SÍMBOLO Y CONOCIMIENTO.
3. SOBRE LOS DIVERSOS MODOS DE COMPRENSION DEL CONOCIMIENTO: EL ESTUTO DEL CONOCIMIENTO SIMBÓLICO.
3.3. El lugar propio del conocimiento acerca de los dioses.
The previously studied methods for detecting or minimizing the occurrence of faking have mostly met with minimal success. The Kuncel and Borneman (2007) method to detecting faking represents a novel approach to the problem that has reported
encouraging results. The current study’s improvements, made through quantifying the recoding scheme and testing its efficacy with real-world applicants, a common
personality measure, and a single job family, provide additional reason to remain positive about the potential utility of this method. With additional research and refinement of the underlying processes affecting the results found here, the application of this method may well represent the control for faking behavior researchers have sought after for so long.
REFERENCES
Abrahams, N. M., Neumann, I., & Githens, W. H. (1971). Faking Vocational Interests: Simulated Versus Real Life Motivation 1. Personnel Psychology, 24(1), 5-12. Arthur, W., Glaze, R. M., Villado, A. J., & Taylor, J. E. (2010). The Magnitude and
Extent of Cheating and Response Distortion Effects on Unproctored Internet‐ Based Tests of Cognitive Ability and Personality. International Journal of
Selection and Assessment, 18(1), 1-16.
Avis, J. M., Kudisch, J. D., & Fortunato, V. J. (2002). Examining the incremental validity and adverse impact of cognitive ability and conscientiousness on job
performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1), 87-105. Austin, J. S. (1992). The detection of fake good and fake bad on the MMPI-2.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(3), 669-674.
Bagby, R. M., Buis, T., & Nicholson, R. A. (1995). Relative effectiveness of the standard validity scales in detecting fake-bad and fake-good responding: Replication and extension. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 84-92.
Bagby, R. M., Gillis, J. R., & Dickens, S. (1990). Detection of dissimulation with the new generation of objective personality measures. Behavioral Sciences & the Law,
8(1), 93-102.
Bagby, R. M., Rogers, R., Nicholson, R. A., Buis, T., Seeman, M. V., & Rector, N. A. (1997). Effectiveness of the MMPI–2 validity indicators in the detection of defensive responding in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychological
Assessment, 9(4), 406-413.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effects of impression management and self- deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 81(3), 261-272.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?
Behling, O. (1998). Employee selection: will intelligence and conscientiousness do the job? Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 77-86.
Berry, C. M., & Sackett, P. R. (2009). Faking in personnel selection: Tradeoffs in performance versus fairness resulting from two cut-score strategies. Personnel
Psychology, 62(4), 833-863.
Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A Meta‐Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(4), 317-335. Butcher, J. N., Morfitt, R. C., Rouse, S. V., & Holden, R. R. (1997). Reducing MMPI-2
defensiveness: The effect of specialized instructions on retest validity in a job applicant sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(2), 385-401.
Butcher, J. N., & Tellegen, A. (1966). Objections to MMPI items. Journal of Consulting
Psychology, 30(6), 527-534.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). An overview of the army selection and classification project (Project A). Personnel Psychology, 43(2), 231-239.
Castro, S. L. (2002). Data analytic methods for the analysis of multilevel questions: A comparison of intraclass correlation coefficients, rwg (j), hierarchical linear modeling, within-and between-analysis, and random group resampling. The
Leadership Quarterly, 13(1), 69-93.
Cattell, H. E., & Mead, A. D. (2008). The sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16PF).
The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, 2, 135-159.
Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005). Reconsidering forced- choice item formats for applicant personality assessment. Human Performance,
18(3), 267-307.
Christiansen, N. D., Goffin, R. D., Johnston, N. G., & Rothstein, M. G. (1994). Correcting the 16PF for Faking: Effects on Criterion-Related Validity and Individual Hiring Decisions. Personnel Psychology, 47(4), 847-860.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press.
Converse, P. D., Oswald, F. L., Imus, A., Hedricks, C., Roy, R., & Butera, H. (2008). Comparing personality test formats and warnings: Effects on criterion‐related validity and test‐taker reactions. International Journal of Selection and
Assessment, 16(2), 155-169.
Converse, P. D., Oswald, F. L., Imus, A., Hedricks, C., Roy, R., & Butera, H. (2006). Forcing choices in personality measurement. In R. L. Griffith, & M. H. Peterson, (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior (pp.263-282). IAP.
Converse, P. D., Peterson, M. H., & Griffith, R. L. (2009). Faking on personality measures: Implications for selection involving multiple predictors. International
Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(1), 47-60.
Costa, P. T. (1996). Work and Personality: Use of the NEO‐PI‐R in
Industrial/Organizational Psychology. Applied Psychology, 225-241.
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Stability and change in personality assessment: the revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000. Journal of Personality
Assessment, 68(1), 86-94.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual, 1992. Psychological Assessment
Resources, Odessa, FL.
Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Holland, J. L. (1984). Personality and vocational interests in an adult sample. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 390-400.
Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Kay, G. G. (1995). Persons, places, and personality: Career assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of
Career Assessment, 3(2), 123-139.
Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 25-36.
Denis, P. L., Morin, D., & Guindon, C. (2010). Exploring the Capacity of NEO PI‐R Facets to Predict Job Performance in Two French‐Canadian Samples.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(2), 201-207.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual
review of psychology, 41(1), 417-440.
Dilchert, S. & Ones, D. S. (2011). Application of preventive strategies. In M. Ziegler, C., & R. Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 177-200). Oxford University Press.
Donovan, J. J., Dwight, S. A., & Hurtz, G. M. (2003). An assessment of the prevalence, severity, and verifiability of entry-level applicant faking using the randomized response technique. Human Performance, 16(1), 81-106.
Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 40-57.
Dwight, S. A., & Donovan, J. J. (2003). Do warnings not to fake reduce faking? Human
Ellingson, J. E., Heggestad, E. D., & Makarius, E. E. (2012). Personality retesting for managing intentional distortion. Journal of personality and social psychology,
102(5), 1063-1076.
Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Connelly, B. S. (2007). Personality assessment across selection and development contexts: insights into response distortion. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 92(2), 386-395.
Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Hough, L. M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 155-166.
Erickson, P. B. (2004). Employer hiring tests grow sophisticated in quest for insight about applicants. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, 1.
Fan, J., Gao, D., Carroll, S. A., Lopez, F. J., Tian, T. S., & Meng, H. (2012). Testing the efficacy of a new procedure for reducing faking on personality tests within selection contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 866-880.
Fekken, G. C., & Holden, R. R. (1992). Response latency evidence for viewing
personality traits as schema indicators. Journal of Research in Personality, 26(2), 103-120.
Framingham, J. (2011). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). Psych
Central. Retrieved on May 16, 2014, from http://psychcentral.com/lib/minnesota-
multiphasic-personality-inventory-mmpi/0005959
Furnham, A. F. (1997). Knowing and faking one's five-factor personality score. Journal
of Personality Assessment, 69(1), 229-243.
Gandy, J. A., Dye, D. A., & MacLane, C. N. (1994). Federal government selection: The individual achievement record.
Ghiselli, E. E., & Barthol, R. P. (1953). The validity of personality inventories in the selection of employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1), 18-20.
Griffin, B., Hesketh, B., & Grayson, D. (2004). Applicants faking good: Evidence of item bias in
the NEO PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1545-1558. Griffith, R. L., & Peterson, M. H. (Eds.). (2006). A closer examination of applicant
faking behavior. IAP.
Griffith, R. L., & Peterson, M. H. (2008). The failure of social desirability measures to capture applicant faking behavior. Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Griffith, R. L., & Peterson, M. H. (2011). One piece at a time: the puzzle of applicant faking and a call for theory. Human Performance, 24(4), 291-301.
Griffith, R. L., Chmielowski, T., & Yoshita, Y. (2007). Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior. Personnel Review,
36(3), 341-355.
Goffin, R. D., & Boyd, A. C. (2009). Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: Advancing models of faking. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie
canadienne, 50(3), 151-160.
Goffin, R. D., & Christiansen, N. D. (2003). Correcting personality tests for faking: A review of popular personality tests and an initial survey of researchers.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(4), 340-344.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.
Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Mount, M. K., Oh, I-S. (in press). A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and non-task performance. Journal of Applied
Psychology.
Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18(2), 135-164.
Heggestad, E. D., Morrison, M., Reeve, C. L., & McCloy, R. A. (2006). Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: Evaluating issues of normative
assessment and faking resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 9-24. Heller, M. (2005). Court ruling that employer’s integrity test violated ADA could open
door to litigation. Workforce Management, 84(9), 74-77.
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001). Emotional stability as a major dimension of happiness.
Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1357-1364.
Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1270-1285.
Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. (1989). How to measure employee reliability. Journal of Applied
psychology, 74(2), 273-279.
Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job- performance relations: a socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 88(1), 100.
Hogan, R. (2005). In defense of personality measurement: New wine for old whiners.
Human Performance, 18(4), 331-341.
Holden, R. R. & Book, A. S. (2011). Faking does distort self-report personality
assessment. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R. Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives
on faking in personality assessment (pp. 71-84). Oxford University Press.
Holden, R. R., Fekken, G. C., & Cotton, D. H. (1991). Assessing psychopathology using structured test-item response latencies. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3(1), 111-118.
Holden, R. R., & Hibbs, N. (1995). Incremental validity of response latencies for detecting fakers on a personality test. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(3), 362-372.
Holden, R. R., Kroner, D. G., Fekken, G. C., & Popham, S. M. (1992). A model of personality test item response dissimulation. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 63(2), 272-279.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities
and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Holland, J. L., Johnston, J. A., Hughey, K. F., & Asama, N. F. (1991). Some explorations of a theory of careers: VII. A replication and some possible extensions. Journal of
Career Development, 18(2), 91-100.
Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11(2-3), 209-244. Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990).
Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 581-595. Hough, L. M. & Ones, D. S. (2001). The structure, measurement, validity, and use of
personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of
Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology: Volume 1: Personnel Psychology
(pp. 233-277). Sage.
Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2005). They're right, well... mostly right: Research evidence and an agenda to rescue personality testing from 1960s insights. Human
Performance, 18(4), 373-387.
Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2008). Personality testing and industrial–organizational psychology: Reflections, progress, and prospects. Industrial and Organizational
Psychology, 1(3), 272-290.
Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues,
evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,
Hsu, L. M., Santelli, J., & Hsu, J. R. (1989). Faking detection validity and incremental validity of response latencies to MMPI subtle and obvious items. Journal of
Personality Assessment, 53(2), 278-295.
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72-98.
Hurtz, G. M., & Alliger, G. M. (2002). Influence of coaching on integrity test
performance and unlikely virtues scale scores. Human Performance, 15(3), 255- 273.
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869-879.
Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Ispas, D., & Ion, A. (2012). Emotional Intelligence in Personnel Selection: Applicant reactions, criterion, and incremental validity. International
Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(3), 347-358.
Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Ispas, D., & Ion, A. (2013). Examining the psychometric properties of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test: Findings from an Eastern European culture. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 121-128.
Ispas, D., Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., & Johnson, R. E. (2014). Exploring the Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of Personality The Romanian NEO PI- R. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 0022022114534769.
Ispas, D., Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Sulea, C., Askew, K., Rohlfs, J. T., & Whalen, K. (2014). Revisiting the relationship between impression management and job performance.
Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 47-53.
Jackson, D. N., Wroblewski, V. R., & Ashton, M. C. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced choice offer a solution? Human Performance, 13(4), 371-388.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of applied psychology, 69(1), 85-98.
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger. Johnson, J. A., & Hogan, R. (2006). A socioanalytic view of faking. In R. L. Griffith, &
M. H. Peterson (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior (pp. 209-231). IAP.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The
Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 855-875.
Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013). Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives.
Kaiser, R. B., & Hogan, J. (2011). Personality, leader behavior, and overdoing it.
Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63(4), 219-242.
Komar, S., Brown, D. J., Komar, J. A., & Robie, C. (2008). Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: A Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 140-154.
Kroger, R. O., & Turnbull, W. (1975). Invalidity of validity scales: The case of the MMPI. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(1), 48-55. Kuncel, N. R., & Borneman, M. J. (2007). Toward a new method of detecting
deliberately faked personality tests: The use of idiosyncratic item responses.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(2), 220-231.
Le, H., Oh, I. S., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much of a good thing: curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 113.
Levin, R. A., & Zickar, M. J. (2002). Investigating self-presentation, lies, and bullshit: Understanding faking and its effects on selection decisions using theory, field research, and simulation. In J. M. Brett & F. Drasgow (Eds.). The psychology of
work: Theoretically based empirical research (pp. 253-276). Psychology Press.
Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2006). Using the BIDR to distinguish the effects of impression management and self‐deception on the criterion validity of personality measures: A meta‐analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(2), 131- 141.
Li, N., Barrick, M. R., Zimmerman, R. D., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2014). Retaining the Productive Employee: The Role of Personality. The Academy of Management
Annals, 8(1), 347-395.
MacCann, C., Ziegler, M., & Roberts, R. (2011). Faking in personality assessments: reflections and recommendations. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R. Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 309-329). Oxford University Press.
Martin, B. A., Bowen, C. C., & Hunt, S. T. (2002). How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires? Personality and Individual Differences, 32(2), 247- 256.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal.
American Psychologist, 52(5), 509-516.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: more substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(6), 882-888.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
52(1), 81-90.
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J. P., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-Cultural Assessment of the Five-Factor Model The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(1), 171-188. McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive
measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 812-821.
McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43(2), 335-354.
Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2006). Assessing response distortion in personality tests: A review of research designs and analytic strategies. In R. L. Griffith & M. H. Peterson (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking
behavior (pp. 85-113). IAP.
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007a). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel
Psychology, 60(4), 1029-1049.
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007b). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 683-729.
Mueller-Hanson, R., Heggestad, E. D., & Thornton III, G. C. (2003). Faking and selection: Considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 348-355.
Murphy, K. R. (2005). Why don't measures of broad dimensions of personality perform better as predictors of job performance? Human Performance, 18(4), 343-357. Newman, D. A., & Lyon, J. S. (2009). Recruitment efforts to reduce adverse impact:
Targeted recruiting for personality, cognitive ability, and diversity. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 94(2), 298-317.
Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of
personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 995-1027.
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). The effects of social desirability and faking on personality and integrity assessment for personnel selection. Human performance,
11(2-3), 245-269.
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied