late 2 Late sometimes 1 Mostly late 6 Knowledge of work 5 Extremely thorough 4 Thorough
3 Knows what is required 2 Limited knowledge 1 Poor knowledge 7 accuracy of Quality and
work
5 High degree of accuracy & thoroughness 4 Generally accurate
3 Meets requirements 2 Makes errors frequently 1 Makes errors most of the times
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
develop self and applying knowledge
contributing
4 Is open to learning new things 3 Does what is required 2 Avoids learning new things 1 Never applies knowledge imparted
9 supervision Need for
5 Never requires supervision, only initial guidance 4 Needs initial guidance with little supervision 3 Requires regular supervision
2 Constantly needs to be monitored 1 Always needs to be scrutinized 10 Organizational & Supervisory
Ability
5 Can definitely take greater responsibility 4 Can maybe take greater responsibility 3 Can take responsibility in a few years 2 Needs more experience to take leadership 1 Should be kept at the same level
Total Annual Rating (simple Average)
* & ' & ( ) # " # " + ' ,* & # " + ' ,* - . & # "
Rating on a scale of 1 – 5 for each performance parameter, with least importance assigned to 1 and highest importance to 5.
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Section D: Employee Performance Summary To be filled in by the recording, reviewing/accepting officer
Judgment Parameter Weight to each
Parameter Final Rating by Recording Officer Final Rating by Reviewing Officer Functional 70%
Behavioural 30%
Total 100% Summation (Final rating on each parameter * weight to parameter)
For Recording Officer
Please compile clear feedback about overall performance of the employee, explaining the key considerations that went into reaching the final score. Also elaborate on the rating of “Unsatisfactory / Poor” with respect to specific development plan if applicable
Would you recommend the employee for job rotation? Transfer? Yes No Yes No
For Reviewing/Accepting Officer: Please accept/modify the performance of the employee. Also provide final comments on the employee’s performance.
Name of Recording Officer Date and Signature Name of Reviewing/Accepting
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
MID YEAR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORMS FOR CLASS III EMPLOYEES OF APDCL/APGCL/AEGCL
S No KPI/Functional Target Annual Target Achievement till now recording officer Comments of
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Corrective actions suggested for employee to achieve final targets:
Support required from organization to help employee achieve annual targets:
& ' # "
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORMS FOR CLASS IV EMPLOYEES OF APDCL/APGCL/AEGCL Section A: Employee Details
To be filled in by the employee at the beginning of the year
Name of Employee Date of Birth
Department/Cadre Designation
Function Date of Joining in current post
Place of Posting Educational Qualification
Name of Recording Officer Designation of Recording Officer
Name of Reviewing
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Section B: Employee performance assessment
To be filled in by the recording and reviewing/accepting officer at the beginning and end of the year
S No Performance Parameter Weightage Recording Rating by Officer
Rating by Reviewing/
Accepting Officer 1 Activities performed / Achievement /
Contribution (to be filled by Employee 30%
2 Attendance 10%
3 Attitude 10%
4 Responsiveness 10% 5 Punctuality & Discipline 10% 6 Organization awareness 10%
7 Work output 10%
8 Appearance & neatness 10%
Total 100% Annual Rating (simple Average)
Acceptance by employee and recording officer at the beginning of the year Name of
Employee Name of Recording Officer
Date Date
Signature Signature
Year End: After rating by recording officer
Name of officer Date Signature
Year End: After rating by reviewing/accepting officer
Name of officer Date Signature
Rating on a scale of 1 – 5 for each performance parameter, with least importance assigned to 1 and highest importance to 5.
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
Section C: Employee Performance Summary To be filled in by the recording, reviewing/accepting officer
Final Rating by
Recording Officer Final Rating by Reviewing Officer Final Rating
For Recording Officer
Please compile clear feedback about overall performance of the employee, explaining the key considerations that went into reaching the final score. Also elaborate on the rating of “Unsatisfactory / Poor” with respect to specific development plan if applicable
Would you recommend the employee for job rotation? Transfer? Yes No Yes No
For Reviewing/Accepting Officer: Please accept/modify the performance of the employee. Also provide final comments on the employee’s performance.
Name of Recording Officer Date and Signature Name of Reviewing/Accepting
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB
MID YEAR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORMS FOR CLASS IV EMPLOYEES OF APDCL/APGCL/AEGCL
S No KPI/Functional Target Annual Target Achievement till now recording officer Comments of
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Corrective actions suggested for employee to achieve final targets:
Support required from organization to help employee achieve annual targets:
& ' # "
Performance Management and Appraisal System in Successor companies of ASEB